‘This is not a “Sit-It-Out-And-Pout” election’

Gerard Vanderleun is passing on some wisdom for those of us who aren’t exactly enamored with Barack Hussein Obama:

AanobamasignsYes, nothing is damaging the “Conservative Brand” lately more than the rolling stupidity that is lumping itself around the failure of the Republicans to come up with a viable candidate that is more “Conservative” than Mitt Romney. This “failure”, which was predictable as long as four years ago, is causing many online ‘conservatives to drop into premature political menopause with whining, hot flashes of anger, and the grinding of dull, old, axes. They are pissed, it would seem, because nobody other than Romney can carry the fight to Obama in the coming election. The more demented among them are declaring, shades of McCain/2008, that they will take their retracted balls and go home on election day rather than vote against Obama.

These people are deeply stupefied and confused. Ideology will do that to you. They seem to think, to actually believe, that this coming election is about only voting if you can vote for a candidate you like. Let me disabuse these kids of this silly notion right away. The election of 2012 ain’t a conservative popularity contest. It’s a war to, first, last, and always, destroy any possibility of a second term for Barack Hussain Obama.

This is not a “Vote-For” election. This is a “Vote-Against” election. This is not a “Sit-It-Out-And-Pout” election. This is a “Get-Obama-Out” election. That is what it is about and that is all it is about.

If people can’t understand, at this point, that very simple concept their minds are much too simple to be conservatives and they might as well go off and sit at the kiddy table and write in “Vermin Supreme” with a blunt pink crayon.

If true conservatives want to have a truly conservative candidate in a truly conservative party they will have to commit to the long march. You know, “the long march” like the one the left took through out political, academic, religious, and media institutions. The one they spent decades on. The long hard road to political supremacy. The one that takes work and money.

That’s the one thing I don’t see erstwhile conservatives actually doing from election to election. Instead they run their lives and their businesses off on the side and they show up every three years or so to watch the little red hens of politics take the nomination away from their conservative flavor of the week.

The way the Republican party is set up in the primary system means that to even have a shot at winning it you have to be running for it years and years and years before the actual elections. That’s what Romney’s been doing. That’s the game and he’s got the pieces in place to win it. You may not like it, but, hey, change it or play it.

But if you’re beat because your “choices” are late to the party like Perry, or not really in it to win it like Mitt, don’t start blaming Romney the little red hen.

It’s just not dignified to hold your breath, stamp your feet, and threaten to take your retracted balls and go home.

So suck it up and remember this: This is not a “Sit-It-Out-And-Pout” election. This is a “Get-Obama-Out” election.

Go now, my conservative friends, and sin no more.

He’s right.  The goal must be to unseat BHO.  And though I’m certainly no Mitt fan, I’ll take this paler shade any day over who currently sits at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.

I suggest those of you who agree start acting like you agree.

Shortlink:

Posted by on January 14, 2012.
Filed under 2012 Presidential Race, Republicans.
I blog more regularly at my own place where plain thoughts are delivered roughly. My about page gives you more on who I am.

Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Up to 90% off top rated local fun!
  • Pingback: Brutally Honest

  • Dodo David

    Well said.

  • http://profiles.google.com/nomad990 me myself

    I’m voting ABO in November. Anybody But Obama.

    • http://wizbangblog.com/author/rodney-graves/ Rodney G. Graves

      Ayup.  Down to and including luaP noR.

      • http://profiles.google.com/jinxmchue Jinx McHue

        At this point, about the only person that could lose to Obama is Hitler.  Hitler or Fred Phelps.  Or that homeless guy who kicks puppies.

    • retired.military

      I think that McCain taught us a lesson if nothing else.  ABO for me.  (Even though I voted McCain in 2008 I did it holding my nose.  will do the same for Romney).

      • http://wizbangblog.com/author/rodney-graves/ Rodney G. Graves

        Same here (voting for McCain with nose tightly held), and will do so again for whoever get’s the Republican Nomination.

        ABO 2012

      • Mr Kimber

        I did the same RM. What I knew about BHO I did not like but he is worse then I thought…so anti America. This MF taught me a lesson…it will take yrs to undo what he’s done. This country can’t take another 4 yrs.

    • http://profiles.google.com/jinxmchue Jinx McHue

      I think that failed in 2008, but will succeed after 4 years of actually having Obama in power.  People didn’t know what they would be getting back then, but now that they’ve actually lived it, they won’t make the same mistake.

      • http://wizbangblog.com/author/rodney-graves/ Rodney G. Graves

        From your keyboard to the electorate’s displays…

  • cacchip

    Amen brother. 

  • JWH

    Something else to think about folks:  What concessions are you willing to allow your nominee — both at election time and when he governs — in order to secure the support of independent voters?  

  • John H

    A fun game is to start a list of who is eligible (e.g No Hugo Chavez) and would be worse than Obama. Mitt doesn’t make the list. Michelle Obama would make the list. See if you can get more than a handful. 
    The real danger is that the dems may buy a clue and figure out that Obama isn’t their strongest horse. If Obama made a graceful exit (“If nominated, I will not run. If elected, I will not serve. I must decline (for my health/ to spend more time with family/ To catch up on Rev. Wright sermons/ fill in the blank) and they put in Hillary, this contest doesn’t become about Obama anymore. Hillary can run away from Obama’s legacy to a much greater degree. Fortunately, Obama’s ego isn’t capable of letting him see reality and bow out. 

    • http://wizbangblog.com/author/rodney-graves/ Rodney G. Graves

      Joe Biden
      Nancy Pelosi
      Harry Reid

      • MunDane68

        Barbara Boxer
        Chuck Schumer
        Dick Grayson

    • Evil Otto

      Little danger of Obama dropping out, John. You’re right, one thing about the man, his ego is massive. A smarter person would see the writing on the wall and get out while the getting was good, but Barack Obama, the lightworker? Not going to happen.

      If, for some reason he did drop out, the black vote would abandon the Democrats in droves. That doesn’t mean they would vote Republican… many would simply stay home, ensuring a crushing defeat for Hillary… something she knows. No, the Democrats have tied themselves to the mast of Barack Obama, and they’re going to ride it down to the bottom of the ocean.

    • Gmacr1

      Obama’s ego will not allow him to step aside. Well, that and the fact that the first Wookie enjoys all the lavish parties, vacations and attendants at her beck & call.

  • Evil Otto

    I agree. The Democrats must be crushed this election. I want them to fear ever nominating anyone like Barack Obama ever again.

    • Mr Kimber

      I will vote for anybody the Republicans nominate. BHO got to go.

    • http://wizbangblog.com/author/rodney-graves/ Rodney G. Graves

      What is best in life is to crush the democrats, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of the LSM.

      • http://profiles.google.com/jinxmchue Jinx McHue

        Awesome!  ;)   I’m so stealing that.

        • http://wizbangblog.com/author/rodney-graves/ Rodney G. Graves

          Just be sure to link back to my comment!

  • ackwired

    Yep.  The extreme conservative domination of the Republican Party appears to be over.  They had their chance and went with W.  As the man says, they will now have to wait a few years for another opportunity.

    • http://profiles.google.com/jinxmchue Jinx McHue

      Do you have a life, or do you just sit around waiting for the newest Wizbang post to go up so you can once again immediately show us all how incredibly, unbelievably stupid and asinine you are?

      George W. Bush is not president anymore.  He hasn’t been for almost 3 years.  Get over it already.  Get treatment for your Bush Derangement Syndrome.  You pissed and moaned when people brought up Clinton during the first year of GWB’s presidency and those people stopped bringing him up.  Yet here we are 3 years on and it’s “Bush did this!  Bush did that!  It’s all Bush’s fault!” 24/7 with you lackwits.

      The extreme liberal domination of the Democrat Party (I refuse to call them “Democratic” because they are not democratic) is over.  You idiots had the House, Senate and White House and all you did was screw this country over.  The “hope and change” promised never came.  You mouth-breathers have consistently tried to pin it all on GWB, but the fact of the matter is he’s not president anymore.  Your side took a massive, crippling (as much as you can cripple an impotent party) hit in the midterms and this year’s election will seal the deal.  I hope you thoroughly enjoy this coming year because it will be the last you will be able to enjoy for a while.  You have guaranteed through your own incompetence that the Democrats
      will not hold any significant power in Washington for a long, long time.

      • ackwired

        I didn’t say any of those things.  I just agreed with my fellow Republican writer that the extreme conservatives have lost control of the Republican Party.  But if you feel you knee jerking and you want to vent on me, feel free.

        ________________________________
        From: Disqus
        To: ackwired@yahoo.com
        Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2012 4:42 PM
        Subject: [wizbang] Re: ‘This is not a “Sit-It-Out-And-Pout” election’

        Disqus generic email template

        Jinx McHue wrote, in response to ackwired:
        Do you have a life, or do you just sit around waiting for the newest Wizbang post to go up so you can once again immediately show us all how incredibly, unbelievably stupid and asinine you are?
        George W. Bush is not president anymore.  He hasn’t been for almost 3 years.  Get over it already.  Get treatment for your Bush Derangement Syndrome.  You pissed and moaned when people brought up Clinton during the first year of GWB’s presidency and those people stopped bringing him up.  Yet here we are 3 years on and it’s “Bush did this!  Bush did that!  It’s all Bush’s fault!” 24/7 with you lackwits.
        The extreme liberal domination of the Democrat Party (I refuse to call them “Democratic” because they are not democratic) is over.  You idiots had the House, Senate and White House and all you did was screw this country over.  The “hope and change” promised never came.  You mouth-breathers have consistently tried to pin it all on GWB, but the fact of the matter is he’s not president anymore.  Your side took a massive, crippling (as much as you can cripple an impotent party) hit in the midterms and this year’s election will seal the deal.  I hope you thoroughly enjoy this coming year because it will be the last you will be able to enjoy for a while.  You have guaranteed through your own incompetence that the Democrats will not hold any significant power in Washington for a long, long time. Link to comment

      • lasveraneras

        There, spot on.  For years I’ve refused to use the term “Democratic” in referring to the Democrat Party.  The word “democratic” has a meaning and the Democrat Party hasn’t gotten close to fitting the definition in decades.

    • herddog505

      Bush was an “extreme conservative”???  George “Prescription Drug Benefit, No Child Left Behind, Bailouts” Bush???

      • ackwired

        Yeah.  That was pretty ironic, wasn’t it.  But he was nominated by the social conservatives who form a large portion of the extreme conservative branch.  He used the code words to appeal to evangelicals.  He was one of them.  Everyone else know that it did not work out well, and the party appears to have looked to more moderate presidential candidates since then.

        ________________________________
        From: Disqus
        To: ackwired@yahoo.com
        Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 1:54 AM
        Subject: [wizbang] Re: ‘This is not a “Sit-It-Out-And-Pout” election’

        Disqus generic email template

        herddog505 wrote, in response to ackwired:
        Bush was an “extreme conservative”???  George “Prescription Drug Benefit, No Child Left Behind, Bailouts” Bush??? Link to comment

        • lasveraneras

          Fine.  “He used the code words to appeal to evangelicals.”  So?  What did he DO, repeat DO, that made him an “extreme conservative?”  The evangelical Christians are a significant voting block.  All political candidates play to their base.  But eventually they have to govern.  Again, what did he DO that makes him an “extreme conservative.”  Was it the re-instatement of the Mexico City Policy concerning abortions?  That’s “extreme?”  He may have “used code words” as a candidate, but both before and after the election, he and his wife stated they would not seek to overturn Roe vs Wade.  His administration rule AGAINST parental notification.  Again, what did he DO that makes him an “extreme conservative?”  BTW since conservatives believe in individual freedom, respect for private property and markets, and small, limited government, how can you be “extreme” about these issues?  I await enlightenment.

          • http://wizbangblog.com/author/rodney-graves/ Rodney G. Graves

            @lasveraneras:disqus You’ll find that @ackwired:disqus hears dog whistles he claims are keyed to various forms of bigotry that no one else seems to hear.

          • ackwired

            There may be a semantics problem here.  Let’s try to not get emotional about it.  The evangelicals are a part of the extreme conservatives, a significant part.  W was associated with them.  I am simply saying that the extremists lost control of the Republican party as a reaction to the dissatisfaction with W’s presidency.  Extreme conservatives are the social conservatives and the extremely militaristic conservatives.  The libertarian virtues that you cite are nearly always cited in their rhetoric, but not always in their actions.

            ________________________________
            From: Disqus
            To: ackwired@yahoo.com
            Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 11:10 AM
            Subject: [wizbang] Re: ‘This is not a “Sit-It-Out-And-Pout” election’

            Disqus generic email template

            lasveraneras wrote, in response to ackwired:
            Fine.  “He used the code words to appeal to evangelicals.”  So?  What did he DO, repeat DO, that made him an “extreme conservative?”  The evangelical Christians are a significant voting block.  All political candidates play to their base.  But eventually they have to govern.  Again, what did he DO that makes him an “extreme conservative.”  Was it the re-instatement of the Mexico City Policy concerning abortions?  That’s “extreme?”  He may have “used code words” as a candidate, but both before and after the election, he and his wife stated they would not seek to overturn Roe vs Wade.  His administration rule AGAINST parental notification.  Again, what did he DO that makes him an “extreme conservative?”  BTW since conservatives believe in individual freedom, respect for private property and markets, and small, limited government, how can you be “extreme” about these issues?  I await enlightenment. Link to comment

      • http://wizbangblog.com/author/rodney-graves/ Rodney G. Graves

        Only on ackwired’s planet.

    • Gmacr1

      May I be so kind as to point out that W was hardly considered a “conservative” at the time, still isn’t.

      • ackwired

        I would agree that there are reasons not to consider him conservative.  That was not the point.

        ________________________________
        From: Disqus
        To: ackwired@yahoo.com
        Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 11:38 AM
        Subject: [wizbang] Re: ‘This is not a “Sit-It-Out-And-Pout” election’

        Disqus generic email template

        Gmacr1 wrote, in response to ackwired:
        May I be so kind as to point out that W was hardly considered a “conservative” at the time, still isn’t. Link to comment

  • GarandFan

    Yeah, the ‘I stayed home’ bunch really showed the country.  Didn’t they?

  • matt noell

    so this column is what passes for “wisdom” in CONservative land. No wonder you get the candidates you have.
        And then this:”The election of 2012 ain’t a conservative popularity contest. It’s a war to, first, last, and always, destroy any possibility of a second term for Barack Hussain Obama.This is not a “Vote-For” election. This is a “Vote-Against” election. This is not a “Sit-It-Out-And-Pout” election. This is a “Get-Obama-Out” election. That is what it is about and that is all it is about.”
     LOL @ you. The last three YEARS have been ALL this is about for the CONservatives in America. No more proof is necessary to conclude “party before country” is the motto of the Republican Party. Yes, Obama has been a failure. From continuing the disastrous Bush tax cuts, to conceding single-payer before negotiations even started on HCR, torture, Gitmo, failure to prosecute the previous Administration for ADMITTED crimes, yes, FAILURE!
      IT DOES NOT MATTER WHO IS PRESIDENT!!! If any of you posters here high – fiving this blogger had ANY patriotism, you would be looking for and campaigning for the candidates that promise and show means of achieving plans for Job Creation, Ending Wars, fair tax reform, etc, issues that ACTUALLY MEAN SOMETHING, instead of circle -J3&king over THIS tripe.Cheesus…..

  • matt noell

    so this column is what passes for “wisdom” in CONservative land. No wonder you get the candidates you have.
        And then this:”The election of 2012 ain’t a conservative popularity contest. It’s a war to, first, last, and always, destroy any possibility of a second term for Barack Hussain Obama.This is not a “Vote-For” election. This is a “Vote-Against” election. This is not a “Sit-It-Out-And-Pout” election. This is a “Get-Obama-Out” election. That is what it is about and that is all it is about.”
     LOL @ you. The last three YEARS have been ALL this is about for the CONservatives in America. No more proof is necessary to conclude “party before country” is the motto of the Republican Party. Yes, Obama has been a failure. From continuing the disastrous Bush tax cuts, to conceding single-payer before negotiations even started on HCR, torture, Gitmo, failure to prosecute the previous Administration for ADMITTED crimes, yes, FAILURE!
      IT DOES NOT MATTER WHO IS PRESIDENT!!! If any of you posters here high – fiving this blogger had ANY patriotism, you would be looking for and campaigning for the candidates that promise and show means of achieving plans for Job Creation, Ending Wars, fair tax reform, etc, issues that ACTUALLY MEAN SOMETHING, instead of circle -J3&king over THIS tripe.Cheesus…..

    • http://wizbangblog.com/author/rodney-graves/ Rodney G. Graves

      Post it a third time so we’ll know you really are that far gone.

    • herddog505

      So, let’s recap, shall we?

      You admit that Barry’s been a “FAILURE!”

      We want to get him out of office.

      And we’re – somehow – stupid and even unpatriotic for this???

  • matt noell

    not my fault Wizbang has crappy servers….

    • http://wizbangblog.com/author/rodney-graves/ Rodney G. Graves

      Feel free to go somewhere (anywhere) with less “crappy servers…”

  • matt noell

    and the only thing I’ve noticed that is “far gone” are the sheep that make up today’s CONservative faction, led there by the likes of Flush Rimjob, Sean Vannity, GFlenn Beckkk, etc.

    • http://wizbangblog.com/author/rodney-graves/ Rodney G. Graves

      And our latest troll is already reduced to scatology, sexual innuendo, licentiousness, and the race card.  Obviously an understudy of DWS.

    • Gmacr1

      Luap Nor much?

  • Pretzel__Logic

    I agree. I heard someone say recently, there will never be a perfect candidate. What I recall of 1979 is Reagan wasnt quite Reagan till he became well..Reagan.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_G7YIUZMXOD5JGZZTCYMVA75KFU Shadow

    Anybody but a Democrat, now and forever!  We’ll take on the rest of the stinking liberals (RHINOS) later.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_IZ5BM5GNLA54OADSWGSXAMA7SY Jay

    Good luck with that.  If Romney or Santorum gets the ticket, Obama will win again.  

    • Gmacr1

      Really?
      I would say that the color of the sky in your world is vastly different than the one in reality.

      I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again now, “I could run roadkill and beat the (P)resident.”

      His favorability polling has been underwater since his 1st year in office and it isn’t getting any better with each piece of the Constitution he wipes his ass with. This election may set a record that beats the Nixon/McGovern ’72 election results in states lost and total vote numbers by “broken glass” conservatives.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_IZ5BM5GNLA54OADSWGSXAMA7SY Jay

        I’ve spent a LOT of time showing the reasons Romney won’t win.  If people don’t like Obama, Romney is in the exact same vein as him.

        If he wins the nomination, expect the US to go ABOAR “Anyone but Obama and Romney”.

        I’d rather pick Ron Paul, than deal with Romney and his using the presidential office as a corporate holding place for his own cronyism.

        • http://wizbangblog.com/author/rodney-graves/ Rodney G. Graves

          There you go projecting again…

  • http://profiles.google.com/rtssdorsai Jeff C

    I agree anyone but Obama …  but why Romney ?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_R7FMXY3DZP7JF7SGSPIOSLLXNE Stephen

    Romney’s the one the GOP Elite decided was electable.

    Did you have a choice in the matter? Nope, your voite doesn’t count.

    Now shut the f&ck up and quit complaing and vote for the guy the GOP elite tells you to vote for.

    • http://wizbangblog.com/author/rodney-graves/ Rodney G. Graves

      So stephen, remind us again who is campaigning against 0bama in the democratic primaries again?  What?  No one?  You’re just projecting again?