Morgan Freeman's lawyer says the actor and his wife of 24 years are getting a divorce. Freeman's lawyer, Bill Luckett, told the Memphis Commercial-Appeal newspaper that the divorce action...
1:19 PM |
0 comments
Countdown to conservative demagogues defending wasteful spending on defense industry boondoggles by attacking liberals rather than addressing the issue in 5... 4... 3...
1:00 PM |
0 comments
BUYER: Peter Norton LOCATION: West 13th Street, New York, NY PRICE: $6,800,000 SIZE: 2,861 square feet, 3 bedrooms, 3.5 bathrooms DESCRIPTION: ...this trophy property features a sprawling layout with 3...
12:31 PM |
0 comments
More and more, gun shows that most people think are merely hobbyist events for collectors to get together to trade items much like model train collectors do are becoming a recruiting grounds for political extremists to recruit new members or...
9:00 AM |
2 comments
Shia LaBeouf may have to amputate one of his injured fingers, reports Star. Doctors have told the 22-year-old Transformers star that he is likely to lose the pinky on...
7:52 AM |
0 comments
Heidi Klum and hubby Seal relax on a yacht while Heidi take her boobs out for some air. And some where else on the sea, Cindy Crawford gives her...
7:48 AM |
0 comments
156 players will be teeing it up at the Oakland Hills Country Club outside of Detroit Michigan. Defending champion Tiger Woods is not in the field due to recent knee...
7:11 AM |
2 comments
Jay Glazer at FoxSports.com was the first to report that legendary Green Bay Packer quarterback Brett Farve was traded to the New York Jets. Now instead of round the clock...
12:41 AM |
0 comments
Another sicko right wing nutjob. Too funny.... If it wasn't for the media Barack Obama would be working in a car wash? He'd be shining shoes? Did this asshole really say that? Amazing.... Just another right wing racist....
8:54 PM |
3 comments
Not much is sacred to Artie Lange, but the health of Howard Stern's right-hand man is apparently no laughing matter. Lange's publicist has confirmed to E! News that the...
7:25 PM |
0 comments
Comments (11)
What do you think will make... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Ztp | February 28, 2006 2:18 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
What do you think will make them madder, the origional cartoons, or the fact that no matter how hard they try, we will not get upset over their attempts to infuriate us, as we have outrageous stuff in the media every day. Heck, we are the kings of outrageous publicity stunts.
1. Posted by Ztp | February 28, 2006 2:18 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 28, 2006 14:18
2. Posted by spacemonkey | February 28, 2006 2:53 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Oh, they know what infuriates us, but is it just my imagination or has there been a moratorium on beheadings?
2. Posted by spacemonkey | February 28, 2006 2:53 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 28, 2006 14:53
3. Posted by RA | February 28, 2006 3:06 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I am neutral on Israel and the Jews who support them. Yes, a lot of Arabs and Euopeans are anti-Semetic. But a majority of Israelis and American Jews are anti-Christian.
I do not see how the US is a safer place because of our support for Israel. In fact Americans are in far more danger because we support Israel. It would be smarter if we were neutral in this conflict. Cut off aid to Israel and all Arab states. Let them solve their own problems.
This would also help Christians in America. A lot of the Jewish money going to anti-Christian groups like the ACLU and NARAL would loose funding because American Jews would pick up the slack from our lack of foreign aid.
Backing Israel is a loosing proposition for all Americans.
3. Posted by RA | February 28, 2006 3:06 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 28, 2006 15:06
4. Posted by diversity day | February 28, 2006 3:48 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
loosing??
4. Posted by diversity day | February 28, 2006 3:48 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 28, 2006 15:48
5. Posted by jab | February 28, 2006 5:00 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
RA, you say you're neutral on Israel, but your comments are anti-semitic. the USA will never turn it's back on Israel, and shouldn't. we've supported israel much longer than we've been in the war on terror. the terroists are coming after us, regardless of who we support, and isolationism, is not the answer.
5. Posted by jab | February 28, 2006 5:00 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 28, 2006 17:00
6. Posted by SCSIwuzzy | February 28, 2006 5:09 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
RA, you must know a whole different (or no) species of Israeli than I.
In fact, I suspect you pronounce that certain word as joooo.
6. Posted by SCSIwuzzy | February 28, 2006 5:09 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 28, 2006 17:09
7. Posted by SilverBubble | February 28, 2006 5:59 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
What's up with all the Christian babies' blood? I thought they drank Palestinian babies' blood! Can't they get their lies straight anymore?
7. Posted by SilverBubble | February 28, 2006 5:59 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 28, 2006 17:59
8. Posted by crosscheck | February 28, 2006 6:29 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"Let them solve their own problems"
Seems to me that Israel can solve its own problems rather well. They are surrounded by enemies who cannot solve their own problems no matter how much assistance they are given. They aren't able to form a stable economy, much less an adequate military, and know that Israel could crush them at will as they did in the past. One scenario, albeit an unlikely one: Hamas attacks Israel, Israel utterly destroys the palestnians, Iran attacks Israel and the US in response (because we support Israel), US in turn wipes out Iran and any local players stupid enough to interfere. After all, the US military isn't necessarily 'stretched thin' in the Iraq war - we're playing nice and trying to build something of value in the region, which is pretty much the last resort after diplomacy and foreign aid failed for the last 40 years. That effort is expensive and time consuming, as nation-building tends to be. Destroying a nation is much easier, cheaper and faster than tearing it down, occupying and rebuilding it. If nukes were to be involved, history is on our side; the US only used nukes to end a war - Iran wants to use nukes to start one. Big difference.
8. Posted by crosscheck | February 28, 2006 6:29 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 28, 2006 18:29
9. Posted by kurt | February 28, 2006 6:34 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
You do realize these are not the cartoons solicited as retaliation for the Danish cartoons. These were solicted (by Israelis) as retaliation for the retaliation.
The link you provide does not go to those "fight[ing] back against one Danish newspaper."
9. Posted by kurt | February 28, 2006 6:34 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 28, 2006 18:34
10. Posted by Synova | February 28, 2006 7:08 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I think kurt has it right. Didn't Iran solicit anti-Semitic cartoons to make a point? And instead of getting offended and angry people said, hey, we can do better ones, just watch...
The one linked to above made me laugh too. Out loud even. ;-)
10. Posted by Synova | February 28, 2006 7:08 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 28, 2006 19:08
11. Posted by Daniel | February 28, 2006 9:21 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Yeah, I'm with kurt and Synova... that's about what I heard.
11. Posted by Daniel | February 28, 2006 9:21 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 28, 2006 21:21