Twisting Words To An Anti-War Agenda

Here’s the headline and first paragraph from a Reuters article about recent comments made Lance Armstrong:

Lance Armstrong says U.S. should focus on cancer war

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Seven-time Tour de France winner and cancer survivor Lance Armstrong on Sunday said the United States, which is embroiled in a costly war in Iraq, should focus more effort on a war facing many Americans — the one against cancer.

Wow. The way this article puts it Lance seems to be calling for a diversion of funds away from the war in Iraq and to cancer research. But is that really what he’s saying?

Not at all, as it turns out:

“I’m not saying that spending on wars and terrorism is a bad thing,” Armstrong said in an interview on ABC’s “This Week with George Stephanopoulos.”

Yet despite the fact that Armstrong states, directly, that he doesn’t have a problem with the money being spent in the war on terrorism Reuters still draws another comparison between that kind of spending and spending on cancer research later in the article:

The National Cancer Institute received $4.8 billion in fiscal 2005, and although it requested more for 2006, its funding is expected to be unchanged.

The U.S. government has spent about $300 billion since late 2001 fighting wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. About two-thirds of that was for Iraq.

Don’t tell me the media doesn’t have a political agenda.

By Rob Port of Say Anything.

Paul Derangement Syndrome
Bush Approval Low For Second Term Presidents

14 Comments

  1. Eneils Bailey August 14, 2005
  2. snowballs August 14, 2005
  3. Will Franklin August 14, 2005
  4. -S- August 14, 2005
  5. Len August 14, 2005
  6. -S- August 14, 2005
  7. SilverBubble August 14, 2005
  8. Jewels August 14, 2005
  9. Earl August 14, 2005
  10. AnonymousDrivel August 14, 2005
  11. Mark J August 14, 2005
  12. snowballs August 14, 2005
  13. Rich August 14, 2005
  14. Jewels August 15, 2005