Catholic University “probably acting with malice”… for being Catholic

There was a time when something like this would be dismissed out of hand:

National-shrineA DC-area legal activist has filed a federal human rights complaint against the Catholic University of America (CUA) for acting “probably with malice” against Muslim students for having Catholic imagery in all of its rooms that would hinder Muslim prayer – though the school says it has never heard a complaint from the students themselves.

John Banzhaf, a George Washington University Law School professor who has a history of filing suits to promote agendas on such topics as childhood obesity and tobacco, filed the complaint with the Washington, D.C. Office of Human Rights, Fox News’ Todd Starnes reports. Banzhaf is the same activist who filed a lawsuit against CUA president John Garvey last month for transitioning the college out of co-ed dorms, which he also called a human rights violation.

“It may not be illegal, but it suggests they are acting improperly and probably with malice,” said Banzhaf about the religious imagery in classrooms. “[Muslims] do have to pray five times a day, they have to look around for empty classrooms and to be sitting there trying to do Muslim prayers with a big cross looking down or a picture of Jesus or a picture of the Pope is not very conductive to their religion.”

The piece goes on to note that no Muslims to date have joined in the complaint and that in fact, many attending the university are complimentary of the school.

Again, in the past, this would be easily dismissed as complete crap.  Today, a lawsuit like this is likely to find favor.

It’d be interesting to see what the White House’s take is on this.

Shortlink:

Posted by on October 28, 2011.
Filed under Leftist Tolerance, WTF?.
I blog more regularly at my own place where plain thoughts are delivered roughly. My about page gives you more on who I am.

You can leave a response or trackback to this entry
Up to 90% off top rated local fun!
  • Pingback: Brutally Honest

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_UG44B3BSUSA2IKDMLCB2AMJ4OM Porkulus Chopius

    Chicago’s DePaul University has the highest enrollment of all Catholic universities.

    Recently, they elected a gay student body president.

    http://www.windycitymediagroup.com/gay/lesbian/news/ARTICLE.php?AID=34382

    What’s next, a child molesting priest becoming chancellor?

  • http://www.rustedsky.net Anonymous

    Sounds like this guy’s acting on the ‘Pre-emptive Offense’ principle. 

    “I think they’re probably offended even though they’re not saying anything or joining a lawsuit, so I will go ahead and sue the school and make lots of money!”

    “What?  Oh, sure – I’ll be GLAD to share what I get as damages… after expenses, of course.”

  • herddog505

    Crucifixes in the classrooms of a Catholic university?  ZOMG!  What’s next?  “No alcohol” rules at a Baptist university?  Copies of the Torah laying about at a Jewish university?

    / sarc

    Given that no actual students have complained (yet), I suggest that the case should not only be dismissed, the a**hole who filed it should be fined for wasting the court’s time.  What a jerk.

  • Pingback: The Question That Answers Itself | Wizbang

  • Anonymous

    I wonder how he plans to get standing in this suit.  

  • http://2012.ak4mc.us/ McGehee

    When the suit does fail, expect it to become a progg cause celebre as proof of how Christians are way more extreme in their hatred of other faiths than Muslims are.

    Because having Catholic imagery in a Catholic university is AS ANYONE KNOWS exactly the same as murdering 3,000 innocent people by crashing into them with jetliners.

    • jim_m

      expect it to become a progg cause celebre as proof of how Christians are way more extreme in their hatred of other faiths than Muslims are.

      Yeah, because cutting off someone’s head is SOOOOOOOO much more tolerant.

  • Anonymous

    Just shows what happens when you have federal judges with no balls and who refuse to label someone like Banzhaf a ‘vexatious litigant’.