Liberal Carnival: Hand Wringing on Bullying that Never Happened

On a recent hospital visit, Denver photographer Steve Crecelius found out he was a woman. Now, this late in his life, he’s all worried about “bullying.” It’s another example of the empty thinking of liberalism that has infected our national discourse.

Mr. Crecelius is what used to be called an hermaphrodite, a person born with both sexual organs either external or internal. In Crecelius’ case inside him he has female organs while outside he has working male genitalia.

According to the ABC News article, some 1,500 kids are born each year with some level of “intersex condition” — the new term for hermaphroditism.

It is an interesting condition, though rare. One might expect that such children could grow up with some coping issues, of course. But, “bullying”? That is what Mr. Crecelius is suddenly all worried about?

At the end of the article this is what ABC writes:

“I think of bullying, because I haven’t heard anyone talk about this. It’s important to talk about,” Crecelius said. “People need to be accepting and understand. I was born this way, and loving each other and supporting each other will always be the main factor in our household.”

Yet, nowhere in the article nor the accompanying video does Crecelius say he lived a life of being bullied. He does mention that once he was called a “queer” back in the 1960s or 70s, but why is he suddenly all about “bullying”? By his own admission he never even knew of his own condition until he reached his late 30s!

The problem of an “intersex condition” is nothing to dismiss, granted. But is this a public condition, one that would draw “bullies”? The fact is, the only way such a physical condition would become open to bullying is if the person suffering the condition would make it public knowledge. After all, it isn’t something readily seen from a properly clothed individual!

Additionally it isn’t the sort of condition that is so prevalent that a public campaign is necessary. Additionally, the condition does not guarantee a challenge to emotional stability for the sufferer. The condition can range from only vestiges of a second set of sexual organs to full-blown dualism. Many suffers won’t have any problem at all living with their condition and will find it just one of the curious parts of their life and some may never even know they have the condition at all. On the other hand, some will have severe coping problems growing up with the physical condition.

But here is the thing: it’s individual. It isn’t the sort of thing that a giant campaign against “bullying” would have any effect on. Yet, Crecelius stampedes straight to “bullying” as a concern. Why?

Naturally, it’s because of the preoccupation that liberals have with social engineering. One person, in this case Mr. Crecelius, had some vague problem growing up so to liberals this means the whole of society should have an onus put upon it.

Certainly every human should have the expectation that their physical condition should not be used as some sort of weapon against them. But this is a matter of general gentility. There is no need for campaigns touting the special needs of specific and rare conditions.

As a society we should be teaching our kids to be kind to everyone. We don’t need to school them on hermaphroditism. It’s just unnecessary minutia, silly navel gazing that doesn’t do anyone any good. Worse, it’s just another way to separate people into classes. Now we have yet another special class to put people in: intersexism.

Shortlink:

Posted by on June 17, 2012.
Filed under corruption, Health Care.
Warner Todd Huston is a Chicago-based freelance writer, has been writing opinion editorials and social criticism since early 2001 and is featured on many websites such as Andrew Breitbart's BigGovernment.com and BigJournalism.com, RightWingNews.com, CanadaFreePress.com, RightPundits.com, StoptheACLU.com, Human Events Magazine, among many, many others. Additionally, he has been a frequent guest on talk-radio programs to discuss his opinion editorials and current events.He has also written for several history magazines and appears in the new book "Americans on Politics, Policy and Pop Culture" which can be purchased on amazon.com. He is also the owner and operator of PubliusForum.com. Feel free to contact him with any comments or questions, EMAIL Warner Todd Huston: igcolonel .at. hotmail.com"The only end of writing is to enable the reader better to enjoy life, or better to endure it." --Samuel Johnson

You can leave a response or trackback to this entry
  • jim_m

    I don’t get it . If the left really believes that truth is relative, why can they not respect the fact that some people think that there is something wrong with people being gay, or hermaphrodites, or having different skin color, etc? It seems to me that they have no problem accommodating these beliefs in muslims. Why not here? They are so bent that American culture is wrong why don’t they start accepting the cultural norms of Afghanistan? We could be stoning and hanging these people and they wouldn’t say a word then.

    And no I am not advocating any sort of abuse of the kind I just wrote of. I’m merely pointing out the inconsistency in the left that rails against certain attitudes and behaviors when it serves their political agenda and ignores them completely when it does not. They don’t really care about equality or bullying. If they did they would be against it in all cases.

    • herddog505

      Because (and I realize that I’m preaching to the choir) it’s not about actually helping people or “justice” for lefties: it’s about political power. By making “bullying” a trendy cause celebre, they open the door to all sorts of panels, commissions, committees, agencies, laws and regulations that give them more power to shape society in ways that they see fit. If “bullying” is a crime, then guess who gets to define what constitutes bullying? Guess who gets to decide how to punish the bullies? And guess who gets to decide how the victims should be (ahem) compensated for their suffering?

  • http://opinion.ak4mc.us/ McGehee

    The focus on “bullying” turns a longstanding condition of childhood into an institution and therefore makes it something that can never be defeated.

    There is no “bullying,” there are only bullies. A bully not only can be defeated, he desperately needs to be — for his own good as well as everyone else’s.

    Likewise, instead of whining about “racism” maybe people should focus on defeating racists. For the same reason, especially since actual (as opposed to the much more common imaginary) racists are just a specialized form of bully.

    • jim_m

      But then we cannot create huge classes of victims. What good is that?

  • GarandFan

    Perhaps Steve Crecelius can create a new class of ‘victims’ deserving of some type of government support.

  • ackwired

    I don’t see the leftist’s involvement in this. Granted, liberals support minorities in their group efforts to obtain civil liberties and equal treatement. But I don’t see any evidence that they have taken up this person’s cause. All we have here is a report that a person found out that he has both male and female sex organs. He thought of “bullying” because some people are reluctant to discuss this condition. I don’t see any evidence that any “leftists” took up the cause, and I don’t see any evidence that anyone is calling for “a giant campaign” as a result.

    • Brucehenry

      Exactly.

      This has been another edition of the Huston Report: News I Imagine Might Happen.

      • Commander_Chico

        Or an excuse to say “hermaphrodite.”

  • Wild_Willie

    Actually, in the 60′s and 70′s being called queer is the exact definition of the word in this case. I guess proper grammar is now bullying. ww

  • ryan a

    What a strange post.

    Where are you getting all of this stuff about social engineering and big
    campaigns and all of that? This is a story about a person who found
    out that he/she is different, and who expressed some concerns about how
    people would react because of that. That’s about it. His main
    conclusion was that people need to be accepting and understanding, and
    that’s it’s important to talk about these kinds of issues.

    So what’s wrong with that?

    “As a society we should be teaching our kids to be kind to everyone.”

    Ok, good. So how do you think this should be done? Are you saying that parents should not talk about subjects like this, or what?

    • http://www.rustedsky.net JLawson

      Teach them to be kind to everyone.

      By example.

      Kids – untaught – are barbarians. Most haven’t been taught anything more than rudimentary manners by the time they hit first grade. And then they pick up the attitudes of their peer group pretty damn fast. If you DON’T correct that thinking when it starts, you end up with problems.

      Hell, maybe I’m not an ‘average’ parent, but I’ve taught my son how to say please and thank you, and how to be kind to others. You don’t celebrate differences – “Oh, look, there’s a transgendered little person of color! Be especially certain to be kind to THEM!” and you don’t denigrate them – “Oh, look! There’s a dumbshit transgendered little person of color! They’re worthless scum, feel free to kick them when you get the chance!” – you just don’t make it remarkable that someone is different – and treat everyone politely.

      Kids get the message pretty fast, because they’re actually pretty damned smart. The trick sometimes is to remember that they’re inexperienced – NOT stupid. If you treat them like a small-statured adult, answer their questions honestly (and appropriate for their ages – you’re not going to get into the physics of how an implosion-type nuclear weapon works when he asks what an atomic bomb is at age 5, after all) they’ll get the message.

      Don’t depend on TV to do it. Don’t depend on the schools. Don’t depend on peer groups, daycare, the books they read – do it by showing them yourself how it’s done by the way you ACT, not the way you TALK.

      What you’ll tell them will go in one ear and out the other. What they see you DO is what’s important.

      • ryan a

        A very admirable, respectable, and reasonable response, JLawson, as usual. Sometimes I wonder why the powers at be at W-bang don’t just give you a job here. Just sayin.

        Anyway, I agree with your points about teaching kids by example. Actions do certainly speak volumes. At the same time, I don’t really see a problem with also using dialog and communication to talk through any questions, fears, or concerns that kids have when it comes to subjects like “being normal” and human difference. But you already mentioned the need to answer kids’ questions honestly, so maybe we’re on a similar page there too.

        Good to hear from you, btw.

        • http://www.rustedsky.net JLawson

          And good to hear from you. Taking a break from your studies?

          Re answering honestly…

          “Daddy, why is that man’s skin so dark?”

          “There’s something called ‘melanin’ in your skin. Everyone’s got some, and some have more than others.”

          “Oh. Okay.”

          There you go. Two hours worth of diversity relations training dialog summed up in two sentences, lol. How’s that for communications?

          If you don’t make a big deal of something, the child will accept it as not a big deal. I think a lot of educators and groups see a need to really push the subject, primarily because there’s really good money to be made charging out the wazoo for ‘diversity courses’ designed to ‘teach tolerance in the workplace.’

          But then, I’ve got a pretty low tolerance for stupidity of that sort. (IE racism) And someone insisting on privilege because of skin color (whether light or dark, I don’t give a damn) gets pushed to the back of the line as far as I’m concerned. You want equality? Inside we’re all red and messy. Anything else is just surface.

          Cultural is a bit more complex, but not much. When you have children, take them to various kinds of hole in the wall ethnic restaurants. Pretend you’re going to different countries, and try different foods. Talk about the different beliefs, different ways of living, different foods. Hit every cuisine you can stomach – and always be polite.

          (That reminds me – haven’t been to an Ethiopian restaurant in quite a while.)

          I got my son to eat salt & pepper calamari in a Chinese restaurant when he was three . Had to tell him it was fried rubber bands to get him to try it, but once he did, he liked it!

          I think the trick is to introduce them early to the ideas of differences, whether it’s cultural or physiological. Once you do, then it’s no big deal. But if you wait until 8 or 10, and then make a real big deal about how they’ve got to ‘learn diversity’ – then you’re setting the stage for some really prejudiced thinking.

          “You know, they’re making us study a lot about skin color, and how I shouldn’t judge people by that. Why? Hey, maybe there’s really some problem with folks with oddly colored skin…” And the seed’s sown, by making a big deal out of something that isn’t a big deal at all. The kid looks for problems and reasons to be prejudiced, where he wouldn’t have before.

          Of course, each child is different and each parent has their own style and way of doing things. What do you do with the kid who won’t eat anything but hot dogs and green beans? Or the parent who regularly uses language and ethnic slurs that would make the folks on Jersey Shore blush?

          I don’t know. Only answers I’ve got are the ones that worked for me, I do know that, knowing how my folks raised me, I was determined to change how I raised my son, and then a friend sent me a poem…

          ————

          “Walk a little slower Daddy,”
          said a child so small,
          “I’m following in your footsteps
          and I don’t want to fall.

          Sometimes your steps are very fast,
          Sometimes they’re hard to see;
          So walk a little slower, Daddy,
          For you are leading me.

          Someday when I’m all grown up,
          You’re what I want to be;
          Then I will have a little child
          Who’ll want to follow me.

          And I would want to lead just right,
          And know that I was true,
          So walk a little slower, Daddy,
          For I must follow you.”

          —————-

          And that changed everything. When you’re aware that your child watches you all the time, you change what you do.

          Well. At least, I did.

          Re getting on at Wizbang – maybe when they announce auditions again. Don’t think the gig pays anything, but that’s not important…

          • jim_m

            If you don’t make a big deal of something, the child will accept it as not a big deal.

            The epic failure of the left’s policy on race summed up in less than 20 words.

          • http://www.rustedsky.net JLawson

            I’m feeling charitable tonight. I think that their intentions were good – and they really thought that the way to get rid of institutional racism was by pushing for advantages for the those who had been discriminated against for so long.

            But for how long? Slavery ended with the Civil War. Segregation ended in the ’60s. We got Johnson’s ‘Great Society’ – which effectively broke up a lot of homes and destroyed the inner cities. Yes – it was with the best of intentions, but you know the saying about what the road to hell is paved with…

            A friend of mine in the Reserves was having problems with her husband. (They’d been separated close onto a decade – then he got off active duty and they started living together.) He was driving her nuts! She’d nag him about the shower curtain, about this, and that. She loved the man, but he was driving her crazy.

            So I suggested she start using a dog trainer’s trick. Praise the things he did right, and just mention briefly the things he did wrong. She was dubious, but agreed to try it.

            Next drill, she told me the results. By NOT harping on what he was doing wrong, she was seeing all the things he did right, and the things that irked her so much … he stopped doing them when she just asked “Hey, could you stop doing that?” without nagging – and when he did, she praised him. She said it turned their marriage around, but I think it would have settled down eventually as they got used to each other again.

            When you stop harping on what’s wrong, it’s a lot easier to see what’s right. Things settle down.

            But the trouble with race in our country, it’s never been allowed to settle down. Things are SO much better now than in the 50s and 60s, but you’ve got the professional grifters and poverty-pimp ‘spokesmen’, who ostensibly want to make things better… but see that if things DO get better, they’re out of a job. They know what their paychecks come from, and it’s not peaceful coexistence, I’m sorry to say. So you hear rhetoric about how the white man wants to put them all back in chains and equally ridiculous stuff – and nobody calls them out saying it’s bullshit.

            So they get all sorts of advantages, and ‘affirmative action’ putting people who are barely qualified into jobs they can barely do. You have school systems that warehouse students who won’t learn because it’s ‘acting white’ – and they end up with crippling educational disadvantages. It’s a big damned mess, all created with good intentions.

            And I don’t even have any real suggestions on how to fix it. There may be no solution for that, except for time.

            But this is getting way off of the ‘bullying because of different (whatever) track. I think I’ll stop now.

            ;- )

          • ryan a

            “And good to hear from you. Taking a break from your studies?”

            Right in the middle of them. I’m in Mexico, doing fieldwork. Sometimes it’s good to get a break here and there. Especially when it’s so damn hot!

            “Two hours worth of diversity relations training dialog summed up in two sentences, lol. How’s that for communications?”

            Well, honesty and dialog go a long way. If kids ask about human difference, talk about it. Your answer about melanin is a good one…right to the point. Ironic how much has been made about relative differences in pigmentation in human history, no? Ridiculous, when you really think about it. But, humans often judge one another based upon really superficial things.

            “I think a lot of educators and groups see a need to really push the
            subject, primarily because there’s really good money to be made charging
            out the wazoo for ‘diversity courses’ designed to ‘teach tolerance in
            the workplace.’”

            Ya, I agree that some folks in academia, politics, etc take things way too far, and make *everything* about their pet issue. At the same time, there are indeed prejudiced, biased, and bigoted people in the world, so I do see value in talking about these kinds of issues (at home, in school, etc). Sometimes things truly are a “big deal” because there are in fact racists and bigots out there–but you’re right that sometimes certain folks are basically just throwing gasoline on the proverbial fire.

            “You want equality? Inside we’re all red and messy. Anything else is just surface.”

            Yep.

            “I think the trick is to introduce them early to the ideas of
            differences, whether it’s cultural or physiological. Once you do, then
            it’s no big deal.”

            Well, ya, that’s teaching kids about the very existence of human difference, and showing them that these things are ok. The sooner they learn that sort of thing, the better. Some kids never experience this sort of thing, let alone talk about it, so they can run into a real social shock. And then it can be double worse if they have been taught certain social prejudices. But the good thing is that kids can come around if they are willing to rethink their ideas and assumptions a bit.

            “And that changed everything. When you’re aware that your child watches you all the time, you change what you do.”

            Very well said.

            “Re getting on at Wizbang – maybe when they announce auditions again.
            Don’t think the gig pays anything, but that’s not important…”

            I really think you should. You’d be a good addition.

            Thanks for the discussion!

          • http://www.rustedsky.net JLawson

            “At the same time, there are indeed prejudiced, biased, and bigoted people in the world, so I do see value in talking about these kinds of issues (at home, in school, etc). Sometimes things truly are a “big deal” because there are in fact racists and bigots out there–but you’re right that sometimes certain folks are basically just throwing gasoline on the proverbial fire.”

            You’re not going to find anyone above about 10 that hasn’t been exposed at length to the ideas of equality. SciFi on TV’s been on the cutting edge of it for decades now, (Ah, Firefly… a show cut down way before its prime, not to mention all the series that preceded it…) not to mention all the sitcoms where integration’s the norm, not to mention the entertainment industry where talent is the key instead of skin color.

            (We won’t talk about the rap subculture there. Self-segregation, misogyny, violence, all sorts of good stuff going on that’d be soundly and rightly condemned if whites were doing it, but engenders a strange silence when blacks do it… It’s a boil on our society, and if it does burst it’s going to be nasty and difficult to cure without a lot of violence. But sometimes the best thing to do is leave a boil alone.)

            Interracial marriage is common now, where it really wasn’t when I was a kid.

            So if, by the age of 30 or so, someone’s a bigot / racist, you’re not going to change their minds by sitting them down in a ‘diversity training session’ for an hour or two. At best, they’ll roll their eyes and be slient about their attitudes in the workplace. At worst? They come away more convinced that they’re right, and angry and resentful over having their racist attitudes shoved in their faces. Yeah, that’ll make the workplace better.

            And here’s a radical thought – why should you even try?

            (Reflexive reply – because they’re bigots and they’re wrong. Okay, they’re wrong. How much time and effort are you willing to spend to convince them of that?)

            You can sit them in lectures, you can browbeat them all day long – and what do you end up with? Someone who’s still a racist and/or a bigot. (And let’s be honest here – it ain’t all one way by a long shot.) But they’ve learned to be quiet about their feelings. (Which might be okay in itself.)

            In my lifetime i’ve seen Segregation disappear. I’ve seen social mores and customs change wildly for the better regarding race relations. I’ve seen an explosion of diversity in the US. I’ve seen a hell of a lot of GOOD social changes.

            And they’re ignored – with time, money, and effort focused like a laser on the things that are wrong… which are getting of less and less importance.

            As Herddog posted above – “Because (and I realize that I’m preaching to the choir) it’s not about actually helping people or “justice” for lefties: it’s about political power.”

            And he’s right. You never get political power by saying things are pretty much okay, all that has to happen is some minor changes. There’s always got to be a disaster in the offing, it’s always got to be the worst thing ever, it’s always got to be urgent that something be done right NOW or we’re going to (Insert scenario here). And they’re always the ones who know just the right thing to do, oddly enough. Just hand over a blank check, it’ll all be okay.

            And in time, when the disaster doesn’t come about, and people are polite to each other without having the PC police beating ‘em with clubs, when the sun keeps coming up and the seasons flowing… all of it becomes much less important.

            Sometimes we obsess about stuff that, in the long run, doesn’t matter at all.

            Stay hydrated, man, and stay safe!

          • ryan a

            Hey JL.

            “You’re not going to find anyone above about 10 that hasn’t been exposed at length to the ideas of equality. SciFi on TV’s been on the cutting edge of it for decades now…”

            Ya, I suppose TV shows can introduce some of these ideas…but I agreed with what you said above: “Don’t depend on TV to do it.” TV shows introduce all sorts of ideas, but only to a certain extent before they cut to the commercials. That’s why I think these sorts of lessons require input and dialog from parents, not to mention teachers. Prejudice and bigotry are learned behaviors, after all–and all I am saying here is that parents (and teachers IMO) play a key role in teaching kids about empathy, respect, etc.

            “So if, by the age of 30 or so, someone’s a bigot / racist, you’re not
            going to change their minds by sitting them down in a ‘diversity
            training session’ for an hour or two.”

            You’re probably right that people aren’t going to change at a certain point. Trust me, I know plenty of people who are firmly entrenched in their way of thinking about [insert x group of people]. It’s impossible, and often a waste of time, to start some conversation about respecting difference or something with many folks. So this leads to another issue: what’s to be done about groups of bigots and racists? How should a society deal with these groups? Of course, it all depends on what they are doing (if anything) with their prejudiced or racist worldviews.

            But then…I’m not advocating for “diversity training sessions” in the workplace here. I am arguing for the need to educate kids–at home and in school–about these sorts of things. Again, this is because something like racism is absolutely a socially learned behavior–we are not born with some hardwired tendency to fear and/or hate people with different levels of melanin–this has to be learned. This doesn’t mean I think we need to turn the subject of “human diversity” or prejudice into some “big deal.” Racism, for example, is something that’s out there in the world–here in the US, sure, but it also takes many forms all around the world (whether Russia, Japan, Mexico, Brazil, etc). I think there is value in teaching about and talking about these issues, again at home and in school. I see no use in ignoring it because it’s an inconvenient or difficult subject.

            “In my lifetime i’ve seen Segregation disappear. I’ve seen social mores
            and customs change wildly for the better regarding race relations. I’ve
            seen an explosion of diversity in the US. I’ve seen a hell of a lot of
            GOOD social changes.”

            Here in the US we have had a lot of positive changes social changes, especially in the 20th century–from women’s rights to civil rights onward. These positive changes are part of the story…are you saying that you think these aspects of our history are getting ignored? Or are you saying that some folks ignore all the good and only focus on the negative?

            Re: what Herddog said:

            Well, now we’re shifting into the politics of it all. I’d argue that a lot of what politicians and pundits say is more about control and power than about justice, fairness, or really doing “the right thing” for “the people.” Each side has their issues that they focus on, and a lot of it is political rhetoric. The left drones on and on about justice and equity, and the right goes on and on about liberty and freedom. And most of it is a bunch of BS.

            “And they’re always the ones who know just the right thing to do, oddly enough. Just hand over a blank check, it’ll all be okay.”

            Ya, I’m pretty sure that politicians, kings, despots, and other rulers have been doing this sort of thing for thousands of years. So the proverbial people need to continue to take all of the “campaign promises” with barrels of salt.

            Ok, I’m off to see how hot the sun is going to get today. Saludos from Mexico.

          • http://www.rustedsky.net JLawson

            Wear a hat, man!

            Re: “These positive changes are part of the story…are you saying that you think these aspects of our history are getting ignored? Or are you saying that some folks ignore all the good and only focus on the negative?”

            When their paychecks depend on keeping the grievances going – you’re not going to hear any good news from the likes of Jackson, Sharpton, and Farrakhan. And for better or worse, they’re the spokesmen that are turned to by the MSM when the subject of race comes up. They’re reliable, they’re consistent.

            And they’ll never say things are getting better.

            Me? I try to focus on the good.

            “Again, this is because something like racism is absolutely a socially learned behavior–we are not born with some hardwired tendency to fear and/or hate people with different levels of melanin–this has to be learned.”

            Absolutely. In fact (as my lovely bride occasionally says) there’s a song about that.

            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/You%27ve_Got_to_Be_Carefully_Taught has the history behind it in the musical “South Pacific”.

            You’ve got to be taught
            To hate and fear,
            You’ve got to be taught
            From
            year to year,
            It’s got to be drummed
            In your dear little ear
            You’ve got
            to be carefully taught.

            You’ve got to be taught to be afraid
            Of people whose eyes are oddly made,
            And people whose skin is a diff’rent shade,
            You’ve got to be carefully taught.

            You’ve got to be taught before it’s too late,
            Before you are six or seven or eight,
            To hate all the people your relatives hate,
            You’ve got to be carefully taught
            —————

            And what happens when you’re not taught that?

            “So this leads to another issue: what’s to be done about groups of bigots and racists? How should a society deal with these groups? Of course, it all depends on what they are doing (if anything) with their prejudiced or racist worldviews.”

            The idea of a quick fix is a nice one. Wouldn’t it be great if everyone could just take a pill before going to bed, and the next day nobody would want to make war, lie, steal, be prejudiced, ruin the environment and overrun their cell phone data plans?

            Hmmm. Wonder what the market might be for time-release cyanide? Probably not many repeat buyers… well, never mind – I guess there’s no quick fix.

            So we go for the long run… which is what we’re doing anyway. Smoking in the US used to be ubiquitous, now it’s actually fairly rare. You change the social climate, and the people will adjust. The social climate’s changed to a point where overt expressions of racism aren’t acceptable – or they’re laughed at. (Witness the mighty KKK, for example. Once a political force to be reckoned with – now an organization’s that’s pretty much a joke.)

            Yes, there’s hard-core racists. But when they’ve got no power – and are basically ridiculed by folks around them who have two or more functioning neurons to rub together – the possibility that they’re going to GET power as our society integrates itself further seems pretty unlikely to me.

            So – if they’re doing nothing, leave them be. We wait them out. If they’re openly advocating hurting others of the improper ‘type’ – shut ‘em down legally IF they act. If they’re attempting things (like the various Muslim sects attempting conversion through explosion in the ME) then shut them down hard.

            Unless something exceedingly unfortunate happens… which I think some on both sides of the racial divide would actively like to see.. in a couple more decades, maybe a couple of generations – they’ll be gone.

            And good riddance to them, I say!

  • Commander_Chico

    One hermaphrodite does not make a trend. Meh.

    I guess you could tell him to eff himself.

  • Digg34

    Seems to me that he is setting himself up as a martyr. He has found he has a unique condition and is inviting the pain of public commentary.

  • http://www.shockandblog.com/ Jay McHue

    Dear Mr. (?) Crecelius,

    I don’t give two flying f**ks about your damn genitals. Get over yourself and stop trying to artificially turn yourself into a faux martyr.

    Sincerely,
    Me