The Truth Is Often Simple; Lies Are Complex

The guys at Zero Hedge are doing Yeoman’s work debunking the fake job numbers that the government continues to thrust upon us now that we’re firmly in an election year. From Tyler Durden, his second great post of the day on this subject:

Sick of the BLS propaganda? Then do the following calculation with us: using BLS data, the US civilian non-institutional population was 242,269 in January, an increase of 1.7 million month over month: apply the long-term average labor force participation rate of 65.8% to this number (because as chart 2 below shows, people are not retiring as the popular propaganda goes: in fact labor participation in those aged 55 and over has been soaring as more and more old people have to work overtime, forget retiring), and you get 159.4 million: that is what the real labor force should be. The BLS reported one? 154.4 million: a tiny 5 million difference. Then add these people who the BLS is purposefully ignoring yet who most certainly are in dire need of labor and/or a job to the 12.758 million reported unemployed by the BLS and you get 17.776 million in real unemployed workers. What does this mean? That using just the BLS denominator in calculating the unemployed rate of 154.4 million, the real unemployment rate actually rose in January to 11.5%. Compare that with the BLS reported decline from 8.5% to 8.3%. It also means that the spread between the reported and implied unemployment rate just soared to a fresh 30 year high of 3.2%. And that is how with a calculator and just one minute of math, one strips away countless hours of BLS propaganda.

Unfortunately we still have plenty of saps with no intellectual honesty who will buy what the government is selling, list it on eBay, sell it at an extreme markup and tell you you got a great deal because they didn’t charge you shipping.

H/T to commenter alien-IQ at Zero Hedge for this posts title.

 

Enhanced by Zemanta
West Virginia Sheriff, Clerk Snared in Vote Fraud Investigation
Birthers lose in court . . . again.