“We want full implementation of the Sharia system…”

“… and we want democracy and the constitution to be suspended.”

Those are the demands from the cretins responsible for bombings in Nigeria targeting Catholic churches:

NigeriaAt a Nigerian Catholic church where a terror attack killed 35 people on Christmas, women tried to clean the sanctuary ahead of Mass on Monday while one man wept uncontrollably amid the debris.

Outside St. Theresa Catholic Church, crowds gathered among the burned-out cars in the dirt parking lot, angry over the attack claimed by a radical Muslim sect and fearful that the group will target more churches.

Rev. Father Christopher Jataudarde told The Associated Press that Sunday’s blast happened as church officials gave parishioners white powder as part of a tradition celebrating the birth of Christ.

Some already had left the church at the time of the bombing, causing the massive casualties. In the chaos after the bombing, Jataudarde said one mortally wounded man, cradling his shredded stomach, begged him for religious atonement.

“Father, pray for me, I will not survive,” the man said, according to the priest.

At least 52 people were wounded in the attack, said Slaku Luguard, a coordinator with Nigeria’s National Emergency Management Agency. Victims filled the cement floors of a nearby government hospital, some crying in pools of their own blood.

On Christmas, attacks by the radical Muslim sect left 39 dead across Africa’s most populous nation. A bomb also exploded amid gunfire in the central Nigeria city of Jos and a suicide car bomber attacked the military in the nation’s northeast.

After the bombings, a Boko Haram spokesman using the nom de guerre Abul-Qaqa claimed responsibility for the attacks in an interview with The Daily Trust, the newspaper of record across Nigeria’s Muslim north. The sect has used the newspaper in the past to communicate with public.

“There will never be peace until our demands are met,” the newspaper quoted the spokesman as saying. “We want all our brothers who have been incarcerated to be released; we want full implementation of the Sharia system and we want democracy and the constitution to be suspended.”

Pope Benedict offered these words in reply:

“Holy Christmas inspires us in a particularly strong way to pray to God so that the hands of the violent are stopped, (hands) that sow death in the world …” the pope said.

He said news of the bombings in Nigeria had brought him “profound sadness” and he wanted to assure Nigeria’s Christian community, hit by “this absurd gesture”, that he was close to them.

“At this moment, I want to repeat once more forcefully: violence is a path that leads only to pain, destruction and death. Respect, reconciliation and love are the only ways to achieve peace,” he said.

I join in prayer for loved ones lost and injured, loved ones left behind to pick up the the pieces of their lives. 

I pray as well for wisdom for Western world leaders as the threat posed by Islamic extremists grows.

Shortlink:

Posted by on December 26, 2011.
Filed under Islam, Religious Liberty, The War On Terror.
I blog more regularly at my own place where plain thoughts are delivered roughly. My about page gives you more on who I am.

Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Up to 90% off top rated local fun!
  • Pingback: Brutally Honest

  • herddog505

    [W]e want full implementation of the Sharia system and we want democracy and the constitution to be suspended.

    So, these cretins want an end to Christianity and democracy.

    Are we sure that they aren’t democrats on vacation?

    /sarc

    “At this moment, I want to repeat once more forcefully: violence is a path that leads only to pain, destruction and death. Respect, reconciliation and love are the only ways to achieve peace,” [the Pope] said.

    While I hate to disagree with the Pope, he’s quite wrong on this: one can also achieve peace out of the bomb bay of a B-52 (figuratively speaking).

    While appealing to our enemy’s better nature and trying to reach a peaceful accomodation with him is the place to start, the fact is that some people simply are not interested in peaceful accomodation until they learn (usually the hard way) that such is the better (i.e. less painful) alternative.  To borrow from a fictionalized Al Capone, you get much further with a kind word and a gun than with just a kind word.  The people and government of Nigeria will have to make it QUITE clear to these beasts that engaging in terrorism will net them nothing but a short stay in prison followed by a long drop at the end of a rope, or else they should go ahead and surrender now and save (some) bloodshed.

    • Anonymous

      Actually, I don’t think what you are saying is in disagreement with Benedict. If we consider the reaction to the violence of the Islamist jihadists, we see that their violence does lead to pain, destruction and death.

      We are not the violent ones. His words are meant for those who are, not for us.

      We, Christians, want to live in peace and are not the ones committing violence on others, but the Church admits that there are times when violence must be met with equal force to protect people. And these cowardly attackers must face that equal force in order to be stopped.

      Wish it wasn’t so, but it is.

  • Anonymous

    Yep.  The “Religion of Tolerance and Peace”.  And if you don’t believe it, we’ll KILL YOU!

  • Anonymous

    The Saudis are the ones funding this type of Islam, they’re the ones paying the imams who preach the most extreme and intolerant messages.  They’ve paid to spread this Wahabism around the world.  If you drill down into any Islamic extremist movement anywhere in the world, you’ll almost always find Saudi money at the bottom of it.

    But they’re our “friends.” 

    • http://2012.ak4mc.us/ McGehee

      So much so, that Obama has blocked most efforts to increase domestic oil production.

      • jim_m

        Yeah.  Thank God obama is ensuring that the US will be dependent upon the Saudis for generations to come.  He could have strengthened the bond between the US and Canada but instead he crapped on the Canadian offer to send their oil here for refining and it may be too late to get it back. 

        So President Genius is sending our money to islamic fascists and sending cheap oil to the Chinese.  That’s what the left calls “Smart Diplomacy”.

    • Anonymous

      I agree Chico.

      I will also note that NO president has ever imparted the one bit of wisdom to the Saudi’s that they should have been told long ago “Stop the madness you export now because for you it’s just one step back to the stone age and we’re about to give you a helping hand there if you don’t.”

      • herddog505

        Within limits, they have the whip hand of us: “Oh, you don’t like our religion, crusader zionists pigs?  Well, that’s fine: you can like it in the dark or in the seat of your non-moving car, ’cause we don’t HAVE to sell you oil.  How d’ya like THEM apples?”

        I also suggest that the Saudis, just like other countries, pay lobbyists to make sure that US politicians know which policies are (ahem) best for everybody.

        • http://2012.ak4mc.us/ McGehee

          One of the reasons OPEC has avoided pulling another of the stupid “embargo” stunts they tried in the ’70s and early ’80s is they discovered that when supply went down, the selling price for all oil went up — so that domestic reserves were accessed that were too expensive before the embargo.

          An anti-drilling Obama maladministration notwithstanding, the Saudis could cut us off and gloat for a few months, if they timed it right — but then their world market share would dwindle and their ability to brandish that whip would never recover fully.

          All the more reason our kowtowing makes no sense.

          • Anonymous

            If the drilling spigot was opened wide in the Gulf, ANWAR, West and East coasts OPEC would only be selling to the Europeans and China. Yes, initially it would sting but the bottom line would be that the yoke of subservience to the oil ticks would be removed radically decreasing the export dollars sent to them that fund their religious radicalism.

          • http://www.rustedsky.net Anonymous

            I LIKE that idea.  

            I’m really getting sick of politicians who continually oppose new production because it’ll ‘take so long’ to get it on line.  But – the time’s going to pass anyway, we’re going to need that oil, so why not open up domestic drilling?

            Maybe too much money we’re sending to Saudi is getting rebated to to folks inside the Beltway…

          • Anonymous

            “It may surprise many, but in less than a decade, the U.S. could pass its 1970s peak as an oil and natural gas producer. If that happens — and many analysts think it’s possible — the U.S. would edge past Saudi Arabia and  Russia to become the world’s top energy producer.”
            http://www.freep.com/article/20111225/NEWS07/112250429/Shale-gas-puts-some-energy-independence-within-reach-for-U-S
            Do you think that Obama/green extremists and their Saudi backers will allow this to happen?

          • jim_m

            Do you think that Obama/green extremists and their Saudi backers will allow this to happen?

            Not a freakin chance.  That’s why the sabotage of any agreement on the Keystoen pipeline.  That’s why the moratorium on drilling in the gulf. obama has declared that he wants to destroy our energy industry and if given four more years he will do just that.

          • Anonymous

            You’re right.  Add the EPA running wild with ideologues instead of scientists [see, e.g. http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/12/26/shutting-down-power-plants-imaginary-benefits-extensive-harm/#more-53705 ], and Obama’s national energy policy will cripple us for years to come.

          • herddog505

            This presupposes that the Saudis are completely rational or that they could not ever become irrational in a fit of picque.

            Yes, an embargo would hurt them.  It might even hurt them badly in the long run.  However, people have a bad tendency to either not think of the long term at all, or else consider only the rosiest projections, or even cast logic and self-interest aside for reasons of pride, revenge, etc.

            Consider that the very Muslim extremists that the Saudis fund also would like to topple the House of Saud, yet the royal family chunks money their way.  Part of this is feeding the crocodile in the hopes that he eats you last, but the rest is ideology.

          • http://2012.ak4mc.us/ McGehee

            This presupposes that the Saudis are completely rational or that they could not ever become irrational in a fit of picque.

            And for us, in the long run, this would be a good thing.

            I repeat: our kowtowing to the Saudis makes no sense.

          • herddog505

            I agree.  I understand realpolitik and the idea of “better the devil you know”, but I don’t care for our country being chummy with trash and thugs like the House of Saud.

      • Anonymous

        Very curious, those blacked-out parts of the 9/11 Commission report, supposedly about Saudi funding and even government resources which went to the hijackers.

        • Anonymous

          Huh?

          ‘If you cant drill em’  Kill em’!!