CPAC Speeches: Contrasting Santorum, Gingrich, Romney

CPAC 2012 featured appearances by the three top GOP contenders who came to ask for the support of the conservatives gathered there. First came former Penn. Senator Rick Santorum, then Governor Mitt Romney, and finally former Speaker of the House of Representatives Newt Gingrich, all came to sell their ideas and candidacy.

Rick Santorum

Santorum came out to the most applause of the three, for sure. As he and his family mounted the stage the crowd was obviously eager to hear what the candidate had to say.

“Conservatism did not fail this country,” began the meat of the former Pennsylvania Senator’s remarks, “conservatives failed conservatism.”

Santorum said that in the past we, “listened to the voices that said we had to abandon our principles and our values to get things done, to win.” But no more compromise, he said. “The lesson we’ve learned is that we will no longer abandon and apologize for the policies and principles that made this country great for a hollow victory in November.”

Santorum went on to say that Obamacare was a “game changer” and with it, as the British found with their system, we will never be free again. “It’s about government control of our lives and it’s gotta stop,” he asserted to great applause.

Santorum ripped global warming and Obama’s fealty to cap and trade, he said that Romney couldn’t fight Obama on Obamacare because of Romneycare. He also attacked Mitt for instituting cap and trade in Mass. when he was governor. Interestingly, Santorum was the only one of the three that spent so much time ribbing the other GOP candidates.

So, how did he do? Well, his speech was perfectly fine, but there were surprisingly few opportunities for applause. Newt, on the other hand, had dozens of applause lines. Only a few times did Senator Sanoturm get heavy and enthusiastic applause during the presentation. He seemed to be delivering his speech without reading it or using a teleprompter and it was competently and passionately delivered, but once again he proved he needs a voice coach or a presentation coach. Rick’s delivery is too much the monotone. Of course that is a style question, not substance and for substance his speech was good enough.

One might be tempted to feel that Santorum missed his opportunity to really rile up the base with a rip-roaring speech. He just didn’t give us that. Instead we got a steady, competent speech. One might also hasten to note that Rick was being Rick. Nothing phony about him for sure.

Mitt Romney

Governor Romney began with a joke, like all good Friars Club speakers. “I suppose we should also acknowledge President Obama,” Romney quipped. “He is the conservative movement’s top recruiter. Turns out he really is a good community organizer, I just don’t think this is the community he planned on organizing, but he did.”

I have to say, Romney’s speech hit all the correct points. Hitting Obama on all his failed policies, touting his own electability, his pro-life credentials, and his economic prowess, Romney’s speech was filled with what conservatives always like to hear. Governor Romney absolutely delivered his speech well with humor and verve. If you knew nothing of Romney’s past, he would certainly seem the sincere, ideal conservative candidate.

But you have to realize that this audience was not by and large supportive of Romney. His speech had more applause lines than Santorum’s, of course, but that applause was nothing if not merely “polite.” Some may even say tepid. He only had a few spates of sustained applause with one standing ovation.

I had the feeling that most of the audience simply didn’t believe Mitt’s repeated claim that he and his principles and record were “conservative.”

For instance, Gov. Romney said at one point that he spent his life “keeping as far away from government as humanly possible.” But does that square with reality? He’s been running for various offices since the early 1990s — and without much success it must be noted. Romney tooted his “I’m not a Washington guy” horn several times in this speech, saying he’s never worked in DC. But, who cannot realize that the phrase “not for lack of trying to run for office, Mitt” occurred to the mind of every participant there.

He did receive one standing ovation line when he said that he wasn’t ashamed of his record in business. Still, for the most part his applause was of the polite variety.

Newt Gingrich

Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich came to the stage to raucous applause after being introduced by his lovely wife, Callista. Gingrich hit the ground running with Reagan on his lips by recounting his days as Speaker and touting all the conservative victories that were had in those golden days.

The crowd dutifully applauded those Reagan references but held its breath when Newt went on. “Let me say to the Republican establishment in this city,” Newt said sternly, “crony Capitalism in Congress is fully as bad as crony capitalism on Wall Street and they had better clean up the Congress if they expect to be reelected.”

Oh, there he goes again, the crowd collectively thought, attacking capitalism. Only a few hands were put together for that one, for sure. Fortunately, after that mention, Newt moved on leaving the subject behind.

From there Newt went into the same litany of policies and “bold solutions to get America working again today” that he’s talked about on the stump many times and places. But the interesting thing is that Newt drew hearty applause throughout his speech. Gingrich may not have introduced anything new into his comments before the faithful, but his performance was very well received.

So, what about the three? How did they fare before the crowd? Newt was a crowd pleaser with laughs and much applause. Santorum didn’t give the crowd many opportunities for applause, but they gave him standing ovations on his opening and closing. The crowd clearly wanted to love him. Mitt, on the other hand, was politely received and that is about it.

And, let’s face it, this is about how these three candidates are being received by the whole of the GOP. Everyone wants to love Rick but often have some trouble warming to him, everyone loves Newt for a speech and he always gets a crowd on their feet — but where it goes form there we don’t know — and Mitt is given the “yeah whatever” from them, especially if they are conservatives.

[Note: I’ve spent most of today making videos with nearly a dozen candidates for Senate and the House from states such as Indiana, Connecticut, Maryland, and more. Those videos will be coming out over the following week. Keep on the look out for them as these are good candidates that need to attention.]

Shortlink:

Posted by on February 11, 2012.
Filed under 2012 Presidential Race, Barack Obama, Big government, Conservatives, CPAC, Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, Republicans, Rick Santorum.


Both comments and pings are currently closed.
  • http://www.ethnografix.blogspot.com/ ryan a

    It will certainly be interesting to see how the whole GOP nomination process shakes out.

    “Oh, there he goes again, the crowd collectively thought, attacking capitalism.”

    Hmmm.  How exactly is it “attacking capitalism” to point out that crony capitalism in congress is just as much of a problem as crony capitalism on Wall Street?  That suggestion doesn’t even make any sense.  Capitalism is a vast political-economic system that takes different forms around the world.  It’s not just one thing.  To point out particular problems/practices here in the US isn’t “attacking capitalism,” it’s an argument against specific instances of corruption/undue influence.  I find it strange that the audience was off-put by this theme, all things considered.  So…you’re saying that people just don’t want to talk about it?  Or that they no longer see this as a problem?

    • warnertoddhuston

      I don’t think you read what I wrote closely enough. I said that people were holding their breath waiting for that attack. I didn’t say he launched into such an attack. You haven’t been paying too much attention to Newt news, though, if you don’t realize that he’s been constantly criticized for seeming to be attacking Romney’s capitalist record from the left. So, when he started on that subject, the crowd was pensive hoping Newt wouldn’t start that attack all over again. How do I read that? Because the applause was hesitant and tepid after that line, that’s how. As I said, he didn’t stay on that theme and moved on quickly.

      • http://www.ethnografix.blogspot.com/ ryan a

        Hey WTH,

        “I don’t think you read what I wrote closely enough. I said that people were holding their breath waiting for that attack.”

        I read exactly what you wrote.  Look at how you phrased it.  You noted what Newt said, and then you said that the crowd collectively thought he was “attacking capitalism” with that remark.  I only asked you a question because the crowd’s reaction sounded a little odd–especially considering the position that certain folks take on cronyism.

        “You haven’t been paying too much attention to Newt news, though, if you don’t realize that he’s been constantly criticized for seeming to be attacking Romney’s capitalist record from the left.”

        Ok, that makes more sense if that’s what you were getting at.  I see what you meant.  But there’s a bit of a difference between saying they thought he was “attacking capitalism” and that they thought he was once again attacking Romney’s capitalist record.  Anyway, it’s a minor issue, thanks for the clarification. 

        • warnertoddhuston

          OK, then perhaps I wasn’t clear enough. Thanks.

          • http://wizbangblog.com/author/rodney-graves/ Rodney G. Graves

            You were perfectly clear to me.

          • http://www.ethnografix.blogspot.com/ ryan a

            No worries.  I was thinking you were suggesting that the crowd was getting tired of hearing the whole “crony capitalism” argument or something.  Which would have been kind of surprising if you know what I mean.  Anyway, thanks again for the clarification.  Have fun out there.

  • http://wizbangblog.com/author/rodney-graves/ Rodney G. Graves

    ABO 2012.

  • RTF1refly

    Hmm, no mention of the fact Sarah had them standing and chanting with an energy none of the candidates did.

    USA,USA,USA!

    • http://wizbangblog.com/author/rodney-graves/ Rodney G. Graves

      Yeah, I saw that too.

      But note what she said to the effect that sending 0bama home was job one.

    • warnertoddhuston

      You DO realize that this was written and posted BEFORE the Sarah speech… don’t you?

  • klaffner

    Well I guess the crowd didn’t end up loving Santorum that much if Romney won the straw poll.