“This is cause for reassessment”

Herman Cain’s campaign is doing some belly button gazing:

CainIn a conference call this morning, Herman Cain told his senior staff that he is “reassessing” whether to remain in the race. He will make his final decision “over the next several days.”

UPDATE: National Review was on the call. It lasted five minutes.

“Obviously, you’re all aware of this recent firestorm that hit the news yesterday,” Cain began, his voice somber. “First thing I want to do is say to you what I have said publicly: I deny those charges, unequivocally. Secondly, I have known this lady for a number of years. And thirdly, I have been attempting to help her financially because she was out of work and destitute, desperate. So, thinking that she was a friend — and I have helped many friends — I now know that she wasn’t the friend that I thought she was. But it was a just a friendship relationship.”

“That being said, obviously, this is cause for reassessment,” he continued. “As you know, during the summer we had to make some reassessments based upon our financial situation. We were able to hang in there; we reassessed the situation and kept on going. We also did a reassessment after the Iowa straw poll and we made another reassessment after the Florida straw poll. When the previous two accusations, false accusations, came about, we made another assessment. The way we handled those was, we continued on with our schedule. We made an assessment about what was going to happen to our support. But our supporters, and even some folks that we didn’t have as supporters, they stood with us, and they showed it not only in terms of their verbal support, they showed it in terms of their dollars.”

“Now, with this latest one, we have to do an assessment as to whether or not this is going to create too much of a cloud, in some people’s minds, as to whether or not they would be able to support us going forth,” Cain said.

He goes on to speak of the toll this is taking on his wife and family.  His denial this time much more forceful than the lame statement he put out when this first broke.  

I continue to think that the campaign is over but we should know in a day or so.

One thing I do know.  If Ginger White is lying about this, she has committed a most despicable act.

And if Herman Cain is lying, his act I’d consider worse.  Let’s hope the truth gets out and sooner rather than later.

Carry on.

Shortlink:

Posted by on November 29, 2011.
Filed under Herman Cain.
I blog more regularly at my own place where plain thoughts are delivered roughly. My about page gives you more on who I am.

Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Up to 90% off top rated local fun!
  • Pingback: Brutally Honest

  • Anonymous

    Chico called it again.

    • Anonymous

      Called what?

      • Anonymous

        Cain would be dropping out.

        • jim_m

          I’m predicting that the sun will rise tomorrow. 

          My being correct in that prediction will be about as stunning as Chica being correct in his.

          • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OEL6MKIDWFC7LIUHOFEFTKLXQA Stephen

            A lot of conservatives thought Cain was the one. Chico didn’t, he knew the opposite is true.

          • retired.military

            Steve

            Can you get your head any farther up his ass?

            Inquiring minds want to know.

          • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OEL6MKIDWFC7LIUHOFEFTKLXQA Stephen

            Just stating facts, and your obsession with males asses is a bit much. Go troll somewhere else, please.

          • Anonymous

            Two weeks ago about half of the commenters were dead-enders saying Cain was a victim of an MSM conspiracy and that people should ignore the sexual harassment stories.

          • Anonymous

            This is not a sexual harassment story.. And I should be ignoring you. This is MSM feces flinging to avoid talking about the liberals failure at dealing with the Presidency in a way that is constructive for Americans. Nothing more, nothing less.

            Barry & they cannot overcome the elephant in the room.  ”Its the Economy Stupid!” They want an insider establishment rino to be picked bad and will do anything to achieve it.

          • retired.military

            Sounds exactly like what the libs were saying about Clinton.  Only thing is CLinton was guilty.

        • Anonymous

          uhm so if I say Bachmann and Ron Paul will be dropping out, i can post later and say “called it”?

          • Anonymous

            Oh not Ron Paul anything  but that, he’s the man ask Chico.

        • Anonymous

          When? After his 1st or 2nd term?

        • Anonymous

          “Cain would be dropping out.”

          Of what?  Drug Re-hab? Hiatus? The Human race? The Rainbow coalition? The Stupor committee? The Occusquat movement? The 13 year relationship he had with himself before he turned 14? The stupid spectacle of American politics mixed with sensenews fabricational emotion toying reporting of irrelevant entertainment tonight PT Barnum silage?

    • retired.military

      I think that Obama (your hero) will not win in 2012.  Want to bet  on the outcome of the election Chico?  I already have a SIMILAR $100 bet with Bruce Henry.  Are you man enough to take the bet as Bruce Henry was?

    • retired.military

      What’s next Chico?  Shotgun?   Michael Jackson’s doctor will get out of his jail sentence early?  The Dow will rise and fall 100 points on different days over the within the next 3 months?  Please bestow upon us your wisdom.

      Hey Bruce Henry. next time you want to accuse people of juvenile behavior you will be getting a link to Chico’s statement above.

      • jim_m

        About the only thing missing was his saying “First!”

  • Anonymous

    In any event, I’m not swinging support to Romney or anyone yet. A weak field again. Good thing Barry is running against the Economy Stoopid!!

  • http://www.rustedsky.net Anonymous

    Frankly, I hope Cain shoots a middle finger and keeps in the race.

    It smacks a lot on the right of “good ‘ol boy” cronyism.  “He’s not our kind.  He didn’t go to the right schools.  He hasn’t run for President before.  He’s not slick.  He doesn’t have instant answers for everything.  He’s not even been elected to office – how can he have any ideas that’ll help the country?” So we get allegations – and ‘Hey, there’s a bus! Let’s toss him under it!”

    The thing I see about Cain – and it could be right or it could be wrong – is that he’ll find out what he doesn’t know and he’ll find someone who DOES know to advise him. You don’t need to have the annual wool harvest of Wherethehekistan or the current mayor of Bumfuk, Egypt on your mental rolodex, that’s what Google’s for.  Screw the Palestinians and their ‘Right of Return’ – we’ve got bigger problems at home.    You don’t much care about that couple squabbling and throwing dishes in the next apartment when you’re bleeding badly in your own.  And you can dither over a pressure pad or a tourniquet – but you can’t wait long.

    Look at him as someone who’s used to being dropped into a situation where he kind of knows what’s going on, (IE the business world) but has to come up to speed fast and adapt to conditions that change faster than political winds blow.  And ask yourself one really important question:

    Who would you prefer – Obama, or Cain?

    (Shit.  I sound like a Paulbot.  As I said, I think Cain would do very well – I think Romney would do ok.  I think Gingrich would be a good choice.  I think voting for Obama would be the equivalent of saying “Screw this modern shit – I want the US to drop to 3rd World Status, and while we’re at it, let’s make him dictator for life cause i luuuuuuv him just so much.”)

  • Anonymous

    Frankly, the more women who come forward, the less likely I am to give any credence to any of their charges. No Republican candidate would be idiot enough to try to run for the office of President of the United States, especially after Sarah Palin when through what she went through in the 2008 campaign, knowing they had that many women out “there” that could at any moment stand up and torpedo their campaign.

    But I have no confidence that a majority of likely voters see it that way. Too many people watch American Idol and Dancing with the Stars for that to be the case.

    • http://www.wizbangblog.com David Robertson

      No Republican candidate would be idiot enough to try to run for the office of President of the United States, especially after Sarah Palin when through what she went through in the 2008 campaign, knowing they had that many women out “there” that could at any moment stand up and torpedo their campaign.

      I disagree. The Republican Party has idiots, too.

      • Anonymous

        I didn’t say there were no idiots in the Republican Party. My statement was qualified to people running for POTUS. So, care to tell us who among the Republican candidates running you believe is an idiot?

        • http://www.rustedsky.net Anonymous

          Considering the grinder you’ve got to go through to become President, I’d suggest they all are.  But – what we want are COMPETENT idiots – who recognized when they DON’T know enough and get real advisors instead of syncophantic suckups.  The one in office now is not, but thinks he is, and has attracted an entourage looking at profit for themselves, and to hell with the rest of the country.

          (Much like a small child, wanting to take apart something expensive.  Not having any sort of experience in how to disassemble, examine, and reassemble something complex, he breaks it and then wants someone else to fix it (you lazy cretins, get  out there and work, dammit!) or just gets bored and walks away.  (Which might be our best hope.  Hell, I’d take Hillary over Obama in a heartbeat.) But if we vote Obama into office again, we’ll deserve what we get.)

          • Anonymous

            ” Considering the grinder you’ve got to go through to become President, I’d suggest they all are.”

            I accept your definition of idiocy within this context.

            “you lazy cretins, get  out there and work, dammit!”

            The daily beatings will continue until moral improves around here. You’re going to pull this cart or die trying. Pull harder or feel my whip again.

            “But if we vote Obama into office again, we’ll deserve what we get.”

            Then we’ll know with absolute certainty that the real idiots are us.

    • retired.military

      But but Stephen said that the more women come forward the more it is proof that something happened.  When I pointed out that Cain has had 3?4? accusers and Clinton had 7ish yet liberals like Stephen failed to utter his statement he has mysteriously decided not to comment again.

      • Anonymous

        I suspect Stephen would have found it too painful to admit that there were two different sets of rules, one for judging Republicans/Conservatives and a second one for Democrats/Liberals/Progressives.

      • Anonymous

        Funny, I had the same response from my liberal Obama supporter at the office after she entered the lunch room and gleefully asked if I had heard about the new scandal for that, er, uh, well you know, the , uh,  Republican candidate.  [She kept reminding me of the Mel Brooks/Blazing Saddles line:  The Sheriff is a {bell rings}].

        I still love parking my NOBAMA stickered truck in front of her window.

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/EU5DQWQTTHTPO4A4ZYSL3AAV2U Adjoran

    Cain’s campaign didn’t falter because of the harassment accusations – his poll numbers and fundraising went UP after those, in reaction.

    It’s the fact he looks like a deer in the headlights when asked a simple question that caused those who wanted to support him to throw up their hands and look to Newt, of all people.  The guy isn’t ready for prime time.

    But those who defend him on this charge need to figure out just why there are so many calls to his private cell number, and why when the reporters texted Cain from the woman’s phone he called back right away.  I note in passing that Stacy “The Other” McCain, one of the earliest bloggers to support Cain, has trouble getting calls or emails returned promptly. 

    Believe whatever you want, but if you believe there is nothing to this allegation, there’s a government official in Nigeria who has a great deal for you.

    • Anonymous

      The question is how many times he’s called her, not visa versa, and where are the copies of his texts back to her.  She has a history of manipulations and accusations that have not held up in court.

      The real error in his ways if he is telling the truth, is that he let a lying conniver hit him up for money for years.  Now THAT disqualifies him for executive office immediately.  For that reason, he should bow out.

      • Anonymous

        I hear ya. but lying didn’t force Bill Clinton out of office.

        • jim_m

          lying didn’t force Bill Clinton out of office.

          Nope. Term limits did that.

          • Anonymous

            Well, can we at least re-name Billie Clintwad  ” Stonewall Cracksome?”  Yeah, why not..

      • Anonymous

        Well, now maybe naiveté  isn’t an instant disqualifier IF he learns from it.

  • Anonymous

    He was involved with her either way and it shows poor judgement.
    He also doesn’t have a “Bimbo Eruption Team” and that obviously is poor judgement.
     
    His ‘other’ problem of making Obama look good when asked an off script question that turned him into a “deer in headlights” had already blown the bottom out of his campaign.

  • Anonymous

    No cause for Cain supporters. They are still the rabid lunatics they always have been, but with a bonus of extra vitriol for those who never joined the Cain train and will not today.

    • Anonymous

      Yes, I suppose it takes a certain amount of insipid lunacy to believe someone when confronted with a blue stained dress as evidence. Oh, wait. That has not appeared yet. Oh, well. He’s conservative and black so we kill 2 birds with 1 stone and ObamaCare stays under the guise of ‘reaching out for bi-partisan healing’  rino act of 2012.  And the deficit grows exponentially for at least 8 more years.

      Open your eyes!@ 

  • Anonymous

    I was never a Herman Cain supporter but I do find it interesting that the women all seem to have the same pattern of behavior, multiple accusations of sexual harrassment, financial issues, etc. They were going to have a press conference but that never happened, 2 of them have nothing what so ever to say about it, one of them tells a story that’s so over the top it’s nearly impossible to believe. I suppose there could be something to this but I gotta tell you if Cain were a democrat these women would have already had a media rectal exam and had their credibility shredded. So I suppose in the end the war is lost and Cain is toast.

  • Anonymous

    Cain’s lawyer says “it isn’t true, but even if it is true, a politician’s sexual life is out of bounds for the media”. Yeah, sounds real convincing.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OEL6MKIDWFC7LIUHOFEFTKLXQA Stephen

      Cain’s guilty as sin.

      But of course the hypocrites will give him a pass on his sins…

      • jim_m

        Funny how the lefties are all about due process and innocent until proven guilty in a court of law when it’s their lefty thug/stooge/politician in the cross-hairs of a scandal.  But when it’s a conservative, well, they’re just “Guilty as sin”.

        Now what were you saying about being a hypocrite?

        Funny also how the left never believes in sin until they can use it to castigate a conservative for failing to meet a standard they would never hold their side to.  Heck, Clinton could be accused of rape and they never once considered him guilty.  It was the old, “Innocent until proven…”  yada yada crap from the left.

        Take your hypocrisy and stick it steve.

        • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OEL6MKIDWFC7LIUHOFEFTKLXQA Stephen

          Funny how the righties are all about due process and innocent until
          proven guilty in a court of law when it’s their righty
          thug/stooge/politician in the cross-hairs of a scandal.  But when it’s a liberal, well, they’re just “Guilty as sin”.

          Now what were you saying about being a hypocrite?

          Funny also how the right never believes in sin until they can use it
          to castigate a liberal for failing to meet a standard they would
          never hold their side to.  Heck, Cain could be accused of rape and
          they never once considered him guilty.  It was the old, “Innocent until
          proven…”  yada yada crap from the right.

          Take your hypocrisy and stick it jim..

          • jim_m

            Actually, I don’t have a problem with presuming someone’s guilt.  I’m not a court of law so I do not have to maintain any such presumption and I can make my own conclusions based on the information that I have.

            The hypocrisy comes in when anyone trots out the “innocent until proven guilty” line for their person.  The left does it constantly.  Rep Jefferson was caught with $90K in bribe money in his freezer and the dems backed him all the way until he went to the pen.  But merely the spectre of scandal for a conservative and the left howls for a resignation.

            THAT’S the hypocrisy.

            GOP officials step down from office far more quickly than dems do when caught in unethical dealings.  Just look at Charles Rangel if you have any questions on that score.

            In the case of Cain we have several allegations of harassment without any specifics, we have one accusation that is specific, but the accuser isn’t very credible and now we have this woman saying that she had an affair.

            For my part it is all concerning, but I was never a Cain supporter.  I think that his inability to answer policy questions is far more damning than this scandal.

            Now if you just remove your head there will be room for that hypocrisy you were going to stick in its place.

          • jim_m

            The right generally does believe in morality and ethics and sticking to those guidelines.  The left does not.  The standard on the left is whether they can be convicted and if they cannot be then it must be OK.

            The left ignores sexual scandals on its side all the time.  The media covered for Edwards in the most despicable of ways. 

        • retired.military

          “Heck, Clinton could be accused of rape ”

          Here Jim let me fix that for you.

          “Heck, Clinton WAS accused of rape”

          and he was accused of rape.  Does that make him guilty of it?  Nope, it never went to trial.     Why is that good enough for dems now but wasnt good enough for dems like Stephen and Chico back when Clinton was in trouble.

      • retired.military

        Really?  Last time I check a person is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.  You know something like what happened to Clinton. 

        Has Cain committed a crime?  Well sexual harassment may be a crime depending on where you are but is he guiilty of it?  We dont know.  But folks like Steve want to bring out the rope and hang the black republican because as Chico put it ” he looks guilty because he was a wearing his pimpin hat”