There are simply no boundaries

Rick Santorum will have to expect more of this if he continues to garner support:

SantorumDuring the question and answer portion of Rick Santorum’s second to last campaign event of the day, a voter brought up a painful memory from the former Pennsylvania senator’s past.

At a Pizza Ranch restaurant in Newton, Iowa,  a member of the audience asked Santorum to react to a controversial attack leveled by liberal Fox News contributor Alan Colmes, who called the Santorum family’s approach to grieving for their dead baby boy, who lived for only two hours after his birth in 1996, “crazy.”

In a Fox News interview on Monday, Colmes characterized Santorum’s decision to bring the deceased child home an example of “some of the crazy things he’s said and done.”

But in Iowa this afternoon, Santorum explained that it was important for his other children to “know they had a brother.”

Santorum’s wife, Karen, who was at the event and listened to her husband talk about the experience, began to weep.

“It’s just so inappropriate,” she said as tears streamed from her eyes.

Earlier on Monday, Colmes criticized Santorum’s handling of the death of the child, Gabriel Michael Santorum.

“Get a load of some of the crazy things he’s said and done, like taking his two-hour-old baby when it died right after child birth home and played with it so that his other children would know that the child was real,” the liberal pundit said in a Fox News interview.

Colmes later apologized and Santorum, as many would expect, was gracious in accepting that apology:

Earlier today, Alan Colmes made headlines by making an unseemly comment about Rick Santorum– namely, about his child who died hours after being born. Colmes let his Twitter followers know that he did his part to apologize to Santorum, and the latter responded to that apology on air today with Sean Hannity, explaining his actions with his child and his acceptance of Colmes’ apology.

Hannity brought up that Colmes had said he had apologized to Santorum and brought the audience to speed on his comments, or at least the subject matter therein. Santorum responded that “there’s a lot of nasty stuff out there on the internet, and I’m sure Alan Colmes reads a lot of that stuff from the left.” He then explained what he had done with the child– remain with him for the night and show him to his siblings after he had passed, as a way to “recognize the dignity of that life”– and added that “it was a tremendously healing experience,” though “I can understand why people may want to do something differently.”

As for his conversation with Colmes, Santorum explained that he accepted. “I know Alan is a very good person at heart,” he told Hannity, “He made a mistake, he admitted the mistake… we all say things and do stupid things.” He did note, however, that it was “part of the culture” for people to make mean comments and impossible to avoid them. “They do say those things, but please, don’t repeat them.”

Sadly, people will, incessantly.  I hope Santorum and his wife will prepare themselves for the nastiness that will come, especially if he does as well as polls are indicating he will today in Iowa.

Shortlink:

Posted by on January 3, 2012.
Filed under 2012 Presidential Race, Meme Watch, Rick Santorum.
I blog more regularly at my own place where plain thoughts are delivered roughly. My about page gives you more on who I am.

Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Up to 90% off top rated local fun!
  • Pingback: Brutally Honest

  • Anonymous

    That IS gracious. Santorum surprised me. Seems like a nice guy.

    • Anonymous

      I’ve met him.when I worked for the PA state Senate (as and for the Democrats, if you can believe it). He is a gracious and genial man. And did not laugh at a joke made at someone’s expense when the rest of the room did. That stuck with me, nearly 17 years later

  • http://otisthehand.blogspot.com/ OTIS the hand

    You’ve gotta love the “non-judgmental” left.

  • herddog505

    Santorum handled it well.  IMO, it would have been more appropriate to invite that scrawny little b*stard Colmes to meet him behind the nearest building and beat his a** like a drum.  I’m not sure on what planet it’s appropriate to mock the death of a man’s child, but Colmes needs to go back there ASAP.

  • Anonymous

    The comments that Colmes made come from some really dark place in the soul. I’ve never been there and don’t wish to go there.

    • Brian_R_Allen

      …. 
      The comments that Colmes made come from some really dark place….

      They do, indeed. They implode from the depths of the Black Hole with which he (as has every other “liberal”) has replaced his soul!

  • Anonymous

    “Take me in, tender woman,
    Take me in, for heaven’s sake,
    Take me in, tender woman,”
    Sighed the snake.

    I don’t know Alan Colmes and to my knowledge I’ve never seen or listened to him, so I have no idea what kind of a person he is. It does seem me that at least on this occasion he lacked the ability to moderate one of his animal instincts (attack, probe for signs of weakness).

    • Brian_R_Allen

      …. 
      I don’t know Alan Colmes and to my knowledge I’ve never seen or listened to him, so I have no idea what kind of a person he is. It does seem me that at least on this occasion he lacked the ability to moderate one of his animal instincts: attack, probe for signs of weakness ….

      Liberalism thrives on its employment, exploitation and manipulation of the lizard-brain. And Alinskyists like Colmes are masters of that game. 

  • http://www.rustedsky.net Anonymous

    It’s all about the win – not about what’s after the election. 

    Any candidate today has to go through garbage like this.  Because it’s not about getting the best possible candidate, it’s about utterly destroying politically anyone who dares to run against you.
     
    And if you manage to get some cheap shots in, hurting them emotionally, so much the better.

    I’ve kind of listened to Alan Colmes in various radio spots – the guy comes across as rather hateful and spiteful.  Might just be his radio personality, but he strikes me as the sort who really gets a ‘tingle’ when something bad happens to someone he doesn’t like, and wouldn’t mind if he were the cause, so long as he isn’t blamed for it. (“No, officer, I don’t know how Michelle Bachman fell down those stairs in front of me. It looked to me like the stupid bitch stumbled over her own feet.”)

    • Anonymous

      Colmes is the unattractive wimpy-looking guy who was hired to play the liberal on Fox across from square-jaw Sean Hannity, right?

      • http://www.rustedsky.net Anonymous

        Heck if I know – but he’s got the personality of a nasty mother-in-law on the radio. 

      • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/EU5DQWQTTHTPO4A4ZYSL3AAV2U Adjoran

        He’s had a nationally-syndicated liberal talk show for many years, not that anyone listens.

      • PBunyan

        Kinda odd thing is Colmes’ wife is far from being hard on the eye, and is the sister of Monica Crowley, who is totally hot, IMHO.  Gotta wonder how their Thankgiving dinners go.

        • Anonymous

          Well, Monica Crowley and Nixon supposedly had something going on, so going ugly might run in the family.

          • PBunyan

            When Monica Crowley turned 18 Nixon was 75, he died 7 1/2 years later when she was 25.   I know you’re often a bit short on logic and reason, but this really takes the cake.  I won’t accuse you of bullshit though– just a simple lack critical thinking skills and the propensity to believe things without even trying to think just a little bit about whether they make sense or not.

          • Commander_Chico

            So it was a May-December romance.  Are you saying Nixon was impotent in his last years? 

          • PBunyan

            No, I’m saying the likelihood of Crowley and Nixon having “something going on” is about the same as the likelihood of Obama getting through an entire interview or speech without a single lie or logical fallacy.  (i.e., Zero)

            The likelihood of some hate-filled Maxist starting this totally unsubstanciated rumor as revenge for Crowley being an outspoken conservative that worked for Nixon and wrote an honest and fact filled book about him is the same as the likelihood of a Democratic candidate being a pro-abortion, anti-capitalist, global warming believer. (i.e., 99.99999%)

          • Hank_M

            Chico, you’re entering Colmes territory here.
            Don’t stoop that low. It isn’t worth it.

      • Brian_R_Allen

        …. 
        Colmes is the unattractive wimp “liberal” on FoxNews …. 

        Only one of them.

        Eighty-five percent of FoxNews employees are “liberals” and fit that description.

        And provide a constant reminder Mr Murdoch’s NewsCorp, word-wide,  employs more totalitarians than do Hu and Putin, combined! 

    • Anonymous

      “Any candidate today…”  One minor quibble.  I would rephrase that to read “any Republican candidate today.  For a Dem it’s the three monkeys approach by the MSM – at least the speak no evil part.

      • http://www.rustedsky.net Anonymous

        Nope, it’s a full three. 

        But it’s all about the win – they’re not worried about the aftermath.

    • Brian_R_Allen

      …. 
      Alan Colmes comes across as hateful and spiteful ….

      And in morbid Denial and pathologically Projecting.

      As does every other sufferer from the Fascissocialist Psychosis. 

  • Anonymous

    It is an ugly business.  Candidates have their backgrounds examined and twisted to look negative.  If nothing can be found, something will be made up.

    Is it any wonder that the best in our society don’t get involved?

    • Anonymous

      Certainly the best aren’t involved this year.   A collection of phonies, whackos, and a-holes.   And yes, that includes Obama.  

      Man, I hope Gary Johnson goes third-party this year.  

      • Anonymous

        I think he has already announced that he is quitting the run for the Republican nomination and that he will seek the Libertarian nomination.

        ________________________________
        From: Disqus
        To: ackwired@yahoo.com
        Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2012 8:48 AM
        Subject: [wizbang] Re: There are simply no boundaries

        Disqus generic email template

        Commander_Chico wrote, in response to ackwired:
        Certainly the best aren’t involved this year.   A collection of phonies, whackos, and a-holes.   And yes, that includes Obama.
        Man, I hope Gary Johnson goes third-party this year.
        Link to comment

        • Anonymous

          You hope Johnson goes 3rd party so you don’t have to vote for Obama or what? All Gary Johnson can do is get Obama re-elected.

  • Anonymous

    I figured Rick would be a hard-core Santorum fan, as they are fellow Catholic religious fanatics, but he’s late to the party.

    But Santorum’s just another decoy for the benefit of the Romney juggernaut.

  • Anonymous

    Skeletor has never been kind. But he always sticks pretty close to the Democratic Party talking points. I wonder if that’s what happened this time.

    • Brian_R_Allen

      …. 
      Skeletor has never been kind. But he always sticks pretty close to the Democratic Party talking points. I wonder if that’s what happened this time ….

      They moved the talking points, of course. 

      Lubburrals have no individual and/or original ideas.

  • Anonymous

    I for one despise Alan Colmes and Ed Schultz as much as I despise Hannithy and Limbaugh but we have a First Amendment so they are the price we pay.

    I live in Iowa and the last 2 weeks here have been nothing much but a poo fight between most of the candidates. Hateful and spiteful things have been said about each of them from each of them.

    There is no party immune from this crap and it’s a sad commentary. But then there’s that First Amendment…

    • herddog505

      God bless it.

    • Anonymous

      I miss the pork loin sandwiches… And loose meat at the Canteen…

    • http://www.rustedsky.net JLawson

      “Hateful and spiteful things have been said about each of them from each of them.”

      And again, it’s all part of the game they play.  Yes, they’ll say shit – but in the end they all shrug it off and go have a beer.  What they don’t realize is the damage they do to their image.  One candidate spends weeks tearing down another, poisoning the electorate against his opponent, then when he loses we’re supposed to (without any hesitation) toss our support to the man he was villifying as Satan Incarnate a week ago?

      And the media just laps it up, egging on the whole process.

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/EU5DQWQTTHTPO4A4ZYSL3AAV2U Adjoran

    Leftists are all like this.  Look at the vitriol tossed at Sarah Palin and her family.

    If you’re a patriot and a Christian, the leftists will say anything to disparage you and your beliefs, as they see all virtues as threats to their perverted ideology.

  • Anonymous

    Please. All that “vitriol” made Sarah Palin and her daughter Reality TV stars and a jillion bucks. She loves it.

    Now, what Colmes said was completely reprehensible. I would say unforgivable. It says a lot about Santorum that he was so gracious about it. Makes me see him in a different light.

    I still think he’d be a lousy president, but he’s a better human being than I gave him credit for.

    • Stephen

      Agree. Santorum could and perhaps should have been a lot less congenial in his response. Basically, it’s none of Colmes f&cking business.

      Just like it’s none of Santorum’s f&cking business if same sex life partners choose to get married… but Santorum cannot figure that out.

      • PBunyan

        Does it bother you Stephen that Obama’s stated position on same sex marriage is the same as Santorum’s?   Why can’t Obama figure out it’s none of his f’ing business? 

        (No need to answer.  Everyone one know’s he was just straight faced lying when he said that and now he’s even starting to Romney on it a bit.)

    • Anonymous

      Santorum outdoes the others in promising to bomb Iran and torture more Muslims, not sure how decent that is.

      • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/EU5DQWQTTHTPO4A4ZYSL3AAV2U Adjoran

        I understand you believe the decent thing to do is to let them bomb us again and again without acting, but that’s because you’re a leftist tool.

        • Commander_Chico

          When did Iran bomb the USA? I don’t remember that.

          Santorum was the guy who told John McCain he didn’t know anything about torture, right?

    • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/EU5DQWQTTHTPO4A4ZYSL3AAV2U Adjoran

      Yes, I’m sure the Palin family loves having their handicapped child made fun of and their parentage disputed, and having Letterman make jokes about their 14 year old daughter being raped by an adult ballplayer.

      I’ve followed Colmes for years and don’t believe he is the heartless bastard his callous remarks make him out to be.  It’s associating with the left for so long which has worn away his sensitivity for decency.

  • http://profiles.google.com/jinxmchue Jinx McHue

    Liberals don’t understand babies.  All they understand is chopping them up while they are still in the womb.  Grieving over one’s deceased baby is confusing and offensive to them.

    • Anonymous

      I’m a liberal.

       If you knew anything about my family, about what happened to my babies, you’d know that saying what you just said is just as offensive as what Colmes said, you punk.

  • Anonymous

    That’s the kind of comment I’d expect from Bill Maher. Colmes has always been a bit punkish, but this is the kind of crap you expect to find on Air America or MSNBC.

  • Brian_R_Allen

    That kind of comment is as ordinary/everyday from Alan Colmes as from Bill Maher or from any other sufferer from the Fascissocialist Psychosis. 
    Those who don’t get that “liberalism” is an any-means-to-an-end totalitarianism are likely, themselves, already halfway to being liberals!