Barack Obama’s avalanche of needless regulations on coal-fueled power plants are going into effect and the net result will be the closing of hundreds of power plants all across the country just when our need for power is increasing. This will absolutely necessitate the cost of our power to skyrocket. But, this is exactly what he wants. He wants to rape us for our power. He said so from the beginning.
Well, now that he’s had the opportunity to put into place just some of the new rules and regulations he wants — and he’s only pushed through a tiny bit of what he really wants, indeed — we are already seeing the results of his attack on us.
Look to Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Maryland where six coal-fueled power plants are being shut down by FirstEnergy because the retrofitting the power plants will have to undergo to satisfy Obama’s whims is just too expensive to justify.
Company spokesmen say there is no help for it.
“This decision is not in any way a reflection of the fine work done by the employees at the affected plants, but is related to the impact of new environmental rules,” said James H. Lash, president, FirstEnergy Generation and chief nuclear officer. “We recently completed a comprehensive review of our coal-fired generating plants and determined that additional investments to implement MATS and other environmental rules would make these older plants even less likely to be dispatched under market rules. As a result, it was necessary to retire the plants rather than continue operations.”
Obama is forcing these new regs on the whole industry. Many thousands of jobs will be lost — this particular shut down will cause the loss of over 500 jobs initially — and the loss of the generating capacity will force a larger load on other plants necessarily causing costs to go up for all of us.
This isn’t just affecting out-of-date plants owned by FirstEnergy, either.
Douglas Gotham, director of the State Utility Forecasting Group, for instance, says that rates hikes are on the way in Indiana, as well, and all because of Obama’s onerous new EPA regulations.
“Due to the federal regulatory focus on emissions from coal-fired generators, Indiana is expected to experience larger price increases than projected on a regional or national level.”
This is exactly what Obama wanted. Remember in 2007 when he sat down with the San Francisco Chronicle and told us all that he wanted to bankrupt the coal industry and that our rates would “necessarily skyrocket”?
Well, his plans are succeeding. Prices are indeed “skyrocketing.” Worse, jobs are being lost. As Sean Harkbarth of the US Chamber of Commerce notes,
Utility MACT is only part of the assault on coal power plants. Last September, I wrote about how EPA’s Cross-State Air Pollution rule cost 500 jobs in Texas. The Chamber’s senior vice president of Environment, Technology, and Regulatory Affairs, Bill Kovacs told Congressmen last summer that the “cumulative impact of regulatory action can be overwhelming” and is causing power plants to be taken offline and putting people out of work.
Hackbarth points to testimony of EPA Assistant Administrator Mathy Stanislaus who admitted last April that jobs are not part of their determinations.
So, Obama’s plans really are well on the way to fruition. But it’s just beginning. He very much wants to do far more damage than he has thus far.
When ideology is your sole driver and you believe that anything that follows your ideology is fundamentally inerrant, then you don’t care what suffering and dislocation you inflict upon others. Indeed, in this case because suffering and dislocation will potentially force people into further dependence upon the government it isn’t a bug it’s a feature.
obama believes that his ideas are infallible. When the polls show that the public disagrees it is because the public is too stupid to understand his genius. With circular reasoning like that it is impossible to impress upon him that there might be a better way of doing things. He won’t listen, he can’t listen. He doesn’t know how to understand dissent as he perceives it as dissent as a personal attack on himself rather than on his ideas.
http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/NLDVHVBNBKSUODWOIAFHQBAHII Stan
Robert Mugabe move over. You have been displaced by someone that is more ruthless. Obama will make Rhodesia look like a business mecca when he gets done with the United States. That is why it is critical that we get this guy out of the White House ASAP.
jim_m
Look at the bright side: We will all be trillionaires when the hyperinflation sets in.
GarandFan
Of course “greedy” companies, heavily dependent on electrical power will “move overseas”.
Saw that here in Kalifornia when electrical rates were deregulated. Local company, Buck Knives, which started in 1902, moved to Idaho.
jim_m
Wasn’t Chico just saying the other day how we needed to keep heavy industry here in the US? I guess his Presidential candidate has other plans.
Yep. Because last year, Jerry and the Clowns didn’t want to make necessary cuts. So they came up with DYNAMITE economic projections that could only be seen by those wearing neon rose-colored glasses.
Well, he wants “green” industries for us all, making mulch or something, but they keep going out of business as soon as the Obama donors make off with the taxpayer money. It’s like six in a row now, must be a conspiracy or something.
Commander_Chico
My presidential candidate is Gary Johnson. Yours is Mitt Romney.
Jwb10001
You’re candidate has zero chance of becoming president. Romney at least has a slim chance. Sadly I’m afraid the current POTUS has the best chance and that could be a big problem.
Commander_Chico
Romney might be a good president, but in his statement to pander to the Republican base, he is following the fascist, warmongering line. He could be worse than Obama.
The problem with Romney is that you don’t know what you’re getting – is it the moderate who ran for senator, then governor of Massachusetts, or the jackass who has been running for president for five years now?
A pox on both their houses – Obama and Romney. At least I’ll vote for someone I feel good about.
Jwb10001
I’m so glad you’ll feel good about yourself, I hope Obama’s policies don’t ruin your life.
Commander_Chico
Obama or Romney equal less freedom. No difference.
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_R7FMXY3DZP7JF7SGSPIOSLLXNE Stephen
If burning coal cleanly isn’t economical, good riddance.
GarandFan
Yeah, “isn’t economical”. Guess that’s why we and every other country has been using it since the dawn of the industrial revolution.
jim_m
But don’t you see it costs nothing to generate no electricity, so living in the dark is far more economical. And being in the dark is something Stevie is familiar with.
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_R7FMXY3DZP7JF7SGSPIOSLLXNE Stephen
If it isn’t economical to burn coal cleanly then don’t burn it at all.
“…since the dawn of the industrial revolution”
The Republicans want to take this country back to the anti-polllution laws of the 1700s.
Americans won’t stand for it. You want to breathe polluted air, go back to the 3rd world country you came from.
retired.military
You are truly an idiot of the first order. Why not use clean nuclear energy? Oh wait. Cant do that thanks to liberal dunderheads like you.
Cant use oil because umm we cant drill it and if we could we dont have the refining capacity thanks to dunderheads like you.
Nice big campaign slogan for republicans going into the election.
Obama saying “under my administration the costs of electricty will nescessarily skyrocket:”
WHen the poor start getting heating bills of $4-$500 a month and have to shut off the AC during the summer just to be able to pay the bills than the dems are going to start getting screamed out quite loudly. Of course you dont care about the poor. As long as your boy Obama gets his way. That is all that matters.
jim_m
That’s a total misrepresentation of what GarandFan said and is grossly dishonest.
No one is suggesting to roll back the clean air regs. What they are saying is that the new regs being put in place by the obama admin are designed to be too expensive to comply with and the utilities are going to be forced to close down the power plants.
There needs to be a reasonable balance between cleaning up the environment and producing the power needed to run an advanced economy. obama does not see the need for any such balance. He promised to put the coal industry out of business and he is trying to come through on that promise.
Gmacr1
This is fantasy, the envirowhackadoodles will never be satisfied until everything is powered by ‘clean’ energy. Even if it causes mass suffering on a scale never before seen.
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_R7FMXY3DZP7JF7SGSPIOSLLXNE Stephen
“Even if it causes mass suffering on a scale never before seen.”
Typical lefty: laughs at others’ suffering, but the second it touches him, he’ll be crying like a two year old.
The sad part is that for Stephen it will represent a decided maturing.
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_R7FMXY3DZP7JF7SGSPIOSLLXNE Stephen
Yeah, especially “mass suffering” – lol..
GarandFan
Hey numbnuts. Why not pull your liberal head out of your ass. No one said anything about throwing pollution laws out the window. Typical freaking liberal. HEY! Lets close down all the power plants, and you know, like invest heavily like the Spaniards in “green” energy. Never mind they totally trashed their economy.
And I was born here, dickhead. Pretty hard to ‘go back to the 3rd world country I came from’.
Go back and play with your clueless, Obama ass-kissing friends at Huffpo.
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_R7FMXY3DZP7JF7SGSPIOSLLXNE Stephen
I’m doing what Jim_M says its the right thing to do — you read someone’s comment then “interpret” what they are really saying and respond to that interpretation instead of what they said.
” since the dawn of the industrial revolution.”
Not good enough. We need modern solutions, not a rollback of pollution laws back to the industrial revolution!
Conservatives don’t offer modern solutions, they reach for the past instead and cling bitterly to their lumps of coal…
jim_m
I don’t do it like that.
Once again you are just being intellectually dishonest. But that is what you do and who you are.
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_R7FMXY3DZP7JF7SGSPIOSLLXNE Stephen
Oh, have you been editing your comments again?
Wow. Knock it off, dude.
Jwb10001
You’re one to talk about editing comments.
jim_m
No. I sometimes will edit my posts to correct spelling because my keyboard is unresponsive and I often lose the “t” at the beginning of words.
But I don’t generally edit unless I add something immediately.
Elsewise I mark my edits.
http://scum-and-villainy.blogspot.com/ Evil Otto
Seriously, Steve? Did YOU just make a crack about someone else editing comments?
Can we get a real, serious lefty in here to debate, instead of you? You’re a hack, Steve.
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_R7FMXY3DZP7JF7SGSPIOSLLXNE Stephen
And Jim admitted he edits his comments.
Your point?
jim_m
Once again stevie you missed the point. I correct my comments and I note when I make a material change.
You don’t. You let people comment and then go back and change your posts to make yourself look better.
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_R7FMXY3DZP7JF7SGSPIOSLLXNE Stephen
Bullshitting again, eh Jim?
And you lie, get caught at lying, and dont’ change your lie – every single time’ – so who are you to point?
Olsoljer
I think we have misinterpreted the term “green energy”. ”Green energy” is when obama gives/bails out companies that manufacture unicorn farts and other losing endeavors, at taxpayers expense, and they reward him with “green” contributions to provide “energy” to his socialist agenda and re election campaign.
Jwb10001
Careful there you know unicorn is a racist code word.
http://www.rustedsky.net JLawson
Aw, crap. ANOTHER one?
Dammit. Pardon me while I go censor my dictionary!
Jwb10001
Check with Steven he identifed it as such a few posts ago. Of course you’re also free to consider the source.
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_R7FMXY3DZP7JF7SGSPIOSLLXNE Stephen
It’s a dog whistle, depending upon the context. In the context in which I commenting, it’s use was racist.
Ask your mom what “context” means.. cause I’m sure you don’t “get it”…
Do you understand what a “cost/benefit ratio” is, Zippy?
914
Anti pollution laws of the 1700′s??
How about anti- psyche laws to protect us from the likes of you.
iwogisdead
Don’t you just want to slap somebody?
GarandFan
The plants are scheduled to close in Sept 2012. Maybe Barry’s staff can get them to hold off until after the elections.
herddog505
That would fit his MO.
jim_m
Perhaps he can threaten them with an IRS audit if they don’t knuckle under.
herddog505
Of all the campaign promises that Barry had to keep, why did he have to pick one that would raise the cost of energy???
Can’t he take Moochelle on another date or something?
jim_m
Aha! There’s the benefit. EVERY dinner is a romantic candle light dinner with obama. Of course with no electricity every dinner will have to be candle light.
Sky__Captain
I just love how the leftist trolls like Stephen keep ducking my questions:
- cite the scientific study that links the “man-made” part to the “global warming” part with a 95% confidence level.
- state the ideal temperature of planet Earth.
C’mon, Stephen – you’re soooo smart, let’s have some answers!
Jwb10001
He’s too busy explaining the context that makes unicorn a racist code word or something.
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_R7FMXY3DZP7JF7SGSPIOSLLXNE Stephen
or something… like ignoring morons.
Sky__Captain
So no actual answers, eh? And here you led us to believe you are smart!
Disappointing, L’il Stephen.
May Olaf’s Hammer visit you soon.
Ramblin_Joe
Would the lack of funds in California be the start of collapse? California is a great example of not finding any answer to having “Green Power” as they have passed laws to keep Electricity generation from growing to keep up with the needs of their population (legal) or otherwise. Rolling blackouts might be the norm nation wide with suppliers shutting down and no “Green” answers that are feasible.