NBC in the tank for Anthropogenic Global Warming

Well, I expected it to happen, but I didn’t know who would do it. Now I do.

NBC Nightly News ran a story in which anthropogenic global warming was blamed for the October snow storm that struck the northeastern USA.

The reporter who presented the story is Anne Thompson, NBC’s chief environmental affairs correspondent.

From reading the transcript of Thompson’s report, it appears that Thompson knows nothing about the 2005 climate study by climate scientists which says that anthropgenic global warming will result in less snow, not more snow.  If Thompson missed reading about the study in “Geophysical Research Letters” (published by the American Geophysical Union), then she could have read about it in a report published by Columbia University.

Thompson’s report was made worse when she talked about a climate study headed by UC-Berkeley Professor Richard Muller. Here is an excerpt from Thompson’s report:

THOMPSON: Adding to all this, a new study that finds  global warming is real and that the science behind it is not impacted by bias,  bad data or cities that act as heat islands.

Professor RICHARD MULLER (University of  California-Berkeley): The existence of global warming, I think, is pretty much  beyond dispute now. I think we have closed the last remaining questions on  that.

THOMPSON: Muller’s study is getting a lot of attention  because it was funded in part by a foundation backed by Charles and David Koch.  They are oil billionaires and climate change deniers. Today no one can deny that  extreme weather is here to stay.

What Thompson failed to mention is the fact that Muller’s claim is disputed by Muller’s colleague Professor Judith Curry, who chairs the Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at Georgia Institute of Technology. Curry co-authored Muller’s study, and she disagrees with Muller’s conclusion that the Earth is still getting warmer. In short, Curry is accusing Muller of hiding the decline in global warming.

Apparently Thompson’s journalistic skills are not of the same caliber of those who work for the U.K.’s Daily Mail, which first reported the dispute pertaining to Muller’s claim, or those of the Drudge Report, which let the world know about the dispute.

Well, this wouldn’t be the first time that a member of the media had blinders on.

For what it’s worth, I am open to the possibility of global warming taking place, because if it happened once (the Medieval Warm Period), then what is there to prevent it from happening again? However, I am opposed to members of the media overlooking predictions by climate scientists that prove to be false, and I am opposed to members of the media overlooking disputes within the scientific community. This brouhaha about global warming is a dispute about what will happen in the future. According to Socrates, the height of wisdom is to say, “I do not know.” Would it kill people to heed the words of Socrates?

By the way, during the 1970s a TIME magazine story also talked about the occurrence of extreme weather, and what was blamed for such extreme weather? Answer: Global Cooling.

Socrates was correct.

Shortlink:

Posted by on November 4, 2011.
Filed under Global Warming.
A refugee from Planet Melmac masquerading as a human. Loves cats*. In fair condition. A fixer-upper. Warranty still good. Not necessarily sane.[*Joke in reference to the TV sit-com "Alf", which featured a space alien who liked to eat cats. Disclaimer: No cats were harmed in the writing and posting of this profile.]

You can leave a response or trackback to this entry
  • Anonymous

    It’s all in those multi-levels of “fact checking”.

  • Anonymous

    The colder it gets, the more it proves of a warming.. Less facts, more nuance..

  • jim_m

    The science religion is settled!

    • http://profiles.google.com/elilla.shadowheart Elilla Shadowheart

      Hearsay against doctrine!  Quick, warm up the rack!

  • Anonymous

    This has become too tedious to comment on any more.
    RLD

  • Pingback: NBC in the tank for Anthropogenic Global Warming | My Blog

  • Anonymous

    I’m shocked that GE/NBC would run that story.. shocked. Well, maybe not that shocked.  I’m not saying that NBC news is a 30 minute GE infomercial or anything like that……

  • herddog505

    OK, it’s one thing for MiniTru to claim that global warming is causing snowstorms.  But how many normal people are going to buy it?  Judging by the decreasing numbers of people who claim to believe in global warming, fewer and fewer with each passing day.

    On what I think is a related note, Herman Cain’s popularity among Republicans has gone UP since the Politco hit piece was published.  I suggest that people are reading / watching the garbage that comes out of MiniTru and thinking that the OPPOSITE of what is being reported must be the truth.

  • Peter Mizla

    The IPCC will have an updated report out in detail in a few days regarding the likelihood of increased extreme weather of all types becoming the norm as Greenhouse gases increase. The OP does a fine job or cherry picking information then distorting it.

    C02 as  Greenhouse Gas as not been this high in over 15 million years (averaging now around 393ppm and rising 2ppm a year) When C02  was last this high in the Miocene

    see here
    You would have to go back at least 15 million years to find carbon
    dioxide levels on Earth as high as they are today, a UCLA scientist and
    colleagues report Oct. 8 in the online edition of the journal Science.

     

    “The last time carbon dioxide levels were apparently as high as
    they are today — and were sustained at those levels — global
    temperatures were 5 to 10 degrees Fahrenheit higher than they are today,
    the sea level was approximately 75 to 120 feet higher than today, there
    was no permanent sea ice cap in the Arctic and very little ice on
    Antarctica and Greenland,” said the paper’s lead author, Aradhna
    Tripati, a UCLA assistant professor in the department of Earth and space
    sciences and the department of atmospheric and oceanic sciences.

     

    “Carbon dioxide is a potent greenhouse gas, and geological
    observations that we now have for the last 20 million years lend strong
    support to the idea that carbon dioxide is an important agent for
    driving climate change throughout Earth’s history,” she said.
    You would have to go back at least 15 million years to find carbon dioxide levels on Earth as high as they are today, a UCLA scientist and colleagues report Oct. 8 in the online edition of the journal Science.

    http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/last-time-carbon-dioxide-levels-111074.aspx

    • http://www.wizbangblog.com David Robertson

      All I have done is reveal what climate scientists themselves have said.

      In 1975 climate scientists said that extreme weather was the result of global cooling.

      In 2005 climate scientists said that global warming would result in North America receiving less snow.

      This year climate scientist Judith Curry said that global warming had stopped.

      I don’t know what to believe.

      • Anonymous

        Only a minority of climate scentists, in 1975 were saying that the earth was cooling, six out of seven were saying the earth was warming. About the same percentage have recently been predicting there would be more oscillations, extreme weather because of  global warming including snow storms more violent and earlier, as  warmer air first off the ocean and then inland  advances north, to meet incomig Arctic Air. Most of your experts, like those in testifying on behalf of  defense team in a court case , normally they aren´t first -rate) can be found  to plead a  case, any case. .

        • Anonymous

          Only a minority of scientist believed the earth was round at one point or that the sun was center of the solar system. The number of scientist that “believe” something doesn’t really matter. What matters is the truth, if you think we’re getting the truth I “believe” you’re wrong.

    • jim_m

      Thanks for demonstrating correlation and confusing it with causality.  Next explain why CO2 content, which is only 0.03% of the atmosphere outweighs the effects of more influential greenhouse gases like methane and water vapor. Explain also why CO2 should be considered the prime mover in global temperature 15 million years ago when methane was more common.

      Since atmospheric methane has increased 150% in the last 261 years please enumerate your suggestions for dealing with this grave problem.  Do you intend to ban landfills?  Were landfills a significant issue in the mid 18th century when this trend started so we know that they are actually a contributor? 

      Will you demand mass slaughter of ruminant livestock in order to remove the single most significant man made contributor to atmospheric CH4?  Do you believe it a just thing to force a vegan lifestyle on 6 Billion people to satisfy your neurotic fantasies about the environment?

      When you answer those I will have further questions.

      • Anonymous

        Methane traps more heat in the atmosphere than C02, but it quickly converts to CO2. Read

  • Anonymous

    Why let the facts get in the way of a good story.  

  • retired.military

    “NBC in the tank for Anthropogenic Global Warming”

    In other news the sun rose this morning.

  • retired.military

    Peter
    ‘You would have to go back at least 15 million years’

    And we know this because scientists of 15 million years ago left such detailed records.

    • jim_m

      Heretic!

      Peter has brought us evidence of correlation.  Therefore we know that CO2 caused the global warming 15 million years ago and we know that the CO2 was created by the dinosaurs and their gas guzzling automobiles.

      The dinosaurs “drove” themselves to extinction allowing the rustic and simple caveman to inherit the earth.  It is the great wisdom of the OWS protesters and the enviro left that demands that we return to the simple lives of those cave dwellers in order to save the earth. (that is as long as they get to keep their ipads and they can still get free food at McDonald’s)

  • Anonymous

    And, while talking about severe weather, how do we know it wasn’t more severe before we we were here? As far as “severe” goes, climate records for those kinds of events go back about 150 years. The earth is 4 billion years old.  Silly me, I thought global warming was supposed to cause, well, warming. Now it’s severe weather. Mr. Mizla- Maybe you can explain why the alarmist’s guru, James Hanson, still has not complied with the FOIA request for his “data”.  You, know- with all that “settled science”, there should be no reason not to, would there? I didn’t think so.