Elizabeth Warren helped family flip wigwams for heap big wampum

Yes dear WizBang readers, it’s time to pick on Big Chief Paleface again.  The Boston Herald is reporting:

Elizabeth Warren, who has railed against predatory banks and heartless foreclosures, took part in about a dozen Oklahoma real estate deals that netted her and her family hefty profits through maneuvers such as “flipping” properties, records show.

A Herald review has found that the Democratic U.S. Senate candidate rapidly bought and sold homes herself, loaned money at high interest rates to relatives and purchased foreclosed properties at bargain prices.

Land records from Warren’s native Oklahoma City show the Harvard professor was active in the often topsy-turvy real estate market in the 1990s, including:

• Purchasing a foreclosed home at 2725 West Wilshire Boulevard from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development for $61,000 in June 1993, then selling it in December 1994 for $95,000 — a 56 percent mark-up in just 18 months.

• Buying a house at 200 NW 16th St. for $30,000 in August 1993, then flipping it for $145,000 — a 383 percent gain after just five months.

• Lending one of her brothers money at 9.5 percent interest to buy a home at 1425 Classen Drive for $35,000 in August 2000. He sold the place three months later for $38,500 — a 10 percent gain in 75 days.

• Providing her brother with financing to buy a $25,000 house at 4301 NW 16th St. in 1994. He sold the property four years later for $42,000, a 68 percent increase.

… Herald columnist Howie Carr reported yesterday that Warren and her relatives also profited from two additional Oklahoma City foreclosures — in both cases showing triple-digit percentage gains.

Warren’s campaign issued a statement last night: “Elizabeth and (her husband) Bruce are fortunate to be in a position where they can help their family. They have been able to help relatives buy their homes and her nephew — a contractor — fix up houses.”

I’m not one to criticize someone for taking advantage of a good deal when they find it.  As a resident of Oklahoma City I can tell you that Warren and her family shrewdly bought bargain homes in parts of town that were popular transition areas (older/retired homeowners selling smaller 1950′s era homes to young first-time buyers) that saw a lot of market activity ten to twenty years ago.  And the house in Mesta Park (200 NW 16th), which is a neighborhood of stately two story WWI era homes that sell today in the $200 – $300k range, was an incredible find.  I’m also pretty certain that buying the house so cheaply meant it was in pretty bad shape, therefore a lot of the sales price went to cover the cost of renovation.

But there is something not quite right about an advocate for fair and affordable housing taking low-priced homes off the market and then reselling them at a substantially increased price.  This helps put thousands of dollars in Elizabeth Warren’s pocket, but it how does it help lower income first-time home buyers looking for an affordable property that they can buy, repair, and use as a means to invest and build equity wealth?  Likewise with foreclosure homes, which generally involve a significant financial loss for the foreclosed homeowner.  Should a critic of “predatory lending” and “dangerous mortgages” be profiting from the resale of foreclosure homes?

And look at the deal for 1425 Classen Drive.  It’s a two bedroom condo in a multi-unit townhouse style building.  The fact that the purchase and sales dates, and purchase and sales prices, of the property are so close together tells me that her brother was likely forced into a quick sale.  Probably the place was resold “as-is” or with little more than a new coat of paint.  If her brother enlisted the help of a licensed real estate agent, then he would have been responsible for paying their commission out of the sales proceeds.  If you factor in the 9.5% interest rate Warren charged her brother, it is very likely that he could have actually lost money on the deal.  But as a lender, Warren of course made money.

As I’ve said before, I have no doubt that Elizabeth Warren is genuinely concerned about the institutionalized or systemic disadvantages borne by America’s low income families.  But she has chosen to make her mark on the political world by attacking wealthy entrepreneurs and the financial industry.  That’s a rather tricky position for someone who has managed to earn a million-dollar fortune for herself, with much of it apparently derived from practices that she now preaches against on the campaign trail.

(Title shamelessly stolen from comments at The Blaze.com)

Shortlink:

Posted by on June 3, 2012.
Filed under Business, corruption, Elections, Finance Reform, Hypocrisy.
Tagged with: .


You can leave a response or trackback to this entry
  • Commander_Chico

    This makes Warren look better to me.  She gets “buy low, sell high.”  Even if she is another redneck Cherokee.

    • jim_m

       Every lefty loves a hypocrite.

      • Commander_Chico

        Flipping houses is not the same as shorting and selling the same crap mortgage backed securities at the same time.

        • http://opinion.ak4mc.us/ McGehee

          Speculators is speculators, whether they deal in paper or dirt.

          • retired.military

            Or oil

            But dont that to BHO or he may have someone put you on his enemies list.

          • Commander_Chico

            No, selling houses is not the same as making up worthless pieces of paper (ok “instruments” with only an electronic existence) and selling and shorting them at the same time.

        • jim_m

           I love the smell of rank hypocrisy in the morning!

          If Warren “buys low and sells high”, she is an economic genius and fit for high office according to Chico.  But if you do it for a living on Wall Street you are a human parasite and deserve to be imprisoned or regulated out of your livelihood.

          It would be one thing if Wall Street people were doing illegal business but Chica is just upset that the idiot government regulations that he so desperately wants to justify, created a circumstance where people thought (sometimes correctly) that they could make a lot of money.  Chica is against this mostly (or so it seems) because he is opposed to people of differing ideology making money.

          • retired.military

            Chico is still mad that the OWS crowd profoundly embarrassed the left and is no longer in the news.

  • Pingback: Elizabeth Warren helped family flip wigwams for heap big wampum … | Real Estate Investing

  • ackwired

    I can’t find the hypocrasy here.  If Mr. Lapaire wrote that she is practicing something that she is campaigning against, or has take an action that she has criticized when taken by others, I missed it.  Buying distressed houses and fixing them up is a legitimate, if risky, business.  The interest rate mentioned sounds about right for bridge loans.  The numbers for the houses that were fixed up indicate to me that the repairs were significant enough that the investor needed to know what they were doing, and the property would probably be inappropriate for the first time homeowner to attempt to buy and fix up.

    I don’t see the problem.

    • jim_m

      I can’t find the hypocrasy here.

      Color me shocked that the leftists cannot identify their own hypocrisy.

      Maybe Warren should distribute her profits to the rest of Massachusetts since her house flipping was made possible by the state that built the roads that allowed her to see the properties and that her contractors used to bring the materials to fix them up with.  Or perhaps she should be paying the government more money for providing the deposit insurance for banks that helped stabilize the banking industry and provided the ability for banks to loan people the money to buy her houses or for her to float loans while she flipped those houses.

      Yes she’s a freaking hypocrite!  She says that we should pay more taxes, that our productivity should belong to the government but she doesn’t put her own money where her mouth is even though there are mechanisms for her to do so.  She is a hypocrite for advocating that others be forced to do what she refuses to do voluntarily.

  • TomInCali

    There’s about as much hypocrisy here as there would be for someone buying stock in a distressed bank while simultaneously advocating for financial reforms that would make it harder for banks to become distressed.

    In other words… none.

  • Pingback: Conn. home sales up again › Condos

  • Pingback: Latest Boston Luxury Condos News | FreeholdCondos.com

  • davidlanza

    Elizabeth Warren’s profits are not as high as reported . . .. unless. . . . .  http://centralpennsylvaniarealestate.blogspot.com/2012/06/elizabeth-warren-real-estate-flipper.html