I’ve made no secret of my opinion of Representative luaP noR, MD, “R”-TX, over the years.
He’s getting both new found “respect” and deeper examination by the LSM as a consequence of running competitively with the worst President of the post WWII era, and for leading in some polls in Iowa.
Dorothy Rabinowitz of the Wall Street Journal would like to remind the LSM of why the good Doctor is so lightly regarded by Conservatives and other thinking people.
It seemed improbable that the best-known American propagandist for our enemies could be near the top of the pack in the Iowa contest, but there it is.
By Dorothy Rabinowitz, The Wall Street Journal
Ron Paul’s supporters are sure of one thing: Their candidate has always been consistent—a point Dr. Paul himself has been making with increasing frequency. It’s a thought that comes up with a certain inevitability now in those roundtables on the Republican field. One cable commentator genially instructed us last Friday, “You have to give Paul credit for sticking to his beliefs.”
He was speaking, it’s hardly necessary to say, of a man who holds some noteworthy views in a candidate for the presidency of the United States. One who is the best-known of our homegrown propagandists for our chief enemies in the world. One who has made himself a leading spokesman for, and recycler of, the long and familiar litany of charges that point to the United States as a leading agent of evil and injustice, the militarist victimizer of millions who want only to live in peace.
Yep. But you know what’s worse?
Should he somehow win the Republican Nomination for President of the United States, I’ll vote for him, because the SCoaMF is that much worse.