No, We DON’T Need More Gun Laws Over Maryland Teen Suicide

A young Maryland boy named Joshua Eisner, 14, committed suicide early in June. He used a reproduction civil war era black powder rifle to do it. Now his father is launching an ill-advised and unnecessary drive to force more gun laws on Marylanders, pushing an idea he wants called “Joshua’s law.”

According to his obituary, young Joshua was interested in music and history, the latter being why he owned the old-style firearm. News reports say that he left no note explaining his actions, but that authorities classified his death as a suicide.

Joshua’s father, Andy Eisner, certainly made an effort to be safe with the black powder civil war reproduction rifle that he occasionally let his son use at civil war reenactments. So safe, in fact, that he is said to have stored the black powder ammunition for the rifle at his ex-wife’s house while the gun stayed at his own home. Mr. Eisner also claims never to have shown his son how to load the piece.

Certainly Joshua’s death is a blow to his family and friends and his loss should be mourned even by those who did not know him. The loss of any child is horrible, after all. But because of the method the young man chose for his death, Mr. Eisner is going to an absurd length to assuage his feelings of loss by attempting to force even more gun laws and restrictions on everyone else in the Old Line State.

Sadly, Eisner wants to force what he is styling “Joshua’s Law” on everyone in the state, adding more restrictions to the books. It is all unnecessary and un-asked for.

Now, we all mourn with Mr. Eisner over the loss of his young son. It is always, always tragic when a young person takes the irreversible action of ending his life. But it has to be said that grieving or no, this father has no right to impose the weight of government on his fellows because of his own loss.

There is an old saying that bad facts make bad law, meaning that an outlier incident, an uncommon incident, or a simple lone tragedy is not enough reason to start imposing laws on everyone else. While it is true that sometimes a tragic incident does shed light on a dearth of needed rules and laws, not every tragic incident should be treated as another excuse to enlarge the power of big government.

This incident is one of those that doesn’t need a new law. This one incident of a teen suicide with a black powder weapon does not mean new laws are needed. It isn’t like this is one of dozens of incidents showing a need for more restrictions. It isn’t like people with black powder weapons are suddenly running rampant across the state. You just don’t start using the iron boot heel of government because one person did something bad.

Mr. Eisner would be advised to assuage his grief over his loss in some other way, one that doesn’t penalize all his fellow citizens, one that doesn’t restrict everyone else’s Second Amendment rights.

As an aside, a news report in question furthers that idiotic refrain from the media of claiming it is the gun that is responsible for any action perpetrated with it.

The report uses rhetoric as follows: “The black powder gun Joshua used that led to his death…”

No, the gun did not “lead to his death.” The gun was but an instrument. An inanimate object. It played no part in the young man’s ultimate decision. People determined to commit suicide do not let methods deter them. If one means is not available, they will choose another. The gun is not a fault any more than drugs would be or a rope would be if the young man chose those options.

This is a terrible moment for the Eisner family, most certainly. But their grief is just not a reason to attack everyone else’s rights.

Shortlink:

Posted by on June 16, 2012.
Filed under 2nd Amendment, Big government, Constitutional Issues, corruption, Deaths, Liberals.
Warner Todd Huston is a Chicago-based freelance writer, has been writing opinion editorials and social criticism since early 2001 and is featured on many websites such as Andrew Breitbart's BigGovernment.com and BigJournalism.com, RightWingNews.com, CanadaFreePress.com, RightPundits.com, StoptheACLU.com, Human Events Magazine, among many, many others. Additionally, he has been a frequent guest on talk-radio programs to discuss his opinion editorials and current events.He has also written for several history magazines and appears in the new book "Americans on Politics, Policy and Pop Culture" which can be purchased on amazon.com. He is also the owner and operator of PubliusForum.com. Feel free to contact him with any comments or questions, EMAIL Warner Todd Huston: igcolonel .at. hotmail.com"The only end of writing is to enable the reader better to enjoy life, or better to endure it." --Samuel Johnson

You can leave a response or trackback to this entry
  • GarandFan

    No mention from Mr. Eisner as to WHY the weapon was not secured.

    The son used the weapon in Civil War reenactments, and Daddy doesn’t understand how his son knew how to load the weapon?

    • http://www.rustedsky.net JLawson

      Yes, because loading a black-powder weapon is so hideously complicated, there’s no way a 14-year old could EVER figure it out just from hanging around re-enactors.

      From Google – “How to load black powder rifle” – about 1,590,000 results in 0.30 seconds.

      Nope, clueless there. I gots no idea how he might have learned it.

      He really needs to be looking at something other than the rifle as the cause of what happened. I’m tending to agree with Jim_m – there was something badly wrong that he didn’t see, for whatever reason.

      I really feel for him, however. I can imagine the guilt and grief that he’s feeling, and this is his attempt to atone for it.

      • UOG

        Usually I’m with you every step of the way Lawson. But not this time. Guilt? Absolutely. Atone? Not one bit. He seeks absolution. Joshua’s law is his path to absolution. It’s just part of the national ethos of not accepting responsibility.

        • http://www.rustedsky.net JLawson

          I’m going out on a limb here, and suggesting that he seeks absolution through atonement. “I fucked up and didn’t pay enough attention. I feel horrible. If I can get this law passed, then I’ll have done something to partially atone for what I did and didn’t do, and maybe I’ll feel better in addition.”

          The two aren’t mutually exclusive. I’m not particularly familiar with the Catholic practice of confession and absolution, but isn’t there something between the two that serves as punishment and atonement?

          I don’t know whether he’s seeking atonement, absolution, or a combination of the two. He may be doing the one thing he can think of to make his heart stop hurting, and I won’t fault him for that. Grief sucks bigtime, and isn’t conducive to clear thought and analysis.

          • UOG

            Of course I don’t know. But actions here remind me of other instances where denial of responsibility was the motivator. So I remain skeptical. He reminds of the the Dr. who gave his 8-year old permission to fire an Uzi on full auto and then said he didn’t know what happened.

            I’m not competent to comment on any matter of Catholic doctrine.

          • http://www.rustedsky.net JLawson

            I worked with the little guy using fully adult power tools from the time he was 6. (Bandsaw, drill press, router, bench sander, grinder…) I ALWAYS impressed on him the need for safety, and at first my hands guided his, then hovered over his – then after about 4 years or so I was comfortable being as far as a yard away while he was using them. I was still watching closely, though.

            Now I’ve got no problems letting him do his own thing in the shop. You have to teach safety and preach safety, and show them how to do things safely.

            Then you’ve got to stand back and watch them make their own mistakes. (“There’s a reason why that chunk of 2×4 was kicked back – want to tell me why?” “I didn’t have the saw blade set high enough?” “Well, try again, and set it so the blade goes more DOWN through the wood, instead of in at an angle.”) You stop them before the mistakes will be harmful, but a sudden kickback of a chunk of wood will impress a lesson that won’t be forgotten quickly.

            That said – I talk with the little guy a hell of a lot more than my dad did with me, and do more. Differing philosophies of child rearing, I guess.

            Now, having an 8-year old firing an UZI on full auto without having your hands covering his for control and guiding him strikes me as murderously stupid. At that age, it’s .22s unassisted (but closely supervised as in you don’t let him get out of arm’s length and you keep your eyes on him every second) and the NRA Eddie Eagle program. Full auto weapons aren’t toys, shouldn’t be treated like like toys, and NEVER given to an untrained 8-year old.

            But a black powder rifle? (And from reading the referenced article, I’ve got a hard time figuring whether this was a rifle or a pistol – the rifles of the time were a bit cumbersome to ‘accidentally’ shot oneself in the head with, and the article seems to make no distinction…) That, without ammo/powder, would have seemed to me fairly safe.

            As far as Catholic practice goes, all I’ve seen of confession is in movies. You sit down, go through the ritual opening, talk to the priest, he assigns penance, you do it to atone, and you walk out with absolution.

            Ah, well. Doesn’t much matter, but I really feel for the guy.

          • UOG

            First, I know you’re truly deserving of it, Happy Father’s Day (even if I am a day late).

            Second, I really don’t have anything else to say. You sound like your a great father. I wanted to wish you a Happy Father’s Day. Sincerely. From the Old Guy.

          • http://www.rustedsky.net JLawson

            Thank you, UOG. I appreciate that greatly. It’s never too late to have a happy childhood, and my son’s been teaching me as much as I’ve been teaching him.

            And to all the other fathers out there – whoever you might be – Happy Father’s Day – even if it’s a late one!

  • jim_m

    Rule #1: If you are naming your bill after a dead child it probably is bad law.

    • Commander_Chico

      Good one.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_WZUXGPRJ6DT7O2QUSWVMOV36HU JoeVideoGuy

      Amber Alert is good “…was originally named for Amber Hagerman, a 9-year-old child who was abducted and murdered in Arlington, Texas in 1996″

      • jim_m

        The Amber Alert is not a law that punishes people but an action meant to find an abducted child. There’s a huge difference.

        • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_WZUXGPRJ6DT7O2QUSWVMOV36HU JoeVideoGuy

          “naming your bill” That’s all you said. While I can appreciate your position on this issue, your comment lacks the depth needed to stand up to questioning. Ryan White Care Act, Code Adam, Kristen’s Law, Jessica’s Law, Anton’s Law, “the Joey Levick Bill, the Dane Rempfer Bill, & Cameron Gulbransen Kids and Cars Safety Act.

          If you were just trying to be cute, then that’s fine. But a lot of people are able to take a tragedy and turn it into great legislation that can save future lives. Don’t throw the baby out with the bath water.

          • jim_m

            You don’t need to name good legislation after a dead person to make it good. However, you do have to name bad legislation after a dead person in order to get sympathy votes to get is passed. I’m against the deceptive pushing of crappy legislation that does little to address the problem and a lot to restrict the freedoms of law abiding Americans.

            It isn’t throwing the baby out with the bathwater to ask that we not foist off bad and intrusive laws on the rest of us because 1 family experiences some sort of tragedy.

          • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_WZUXGPRJ6DT7O2QUSWVMOV36HU JoeVideoGuy

            Wow, I just did a simple google search of bills named after people. Looks like you actually read the articles. Well played.

          • jim_m

            You also list a bunch of laws that are little more than nanny state busy body legislation mandating child safety seats etc. While these laws do increase child safety, did we really need to mandate 100′s of millions of dollars in child seats? Did we have to create mandates that fell disproportionately on the lower income family? Did we have to criminalize non use of child seats to the point of making it criminal neglect?

            Like I said, the seats work (although there is also evidence that if not used properly, and many people do not install them properly, that they are every bit as dangerous as not having one at all) but did we see such massive carnage before these laws? No, of course not, because had we done so we would ave all been beating a path to the store to buy the seats already.

            Just more proof that named laws are predominantly nanny state crap legislation. A good law doesn’t need some sob story to get itself passed.

  • jim_m

    “Mr. Eisner would be advised to assuage his grief over his loss in some
    other way, one that doesn’t penalize all his fellow citizens, one that
    doesn’t restrict everyone else’s Second Amendment rights.”

    Perhaps if he had spent as much time paying attention to his son as he is on this law he wouldn’t be going through this.

  • Commander_Chico

    A very sad story when any child dies. I can’t imagine the grief of the father. The ambiguity of the situation (no note) must be tearing at him.

    But if the boy had hanged himself, would he be trying to ban rope?

    • jim_m

      The situation stinks. It isn’t the parent’s fault. It certainly isn’t the gun’s fault. Life is difficult. The boy made a very unfortunate choice but the blame (to the extent that there should be any) belongs to him alone.

    • http://www.rustedsky.net JLawson

      That’s a good question.

      It kind of shows where our culture is anymore. It’s never the fault of the people using it – it’s always the fault of the device.

      I think we’ve got too many lawyers.

      But, man, I can just imagine how he’s tearing at himself now, trying to remember anything that would provide a clue. Suicide’s a permanent solution to a temporary problem – and just being able to talk about the problem that’s making you think that’s the solution goes a long way towards defusing it.

      That said – he may never know. The guilt must be tremendous.

  • Stan Brewer

    Mr Eisner is just like Sarah Brady after her hubby was shot during the attempted Reagan assassination. She blamed the gun for the incident. Why didn’t she blame the ravings of the lunatic John W Hinckely? Oh yeah he was and still is a committed lefty. I am surprised that Eisner did not blame Sarah Palin and the Tea Party for his son’s death, as the left did after the Gabriele Gifford shooting

  • retired.military

    Instead of a new gun law maybe they should ban civil war reenactments. Or maybe make another law against teens comssitting suicide. It wou8ld be just about as effective

    • UOG

      It’s probably just a matter of time before some bright spark in the legislature proposes a law making teen suicide a capitol offense.

  • http://www.wizbangblog.com David Robertson

    Here is the comment that I gave to that website carrying the story about that boy’s death:
    “There is a difference between a storing a gun and keeping a gun locked up so that a minor cannot get it. Wouldn’t Joshua’s use of the black powder gun have been prevented if his father had locked it up? Joshua’s death was not the result of a lack of a law regulating black powder guns. It was the result of Joshua’s determination to kill himself, and he chose to use the black power gun because he had access to it.”

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Doc-Musgrove/100000620620015 Doc Musgrove

    “…assuage his feelings of loss…”? Perhaps he is assuaging his feelings of guilt?

    • jim_m

      Either way, feelings are by definition irrational, and so are this man’s actions.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Doc-Musgrove/100000620620015 Doc Musgrove

    If the gun was in one place, and the black powder was in a separate residence, where did the kid get the black powder (and where were the balls stored)?

  • Idahoser

    you make the incorrect assumption that if this was happening on a regular basis, that new laws WOULD be needed.

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/HL3635XCHO7RVRN2JMXPUJQXUY Steven

    Assuming the (unproven) fact the boy had desired to kill himself, any reasonably resourceful youth will find dozens of ways of accomplishing this mis-deed.

    Compare and contrast; how many people have, and will die of the austerity resulting from Socialized Medicine?

    A Nanny-State Government is far more deadly than the improper use of firearms.