ABA Collaborates with Democrats to Undermine Bush Judicial Nominees

Although we’ve always known the ABA was a liberal organization, it at least attempted to look objective in its assessments of Bush’s judicial nominees. Well, now the ABA has decided to throw all pretenses out the window with its “unqualified” rating of Michael Wallace, whose credentials are impeccable. Power Line explains:

It’s official: the American Bar Association is off the reservation. After several years of relatively good behavior, it has now drawn its knives and enlisted in the Democrats’ 2006 campaign. Today, the ABA’s judicial qualifications panel opined unanimously that Michael Wallace, nominated to the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, is “unqualified” for the post.

This is ridiculous. Wallace’s bio is here. He graduated from Harvard and (at the top of his class) the University of Virginia Law School. He clerked for the Mississippi Supreme Court, and for Justice Rehnquist on the U.S. Supreme Court. President Reagan appointed Wallace to head the Legal Services Corporation. For some years, Wallace has had what appears to be a top-notch litigation practice, with an appellate focus, in Jackson, Mississippi.

Based on Wallace’s resume, there are two reasons why the Democrats at the ABA consider him “unqualified.” The first is that he is a Republican. He is General Counsel of the Mississippi Republican Party, and–no doubt a key fact–he served as Special Impeachment Counsel to then-Majority Leader Trent Lott for the impeachment trial of President Clinton. The second reason is that Wallace is from Mississippi. I doubt whether the ABA would dare to pull the same stunt with a Northerner.

With this nakedly political move, the American Bar Association has once again forfeited any claim to credibility.

The American Thinker says that the ABA downgraded Brett Kavanaugh’s rating for political reasons as well:

Kavanaugh’s ABA rating was downgraded upon the word of Marna Tucker, a D.C. lawyer with longstanding ties to Hillary Clinton who had long had a hold on his confirmation for the reason he served under Ken Starr on the Whitewater investigation.

So, this is the tack the Dems, in collaboration with the ABA, are going to use to undermine the rest of President Bush’s judicial nominees: simply slap them with “unqualified” ratings despite their impeccable education and experience.

Favorite Conservative Columnists
Topsy Turvy Land on Turtle Bay

22 Comments

  1. Al Shopton May 11, 2006
  2. Just a Patent Attorney May 11, 2006
  3. epador May 11, 2006
  4. jumbo May 11, 2006
  5. Jason May 11, 2006
  6. Lee May 11, 2006
  7. Lee May 11, 2006
  8. drjohn May 11, 2006
  9. drjohn May 11, 2006
  10. wave_man May 11, 2006
  11. Lee May 11, 2006
  12. drjohn May 11, 2006
  13. Sherard May 11, 2006
  14. Just a Patent Attorney May 11, 2006
  15. BrianOfAtlanta May 11, 2006
  16. Lee May 11, 2006
  17. bob f May 11, 2006
  18. SCSIwuzzy May 11, 2006
  19. Lee May 11, 2006
  20. SCSIwuzzy May 11, 2006
  21. Eon the terrible May 12, 2006
  22. Falze May 12, 2006