
My referrer logs tell me that another teacher arrested for having sex with an underage student is in the news again. This time it's Pamela Rogers Turner. From Nashville's NewsChannel 5:
Pamela Rogers was back in court Wednesday, charged with violating seven terms of her probation.Prosecutors said Rogers wasn't allowed to use the Internet or have any contact with the victim's family.
Investigators believe Rogers broke both of those rules.
Rogers was released on bond Wednesday but will be back in court in July.
If Rogers is found guilty on these charges, she may have to serve more jail time.
Part of Roger's plea agreement ordered her not to use the Internet.
...Authorities said Rogers used a popular interactive Web site called Myspace.com to communicate with the victim's 17-year-old sister.
The court ordered her not to contact the victim or his family and to not use the Internet.
Here's the creepy part. On her alleged MySpace page (cached at BadJocks) she leaves this message for her former lover
- TO NUMBER 32..... "My Plans are Your Plans...." "Nothing's Changed...." "Say it.....say it...." Always is the word, Baby, always. Listen to "Far Away" by Nickleback.... that's for you. But, you know... I hate hearing something that is exactly the opposite of what you have said. I hate lies. Honesty is the biggest, most important trait in people. When I find out that I have been lied to and deceived, after all the sacrifices I have made, it makes me wanna.....
Later, in another section of the page, she says this:
- Also, I am not looking for a boyfriend, I am happily single and I went through a divorce about a year ago, so I am not looking for anyone.... I still do believe in LOVE, though... ;p I just think that I will wait for about 3 years before I fall into that..... Always, PJ
If the page is really hers, which seems likely given the volume of photos shown in the frontpage slideshow, it sure looks like Rogers is heading down the trail blazed by Mary Kay Letourneau. Perhaps, instead of sending her back to jail, authorities should mandate psychiatric care...
More pictures from Pamela Rogers MySpace page - [BadJocks]
Pamela Rogers Archive - [Wizbang]
Comments (84)
I tried to hit on honeys li... (Below threshold)1. Posted by cubanbob | April 13, 2006 3:09 AM | Score: -1 (1 votes cast)
I tried to hit on honeys like that ( teachers) when I was in school but alas no luck.
1. Posted by cubanbob | April 13, 2006 3:09 AM |
Score: -1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on April 13, 2006 03:09
2. Posted by docjim505 | April 13, 2006 6:47 AM | Score: -1 (1 votes cast)
What kind of line do these kids throw??? I think they've got a tremendous opportunity to make some money for themselves by publishing a "how-to" book:
"Hot for Teacher: A Easy Guide to Picking Up Hot Older Women".
The thing would FLY off the shelves.
2. Posted by docjim505 | April 13, 2006 6:47 AM |
Score: -1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on April 13, 2006 06:47
3. Posted by Lostinspace223 | April 13, 2006 7:38 AM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Previous comments only support lighter sentencing for females. You guys should try for a seat on her jury. Perhaps you could win a date afterwards. Carry on.
3. Posted by Lostinspace223 | April 13, 2006 7:38 AM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on April 13, 2006 07:38
4. Posted by Imhotep | April 13, 2006 9:03 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
The wraping is nice, but you know she is seriously f'd in the head. I'd like to hear what her ex-husband has to say.
4. Posted by Imhotep | April 13, 2006 9:03 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 13, 2006 09:03
5. Posted by McGehee | April 13, 2006 9:22 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
You're reading a little too much into things, Lost.
5. Posted by McGehee | April 13, 2006 9:22 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 13, 2006 09:22
6. Posted by Mac Lorry | April 13, 2006 9:46 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Apparently there's a strong desire on the part of some female teachers to expand their repertory of subjects to include love making techniques. These unselfish professionals merely what to ensure the success of their students by honing their love making skills through proper instruction and lots of drill and practice. State testing standards require students pass a final exam and these dedicated teachers allow students to practice for that high stakes test as often as they desire.
6. Posted by Mac Lorry | April 13, 2006 9:46 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 13, 2006 09:46
7. Posted by Beast | April 13, 2006 11:38 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Unless the woman does something against the boys will, he can'tbe raped.
Boys at that age will stick their dick in anything willingly. Hence the pie joke in American Pie.
7. Posted by Beast | April 13, 2006 11:38 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 13, 2006 11:38
8. Posted by JR | April 13, 2006 12:47 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I WAS IN THE SAME SITUATION... BUT I WAS 17 NOT 13... WE DATED FOR 5 YEARS. NOW SHES MARRIED AND I AM IN A LONG TERM RELATIONSHIP. WE ARE STILL FRIENDS AND ON GOOD TERMS... IN MY CASE I WAS THE ONE WITH THE MATURITY AND MET ON HER LEVEL... HERE ITS A BIT DIFFERENT... SHE IS COMMING DOWN TO HIS 13YR OLD LEVEL. SAD
8. Posted by JR | April 13, 2006 12:47 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 13, 2006 12:47
9. Posted by chris | April 13, 2006 12:49 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Looking at her site, she is just sad and pathetic. Something has gone wrong in her head!
9. Posted by chris | April 13, 2006 12:49 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 13, 2006 12:49
10. Posted by lynn | April 13, 2006 1:40 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Pamela is not guilty of any of this!!!!
10. Posted by lynn | April 13, 2006 1:40 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 13, 2006 13:40
11. Posted by lynn | April 13, 2006 1:40 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Pamela is not guilty of any of this!!!!
11. Posted by lynn | April 13, 2006 1:40 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 13, 2006 13:40
12. Posted by MATT | April 13, 2006 1:54 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
ARE U SERIOUS LYNN .,, WTF UR A RETARD !
12. Posted by MATT | April 13, 2006 1:54 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 13, 2006 13:54
13. Posted by Jamie | April 13, 2006 3:11 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
This whole thing seems a little screwy. Are they just out to get her? She posted a message referring to someone. That is not really contact with him is it? And anyone can find photos of her on the internet and post them. To send her to prison for 8 years for this myspace thing is absurd. 8 years is a long freaking time. Let's not forget she was good friends with that whole family before any of this started.
13. Posted by Jamie | April 13, 2006 3:11 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 13, 2006 15:11
14. Posted by Jamie | April 13, 2006 3:18 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
And another thing. Including a probation provision that says you can not use the internet is just stupid. That's just setting someone up for failure in today's society. But I guess she agreed to it.
14. Posted by Jamie | April 13, 2006 3:18 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 13, 2006 15:18
15. Posted by f | April 13, 2006 4:20 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
she can use the internet, just cant contact anyone, plus she put stuff that incriminates her on the internet, what a tard
15. Posted by f | April 13, 2006 4:20 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 13, 2006 16:20
16. Posted by virgo | April 13, 2006 4:43 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
wha !! Put stuff on the internet that incriminates Her ? i better erase my files.
16. Posted by virgo | April 13, 2006 4:43 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 13, 2006 16:43
17. Posted by Joe | April 13, 2006 4:45 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
she sure dolled herself up for the cameras did,nt she !
17. Posted by Joe | April 13, 2006 4:45 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 13, 2006 16:45
18. Posted by Moon | April 14, 2006 8:11 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I'm really shocked by some of the comments here defending this woman. She is a PEDOPHILE and should never had been released to begin with. I'm glad she showed her stupidity by posting this info. at Myspace...I only wished her sentence was much longer. We have a duty to protect our children from these sickos out there. Giving them short sentences is not protecting our children...it only sends the message that we are not concerned with their future or their mental health. Its time to right the wrongs and stop confusing our youth. It's because of people like Pamela, our society is as whacked as it is.
I say, "Lock her up and throw away the key"!
18. Posted by Moon | April 14, 2006 8:11 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 14, 2006 08:11
19. Posted by Uncle Mikey | April 14, 2006 8:59 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I don't know about you people, but in my experience nice wrapping + seriously f'd in the head = the best sex ever. Why waste that on a high school kid?
19. Posted by Uncle Mikey | April 14, 2006 8:59 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 14, 2006 08:59
20. Posted by C-rad | April 14, 2006 9:27 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Where were these teachers when I was in school? It is wrong for these teachers to be taking advantage of these young kids, but I'm not so sure if I were in their shoes and my hot teacher wants a piece of me that I would be doing too much complaining. Wish I was young again, but knowing my luck I'd have some old hag for a teacher.
20. Posted by C-rad | April 14, 2006 9:27 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 14, 2006 09:27
21. Posted by Brian | April 14, 2006 9:46 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Man Pam really screwed up this time didn't she?.....so much for her not being guilty eh Moon?
....before this went down I got letters from her admitting it all so....I'm not going to try and be her friend or protect her anymore man she's on her own. I tried to give her good advice while we wrote letters during her jailtime on moving on and rebuilding her life and esteem but....she just ignored it all she was just interested in flirting with me and hooking up when she got out....instead she dumps me for a 15 year old....that felt really wierd.
I mean I thought Pam was just another nutty gal like I always seem to end up dating so I just sort of blew off her odd nature....hell show me a woman that isn't a little wierd right?....but I never saw this coming....and I'm pissed at her for being so stupid and self-destructive.
I can't hang around for that. I'm letting her go. She needs the kind of help that can only come from trained professionals.
For what its worth she's not a pedaphile....beleive me the young man she went after was very physicaly mature and "equipped" if you know what I mean....the reason I know is because she told me....in so many words. She'd never gone after him otherwise. But going after him again after her release was absurd. She knew better than that shit. Her life is now forfiet.
21. Posted by Brian | April 14, 2006 9:46 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 14, 2006 09:46
22. Posted by CurlyLarryMoe | April 14, 2006 11:19 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Pamela is not guilty of any of this!!!
22. Posted by CurlyLarryMoe | April 14, 2006 11:19 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 14, 2006 11:19
23. Posted by phill | April 14, 2006 10:49 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
hell, i'd fuck her too
23. Posted by phill | April 14, 2006 10:49 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 14, 2006 22:49
24. Posted by Brian | April 15, 2006 1:09 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Sorry if I can't bring myself to take you seriously there Curly Larry and uh...Moe...three stooges right?....and I'm supposed to take your word on this?.....uhm.....yeah....ok.
24. Posted by Brian | April 15, 2006 1:09 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 15, 2006 01:09
25. Posted by Moon | April 15, 2006 10:08 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Brian...I must disagree with you on the wether or not she's a pedophile. The boy was 13...maybe mature physically but by no means, mature mentally! I've been racking my brain trying to figure out Pam's mentality here. Why on earth would she even consider the possibility of carrying on with a boy?? I guess I'll never understand the mentality of the Pam's and Mary Kay's out there.
I am glad that you've given up on trying to be a friend to her...she's not worth it.
And to the stooge fan....let's see some proof to your claim.
25. Posted by Moon | April 15, 2006 10:08 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 15, 2006 10:08
26. Posted by Rich City | April 15, 2006 1:05 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
you guys are fucking retarded... She is not a pedofile. It takes 2 to tango. A guy doesnt get his penis hard from torture or someone forcing him. So let Pamela Rogers off the hook. She does not deserve this.
26. Posted by Rich City | April 15, 2006 1:05 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 15, 2006 13:05
27. Posted by Brian | April 17, 2006 2:57 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Rich City:
....yeah its kinda' hard to rape a guy when his dick is limp and he's running in the other direction....you got a point....beleive me man....we all know he ate it up like candy....but sadly, I'm afraid thats beside the point....Pam broke a law...hey listen...I'd like to let her off the hook you kiddin'....a woman like that walking around that can't control her sexual urges?.....hell I'm not complaining or threatened....but our godfathers in washington don't feel to cozy about it....and Moon made a good point to....about the maturity thing...
Moon....Pam did it because she had an extremely young yet- manly-for-his-age prepetual erectioned sex machine on call at her immediate command and disposal. Now, this is a tremendous sexual turn on for a woman almost 30 with the right mentality ( or wrong mentality in this case ) to be tempted with all the time like she was....and when she expereinced a glimps of his youthful ability to screw her silly....she ( and he ) became addicted....her more than he obviously.
If I had a 13 year old son, who like me was very developed at that age, I'd rather he be exposed to the embrace of a woman in his early manhood instead of the dark specter of pornography and the debilitating sexual habits and perceptions of women that would result and follow. Porn has nothing to do with real human sexual expereinces and dynamics, its actualy a poor sick portrayal of human sexuality and blatant disregard and disrespect of women and their needs. And I'd feel much more comfortable catching him in the arms of a beautiful intelligent woman than mind-fucked by pornographic influences.
But I must admit your point.....sex between female's over 20 and males in the young manhood of their teens is pretty intense stuff.....like crack cocaine.... I would know..... I've expreinced it(both actualy)....its been deemed by our society as taboo....a forbidden pleasure.....and for good reason. A young man of 13 having sex with a woman vs having sex with another girl of 13 is a totaly different expereince and matter. A 13 year old boy having sex with a 13 year old girl is nowhere as intense or strangely exquisite when compared to sex with a woman.....strictly no contest. When your a teenaged boy, sex with a woman is like a drug. And just like a drug, the heightened first time expereince of sex beyond what is normal can sometimes mess with a young man's mind in a negative way should he not have the emotional constitution to deal with such a sudden intense, provocative pleasurable expereince. Most young men in their teens however are not that vulnerable sexualy, And they eat it up like candy, I damn sure wasn't (vulnerable) and I did (eat it like candy)....but then again some are of weaker constitution, and to be sexualized that early would not serve them well mentaly and emotionaly....and thats reason enough to take the moral high ground....even if its just to protect the weaker few. And, like Moon, I have to cast my vote in favor of protecting the potentialy weak. Despite my darker masculine side wanting to let Pam off the hook. Beleive me, a part of me would really like to.
Besides, these activities between women and younger men are having wierd repercussions, have you noticed?...I mean now females over 20 are no longer to be trusted by anyone with teenage boys...its bizzare...but now a reality....it used to be that men were the stinkers who couldn't reliably control their biological urges....now women have been thrown into the same negative reputational cess-pool....oh I'm sure women are just thrilled with that. Thats just another societal pressure they gotta' deal with now.
And teachers....wow....as if they aren't overworked and underpaid enough, now they have to deal with this added burden and carry it....not good....not fair to them. Hell they are some of the most important people in our society and are not paid a fraction of what they are worth or deal with and this is how we thank them....more scandals....more precautions and restrictions against them. Making an impossible job even more so. Its stuff like this that caved the powerful Roman empire of old in. And ours is not far behind if we don't make some changes.
27. Posted by Brian | April 17, 2006 2:57 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 17, 2006 02:57
28. Posted by Moon | April 17, 2006 12:57 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Amen, Brian....it's so nice to see a man here who is thinking with the right head!!!
28. Posted by Moon | April 17, 2006 12:57 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 17, 2006 12:57
29. Posted by Brian | April 17, 2006 2:16 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Thanks Moon...I'm afraid I don't deserve that kind of credit....LOL !!!!....but I'm working on it.
We men do have the tendency to think with our smallest head, its the way were built, and as a result we tend to overlook important details about women. I'm not going to make that mistake anymore. Or at least try to minimize it.
Our male dominated society has been underestimating a woman's ability to lust for centuries, and its coming back to bite us. As is clearly demonstrated by all these female sex scandals. And how suprised and alarmed everyone is by them. Instead of asking " oh my gawd...why are these women doing this...oh my gawd"....we should be asking...why the hell not? They are just responding to all the warped sexual propaganda that has been needled into our veins for decades now like some narcotic.
Women these days are freer, more sexualy empowered and expressive, and less inhibited....and are prone to act alot like men....acting out and on thier biological compulsions, even when inappropriate, instead of repressing them like they always have in the past.
and its just begun....you think the 60's and 70's were a sexual revolution....well....we ain't seen nothin' yet. Just wait.
Were in for a real shit storm. If anything....it will be interesting tho'...I must say.
29. Posted by Brian | April 17, 2006 2:16 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 17, 2006 14:16
30. Posted by yup | April 20, 2006 7:53 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
man what a lucky kid i would have loved to wax that...........
30. Posted by yup | April 20, 2006 7:53 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 20, 2006 19:53
31. Posted by xxxxxxxxxxx | April 21, 2006 3:41 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
The Sting of Pamela Rogers----Phase Two
I take credit for being the most informed person about the case other than her mother and father. It seems that the Rogers case has become almost my third full time job, keeping up with what is happing next. I do know some information that I can share with the readers of this webpage. I have had two emails from a close friend of Pamela's and have talk with her brother by phone in the last three days.
I know that the boy's family changes there phone number to unlisted sometime in the spring of 2005. I know that the cell phone number that Pamela used to call the boy's mother on was disconnected sometime in the spring of 2005. This was the same number that the DA tried to say she used to contact the boy. I also know that Pamela did not know the new phone numbers. If there happens to be contact by phone it would have been by the boy or the boys family not Pamela.
I was email on about 20.February. 2006 by a teacher in South Fentress Elementary telling me that Pamela's mother wanted me to know they had disconnected their Internet service. I talked with Pamela's father sometime about 05.March. 2006 and the subject of the Internet did come up in that discussion and he said it has been disconnected. Some where around the 20.March.2006 I received a very distasteful email from some man that had ideas that Pamela was in love with him. I called the Rogers home and talked with Pamela's father and he said that wish you could just forward that to me, but we don't have the Internet. He asked me to mail a hard copy of the email to him. Which I did.
It seems that the Pictures on the web pages are some of the picture that Pamela misplaced in her haste retreat from Centertown. The writing on this web page is not in the form of writing that Pamela uses. Pamela Rogers almost has a Master degree in English. A less educated person wrote this page. We may never know who made the web page but two things are for sure. It was not by Pamela Joan Rogers and it was by someone that was close to the case. This person could either use the sister's email and played both the part of Pamela and the sister or they were able to make the sister think it was Pamela. Can anyone tell me how Dale Potter found this web page?
T. Dan Bass Ed.S
danba@usit.net
31. Posted by xxxxxxxxxxx | April 21, 2006 3:41 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 21, 2006 15:41
32. Posted by Brian | April 22, 2006 10:18 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
....Give it up Dan.
For one thing.....I have those letters everyone, letters that Dan is just dying to get his mits on, because they tell a totaly differnt story in Pams own words and handwriting than the conspiracy theory he is trying to promote ....and I have that stupid inane Email he sent me claiming that a cell mate wrote me vicariously through Pamela. It was totaly retarded and an obvious rediculous fabrication. The infantile Email was supposed to have been forwarded to me from Pam, desighned to convince me that I never had contact with Pam while in jail, but with her cellmate instead, ....the email looked like it was written by a flighty 12 year old girl caught with her hand in the cookie jar, instead of an articulate, innocent, intelligent woman of almost 30. And it was such an obvious lie that I can't beleive they tried to even convince me of its authenticity, they must think I'm as dumb as they are.....LOL !!!! That was a bad boo-boo guys.
Hell all it did was furthur indicate to me that she's indeed as guilty as what she admited to me in her letters.
Hang it up pal....the fat lady has sung.
And for another...I thought Pam was in love with me?.....man who you trying to kid? Infatuated, sexualy aroused, flirtatious, .....yes.....but in love?....hell no....she wasn't anymore in love with me than she was the 13 year old she boinked.
The letters I wrote her were meant to seduce her into opening up so that I could peer into the mind of a female sexual predator of her caliber and type and do scientific research on it. And guess what....it worked.
Don't let the Harliquen romance novel style of my letters fool you into thinking that I was looking for anything else but info...I was just trying to mesmerize Pam into spilling her guts....and she did.
By the way Dan....the term for me is "brutaly honest"....not distasteful.
Distasteful is when you rape young boys.
If you don't like the way I verbaly express myself then continue to do what you do best when you deal with me....run and hide.
Oh by the way danny boy....I want you to plug this into your formula...ever think about what your going to do and how your going to feel when you analyze the handwriting of one of the letters I'm going send you and it matches Pam's handwriting....perfectly?....think about it bro.
32. Posted by Brian | April 22, 2006 10:18 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 22, 2006 22:18
33. Posted by Brian | April 23, 2006 3:40 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Hey Moon....you getting any of this? Was I to hard on Dan? I was rude again wasn't I......damn. I really need to learn to hold my tongue.
Yeah Dan was the guy I was telling you about Moon who independantly investigated her case and discovered how haphazardly everything was handled and processed. Its true she had no evidence against her, none that would qualify as "exhibit A" or "exhibit B" in a court of law anyway, a court hearing would have basicaly been a free-for-all of their word against hers....a real media circus, and an oppurtunity for the sleazy tabloids to pounce. So a plea-bargain was worked up and settled on instead. To keep the media from milking this thing and embarrasing the hell out of Warren county more than it already has.
But Pam didn't need hard evidence against her she pretty much buried herself in a shit-storm of verbal self-destruction....going around telling friends what she'd done ( including me ) like she was almost proud of it.
Pam is gifted with a list of awesome qualities, and hell, I like her, can't help it, but she's dangerously naive, and has never learned to look before she leaps, and therefore does and says alot of things that are less than appropriate...and is always getting in some kind of trouble, I've never seen anyone attract more bad luck in all my life. She's a very sharp lady, very intelligent, hell she was a school teacher and terrific at it, but when it comes to being naive she has a cog missing upstairs. And it landed her in some serious deep mud this time.
You know, when you read Dan's stuff man you can't help but be impressed by his tenacity and loyalty and hard work. I get weird vibes from him, but I'd definitely want him in my corner if I ever needed investigative support, thats for sure.
I almost hate to send him copies of a couple of my letters for him to examine....whats he gonna' do when he finds out that all his hard work is all for naught?
Yo' Dan.....your not going to do something foolish when you find out those letters really are from Pam are ya? Its ok man......we all make oversights. Hey, you did your best.......it was kind of you. It really was. You may be a little peculiar but.....you are kind......to her anyway....can't really say the same for me tho'.....you were a condescending, aloof prick toward me from the very moment we met. And rudely ignored me until you discovered from Pamela that I have those letters. But hey, you know what, I forgive you. You've earned it.
What do you think Moon?
33. Posted by Brian | April 23, 2006 3:40 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 23, 2006 03:40
34. Posted by Brian | April 23, 2006 2:49 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Oh and one last thing....I can't help but wonder what Dan's approach was to get in tight with Pamela and her folks.....how'd you pull that off Dan?......I begged and pleaded with Pam's parents when her case first reached "critical mass" and went nuclear.....and I got to talk to her mom a few times but they never embraced me like they did Dan.....all I got was a cold phone conversation and shoulder basicaly. And I'm very persuasive ( just ask Pam ), thats part of how I make my living, I'm in sales, and I'm a male model, so if I don't seduce.....I don't eat. Kind of like being a prostitute only on a higher level.....LOL !!!!
Anyway my hats off to ya' Dan for pulling that off you suceeded where I failed.....you must be very overtly non-threatening somehow....your either handicapped ( wheelchair, crutches, body-cast ) with some obvious injury or infirmity, or your extremely efiminate ( perhaps blatantly gay? ) or very elderly. Whatever it was.....it worked......more power to ya'.
You know, it just dawned on me, I should have talked and acted like I was hard core gay when I talked to Pams folks the first time, man that would have put them at ease and relaxed them like three shots of Jack Daniels.....LOL !!!! Why do I always think of this stuff after the fact? Oh well.....20/20 hindsight vision I guess.
34. Posted by Brian | April 23, 2006 2:49 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 23, 2006 14:49
35. Posted by Terry"Big Cock" Paul | April 26, 2006 5:00 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)