About that FORWARD thing…

April 30, 2012 | Filed under 2012 Presidential Race | Posted by

…It seems like it’s been done.

Let’s see…

Why yes, yes it has!

Lening leading the Communists "Forward"

Communism Moving Forward (under Lenin)

 

What, that didn’t end well?

Well then, who besides Lenin was leading the way “Forward”?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Under the leadership of the great Stalin - forward to Communism

 

Even worse you say?

Ok, then, who besides the Russians promised to lead us “Forward”?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mao Zedong's "Great Leap Forward"

Let's march forward under the banner of Mao Zedong!

 

Worse yet you say?

Ok, then, who besides the Soviets and Chinese promised to “Lead us Forward”?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Never took effect there you say?

Ok, then, who besides the Communists?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreward with Comrade Obama

Foreward with Comrade 0bama

 

Why, by 0bama, of course!

 

 

 

 

 

Just remember this NOvember, NObama.

 

 

Let those words ring out!

 

Hat Tip: Full Metal Patriot via Google+

« « The Last Helicopter; the true legacy of the Flower Children
In honor of May Day – the world’s only surviving DPRK prison camp escapee » »

Shortlink:

Posted by on April 30, 2012.
Filed under 2012 Presidential Race.
Tagged with: • .


You can leave a response or trackback to this entry
  • jim_m

    How appropriate that it is on a black background.

    Yes Comrade!  Let us go forward into the darkness!

    • Gmacr1

      Or as a good friend of mine is ofter heard saying “The endarkenment.”

  • Guest

    After Obama wins re-election watching the right go ballistic is going to be quite entertaining.

    • jim_m

       We won’t be rioting in the streets should that come to pass. Can’t say the same of the left if obama loses.

      • http://wizbangblog.com/author/rodney-graves/ Rodney G. Graves

         Better to just ignore the old fool, Jim.  I do…

    • GarandFan

       Yeah, and I suppose watching the economy come apart at the seams will be a laugh-riot as well.

    • retired.military

      Wnat to bet $100 to favorite charity.  I win if Romney wins and Republicans take both houses of Congress.

      You win otherwise?

      I dont think Obama is going to get 45% of the vote.

      • Brucepall

        Retired Military,

        I can hear his thinking now: “The stakes are more than fair, and the odds are quite favorable.”

        Even so, that voice of experience is speaking in the back of my head: ” If you don’t know who the patsy is at the table… its you.”

        Besides that, you’ve set things up nicely to clean old Grumpy out.

        And so, if we ever meet, please do me a favor, and remind me to never, never, play poker with you.

        Semper Fidelis-

        • retired.military

          LOL.  Will do Bruce.  But first beer is on me.

          I doubt Grumpy will even respond.

    • Evil Otto

       ”Evacuate? In our moment of triumph? I think you overestimate their chances.”

      Y’know, an honest liberal would wake up in a cold sweat at night worrying what it’s going to take to get Obama reelected. You’re not honest. With $4 a gallon gas, over a trillion in deficits every year, 10% real unemployment and 17% combined unemployment and underemployment, a terrible housing market, and an economy that continues to drag even after massive stimulus, Obama’s chances are pretty lousy. Presidents simply aren’t reelected with these numbers.

      By all means, troll, continue to be overconfident. Continue to think that you’ve got nothing to fear. Oh, wait, you don’t think that. You’re scared, and we know it. And if (when) Obama loses, watching the left go ballistic is going to be quite entertaining.

      • Guest

        “Y’know, an honest liberal would wake up in a cold sweat at night
        worrying what it’s going to take to get Obama reelected. You’re not
        honest.”

        Well, I don’t wake up in a cold sweat, and I’m more honest than some comment thread clown who pretends to “know” that I’m nervous.

        Instead, I look at the polls and see Obama even or ahead where needs to be.

        I look at the way in which the Republican Party has driven women voters away with their backwards efforts at rolling women’s rightsback to the nineteen century.

        And I look at the GOP nominee, the guy nobody wanted and now everybody has to settle for. They guy without a spine whose policies bend in whichever direction the wind is blowing.

        And I see no problems whatsoever.

        Obama 2012. It’s a sure thing.

        • cirby

          ”
          Instead, I look at the polls and see Obama even or ahead where needs to be.”

          You need to look again.

          This is a close race for this part of the election cycle – the few polls that showed Obama with large margins massively oversampled Democrats (by as much as nine percent, to get an eight percent lead).  That is a DISASTER for Obama.  He should be several points in the lead right now.

          The big problem for the Democrats is that they committed themselves too early.  A lot of the things they did to get a short term “improvement” in the economy have run out – and the economic down trend is catching back up.  They fudged unemployment a lot for a few months, but any more, and even the media will have to say something about it.  They latched onto the Zimmerman case, but it’s going to fall apart well before the election.  They backed OWS, and it’s turning around and biting them in the throat – see today’s news.

          For Obama to win, he needed to have an honest ten percent margin right now.  He doesn’t have that.  He also needed to have a billion (yes, with a ‘B’) dollars to play with for his campaign treasure chest. That’s not happening either.  He also needed massive support – even more than he had four years ago – from the youth vote and black vote.  He’s even losing ground with those cohorts, which says a lot.

          He’s hosed.

          All the Democrats can do is play a “scorched earth” game.  They have to be as nasty as possible, pulling out every dirty trick they can.  They’re going to slam Romney in every possible way – and that means using the “religious bigotry” card.  They’re going to scream about “Republican obstructionism” – and have to discuss why they didn’t do anything useful for two solid years, but instead passed a huge health care bill that most people did not want.

          Et bloody cetera.

  • GarandFan

    The rest of the slogan ……  LEAN FORWARD AND BEND OVER.

    Remember, under Obama, KY is your friend.

  • Vagabond661

    If so far he thinks he is going forward, I hate to see what backward is…

    • http://2012.ak4mc.us/ McGehee

      I’m reminded of the opening to the old “Dudley Do-Right” cartoon.

    • 914

      Backwards would be the Boosh years of 5% unemployment and $1.84 a gallon gas..

      • http://wizbangblog.com/author/rodney-graves/ Rodney G. Graves

        I, for one, could definately go for that.

    • retired.military

      He is going forward.  Right off the cliff.

  • LiberalNightmare

    I heard they wanted to keep the slogan down to one word so that Biden could remember it.

    • Mr Kimber

      That probably wouldn’t work if the word had more then 5 letters in it.

    • retired.military

      No no no.  It has to have 1 syllable.

      • 914

        In any event it would be pointless without a teleprompted voice duplicator..

        • retired.military

          True true

  • 914

    Forward?? Really? To what? 30 trillion deficit? 40% unemployment? That is the reality 2 years down the road with the Dum ass pinochio  in chief at the wheel..

  • http://www.outsidethebeltway.com rodney dill

    I like my version better.
     

  • Sky__Captain

    Actually, the 0bama campaign misspelled the word.
    It’s “FORE-ward”.

    When “Teh Zero” first took office, the continuous mistakes and gaffes made me think “Its Amateur Hour at the White House!”
    Now, it seems to be “its Amateur Hour on the 0bama campaign!”

  • MichaelLaprarie

    The “Great Leap Forward” which cost the lives of between 50 and 100 million Chinese also comes to mind.  Happy May Day everybody.

  • herddog505

    The thing that gives me the creeps about politicians who shout about going “forward” (quite aside from the historical connotations) is that it implies that people are NOT individuals, but rather part of a mass, a herd.  The point of the United States is – or, at least, HAS been – that our people have liberty to live their lives as THEY see fit.  They haven’t got to go “forward” or in any other direction that they don’t want to as free citizens.

    It’s one thing to say, “This is a great idea.  Let’s all work together to see it come to fruition.” It’s quite another to say, “This is a great idea.  This is what you WILL do to make it come to fruition.”

  • http://www.facebook.com/ernie.ball3 Ernie Ball

    The name Forward carries a special meaning in socialist political terminology. It has been frequently used as a name for socialist, communist and other leftwing newspapers and publications. For example, Vpered (Russian language for ‘Forward’) was the name of the publication that Lenin started after having resigned from the Iskra editorial board in 1905 after a clash with Georgi Plekhanov and the Mensheviks.[1]

  • http://www.facebook.com/ernie.ball3 Ernie Ball

    The name Forward carries a special meaning in socialist political terminology. It has been frequently used as a name for socialist, communist and other leftwing newspapers and publications. For example, Vpered (Russian language for ‘Forward’) was the name of the publication that Lenin started after having resigned from the Iskra editorial board in 1905 after a clash with Georgi Plekhanov and the Mensheviks.[1]

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jack-Zimms/100003653414389 Jack Zimms

    Forward is a common word. My issue with Obama is his attitudes
    that a person success is “all” due to the “community” and the individual
    deserves little to no credit.  There is
    nothing wrong with being appreciative to those who have a positive influence on
    you. However giving the “community” all the credit while giving, little to no credit
    to individuals shows a socialist belief.

  • TaterSalad

     Amerika’s march towards Communism by the Barack Obama administration.  “We shall move “Forward” and be “Flexible” while bringing Re-Distribution and “collective” empowerment to the people.  What a full blown crock of you know what!  The Obama regime has gone from Hope and Change to “Forward and Flexible”!

    http://weaselzippers.us/2012/05/01/forward-to-communism/

  • Pingback: may day , world workers way , Victims of Communism Day « YouViewed/editorial

  • PBunyan

    It turns out that Obama was just instructing the post office as to what they should do with his mail starting next January 21st.  Someone on his campaign staff misunderstood and turned it into a poster…

  • retired.military

    Still no repsonse from Grumpy on the bet.   Chickenshit.

  • jim_m

    Barry was just trying to prepare for the release of the follow up single to “mmm, mmm, mmm, Barack Hussein Obama”.  http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/04/obamas-new-campaign-slogan-forward-is-a-nazi-marching-tune-video/

    Nothing like taking campaign slogans from the Nazis.

  • Sky__Captain

    Despite the view of many that Wikipedia is not reliable source for research, someone is trying to scrub any connection of the 0bama campaign latest inane slogan and references to socialism’s use of the same term…
    http://www.boortz.com/weblogs/nealz-nuze/2012/may/02/proggies-muck-wikipedia/

    When will teh Grumpy (and Senile) one weigh in?
    Hopefully, never.

  • Pingback: Forward …. LOL « YouViewed/editorial