New Film: Jesus Christ Not Divine, Born of Roman Rapist

So much for Hollywood’s days of the sweeping Biblical epic, I suppose, but a film director and author of a controversial book on Jesus Christ has announced he’s found the financial backing to produce a film on the Christian Messiah that will contend that Jesus was just a good politician, one born after his mother was raped by a Roman soldier, but a man most certainly not the Son of God.

Director Paul Verhoeven, most famous for having brought movie goers the 1987 film Robocop, is looking to begin filming his newest flick based on his own book, Jesus Of Nazareth.

Verhoeven’s 2008 book dismisses the Bible’s chronicling of miracles performed by Jesus Christ not to mention asserting that Jesus’ birth was less than immaculate and indeed was the result of Mary being raped by a Roman Centurion. Verhoeven also claims to debunk the fact that Judas Iscariot — one of the Twelve Disciples — betrayed Jesus to Roman authorities just previous to the crucifixion.

In 2008 Bill Donohue, President of the Catholic League, called Verhoeven’s book “laughable.”

“Here we go again with idle speculation grounded in absolutely nothing,” Donohue told FOXNews.com. “He has no empirical evidence to support his claim, which is why they say ‘may have.’”

This isn’t the first time Verhoeven has plumbed a Christ narrative. In 2010 the director admitted that he intended the main character in Robocop to be a Christ-like figure.

“The point of Robocop is of course that it is a Christ story. It is about a guy that gets crucified after fifty minutes then is resurrected in the next fifty minutes and then is like the supercop of the world. But is also a Jesus figure as he walks over water at the end. he could walk over the water and say this wonderful line, which is basically, em, to Clarence Boddicker ‘I am not arresting you any more.’ Meaning I’m going to shoot you. And that is , of course, the American Jesus.”

Verhoeven also asserted that Robocop meant to portray the United States as a bad, destructive place, one that is rotten to the core — a favorite Hollywood theme.

In 2010 Verhoeven also attacked Mel Gibson’s 2004 film, The Passion of the Christ, scoffing over the idea that Jesus died for our sins.

Though Verhoeven denies Christ’s divinity, he still says he greatly respects Jesus Christ’s “ethics.”

“If you look at the man, it’s clear you have a person who was completely innovative in the field of ethics. My own passion for Jesus came when I started to realize that. It’s not about miracles, it’s about a new set of ethics, an openness towards the world, which was anathema in a Roman-dominated world. I believe he was crucified because they felt that politically, he was a dangerous person whose following was getting bigger and bigger. Jesus’ ideals are about the utopia of human behavior, about how we should treat each other, how we should step into the shoes of our enemy.”

Verhoeven’s new Jesus film joins several other Bible-based films already in the works. One on Noah and the flood and a pair of movies based on the Biblical figure Moses are also underway in Hollywood.

Shortlink:

Posted by on June 23, 2012.
Filed under Christianity, corruption, Culture Of Corruption, Democrats, Entertainment, Religion, Religious Liberty.
Warner Todd Huston is a Chicago-based freelance writer, has been writing opinion editorials and social criticism since early 2001 and is featured on many websites such as Andrew Breitbart's BigGovernment.com and BigJournalism.com, RightWingNews.com, CanadaFreePress.com, RightPundits.com, StoptheACLU.com, Human Events Magazine, among many, many others. Additionally, he has been a frequent guest on talk-radio programs to discuss his opinion editorials and current events.He has also written for several history magazines and appears in the new book "Americans on Politics, Policy and Pop Culture" which can be purchased on amazon.com. He is also the owner and operator of PubliusForum.com. Feel free to contact him with any comments or questions, EMAIL Warner Todd Huston: igcolonel .at. hotmail.com"The only end of writing is to enable the reader better to enjoy life, or better to endure it." --Samuel Johnson

You can leave a response or trackback to this entry
  • jim_m

    We can make a movie blaspheming Christ but we cannot even tell the truth about mohammad being a pedophile and marrying a 9 year old.

    • Commander_Chico

      didn’t you just say that?

      • jim_m

        I can say that. I’m not in the media where I would be blacklisted for all eternity.

        • The_Queen_of_France

          not to mention being the recipient of very credible death threats.

          • jim_m

            Yep. Just ask Theo van Gogh and Pim Fortuyn how far criticism of muslims got them. Oh, never mind, you can’t because they were both assassinated. But the left still blames them for their own deaths.

  • ackwired

    It is interesting that even this guy recieved Jesus’ message. But I wouldn’t advise investing in his film. I’d be surprised if it does very well.

  • 914

    Another sicko prevert tries to scam a dishonest buck,, He should run for office,

  • http://www.rustedsky.net JLawson

    After what he did to “Starship Troopers” I’m not surprised he’s looking to bugger another book, and considering it’s a book he wrote, wouldn’t that be literary incest?

    Guy must have paper cuts in really embarrasing places…

    • Commander_Chico

      Starship Troopers is mildly entertaining as a satire.

      • http://www.rustedsky.net JLawson

        Eh…

        It wasn’t even a good satire, unless you like being beaten over your head with a metaphorical club.

        Visually, it wasn’t bad. I’ll give it that much.

        • GarandFan

          “Starship Troopers” was about one hell of a lot more that space bugs.

          Verhoeven fucked it up completely.

          As for his new “epic”, someone must need a tax write off really bad.

          • http://www.rustedsky.net JLawson

            That it is, and that he did.

            Frankly, I think he did a brief scan of the book, pulled some names and plot points, and then just tossed out the rest.

    • Conservachef

      Starship Troopers? I think I remember that- it was a drinking game back in my college days…

  • Commander_Chico

    Well, I liked Robocop.

    • http://wizbangblog.com/author/rodney-graves/ Rodney G. Graves

      That’s the first bad thing I’ve ever seen said about Robocop.

      • Commander_Chico

        What, you didn’t read Warner’s post first before commenting? Shame.

        • http://wizbangblog.com/author/rodney-graves/ Rodney G. Graves

          That was very mild criticism indeed as compared to a chicka endorsement.

  • Owen007

    Verhoeven is a hack. “RoboCop” was the last good movie he ever made. He’s also demonstrating some rather obnoxious arrogance. What exactly makes him an expert on Jesus? Does he have 2000 years of teachings to back up his viewpoint? No, he’s claiming those 2000 years of teachings are wrong based his “may haves.”

    But since Verhoeven got backing for this project, when will Hollywood be producing a movie giving the same treatment to Muhammad? Or is the Hollywood – the self-proclaimed “anything goes” outfit – too afraid to rattle that cage?

  • Pingback: New Film: Jesus Christ Not Divine, Born of Roman Rapist | RECONCILE WITH GOD

  • Wild_Willie

    I doubt he has backers. Everyone knows no one will watch this crap except the usual loons. He is trying to garner publicity so he can get funding. ww

    • jim_m

      Mel Gibson should slip him some money just because the publicity for this obscenity will almost certainly drive DVD sales of The Passion.

  • marcthepig

    Why do these liberal Hollywierd girlymen never make any insulting movies about Mohammed?