Restoring American Exceptionalism – Chicago Townhall

I just got back from a wonderful evening taking school choice at the Restoring American Exceptionalism, Chicago Townhall. In attendance were radio talk show host Michael Medved, Fox News contributor Juan Williams, and Dr. Paul Worfel, Director of Education of Trinity International University. The discussion was moderated by John Tillman of the Illinois Policy Institute.

The event was sponsored by National School Choice Week, an effort by Americans for Prosperity, and is one of many events being held across the country to encourage parents, legislators, and activists to work toward allowing parents a choice in their children’s education. Co-sponsors were Townhall.com, Salem Radio Networks, and Chicago’s WIND Radio, AM 560

Arriving at the sprawling campus of Trinity International University of Deerfield, Illinois, the biting cold outside was quickly forgotten by the warm reception all received by the event staff. The program started promptly with an introduction by local radio host Big John Howell of AM 560, WIND radio who turned the program over to John Tillman of the Illinois Policy Institute.

The night’s debate was nicely balanced from right, center and left with a panel featuring the conservative side of the debate on education represented by talk show host Michael Medved, the center represented by Fox News contributor Juan Williams, and the more traditional educrat’s position taken by Dr. Worfel.

I won’t repeat the whole discussion, but here are some of the more interesting (and some might say provocative) highlights.

Juan Williams was one of the first to reply to Mr. Tillman’s prompting and in no uncertain terms he pointed out that unions and parents are basically at odds with “quite distinct missions” in mind for our American education system. The education establishment, Williams said, was separated between unions interested in their own needs and students and their parents that want a better education for kids.

This is all damaging education in America. “You’ll find that American children are falling behind and in terms of the global economy our education system is failing children in both the inner cities and the suburbs,” Williams lamented.

“One child in America drops out of school every 26 seconds. That is a national crisis,” Williams said.

Worse, these kids that drop out are now at a severe disadvantage when starting out their lives. “What do these kids do,” Williams asked. “They dream they are going to be a rapper, they dream they are going to be an NBA star.” This is all unrealistic, Williams said. “It’s criminal and I think its led to a crisis in American education.”


Interview with Michael Medved on school choice

Mr. Tillman chimed in to note that because of unions, improving education is difficult at best “It’s very difficult to hold bad teachers to account and difficult to reward good teachers. How do we wrest it from the teacher’s unions?”

Williams went on to point out that one of the biggest problems is the preponderance of single parent families. “We need to talk about the achievement gaps based on the kids that come from single parent families compared to two parent families,” he said.

Williams also pointed out that the black culture in America is detrimental to the success of minorities. How can black kids succeed when they are told to avoid looking or sounding intelligent? “How totally insulting is it when people say ‘you’re acting white’ when you succeed,” Williams said.

Michael Medved expanded on that by decrying the lack of Americanism in the classroom. “This is the only country in the history of the earth that was started based on a good idea,” he said. “But today, kids don’t learn the basic Americanism that is going to be crucial for their later success.”

Mr. Tillman then went into more discussion of teachers unions saying that 9 of the top ten best schools for graduation rates in Illinois are charter schools, institutions that don’t have to worry much about union influence. Tillman also noted that public education did not start getting unionized until the mid 60s and that is exactly when results started to go downhill.

Dr. Worfel hastened to note that the influx of unions into education doesn’t necessarily equate as cause and effect in the downturn in educational outcomes in America. Worfel reminded the audience that it was also in the1960s when students that weren’t included in the past had flooded the system. Minority students that were offered a lesser standard of education previously were bound to cause results to fall once they were included in the whole system, he insisted.

Williams, however, was focused on the need to allow parents a larger part in their children’s education. “The heart of education is power to the parents,” he said. “Parents are interested in getting their children into the best schools. Choice is absolutely at the heat of the answer.”

But Williams worried over the fact that too many parents are not as involved as they should be. “Why aren’t parents up in arms? They should be leading this fight.” But Williams was sure that given a choice, “parents will make the right decision.”


Interview with Juan Williams on school choice

So where do we go from here? Medved offered an idea.

“How do you break the power of teachers unions so that they serve the students instead of the union? Here’s the bargain: we will allow the tax increases that legislators and schools want IF as a corresponding benefit there is more choice in education. Some of that tax money needs to go back to the student. That would be our grand bargain.”

Shortly afterward, the subject of the recall effort being launched by progressives in Wisconsin against Governor Scott Walker, an education reformer, was broached. Williams was disgusted at the whole scene.

“The recall in Wisconsin has just become a union-funded effort to oust the governor. But he was democratically elected. To me this is like the Empire Strikes Back, the unions are saying in terms of school reform it’s not going to happen. But it’s not about that, it’s about making schools more accountable and giving parents power through school choice.”

As the night neared its end during the questions and answer period one of the inevitable questions arose from a conservative audience of ending the federal Department of Education. Part of Williams’ answer dwelled on the fact that various governors and mayors have been forced to take control of their own education systems and that government intervention is often quite necessary. Medved agreed but not to the extent that that involvement needed to go as high as the federal government.

“Sometimes Governors do have to step in and rescue failing schools. They do. But that doesn’t mean that presidents do,” Medved said.

“The problem with a Dept. of Education is, what sense does it make to take money from someone in Libertyville, send the money to Washington DC, and then for them to determine under what circumstances and in what amount that money will go back to Libertyville! Let the money stay home.”

In all, it was a very uplifting and informative debate. If a National School Choice Week event is happening near you I urge you to attend. To see if there is an event in your area, check out the schedule of events.

After the event I was had the opportunity to discuss school choice with both Medved and Williams. Please take the few minutes to watch the videos I made of these encounters.

Finally, I’d like to say that it was fitting to see Mr. Tillman leading the discussion as moderator because the Illinois Policy Institute has been an education reform leader in the Land of Lincoln and has spent a lot of energy working to steer Illinois toward reform and school choice. On its webpage, the Institute laments the failure recent school choice legislation in Illinois, but notes some success regardless.

Illinois’ record on school choice improved last year but nowhere near as boldly as the other states. Following the defeat of a pilot program voucher bill for Chicago’s poorest students in May of 2010, the legislature retreated on the issue. However, they did begin to focus on altering the measurement and accountability of public schools. Through the new “Performance Counts” law, the practice of “Last in, First Out” was completely ended. Teachers are no longer hired and fired based solely on their seniority. For the first time, student outcomes can be taken into account when judging a teacher’s performance in the classroom. The Charter School Quality Act created an independent commission to approve requests for new downstate and suburban charter schools. These were key steps on the road to a true overhaul and reformation of the system.

More work needs to be done, of course, but at least the work of introducing the concept is fairly begun.

Join the fight for school choice.

Shortlink:

Posted by on January 24, 2012.
Filed under Big government, Congress, corruption, Democrats, Economics, Education, Federal Budget, Liberals.
Warner Todd Huston is a Chicago-based freelance writer, has been writing opinion editorials and social criticism since early 2001 and is featured on many websites such as Andrew Breitbart's BigGovernment.com and BigJournalism.com, RightWingNews.com, CanadaFreePress.com, RightPundits.com, StoptheACLU.com, Human Events Magazine, among many, many others. Additionally, he has been a frequent guest on talk-radio programs to discuss his opinion editorials and current events.He has also written for several history magazines and appears in the new book "Americans on Politics, Policy and Pop Culture" which can be purchased on amazon.com. He is also the owner and operator of PubliusForum.com. Feel free to contact him with any comments or questions, EMAIL Warner Todd Huston: igcolonel .at. hotmail.com"The only end of writing is to enable the reader better to enjoy life, or better to endure it." --Samuel Johnson

You can leave a response or trackback to this entry
  • ackwired

    Sounds like a great discussion.  One question.  Why is it called school choice.  The implication is that something is prohibiting parents from choosing the school they send their child to.  I think they currently have that freedom.

  • ackwired

    Sounds like a great discussion.  One question.  Why is it called school choice.  The implication is that something is prohibiting parents from choosing the school they send their child to.  I think they currently have that freedom.

    • jim_m

      That freedom is limited inthe sense that Chicago schools suck and you can’t choose to go to one that sucks less than the one in your neighborhood.  Teacher’s unions in Illinois have been very successful in keeping out voucher programs and charter schools. 

      About the only area in Illinois where there is real freedom is, oddly enough, in home schooling, where thanks to the courts the state is barred from imposing any restrictions on homeschoolers.  There are no reporting requirements what-so-ever and the home school lobby has been successful in keeping the legislature at bay.

      Still, the unions have been successful in keeping minorities trapped in crappy state-run schools that do little to help the children and essentially doom them to lives of poverty and dependence upon government handouts.  But then, that dependence is not a bug but a feature of the public school system. 

      • ackwired

        Sounds bad.  Are there no private schools or charter schools in the Chicago area?

        ________________________________
        From: Disqus
        To: ackwired@yahoo.com
        Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 2:05 PM
        Subject: [wizbang] Re: Restoring American Exceptionalism – Chicago Townhall
        Disqus generic email template

        jim_m wrote, in response to ackwired:
        That freedom is limited inthe sense that Chicago schools suck and you can’t choose to go to one that sucks less than the one in your neighborhood.  Teacher’s unions in Illinois have been very successful in keeping out voucher programs and charter schools.
        About the only area in Illinois where there is real freedom is, oddly enough, in home schooling, where thanks to the courts the state is barred from imposing any restrictions on homeschoolers.  There are no reporting requirements what-so-ever and the home school lobby has been successful in keeping the legislature at bay.
        Still, the unions have been successful in keeping minorities trapped in crappy state-run schools that do little to help the children and essentially doom them to lives of poverty and dependence upon government handouts.  But then, that dependence is not a bug but a feature of the public school system. Link to comment

    • jim_m

      That freedom is limited inthe sense that Chicago schools suck and you can’t choose to go to one that sucks less than the one in your neighborhood.  Teacher’s unions in Illinois have been very successful in keeping out voucher programs and charter schools. 

      About the only area in Illinois where there is real freedom is, oddly enough, in home schooling, where thanks to the courts the state is barred from imposing any restrictions on homeschoolers.  There are no reporting requirements what-so-ever and the home school lobby has been successful in keeping the legislature at bay.

      Still, the unions have been successful in keeping minorities trapped in crappy state-run schools that do little to help the children and essentially doom them to lives of poverty and dependence upon government handouts.  But then, that dependence is not a bug but a feature of the public school system. 

  • Gmacr1

    No, you don’t. You send your child to the school zone you live in unless they are special needs or are gifted enough to be in a magnet school.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_R7FMXY3DZP7JF7SGSPIOSLLXNE Stephen

      Not true in all cases…