Palin movie does well on opening day… unless you read The Atlantic

We’ll come back to The Atlantic but first, to Yahoo’s Associated Content:

Just on the face of it, it would seem to have been the biggest risk in marketing history to roll out a documentary about a politician with less than stellar poll numbers on the same night that the last Harry Potter movie was scheduled to be released.

But, by all accounts, “The Undefeated,” the Sarah Palin biop, which was placed in limited release in ten screens across the country, did surprisingly well.

According to the Fort Worth Star Telegram, the theater in Grapevine, Texas, a suburb near the Dallas/Fort Worth area, at least one Friday evening showing actually sold out.

Gateway Pundit reports similar sellout or near sell out crowds seeing “The Undefeated” in Georgia, Orange Country, California, Houston, Orlando, and other markets.

“The Undefeated” was heavily marketed in social media, with regular updates on Twitter and Facebook. The below the radar strategy seems to have paid off, at least for the first night. The question arises, however, has the movie developed enough word of mouth buzz to develop legs, as film marketers call it, so that audiences continue to show up?

Time will bring the telling.

Speaking of telling, this related piece by The Atlantic, filled with typical liberal snarkiness, is pretty telling in and of itself:

Sarah Palin Movie Debuts to Empty Theater in Orange County

When the clock struck 12:01 am today, AMC theaters in select cities were permitted to start showing “The Undefeated,” a feature length documentary about Sarah Palin. As it happens, I’m visiting my parents in Orange County, Calif., home to one of just 10 theaters where the film is being rolled out. Watching it didn’t interest me so much as going to interview folks who decided to attend. I figured I’d meet some nice people, perhaps run into someone who knows my grandparents, press five or six Palin fans on why they like her, and convey their worldview. It’s my experience that the grassroots doesn’t fit the caricature of its champions or its detractors.

In the parking lot of The Block, an outdoor mall in the City of Orange, I worried that arriving 45 minutes early was cutting it too close: it took 20 minutes to find parking, and folks were lining up scores deep outside the theater box office. Our airport is named after John Wayne. Ronald Reagan remains a hero to many. Even Richard Nixon’s association with this place is treated as a point of pride. When I was growing up here, a local hotel broadcast the Rush Limbaugh program everyday in its restaurant. I should’ve known there’d be a big turnout, I thought.

As I approached, however, I realized that most people present were dressed in costume. The crowd was either showing ironic solidarity with Christine O’Donnell, the tea party candidate who is not a witch, or else everyone was there to see the Harry Potter movie playing on a majority of the theater’s 30 screens. Without any way of telling Palin moviegoers from Potter fans dressed up like muggles, I’d have to pay, go to the assigned theater, and look for interviewees.

I hurried through the teenage hordes, bypassed a concession stand that sold 1,020 calories of soda for $5.25, and entered theater number 30, hoping I’d have ample time before the previews to talk to some people. But inside, the theater was empty. I sat there alone for 20 minutes, at which point an usher stuck his head in the door, gave me a quizzical smile, and said, “How come you’re not watching Harry Potter?” Then he left me by myself again, and without any good answer.

The Atlantic chooses to attend a midnight showing of the movie and report breathlessly that behold, no one showed up.

Which piece do you think will get an airing on regular media outlets later today?  The former or the latter?

Shortlink:

Posted by on July 17, 2011.
Filed under 2012 Presidential Race, Meme Watch, Sarah Palin.
I blog more regularly at my own place where plain thoughts are delivered roughly. My about page gives you more on who I am.

Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Up to 90% off top rated local fun!
  • Pingback: Brutally Honest

  • Anonymous

    That’s right.  They were open at midnight for the Harry Potter opening and since they were open they ran their other films as well.  WTF. 

    Does anyone wonder why the usher asks, “How come you’re not watching Harry Potter?”The author’s decision to view The Undefeated at that time was deliberately made to find the time with the highest likelihood of a low turnout.

    This demonstrates two key character traits of  the left: 1) Personal anecdotes always trump statistical data.  It doesn’t matter if 90% of the theaters are packed, if they can find one that was empty then all theaters were empty.  and 2) They will go to any length to find the anecdotal incident that supports their belief so they can ignore all other evidence to the contrary.

    • http://twitter.com/davepavalok Dave Pavalok

      haha… wow.  You’re so right!  Only liberal politicians are snarky or go to great lengths to find the one exception that proves their point… oh wait, that’s politics in general!  Moron.

  • Anonymous

    I agree, it’s pointless and deceptive for the Atlantic to publish an article about The Undefeated’s appeal now, before the Variety.com weekend box office is out.

    Of course, it’s also pointless to complain about the article before the Variety.com weekend box office is out. 

    Maybe it will do well.  Maybe it will bomb, despite the apparent placing of the film at hand-picked screens in right-wing neighborhoods.   Variety.com will tell.

    Aside from all the questions about Palin’s money grabbing and celebrity-whoring, Palin never figured that someone like Bachmann would run.  Now that Bachmann has got some traction among the right-wing, Palin’s effectively shut out.   People with a brain know that, so she’s yesterday’s news.

    • Anonymous

      “Maybe it will do well.  Maybe it will bomb, despite the apparent placing of the film at hand-picked screens in right-wing neighborhoods.   Variety.com will tell.”

      I suppose it would have made more economical sense to ‘pull a Barry’ and show it where it would be a guaranteed financial failure ?

      Keep hatin’ commander of much Kool aid

    • http://2011.ak4mc.us/ McGehee

      Chico, except for here at Wizbang, where on earth do you ever encounter “people with a brain?”

      Or by that exact phrase do you mean, “large numbers of people who have about one brain among the lot of them”…? If those are the people you claim “know” that Palin is “shut out,” I guess I can believe that.

    • http://2011.ak4mc.us/ McGehee

      Chico, except for here at Wizbang, where on earth do you ever encounter “people with a brain?”

      Or by that exact phrase do you mean, “large numbers of people who have about one brain among the lot of them”…? If those are the people you claim “know” that Palin is “shut out,” I guess I can believe that.

    • http://2011.ak4mc.us/ McGehee

      Chico, except for here at Wizbang, where on earth do you ever encounter “people with a brain?”

      Or by that exact phrase do you mean, “large numbers of people who have about one brain among the lot of them”…? If those are the people you claim “know” that Palin is “shut out,” I guess I can believe that.

    • http://2011.ak4mc.us/ McGehee

      Chico, except for here at Wizbang, where on earth do you ever encounter “people with a brain?”

      Or by that exact phrase do you mean, “large numbers of people who have about one brain among the lot of them”…? If those are the people you claim “know” that Palin is “shut out,” I guess I can believe that.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Rand-Collins/100002370695594 Rand Collins

      Palin’s “celebrity-whoring”?  Wow, you haven’t gotten any smarter, have you?

      Is it Palin who “forced” the media to attack her 24×7 for 3 staright years…without a pause…EVER?

      Sarah Palin has been attacked in every way, shape and form during that entire time and she is Undefeated!  Pretty freaking amazing actually.

      • http://twitter.com/davepavalok Dave Pavalok

        Poor Palin, she hates the media so much!  Although, she does take every chance she gets to spew her garbage and out-dated, uninformed views to her half-wit minions on tv, magazines, and now in select theaters.  It is amazing how much of a media whore she is.  She’s a bad mother, and worse politician.

      • http://twitter.com/duncan_stuart Duncan Stuart

        Actually it pretty-much WAS Sarah’s fault.  She has been aiming to be POTUS – so she invites intense scrutiny. Just as I would if somehow I decided to run. It isn’t a pleasant process, but since the 1970s has become relentlessly savage – just ask McGovern, Carter, Dukakis, Kerry, George H and George W to name a few. Nobody gets let off easily.

        On another note. What has the opening of Harry Potter got to do with the opening of the Palin pic? Different audiences. Thank God there’s something on besides that twerpy group of Wizards.

  • Jeff Blogworthy

    “Watching it didn’t interest me so much as going to interview folks
    who decided to attend. I figured I’d meet some nice people, perhaps run
    into someone who knows my grandparents…”

    Interesting how the left is always dismissing the Tea Party as “just a bunch of retired people” as though they don’t matter, isn’t it? Yes, retirees are second-class, over-the-hill citizens with one foot in the grave and an idealistic, 50′s view of society. In the next breath, the leftist will talk like they are the champions of the same group, the only ones who care, and the sole force keeping them from eating out of dog-food cans. It is amazing that anyone takes anything they say seriously.

  • Anonymous

    Natch! Its not Sarah’s fault the shit stream media hate Her.  I am sure glad they pursued Barry with such intense scrutiny. Oh, wait. They haven’t to this day checked out this jive talkin’ shiester.

    To haters like Davy Pavlov above, the only way out of BDS is PDS  and a lot of blue Maui kook aide.

  • Anonymous

    Yes, the Palin movie did well, unless you read the Atlantic — or unless you compare it to Al Gore’s movie ($90K per screen opening weekend), Moore’s movie ($60K) or Moore’s other movie ($27K). Oh, or Moore’s other other movie ($10.2K).

    As I’ve mentioned before, Palin is to Bachmann as the Jonas Brothers are to Justin Bieber. So last year.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Rand-Collins/100002370695594 Rand Collins

    Simple reminder for the Palin haters who seem to have infested this thread:
    the MEDIA hounded Palin relentlessly AFTER the election.  Remember? 

    In the history of the United States (hell, of mankind) only ONE losing candidate on the bottom half of the ticket has received such scrutiny.  She wasn’t running for ANYTHING at that point (still isn’t, btw).  But the media camped out in Alaska and started going through her trash looking for dirt.  They (and you Palin haters) feared her then…and fear hew now).

    She is feared by the Left because she is:
    - smart
    - pretty
    - Conservative (while being female)
    - and NORMAL

    The only female politicians permissible by the Left are ugly trolls like Nancy Piglosi, who made their careers by espousing infantcide. 

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_425GVKQCLFZMQYYENR7CJBRDVA jb

      lol.

      Please continue believing we fear Sarah Palin because she’s so smart.

      And please please PLEASE nominate her or her upstart competitor Bachmann for President. OH MY GOD PLEASE RUN EITHER ONE OF THEM.

      I mean, we are so scared of either of them that the easiest way to make liberalism fail is to run either of them. That’s what I meant. Yeah. That’s the winning GOP Presidential ticket.

  • Anonymous

    poor man’s idiot-

    “Yes, the Palin movie did well, unless you read the Atlantic — or unless you compare it to Al Gore’s movie ($90K per screen opening weekend), Moore’s movie ($60K) or Moore’s other movie ($27K). Oh, or Moore’s other other movie ($10.2K).”

    Selling out is selling out Bruce. You cannot do any better with any comparison. But since you are into comparisons, Albert Moore’s movie’s were lie infested propaganda that leftist turds such as yourself fell for.

    You would be hard pressed to find the same in Sarah Palin’s movie. Would likely turn out just like her much vaunted email search’s..

    • Anonymous

      Well, since the thread is about how successful Palin’s movie was on its opening weekend, I thought you guys might want to compare and contrast.

      It did 5.5% of what Al Gore’s movie did. 8.3% of what “Capitalism, a Love Story” did. But, on the bright side, it did almost HALF as well as “Sicko.”

  • Anonymous

    WHO reads the f’n Atlantic?!