The Coalition Of Sniveling Cowards

Washington Post:

President Bush’s nomination of John Bolton as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations has generated a bad case of dyspepsia among a number of senators, who keep putting off a confirmation vote. That hesitation is now portrayed as a consequence of Bolton’s purported “mistreatment” of several State Department intelligence analysts. But this is a smoke screen. The real reasons Bolton’s opponents want to derail his nomination are his oft-repeated criticism of the United Nations and other international organizations, his rejection of the arguments of those who ignore or excuse the inexcusable (i.e., the election of Sudan to the U.N. Human Rights Commission) and his willingness to express himself with the bark off.

As to the charge that Bolton has been tough on subordinates, I can say only that in more than a decade of association with him in the State Department I never saw or heard anything to support such a charge. Nor do I see anything wrong with challenging intelligence analysts on their findings. They can, as recent history demonstrates, make mistakes. [Emphasis added] And they must be prepared to defend their findings under intense questioning. If John pushed too hard or dressed down subordinates, he deserves criticism, but it hardly merits a vote against confirmation when balanced against his many accomplishments.He cites Bolton’s work on the repeal of U.N. Resolution 3379, which equated Zionism with racism, and U.N. resolutions authorizing the first Gulf War. Eagleburger then make the following point:

Given what we all know about the current state of the United Nations, it’s time we were represented by someone with the guts to demand reform and to see that whatever changes result are more than window dressing.

Heaven forbid we offend any of those fine, upstanding U.N. officials…

Blunt but Effective – [WP]
Released E-Mail Exchanges Reveal More Bolton Battles – [

"What kind of idiot would put poison in both cups?"
Ben Franklin: "Nothing can be said to be certain except death and taxes"

41 Comments

  1. Omni April 24, 2005
  2. Rod Stanton April 24, 2005
  3. Jim April 24, 2005
  4. -S- April 24, 2005
  5. -S- April 24, 2005
  6. -S- April 24, 2005
  7. Gabriel Chapman April 24, 2005
  8. ts April 24, 2005
  9. Les Nessman April 24, 2005
  10. Al April 24, 2005
  11. OregonMuse April 24, 2005
  12. SPG April 24, 2005
  13. Tom April 24, 2005
  14. Jonny April 24, 2005
  15. SteveG April 24, 2005
  16. Jimmie April 24, 2005
  17. The Indigent Blogger April 24, 2005
  18. mychimo April 24, 2005
  19. BIlly April 24, 2005
  20. SteveG April 24, 2005
  21. RobertG April 24, 2005
  22. minnie April 24, 2005
  23. BillH April 24, 2005
  24. t.joel April 24, 2005
  25. Tom April 24, 2005
  26. JimB April 24, 2005
  27. jonmc April 24, 2005
  28. Alan April 25, 2005
  29. BIlly April 25, 2005
  30. Charlie April 25, 2005
  31. George April 25, 2005
  32. Kris April 25, 2005
  33. SPG April 25, 2005
  34. Patriot April 25, 2005
  35. -S- April 25, 2005
  36. -S- April 25, 2005
  37. -S- April 25, 2005
  38. -S- April 25, 2005
  39. McGehee April 25, 2005
  40. -S- April 25, 2005
  41. hc April 25, 2005