Heartland Institute: The ‘Gate’ Scandal That Never Was

Global warmists finally have an email “gate” of their own that they can turn against “deniers” and they are taking full advantage of it. The Warmists are excited that the Heartland Institute, a Chicago-based state policy group, has been “outed” for attempting to undermine the religiously held tenets of global warming. Emails to that effect are claimed to have been leaked from this group and the warmists as well as their handmaidens in the Old Media are touting this scandal as proof of… well, it’s a bit hard to discern what it is proof of. In fact, it isn’t “proof” of much of anything, really.

For one thing the documents are fakes, but even if they weren’t… so what?

For quite some time, for instance, Chicago’s Heartland Institute has been holding events, debates, and seminars on the hoax of global warming. The Heartland Institute has an entire section of its website dedicated to debunking global warming and it has produced books and pamphlets attacking the false “consensus” of man-made global warming. Without question, global warming (a quasi religious belief I personally call globabloney) has been a major focus at Heartland for a long time, to be sure.

That being understood — not only understood but glaringly obvious — leaked emails that purport to show that Heartland has a plan to influence lawmakers, scientists, members of the media, and even schools against global warming is a bit of a “well, duh!” Any ten seconds of time spent on the Institute’s website would tend to make it clear that they are against claims of man-made global warming. At some point, even if the documents were real it should not come as any sort of shocking revelation.

So, why would these so-called leaked emails be such a big story? Well, really for only one reason: to give a helping hand to the high priests of global warming who were a few years ago stung by climategate, a scandal that did, indeed, reveal through leaked emails that warmists were lying about their flawed research and attempting to cajole others to support their lies.

We need but turn to Politico to see how the media is trying to turn these Heartland emails into the equivalent of climategate in order to somehow prove that anti-warmists are just as bad as the climategate scientists. Note the headline in a piece by Politico’s Darren Samuelson entitled, “Heartland Burned by ‘DenialGate’ Memos..” You can almost hear the glee in that headline, can’t you?

Politico isn’t the only outlet coming to the aide of the globalwarming religionists. The New York Times posted a piece similarly headlined as Politico’s. For the Times on February 15 Justin Gillis and Leslie Kaufman gave us “Leak Offers Glimpse of Campaign Against Climate Science.”

Notice how the Times characterizes the story as an attack on the “science” of global warming? The Times casts Heartland in the role as monster that needs to be destroyed.

But as I alluded to, there is a major problem with these supposed emails from Heartland. It appears they have been faked. This is quite unlike the climategate emails that were all too real.

Even The Atlantic, no right-wing rag there, reports that some of the documents are fakes. The Times notes that Heartland says the documents are fakes but decides that Heartland is lying, the Times essentially claiming that the documents are too good not to be true.

According to the Heartland Institute, the documents are simply false. Some, though, appear to have been altered from actual Heartland documents that were stolen from them.

As Heartland explains it:

The stolen documents were obtained by an unknown person who fraudulently assumed the identity of a Heartland board member and persuaded a staff member here to “re-send” board materials to a new email address. Identity theft and computer fraud are criminal offenses subject to imprisonment. We intend to find this person and see him or her put in prison for these crimes.

Again, this is all quite unlike climategate because the lies and schemes of the warmists were all completely true.

Truth, though, is not on the menu for the left-wing journalists that are so happy to see an email gate that they can use against those that know that global warming is neither man-made and that there isn’t anything we mere humans can do about the weather.

Look for this story to perhaps grow with more left-wingers attempting to use it as a weapon in the global warmist’s arsenal of falsities.

(Update, I uploaded an earlier document here. I have since updated with corrected links, etc.)

Shortlink:

Posted by on February 17, 2012.
Filed under Conservatives, corruption, Culture Of Corruption, Environment, Environmentalism, Global Warming, Media.
Warner Todd Huston is a Chicago-based freelance writer, has been writing opinion editorials and social criticism since early 2001 and is featured on many websites such as Andrew Breitbart's BigGovernment.com and BigJournalism.com, RightWingNews.com, CanadaFreePress.com, RightPundits.com, StoptheACLU.com, Human Events Magazine, among many, many others. Additionally, he has been a frequent guest on talk-radio programs to discuss his opinion editorials and current events.He has also written for several history magazines and appears in the new book "Americans on Politics, Policy and Pop Culture" which can be purchased on amazon.com. He is also the owner and operator of PubliusForum.com. Feel free to contact him with any comments or questions, EMAIL Warner Todd Huston: igcolonel .at. hotmail.com"The only end of writing is to enable the reader better to enjoy life, or better to endure it." --Samuel Johnson

You can leave a response or trackback to this entry
  • GarandFan

     ”For one thing the documents are fakes….”

    Whoa!  Where’s Dan Rather and Mary Mapes?

  • cirby

    To be fair – only one of the documents is an actual fake, according to Heartland.  

    The rest are pretty blah.The funny bit is that pretty much all of the warmist blogs and commenters pulled their quotes from the fake document, and found almost nothing worth commenting on in the rest.

    A number of the skeptic blogs have been looking really closely at the fake one – and they seem to have a decent lead or two on which of the warmists actually wrote the faked memo.

    What’s really interesting?  The guy who probably faked the memo seems to have dropped off the face of the Earth, as far as Heartland goes.  Seems like he’d want to make some public comments about this huge scandal, right?  Unless he’s starting to figure out just how badly he burned himself, of course…

  • herddog505

    Identity theft and computer fraud are criminal offenses subject to imprisonment. We intend to find this person and see him or her put in prison for these crimes.

    Good luck with that.

    Waiting for the left to screech about “privacy” and “cyber crime” as they did when the CRU got hacked.  Yep, expecting them to start howling for the blood of the hacker aaaaaany minute now…

  • herddog505

    Identity theft and computer fraud are criminal offenses subject to imprisonment. We intend to find this person and see him or her put in prison for these crimes.

    Good luck with that.

    Waiting for the left to screech about “privacy” and “cyber crime” as they did when the CRU got hacked.  Yep, expecting them to start howling for the blood of the hacker aaaaaany minute now…

    • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/EU5DQWQTTHTPO4A4ZYSL3AAV2U Adjoran

       No need to wait for the left to do squat on this.  The law is the law – the guy who hacked Palin’s emails is doing real time.  I believe this is the same thing under the law.

      • herddog505

        Oh, absolutely, and whoever did it OUGHT to be prosecuted.

        I just don’t expect the left to be (shall we say?) eager to uphold the law here.  I should say, any more eager than they ever are unless it benefits them somehow.

  • Walter_Cronanty

    What’s revealing is the fact that the warmistas can’t differentiate between e-mails from a think tank with an open advocacy position and e-mails from supposed disinterested scientists.  How in the world can they be thought of as being the same thing?  What morons.

  • Commander_Chico

    There’s the political controversy and the scientific controversy.  Only the scientific controversy matters.  The hacks on both sides make the political controversy based on lies.

    When I get a degree in atmospheric physics, I’ll get back to you on the science of the issue.

    I will point out again that the supply of carbon to burn is finite, and prone to political risk.  It’s best to develop other sources of energy (fusion, new nuke, solar, wind) in the medium to long term.

    • herddog505

      While I agree that hacks on both sides are out to make points by hook or crook:

      1.  SOMEBODY is right here.  Truth is truth and lies are lies whether hacks are yapping about them or not;

      2.  One doesn’t need a specialized degree to judge whether scientists are doing honest research or not.  When evidence comes out that communications are deliberately being hidden, or that coordinated efforts are being made to stifle critics, or that evidence is being cooked up, then there’s real reason to believe that they are NOT.

      I preume that you’re not a doctor, but what would you think if your doctor told you that you MUST undertake a very expensive, painful regimen that he prescribes or risk certain death in a few years, but absolutely refused to let you see the X-rays, blood tests, etc?  Further, he refused to hand them over to anybody but another doctor of his own choosing for a second opinion?  Finally, you find out that he’s accused of scamming other patients with a ‘do what I say or die!’ racket?

      One doesn’t have to be an MD to raise an eyebrow at this, I think.

      Commander_ChicoIt’s best to develop other sources of energy (fusion, new nuke, solar, wind) in the medium to long term.

      Absolutely.  The problem is getting Uncle Sugar out of the way.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Andrew-Logar/1255825670 Andrew Logar

    Simple logic shows AGW theories go well beyond the pale. According to
    Newton’s Second Law of Motion, if the venerable Queen Mary were set to float
    freely, absent other forces, and a clothes line attached to the bow were pulled
    by just one person, the ship would start moving in response to that weak force,
    at first ever-so-slowly – and then faster and faster. Note: there would be a
    great time-delay between the application of that comparatively tiny
    pulling force and a resultant perceptible motion of the relatively enormous
    mass and its inherent inertia.

     

    The proponents of
    AGW are saying that, shortly after the beginning of the Industrial Revolution
    when there were no automobiles, very few steam engines, only 1.2 billion people
    (versus today’s 7 billion), the introduction of initially tiny quantities of a
    weak greenhouse produced, without time-delay, an in-phase and measurable
    rise in global temperatures that continues to this day. That is like saying the
    application of a weak force to an enormous mass sets that mass into immediate
    and measurable motion. That does not happen in simple mechanical systems nor
    would it in enormously complex and massive systems such as our atmosphere.