Al Gore's mansion uses more than twice the electricity in one month than the average household does in an entire year. From the Tennessee Center for Policy Research:
Last night, Al Gore's global-warming documentary, An Inconvenient Truth, collected an Oscar for best documentary feature, but the Tennessee Center for Policy Research has found that Gore deserves a gold statue for hypocrisy.
Gore's mansion, located in the posh Belle Meade area of Nashville, consumes more electricity every month than the average American household uses in an entire year, according to the Nashville Electric Service (NES).
In his documentary, the former Vice President calls on Americans to conserve energy by reducing electricity consumption at home.
The average household in America consumes 10,656 kilowatt-hours (kWh) per year, according to the Department of Energy. In 2006, Gore devoured nearly 221,000 kWh--more than 20 times the national average.
Last August alone, Gore burned through 22,619 kWh--guzzling more than twice the electricity in one month than an average American family uses in an entire year. As a result of his energy consumption, Gore's average monthly electric bill topped $1,359.
Since the release of An Inconvenient Truth, Gore's energy consumption has increased from an average of 16,200 kWh per month in 2005, to 18,400 kWh per month in 2006.
Gore's extravagant energy use does not stop at his electric bill. Natural gas bills for Gore's mansion and guest house averaged $1,080 per month last year.
"As the spokesman of choice for the global warming movement, Al Gore has to be willing to walk the walk, not just talk the talk, when it comes to home energy use," said Tennessee Center for Policy Research President Drew Johnson.
In total, Gore paid nearly $30,000 in combined electricity and natural gas bills for his Nashville estate in 2006.
Yikes! Gore is an energy glutton. Now compare this to President Bush's comparatively modest home in Crawford, Texas, which is a model of environmental friendliness:
The 4,000-square-foot house is a model of environmental rectitude
Geothermal heat pumps located in a central closet circulate water through pipes buried 300 feet deep in the ground where the temperature is a constant 67 degrees; the water heats the house in the winter and cools it in the summer. Systems such as the one in this "eco-friendly" dwelling use about 25% of the electricity that traditional heating and cooling systems utilize.A 25,000-gallon underground cistern collects rainwater gathered from roof runs; wastewater from sinks, toilets and showers goes into underground purifying tanks and is also funneled into the cistern. The water from the cistern is used to irrigate the landscaping surrounding the four-bedroom home. Plants and flowers native to the high prairie area blend the structure into the surrounding ecosystem.
No, this is not the home of some eccentrically wealthy eco-freak trying to shame his fellow citizens into following the pristineness of his self-righteous example. And no, it is not the wilderness retreat of the Sierra Club or the Natural Resources Defense Council, a haven where tree-huggers plot political strategy.
This is President George W. Bush's "Texas White House" outside the small town of Crawford.
Keep in mind that this piece by Rob Sullivan was first published in the Chicago Tribune in 2001, so the fact that President Bush's home was ecology friendly was not unknown in the media. They just chose to ignore it while they heaped praise on Gore.
And take a look at this piece from TreeHugger:
Only your dispassionate Canadian correspondent could write this without colour or favour, but is it possible that George Bush is a secret Green? Evidently his Crawford Winter White House has 25,000 gallons of rainwater storage, gray water collection from sinks and showers for irrigation, passive solar, geothermal heating and cooling. "By marketplace standards, the house is startlingly small," says David Heymann, the architect of the 4,000-square-foot home. "Clients of similar ilk are building 16-to-20,000-square-foot houses." Furthermore for thermal mass the walls are clad in "discards of a local stone called Leuders limestone, which is quarried in the area. The 12-to-18-inch-thick stone has a mix of colors on the top and bottom, with a cream- colored center that most people want. "They cut the top and bottom of it off because nobody really wants it," Heymann says. "So we bought all this throwaway stone. It's fabulous. It's got great color and it is relatively inexpensive." Hmm, back to that vote about the Greenest President?
George Bush lives environmentalism whereas Al Gore only gives it lip service, yet he's is hailed as God's greatest gift to the environment. Meanwhile, he greedily consumes far more energy than the average American who, by the way, would be footing the bill for Kyoto if we hadn't pull out of it.
Every single one of those actors at the Oscars last night who was applauding Al Gore and nodding his or her head in agreement when Gore said global warming is a moral issue not a political one, needs to take lessons on how to be eco-friendly from President Bush. Next time liberals smugly announce that they drive Priuses, laugh in their faces.
Hypocrisy, thy name is Gore.
By the way, read all of Sullivan's piece on President Bush's Crawford ranch. In spite of the president's efforts to build a home that is as environmentally friendly as possible, he nonetheless, reaches to ridiculous lengths to find ways to slam the president as being inconsistent:
I suppose in George W.'s architectural world only the rich and powerful have views; vistas that the public owns as part of its shared heritage are up for lease and sale.
Heymann also termed the house "stunningly small." Really? Would it be stunningly small for a single mother in South Central Los Angeles? How stunningly small would it be for an immigrant Latino family in San Antonio Maybe in the rarified heights where second homes are the norm, 4,000 square feet is small and on a stunning scale as well, but in Main Street America that much elbow room is pretty big for the first and only home.But then most of us can't reconcile what might at first glance appear to be inherently irreconcilable. Maybe some day, like our noble president, we will be able to make that kind of staggering mental feat. That is, if we ever stop misunderestimating ourselves.
Update: John Hinderaker at News Bloggers asks about Gore's other homes and modes of transportation:
How much energy do his other mansions and estates consume? And how about those private airplanes, the ultimate CO2 machines? The fun that could be had at Gore's expense is just about infinite.
The Anchoress writes about the pro-environment and pro-economy initiatives that President Bush advocated but were completely ignored by the environmentalists and the complicit media:
I think it's an amusing double-standard. Gore gasses away about the environment while he and his friends use private jets to go from huge, air-conditioned home to home, and he is heaped with accolades and good press, while Bush says little about the environment but lives the green-creed at home and gets no press...unless it can be negative press.
So, while you hear nothing at all about President Bush successfully gaining international co-operation for a green initiative that does not destroy economies like the Kyoto treaty, and you read nothing about how the president is committed to helping the restoration of ancient Iraqi Marshlands, you hear rather too much about all the preening and moralizing going on by Green Al Gore...except when he cancels interviews that might make him address...inconvenient dissent.
Update II: Al Gore has responded:
1) Gore's family has taken numerous steps to reduce the carbon footprint of their private residence, including signing up for 100 percent green power through Green Power Switch, installing solar panels, and using compact fluorescent bulbs and other energy saving technology.
2) Gore has had a consistent position of purchasing carbon offsets to offset the family's carbon footprint -- a concept the right-wing fails to understand. Gore's office explains:What Mr. Gore has asked is that every family calculate their carbon footprint and try to reduce it as much as possible. Once they have done so, he then advocates that they purchase offsets, as the Gore's do, to bring their footprint down to zero.
How are the other households in Gore's region going to reduce their carbon footprint to zero when he consumes huge amounts of green energy? There's only a finite amount of alternative energy to go around. For example, the Tennessee Valley Authority installed fifteen new wind machines in the Buffalo Mountain site, bringing that site's production to 29 megawatts of electricity, enough energy for 3,780 homes. However, I would bet that when the TVA did their statistical analysis, they weren't using homes as large as Gore's in their calculations. The average home in the US is 2,300 square feet, significantly smaller than Al Gore's home, which means Gore's mansion has got to skew that statistic quite a bit.
This is a zero-sum game, folks. The more of the 29 megawatts he uses the less there is for others to use, so he still looks really gluttonous. Additionally, based upon the law of supply and demand, he drives up the price of this green energy, preventing others from using it because it becomes too cost prohibitive.
Update III: My comments above are in response to those who retort that Gore signed up for the TVA Green Power Switch and, therefore, get all of his energy from alternative energy sources, not from traditional sources. However, Wizbang commenter SCSIwuzzy makes a great point (emphasis mine):
I work for a utility company, a rather large one at that. We have nukes (more than any other in the US), windfarms, geo, gas, hydro, coal and oil.
And I'll side with Leo and Jess. Electrons are electrons. No matter who you pay your generation charges to, you are getting your juice from the nearest one or two stations, dirty or clean.Paying TVA or Green Mountain or whomever only subsidizes the green gen stations. If you want to help reduce emissions, push for more nuclear plants, invest in research and most of all, use less energy and take load off the damned grid.
Brutally Honest is following this as well.
Others blogging:
The Political Pit Bull
NewsBusters
Jules Crittenden
Don Surber
Blue Crab Boulevard
Ace of Spades
Stop the ACLU
Sister Toldjah
Comments (248)
How stunningly small?? Well... (Below threshold)1. Posted by wavemaker | February 26, 2007 8:38 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
How stunningly small?? Well let's see..it's 8% of the size of John Edwards house in North Carolina. Did Sully point that out? Didn't think so. Jeez what an airhead.
So what does Algor have going in that house that he burns so many kilowatts? Tipper's hairdryer? A 100' HDTV in every room to replay his acceptance speech 24/7? Maybe continuous loops of March of the Penguins?
1. Posted by wavemaker | February 26, 2007 8:38 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 26, 2007 20:38
2. Posted by Mitchell | February 26, 2007 8:48 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Is this Gore, or John Edwards, we're talking about?
I am getting so confused with the stories of fat-cat Democrats with their sprawling mansions and large carbon footprints.
All the Lefties here tell us that the Dem Party is "for the little people."
I guess they mean little people with large houses and huge energy needs.
2. Posted by Mitchell | February 26, 2007 8:48 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 26, 2007 20:48
3. Posted by jaymaster | February 26, 2007 8:50 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Let's start the countdown to "attack the source".
3-2-1.....
3. Posted by jaymaster | February 26, 2007 8:50 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 26, 2007 20:50
4. Posted by Paul | February 26, 2007 9:10 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Killer post Kim
4. Posted by Paul | February 26, 2007 9:10 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 26, 2007 21:10
5. Posted by Kim Priestap | February 26, 2007 9:11 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Thanks, Paul.
5. Posted by Kim Priestap | February 26, 2007 9:11 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 26, 2007 21:11
6. Posted by BarneyG2000 | February 26, 2007 9:15 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Gore buys 100% of his electricity from renewal power sources (Tenn. Val. Green Power Switch):
What is Green Power Switch?
Like any revolutionary idea, the idea behind Green Power Switch is simple: harness the natural power of the wind, the sun, and the earth to create an energy source that's usable in our everyday lives. TVA and local public power companies, working in cooperation with the environmental community, developed Green Power Switch as a way to bring green power -- electricity that's generated by renewable resources such as solar, wind, and methane gas -- to Valley consumers.
Another right wing smear put to rest.
6. Posted by BarneyG2000 | February 26, 2007 9:15 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 26, 2007 21:15
7. Posted by DoubleU | February 26, 2007 9:16 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I am shocked! I am shocked!
Oh wait, liberals want to control us, because it is for our own good.
7. Posted by DoubleU | February 26, 2007 9:16 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 26, 2007 21:16
8. Posted by DoubleU | February 26, 2007 9:18 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
BarneyG2000, it still causes global warming, don't think he can get out of using all that energy and not DESTROY the earth.
8. Posted by DoubleU | February 26, 2007 9:18 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 26, 2007 21:18
9. Posted by Samantha | February 26, 2007 9:21 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Just one thing, we're not "in" the Kyoto Protocol. There was a 95 to 0 vote against it in the Senate in 1999 and that's about as close as we've come to being "in" Kyoto so far.
9. Posted by Samantha | February 26, 2007 9:21 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 26, 2007 21:21
10. Posted by Chip | February 26, 2007 9:23 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Barney,
It's not 100% green....(From TVA website)When the green power resources aren't operating -- for instance, when wind speeds are too low to generate energy -- TVA's other resources will continue to supply reliable electricity.
http://www.tva.com/greenpowerswitch/green_mainfaq.htm
10. Posted by Chip | February 26, 2007 9:23 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 26, 2007 21:23
11. Posted by Jo | February 26, 2007 9:23 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
And don't forget Gulfstream Gore and his private jet way of life.
When the dems say they are for the little people, they mean the little people who will work for them. In their yards, in their fields, in their kitchens. You know the deal.
Do as I say, not as I do. That's the liberal motto.
11. Posted by Jo | February 26, 2007 9:23 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 26, 2007 21:23
12. Posted by BarneyG2000 | February 26, 2007 9:25 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
UU, that's it, change argument. I just proved that the Drudge report was complete nonsense, but do you address the lie?
OK, how does using renewable electrical energy (non carbon based) create more greenhouse gasses than coal or oil based electricity?
This should be good.
12. Posted by BarneyG2000 | February 26, 2007 9:25 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 26, 2007 21:25
13. Posted by Jo | February 26, 2007 9:26 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Ann Coulter said it best tonight when confronted on Hannity & Colmes about the latest Gore hypocrisy. She said she actually had more respect for him, because it clearly shows he's not dumb enough to believe his own man made global warming BS.
Bwahahahahah.... love it.
13. Posted by Jo | February 26, 2007 9:26 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 26, 2007 21:26
14. Posted by Jo | February 26, 2007 9:28 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Barney, Drudge was just reporting from another source in Tennessee who was pointing out Gore's hypocrisy. Nice try.
Oh and BTW, you didn't put to rest anything. Again, nice try.
14. Posted by Jo | February 26, 2007 9:28 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 26, 2007 21:28
15. Posted by Mike in Oregon | February 26, 2007 9:28 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Barney,
When you defend the indefensible you lose what very small, extraordinarily small, shred of credibility you would otherwise have. Give up on this one.
15. Posted by Mike in Oregon | February 26, 2007 9:28 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 26, 2007 21:28
16. Posted by Jess | February 26, 2007 9:29 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
BarneyG,
As one who has worked on a TVA project, I'm calling you out.
The GPS/TVA is simply a distribution plan - nowhere in either the business nor residential contracts is it confirmed that the actual electricity delivered to a given location is generated by the wind/solar/methane providers.
In other words, just b/c one signs up, there's no assurance that a given watt was generated by a given program under the TVA umbrella.
J
PS - I'd love to see Al's "energy right" form...
16. Posted by Jess | February 26, 2007 9:29 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 26, 2007 21:29
17. Posted by yo | February 26, 2007 9:29 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Ugh... I'm going to be sick, but I think I may have to agree with Barney. Whereas DoubleU's got a point about that energy being expended, isn't one of the driving factors of "global warming" not so much that energy's being expended, but how it's created?
Also, I've heard that Gore runs a few different offices out of that house; so, whereas he may be using X times as much as the average household, he may not be running an average household, in this case. Therefore, he may actually be using LESS engery, cummulatively.
Now, really .. I think I just puked in my own mouth defending Gore; but, honestly, and with all due respect for Kim, I smell a red herring.
The point about Sullivan being a jerk is dead on, of course.
The amazement of "stunningly small" is wholly taken out of context and Sully is definitely eyeing an insignificant nit to pick.
If Sullivan were to replace Bush as his target with Edwards, well .. he'd be on to something.
17. Posted by yo | February 26, 2007 9:29 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 26, 2007 21:29
18. Posted by Scraprion | February 26, 2007 9:34 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Conservatives walk the walk, Liberals talk the talk (aka lie about everything) while wimps like Barney Google come out to defend the indefendable.
It was funny tonight watching a dhimmi talking head defend (on O'Reilly) an ACLU sexual pervert who preys on children. That is about as low as a person can get but it's right up the dhimmi's alley. Brings up the big question, Are all dhimmi's perverts or are all perverts dhimmi's? Something stinks in the land of the left wing. Maybe because there's right guard but no left guard. It's right down on the level of supporting a military tratitor that no one would ever trust again. Try them, convict them and shoot them. Problem solved.
In case you dhimmi's haven't figured it out, the majority of the American people are now laughing at you, not with you.
This has been the most comical 4 months in history and will continue for another two years. That is if the Peeeloshi/Murtha crowd doesn't succeed in getting several million Americans killed.
Read a question tonight, 'are the actions of Peeeloshi and Murtha getting American Soldiers killed'? That was a stupid question since everyone with a functioning brain knows they are doing just that and doing it on purpose for what they think is political advantage. The big problem is that the American people are figuring it out and turning against them, along with lefties now eating lefties it's a great comedy, keep it up.
18. Posted by Scraprion | February 26, 2007 9:34 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 26, 2007 21:34
19. Posted by Lee | February 26, 2007 9:39 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"Posted by: Scraprion at February 26, 2007 09:34 PM "
I've always suspected that there were conservatives so stupid they'd misspell their own name.
Nice work Barney. You got good old Scraprion foaming at the mouth.
19. Posted by Lee | February 26, 2007 9:39 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 26, 2007 21:39
20. Posted by BarneyG2000 | February 26, 2007 9:40 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Gore drives a hybrid car. He flies commercial as much as possible. He is installing solar panels on his home. He buys carbon offsets to make-up the difference. He buys his power from a green source.
To say that Gore is a hypocrite is a total lie.
The right is just pissed that Gore won last night, and like the little babies you are, the best you can do pout and smear.
20. Posted by BarneyG2000 | February 26, 2007 9:40 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 26, 2007 21:40
21. Posted by Mike in Oregon | February 26, 2007 9:46 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"The right is just pissed that Gore won last night, and like the little babies you are, the best you can do pout and smear."
Right, Barney. Close your eyes, relax, and try to imagine how little the right cares about Algore winning an Oscar last night. What a laugh! Thanks.
21. Posted by Mike in Oregon | February 26, 2007 9:46 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 26, 2007 21:46
22. Posted by Michael Evilcorn | February 26, 2007 9:51 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
By the looks of Gore's weight, it would take a special power source to power all the refrigerators for his food.
Also, imagine all the methane that dude emits.
22. Posted by Michael Evilcorn | February 26, 2007 9:51 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 26, 2007 21:51
23. Posted by SShiell | February 26, 2007 9:56 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"The right is just pissed that Gore won last night."
No, Barney. The Right doesn't mind if Gore won the next 20 Oscars. More power to him. You see he LOST the one race that really counted in 2000!
23. Posted by SShiell | February 26, 2007 9:56 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 26, 2007 21:56
24. Posted by Larkin | February 26, 2007 10:01 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Gore's mansion, located in the posh Belle Meade area of Nashville, consumes more electricity every month than the average American household uses in an entire year, according to the Nashville Electric Service (NES).
Isn't it sort of obvious that it takes more energy to heat and cool larger homes than it does smaller homes? The "average American household" isn't anywhere near the size of Gore's.
So, as I understand this thread, you guys are mad because Gore has a large home. That's awfully progressive of you guys. Maybe there's hope for you yet.
24. Posted by Larkin | February 26, 2007 10:01 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 26, 2007 22:01
25. Posted by Kim Priestap | February 26, 2007 10:06 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I've noticed that all the liberal trolls have come calling to defend Gore, but not one has offered any positive words about President Bush, whose Crawford ranch has been ecology friendly since it was built in 2000, I believe.
25. Posted by Kim Priestap | February 26, 2007 10:06 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 26, 2007 22:06
26. Posted by Leo | February 26, 2007 10:14 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
>Gore buys 100% of his electricity from renewal
>power sources (Tenn. Val. Green Power Switch):
>What is Green Power Switch?
Electricity, like money, is fungible. If he is burning that much, it's that much less that TVGPS can sell to dirtier energy companies and cut down on their coal use.
26. Posted by Leo | February 26, 2007 10:14 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 26, 2007 22:14
27. Posted by Mike in Oregon | February 26, 2007 10:18 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Larkin,
And isn't it sort of obvious that Algore is so important he SHOULD fly around in private jets that use more fuel in a couple hours than the average American uses in an automobile in a year? He's such a rich guy that he can afford to ignore the dire warnings he's making to the little people. He's my hero, and apparently yours too.
27. Posted by Mike in Oregon | February 26, 2007 10:18 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 26, 2007 22:18
28. Posted by Hugh | February 26, 2007 10:20 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Bush's 25,000 gallon cistern is there to ctach all the bullshit coming from his "ranch." Only problem is it's not animal bullshit and it's been known to overflow on a regular basis.
28. Posted by Hugh | February 26, 2007 10:20 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 26, 2007 22:20
29. Posted by BarneyG2000 | February 26, 2007 10:23 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
The Bush and Gore homes are not much different. Both are doing what they can to reduce carbon emissions, and that is all any one can ask for.
"W" is doing what he can educe his carbon foot-print. Bush has on several occasion stated that global warming is caused by human activities.
"The issue of climate change respects no border. Its effects cannot be reined in by an army nor advanced by any ideology. Climate change, with its potential to impact every corner of the world, is an issue that must be addressed by the world."
"Concentration of greenhouse gases, especial