Occupy Wall Street: Not our neighbors

Via Don Surber, a local New York resident who speaks for many:

“Frankly we’re not interested in a good neighbor policy. The occupiers are not our neighbors,” said Linda Gerstman, a board member at 15 Broad Street. “Our neighbors do not beat on drums while children are sleeping, our neighbors do not verbally attack people on their way to work, our neighbors do not break into our buildings and vandalize them, our neighbors do not urinate and defecate in the street. These occupiers need to vacate our neighborhood.”

In Oakland, officials had the same sentiment and decided that enough was enough:

Under the cover of darkness early Tuesday, hundreds of police swept into Oakland’s Occupy Wall Street protest, firing tear gas and beanbag rounds before clearing out an encampment that demonstrators had hoped would stir a revolution.

In less than an hour, the 2-week-old, miniature makeshift city was in ruins.

Scattered across the area were overturned tents, pillows, sleeping bags, yoga mats, tarps, backpacks, food wrappers and water bottles. Signs decrying corporations and police still hung from lampposts or lay on the ground.

Protesters had stayed awake through the night, waiting for the expected raid. Officers and sheriff’s deputies from across the San 

Francisco Bay area surrounded the plaza in front of City Hall around 5 a.m. and closed in.

Eighty-five people were arrested, mostly on suspicion of misdemeanor unlawful assembly and illegal camping, police said.

Shortlink:

Posted by on October 26, 2011.
Filed under Occupy Protest.
I blog more regularly at my own place where plain thoughts are delivered roughly. My about page gives you more on who I am.

Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Up to 90% off top rated local fun!
  • Pingback: Brutally Honest

  • Anonymous

    They moved in on the Orlando OWS last night, too, but they’re going to let them back in this morning (parks in Orlando are closed from midnight to 6A).

  • retired.military

    I suspect in 2 months all the OWS crowd will be in the southern cities.  The cold will kill any protests up north. 

    • Anonymous

      They will probably all be crying about global warming the whole time they are freezing or moving south.

    • http://otisthehand.blogspot.com/ OTIS the hand

      They will not find Southerners nearly as “hospitable.” We don’t cotton to communists.

      • http://2012.ak4mc.us/ McGehee

        Atlanta mayor Kasim Reed seems to be trying, at least, to take a hard line with his infestation. Somehow I doubt an influx of carpetbagging #Occupiers would be any more welcome than the home-fermented variety.

        • Anonymous

          Sounds like y’all are getting your wish in Oakland, they broke the skull of an Iraq veteran with a rubber bullet or something:

          http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/Occupy-Oakland-Protester-Seriously-Hurt-Report-132644468.html

           

          • herddog505

            I object to this accusation.  I certainly don’t want people to be hurt, and I think that nobody else does, either.  Well, except that liberal dipsh*t on MSNBC who was hoping for a “Kent State moment”. We merely want these smelly idiots to clean up their sh*t (literally, apparently) and go the hell home.  If they’d take a bath and get a job, that would also be good.

            Seriously, though: wasn’t this sort of thing predictable?  Large groups decide to squat in the middle of major cities with no preexisting plans for sanitation, security, housing or feeding.  Their entire philosophy is confrontational: they are there to PROTEST, dammit!  To make their voices heard against the “1%” who have – in some obscure way – done bad things!  It was inevitable that even the most indulgent of cities would get tired of it even if the groups hadn’t attracted criminal elements; who the hell wants to step over piles of sleeping people or wade through crowds of protesters, no matter how polite and clean, to get to work or take the kids to school or just get the morning paper every day?

            The OWS people have suddenly found themselves to be the “1%”: the tiny minority that people increasingly dislike and want dislodged.  Party’s over: everybody out of the pool and go home.  They also found that the law isn’t quite what they thought: rather than seeing millionaires arrested for… um… er… being bad, THEY are breaking the law.  Actual, real laws that have, for excellent reasons of public safety and sanitation, been on the books for decades.  We haven’t (yet) criminalized making too much money, but p*ssing on the streets has been a no-no for a long time.

            O’ course, being self-appointed heirs to the protests of the ’60s, the yobs think that disobeying the law and standing up to the police is not only a good idea, but a VIRTUOUS one.  It never occured to them that the the police think that upholding the law is not only a good idea, but a virtuous one… and they are armed (I guess that the core curriculum in Private U. doesn’t include “Nightstick 101″).

            So, the inevitable happened.  Nobody’s happy about people getting hurt, but it is a good thing that the law is – at last – being upheld.  And, I must confess, I find it delicious that many of the mayors ordering their police to roust these layabouts are democrats.  How’s it feel to be The Man?

          • Anonymous

            When you’re calling them to get tough on an “infestation,” you’re calling for stuff like this.

            One thing that was predictable, was that cops would not be able to control themselves and would aim for the head.  It happened in Boston a few years ago, it happened in Oakland – “non-lethal” pepper/gas weapons meant to be fired indirectly were fired directly into skulls.  In Boston a young woman out celebrating the Red Sox was killed by a point-blank shot of a pepper pellet into the eye.

          • herddog505

            It’s a question of desire.  Calls for “getting tough” – upholding the law and no nonsense about it – are NOT calls for gratuitous mayhem.  There’s a difference between shedding no tears over somebody suffering from being stupid enough to resist the police in the lawful performance of their duties and being happy that somebody was hurt or killed.

            As for the police getting trigger-happy, out of control or just plain stupid, I believe that you’ll find that many of us on the right are just as critical – if no moreso – of this sort of thing as even the most bleeding-heart liberal.  We remember Ruby Ridge and Waco.

            A gunblogger I enjoy posted just this morning about a SWAT team in New Hampshire being called out to handle a deranged man threatening his wife with a gun.  Net result: no shots fired, no doors kicked in, no damage done because the police cordoned off the area and dealt calmly with the situation.  Well, one shot was fired: the man killed himself.

            The comments on this conservative / libertarian-leaning blog were of approbation for the NH cops for their restraint as well as criticism for other police officers / departments who take a more combative view toward their work.

            http://booksbikesboomsticks.blogspot.com/2011/10/cant-win-for-losing.html

          • Anonymous

            I found this story interesting. Since I am old enough to remember protests from the late 60s early 70s I thought it was interesting that only one guy got nailed. I look forward to seeing any videos that were taken at the scene. He could have tripped over a park bench while the crowd was being pushed back or something. I have no doubt that if  a cop hit this guy someone has a digital of it. If no videos come forward I will be very suspicious.  I mean the left is looking for a way to make the establishment look bad so I am sure everyone is on alert to keep their iphones ready. If a cop did beat this guy then in my mind that is a big problem. However, I will reserve judement till I see a video. 

          • http://2012.ak4mc.us/ McGehee

            When you’re calling them to get tough on an “infestation,” you’re calling for stuff like this.

            If you really believe that, you might want to avoid making me wish for the moderators here to get tough on the Chico infestation.

            Leftists lie, and you are a leftist.

  • http://otisthehand.blogspot.com/ OTIS the hand

    This NY Post article is a must read.

    “Occupy Wall Street’s Finance Committee has nearly $500,000 in the bank, and donations continue to pour in — but its reluctance to share the wealth with other protesters is fraying tempers.”

    The COWS are not very good at “spreading the wealth around” when the time comes actually to live by their stated ideals. Shocking. They’ve set up their own little “government” which takes as much money as possible and does not give it back. Hmmm. Could there be an object lesson? Naaah!!

    http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/they_want_lice_of_the_occu_pie_9xKCxcI4aectFYkafMb8UJ

    • Anonymous

      They have learned well from hope and changes pushers.

    • Anonymous

      Some COWS are more equal than others

      • http://profiles.google.com/elilla.shadowheart Elilla Shadowheart

        Off to market with ya.

    • J Motes

      Don’t forget another little source of income: They are taking half of the money given to the drummers in Zuccotti Park. That 50% tax rate assessed against a probably small income doesn’t seem consistent with the Occupiers’ complaint that Wall Street and corporate America (big government, actually) are “stealing” from the 99%. Even the IRS wouldn’t take 50% of the low income the drummers are producing. True to form, the moochers and looters are seizing what they want from the only actual income producers in the group.

  • herddog505

    I’ve seen these questions posed elsewhere, but I repeat them here:

    1.  Where’s all the money coming from?

    2.  Who’s managing it for the OWS crowd?  A bank?  Do they have it in a big tin can buried in a park somewhere?  When the protests are over, what do they plan to do with the money that’s left?  Who makes that decision?

    • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/EU5DQWQTTHTPO4A4ZYSL3AAV2U Adjoran

      I heard early in the protest that some leftist 501 (c) (4) non-profit had agreed to accept donations for the OWS so they had somewhere to put them.  Probably that group is causing the money trouble, because they still have to abide by the rules for disbursing funds – they cannot just hand out cash and say, “Okay, go buy new drums or whatever.”  Each expense must meet the criteria and regulations or they risk their tax exempt status.

      Even without that to deal with, OWS’ own rule on “consensus” decision-making stops quick approvals.

      The money comes from the usual suspects:  leftist groups, individuals, and unions.

      • herddog505

        I read about that non-profit, too.  I immediately thought of Dogbert…

  • Anonymous

    Probably Mikey Moore, Albert Gorebert, Jeanne Giraffalo or some other interloper waiting to cash in on these clowns. 

    • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/EU5DQWQTTHTPO4A4ZYSL3AAV2U Adjoran

      Hey, they didn’t get where they are by giving money to peasants!

      Garofalo probably doesn’t have any to give, she doesn’t work so much these days.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_425GVKQCLFZMQYYENR7CJBRDVA jb

      Yeah, God it’s AWFUL when rich people donate to protesting groups.

      [cough](Koch Brothers > Tea Party)[/cough]

      • herddog505

        WE HATE THE RICH! [cough] give us money [cough]

        • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_425GVKQCLFZMQYYENR7CJBRDVA jb

          WE ACCUSE PEOPLE WHO THINK CORPORATIONS SHOULD PAY TAXES TOO, OF HATING THE RICH! [cough] Corporations are people unless they have to pay taxes [/cough]

  • Anonymous

    So when will the MSM drop the comparison to the Tea Party?

  • Anonymous

    Yeah? Funny how I don’t recall the Tea Parties being gassed and disbursed..  Must be an Incontinence issue..Along with the freeloading of course.

    • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/EU5DQWQTTHTPO4A4ZYSL3AAV2U Adjoran

      Well, we weren’t “speaking Truth to Power,” we were jus’ spittin’ on black congressmen.

  • Anonymous

    I think the Flea Party is old news. Yawn! ww

  • http://profiles.google.com/ozcar.da.grouch Ozcar Grouch
    • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/EU5DQWQTTHTPO4A4ZYSL3AAV2U Adjoran

      Wow . . . who used to be ACORN’s lawyer, anyway?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_AXDLBHGWBWIDXWT2LH62AO7I4M Real American

    Freaking hypocrites. were al fine when the tea baggers claimed to represent all of america. 

  • http://www.locomotivebreath1901.blogspot.com locomotivebreath1901

    Two words: WATER CANNONS.

  • http://www.locomotivebreath1901.blogspot.com locomotivebreath1901

    Two words: WATER CANNONS.