Cheney v. Obama

Not even close to a fair fight. Too many good quotes in the Cheney speech to excerpt. Read it all – posted at Weekly Standard.

Mary Katharine tweeted the speeches.

Another TOTUS moment.

Update: The more Dick Cheney talks, the more people like him. He’s starting from basement numbers, having been vilified for eight years, but what he is saying makes sense, especially in comparison to the current administration’s flipping and flopping on issues of national security.

Americans are Waking up to Dangerous Government Spending
CNN's Anderson Cooper apologizes for "teabagging" crack
  • 914

    Way to take out the trash Dark lord.

  • SCSIwuzzy

    Well, I know this http://www.milkandcookies.com/link/141217/detail/
    was a turning point for me.

  • 914

    Ha ha ha Cheney as Tony Stark..

  • http://www.floppingaces.net Aye Chihuahua

    Cheney pounded Obama so far into the ground today that sunlight cannot even reach him.

  • Adrian Browne

    Place a check by the name of the administration(s) under whose watch the U.S. has been attacked:

    The Obama Administration

    The Bush Administration

  • http://fullthrottle.cranialcavity.net/ marc

    a browne

    Place a check after the name of the president that has been or should be called a war mongering chickenhawk and killer of woman and kiddies

    The Bush Administration √

    The Obama Administration √

  • http://carlosechevarria.blogspot.com Carlos Echevarria

    Amateur Hour again by TOTUS…Obama has no shame, he is a charlatan of the highest order!

    Cheney is a real man, a patriot who understands what we must do every day, at every hour to keep our country and our way of life alive.

  • Patrick

    Adrian:

    Obama has been in office for FOUR MONTHS! I think it will be nothing short of a miracle if we are not attacked before the end of his four year term. We will be lucky if we don’t get hit before the end of the year. I am sure you are one of these misguided souls who feels that Clinton had NOTHING to do with 9/11 when the planning for that operation was mostly completed when he was still in office. The difference between Obama and Bush was that Bush chose to be an adult after 9/11 by getting on with the job and not point fingers of blame at Clinton. All Obama does is look backwards all the while claiming to be wanting to look forward instead. WE DID NOT GET ATTACKED after 9/11 and Obama has no credibility when he refuses to credit the Bush Administration for anything even as he keeps many of the core policies he ridicules in place. I just cannot take Obama seriously on national security. He has maligned Guantanamo for years and he STILL has no concrete plan as to what to do with the detainees! For soemthing that was so bad it astounds me that he cannot think of another plan that would be better. Obviously governing is much harder than campaigning – which is why he continues to campaign because he certainly has no clue on how to lead this nation. We are so screwed…

  • Tim

    Adrian, you missed one.

    Place a check by the name of the administration(s) under whose watch the U.S. has been attacked:

    The Obama Administration

    The Bush Administration √

    The Clinton Administration √

  • Peter F.

    Triangulation is a political
    strategy, not a national security strategy.

    One of my fave big-slaps to Obama by Dick.

  • Tim

    Now let’s try this one on for size.

    Which administration fought back after we were attacked:

    The Bush Administration √

    The Clinton Administration

  • 914

    Place a negative vote under the most useless idiots comment.

    Done!

  • Peter F.

    Dumb Obama quote:

    “Nobody has ever escaped from one of our federal ‘supermax’ prisons, which hold hundreds of convicted terrorists.”

    Um, no, Anointed One, we have ONE “super-max” prison, and it holds several, not hundreds (hell, prison capacity is only 490) well-known terrorists: The Blind Sheik, Moussaoui, Ramsey Yousef and Mahmud Abouhalima, three of whom were involved in the 1993 WTC bombing. And that prison currently has a sign hanging out in front that reads, “No Vacancy”.

    Unless he plans on building one really quickly, where Mr. Genius In Chief plans to house the at least 50 Gitmo detainees who are a clear and present danger to the security of the United States when and if they are convicted in misguided “civil” trials (what a joke), is an absolute frikkin’ mystery….

  • WildWillie

    Barry should not bring up National Security. It is one of his many weaknesses. I don’t care what his teleprompter says, closes Gitmo is a mistake. I think he even knows it but his mouth wrote a check his a$$ can’t cash. ww

  • http://fullthrottle.cranialcavity.net/ marc

    Peter f – “Unless he plans on building one really quickly, where Mr. Genius In Chief plans to house the at least 50 Gitmo detainees….”

    Sounds like malicious Murtha’s wet dream, he proudly proclaimed he’d take them. Of course he has no facility to house them, that would be built after getting hundreds on millions to build one. (“a little bit for you, a little bit for me and mine”)

    What would the end result of housing gitmo jihadis-cut-throats in a super-max or any other U.S. prison?

    A clue can be found in the story of the four that were arrested in the last 24 hours.

    Three of the four wouldbe jihadis converted to Islam after recent stints in jail.

  • TOhio

    Bravo Dick Cheney! I love how he is going on the offensive and shows no sign of backing down.

    I just read his speech and it’s excellent. Cheney (to use a Sean Hannity line) is firing “torpedos of truth through a wall of lies.”

    Keep firing Cheney!!!

  • 914

    They would also have to allow the jihadis a proper place to worship and wash their filthy feet thereby increasing the bill for Americans to house these degenerates.

  • irongrampa

    So, Barack-how’s my ass taste?

    D. Cheney.

  • DaveD

    Adrian,
    Please, after looking at Obama’s concept of economic policy he may be the first American president that actually goes down in history as attacking his own country. (Of course we can check the birth certificate to be sure.)

  • WildWillie

    After eight years of having a muzzle put on him, Cheney can now speak freely. I pity the person that underestimates his intelligience. ww

  • BHOwasborninIndonesia

    Sick em Cheney!!

  • Peter F.

    marc,

    Spot on there with jihadist peddling influence former Gitmo detainees could possibly have in a less-than-supermax facility–probably even more so for the lower-level detainees who would have greater access to general prison populations.

    I would hope the detainees would be segregated from general populations, but given the Obama Administration’s penchant to make sure every one is happy and where they should be, I wouldn’t put it past them to let a few into less secure facilities.

  • Jake

    Nothing like a Cheney speech to bring out the hate.

    Watching the speech, I couldn’t help but notice the pure pride that Cheney seems to have for his part in torture.

    Let’s pretend for a second that I supported the idea of disappearing, torturing, and holding indefinitely anyone the President, any President, wishes. I would at least hope that PRIDE wasn’t the adjective used to describe the actions. Sometimes we may have to dip into things we don’t like, but do we have to be so damn proud of such vile acts?

    To make a comparison this crowd should understand:

    If a burglar breaks into your house and you have to shoot him in self-defense, should you feel pride in having killed a man? Should you go on TV talking all about how death is a wonderful solution to your problems? Should you gleefully make a case for more death?

    Oh wait, maybe this is the wrong crowd to make that comparison after all.
    depp=true
    notiz=How big a shovel do you want?

  • Jake

    I know I’m new here, but can someone please explain what just happened to my last comment’s formatting??

  • DJ Drummond

    Jake, I know you’re new here and all, and we’re pretty obliging as blogsites go.

    But …

    We still have rules. And while I don’t know what you wrote in your 4:44 comment that just you in trouble, you have not been trying to advance the discussion, you’ve been trying to be a smartass and a rude jerk.

    Kind of like President O-boy, but that’s for another place.

    Whatever you said was over the line, and one of the editors devowelled your comment. That’s kind of a warning shot, if you keep it up you can be deleted or in extreme cases banned.

    So you have a choice, mister. You can whine like a little boy or you can make an effort to make your case w/o the venom. The first course will be futile, and end up with you getting known as a petty troll who can’t make his case on the facts, or you can step back from the insults and sneering and make your point like an adult.

    Your call, but choose wisely. Up to now you have not exactly shown wisdom or maturity, son.

    And before you ask no, I did not devowel your comment. I just was passing by and caught the smell of juvenile piss and realized we have a newcomer from the Left.

  • http://fullthrottle.cranialcavity.net/ marc

    Peter F – “I would hope the detainees would be segregated from general populations, but given the Obama Administration’s penchant to make sure every one is happy and where they should be,….”

    I suspect if a jihadi were within reach of the general prison population they would get the same treatment as imprisoned police officers and pedophiles – SHANKED.

  • Mac Lorry

    Obama quote:

    “Nobody has ever escaped from one of our federal ‘supermax’ prisons, which hold hundreds of convicted terrorists.”

    What I want to know is how well are the federal ‘supermax’ prisons designed to repel an armed attack from the outside that starts with a truck bomb blowing a big hole in the perimeter defenses? What about the warden and several guards having their homes invaded at night and their families held hostage while they are taken to the prison to facilitate a takeover. There’s a difference between common criminals and terrorists who are part of a group willing to kill and be killed for their cause.

  • http://fullthrottle.cranialcavity.net/ marc

    Mac Lorry – “What I want to know is how well are the federal ‘supermax’ prisons designed to repel an armed attack from the outside that starts with a truck bomb blowing a big hole in the perimeter defenses?”

    Along the same lines… how long would it be before the jihadis started crying because the treatment received in a state-side prison is much less “kindly” than what they had in gitmo?

    And after the nutcakes from the ACLU intervened and got better treatment for them the remaining and “normal” prisoners all filed suit to get the same special treatment?

  • http://www.wizbangblog.com maggie

    Jake,
    You were disemvoweled. By me, the comment
    section editor. Look over to the right side
    bar and educate yourself.
    If you don’t like the way this blog is operated,
    you can easily go elsewhere to comment.

  • Adrian Browne

    Y’r rght abt tht Jk, thr’s n dffrnc.

    (You’re right about Jake, there’s no difference.)

  • http://www.wizbangblog.com maggie

    Adrian,
    You’re not funny. And pushing the envelope
    on how this website is operated might find
    you shoveling yourself out of a very deep
    hole. Think China.

  • Norris Hall

    This is great.
    The Republicans are being defended by the most unpopular vice president in recent history.
    It’s like having Adolf Hitler as your spokesperson.

    So now, the leaders of the Republican party will be Rush Limbaugh and Dick Cheney.

  • Peter F.

    The Republicans are being defended by the most unpopular vice president in recent history.
    It’s like having Adolf Hitler as your spokesperson.

    Actually, he’s not like Adolf Hitler at all. Hitler psychotically murdered, tortured (the real “torture”, the kind where you want to die) and conducted barbaric genetic experts on at least 7 million+ Jews because of some deep-seeded Mommy issues, plus he tried to spread his sick and twisted Third Reich to the rest of the world.

    But you probably know all that, seeing as how you’re so very adept at making relevant historical comparisons and all.

    Tool.*

    *I guess I could’ve just said this and made my point, but oh well….

  • http://fullthrottle.cranialcavity.net/ marc

    Norris Hall – “So now, the leaders of the Republican party will be Rush Limbaugh and Dick Cheney.”

    “This is great,” another leftist making another hitler comparison of a VP and or president.

    I wonder.. can you generate an original thought, or must you rely on time-worn horse-shit?

  • Oyster

    SCSIwuzzy: that video was hilarious!

  • retired military

    Now let’s try these on for size.

    Which administration was attacked more than once and did nothing about it:

    The Clinton Administration √
    The Bush Administration

    Who promised once elected to end the war right away and bring the troops home:

    Democrats (2006) √
    Republicans

    Which administration said they were not going to raise taxes for folks making under 250k “NOT ONE DIME”:

    The Obama Administration √
    The Bush Administration

    Which administration spent more in 4 months than we did in 6 years in Iraq

    The Obama Administration √
    The Bush Administration

    See how those games work Adriane.

  • WildWillie

    Cheney’s approval numbers are rising and the left is going nuts. ww

  • Adrian Browne

    “That’s MR. 22% to you, Libs.”
    ~Dick Cheney

  • Nadine

    I was very impressed by Cheney’s speech , he gave his opinions and facts without any rhetoric .
    Obama once again resorted to a teleprompter campaign style speech without substance.
    I am surprised how fast Americans have forgotten 9/11 and if they are being reminded they call it fear mongering and scare tacticts.
    I am not a Republican but one should give credit where it’s due , the Bush administration kept the country safe for 8 long years.

Optimization WordPress Plugins & Solutions by W3 EDGE