Aaron Worthing Wins Blow for Free Speech, Then Gets SWATed

June 25, 2012 | Filed under Constitutional Issues,corruption,Democrats,Liberals | Posted by

Earlier today, *Aaron Worthing’s illicitly imposed muzzle was lifted from him by a successful stay of foolish Judge Vaughey’s “flagrantly unconstitutional prior restraint upon” upon Worthing’s rights to free speech. And then? Well, then some criminal leftist SWATed him.

For those unaware of the details of this story check out Dana Loesch’s May 25 post here. But essentially, a convicted left-wing, domestic terrorist named Brett Kimberlin began a campaign to use nuisance lawsuits and vicious, false accusations to get Mr. Worthing sent to jail because Worthing had the temerity to expose him for the criminal he is.

Then, a dull witted, aged “judge” that has no clue what all these Internets stuff is all about, stepped on Mr. Worthing’s rights to free speech with an illogically constituted injunction.

When the stay of Vaughey’s order summarily quashing Worthing’s right to write blog posts about his ordeal was lifted, that gave back to Worthing his Constitutional right to talk about his situation.

Mr. Worthing took the occasion of the restoration of his rights to ask people not to harass Mr. Kimberlin and to leave Kimberlin’s family alone as well. And what did Mr. Worthing get for his kindness?

He got SWATed.

On the evening of Monday, June 25, Patterico now reports that someone called the police in Worthing’s home town and told them that Worthing had “shot” his wife.

Patterico says that he spoke with Mr. Worthing who said he was a “little shaken up” but both he and his wife were OK. The cops came to the house, automatic weapons at the ready, but quickly sized up the situation realizing it was another SWATing hoax.

SWATing is when someone calls the police on another person giving police a false story about trouble, drugs, shootings, or other situations that might cause police to go to the victim’s home, guns drawn, to investigate. What the left-wing SWATers hope is that the conservative upon whom the police were called will end up shot at the hands of the police. So, it is a SWATing, as in police SWAT teams have been illegally sicced upon the victims.

But this is how the left operates, folks. They pretend they are the victims all the while perpetrating crimes against their foes. This is how left-wingers and Democrats have always worked. Remember the Fugitive Slave Law, remember Jim Crow? Democrats claimed they were the victims then, too, and then used a form of lawfare as warfare against their enemies.

Sadly, Mr. Worthing has lost his job because of the left’s criminal actions. In his June 25 blog post he details that suffering.

My wife and I have lost our jobs due to the harassment of convicted terrorist Brett Kimberlin, including an attempt to get us killed and to frame me for a crime carrying a sentence of up to ten years. I know that claim sound fantastic, but if you read starting here, you will see absolute proof of these claims using documentary and video evidence.

This tale is long from being over, but let us hope that in the end the law wins out and Kimberlin and his left-wing pals are the ones that end up in jail.

Who is Brett Kimberlin?

Previous Coverage

*Aaron Walker is his real name, “Wothing” being his Internet name.

« « In America, consumption inequality narrowed significantly during the last 30 years
LA Times Styles Romney the Whites Only Candidate » »

Shortlink:

Posted by on June 25, 2012.
Filed under Constitutional Issues, corruption, Democrats, Liberals.
Warner Todd Huston is a Chicago-based freelance writer, has been writing opinion editorials and social criticism since early 2001 and is featured on many websites such as Andrew Breitbart's BigGovernment.com and BigJournalism.com, RightWingNews.com, CanadaFreePress.com, RightPundits.com, StoptheACLU.com, Human Events Magazine, among many, many others. Additionally, he has been a frequent guest on talk-radio programs to discuss his opinion editorials and current events.He has also written for several history magazines and appears in the new book "Americans on Politics, Policy and Pop Culture" which can be purchased on amazon.com. He is also the owner and operator of PubliusForum.com. Feel free to contact him with any comments or questions, EMAIL Warner Todd Huston: igcolonel .at. hotmail.com"The only end of writing is to enable the reader better to enjoy life, or better to endure it." --Samuel Johnson

You can leave a response or trackback to this entry
  • jim_m

    Cue Chico and the usual suspects to claim that this never happened and that if it did it is only a coincidence.

  • Commander_Chico

    Cue Chico to say: Who cares?

    It’s hardly of national importance, a feud between some bloggers. Whoever’s doing this will be caught eventually.

    Small minds cover small issues.

    • http://wizbangblog.com/author/rodney-graves/ Rodney G. Graves

      So you have no objection to someone calling the police (via an IP phone showing your home number) claiming to be you and stating that you just murdered your entire family, thus sending a SWAT roll out to your door?

      • jim_m

        As I have maintained. chico and his fellow travelers will not stand up against violence perpetrated in the name of left wing goals. They are too cowardly to commit such acts even though they desire to reap the blood soaked benefit of oppression and they are too cowardly to stand up against them because they enjoy the benefits too much.

        • Guest

          If you clowns weren’t so over the top with your rhetoric you wouldn’t get pranked as much.

          But go ahead and provide example after example of the stupid, idiotic rants you clowns repeat and then scratch your heads and wonder why the world thinks you’re clowns worthy of mockery and practical jokes….

          .My wife and I have lost our jobs due to the harassment of convicted terrorist Brett Kimberlin, including an attempt to get us killed and to frame me for a crime carrying a sentence of up to ten years.

          I think the perps who are doing this nonsense must be amused at the way in which this guy glorifies himself as a martyr simply because the police show up at his door.

          And what’s funny are the Wizbang clowns who think it’s such an issue. Hint: It isn’t – and isn’t worth writing about.

          You haters have plenty of hate in your hearts, do you really need more?

          As I have maintained. chico and his fellow travelers will not stand up against violence perpetrated in the name of left wing goals. They are too cowardly to commit such acts even though they desire to reap the blood soaked benefit of oppression and they are too cowardly to stand up against them because they enjoy the benefits too much.

          “Hello 911? I’d like to report an over-the-top idiot who hates people so much he’s a danger to family….”

          The “blood soaked benefit of oppression.” LOL!!!!! ROTFLMAO! If that ain’t prankworthy my name isn’t Grumpy.

          • jim_m

            Thank you for demonstrating how the typical leftist thinks it is funny to send armed agents into a family home with the purpose of intimidating and possibly killing the occupants. You are exactly the person I speak of when I say that the left has no problem with these sorts of acts because these acts support their agenda.

            Grumpy may be too much of a coward to commit the act himself but he will gladly reap the rewards, if any, and he will willingly support those who do them.

          • Guest

            Again …. wedgie == prank. Calling the cops with a false report == crime.

        • Commander_Chico

          “they desire to reap the blood soaked benefit of oppression”

          Good one, that is pretty funny.

          What benefit is that, some kind of marinated dish? I’m curious.

          You’re right, I can’t match your courageous stand here as an anonymous commenter.

          • jim_m

            See my post below in response to WTH. You provide excuses and cover for those engaging in this activity. You are a de facto supporter of the activity by your doing so.

            You benefit from the attempts to intimidate and silence the opposition and you welcome those attempts even though you are not willing to make them yourself. You cowardly hide behind a claim that “it is no big deal” and that “no one got hurt this time” and that “it is just a local issue”.

          • http://wizbangblog.com/author/rodney-graves/ Rodney G. Graves

            ATFQ, chicka.

    • herddog505

      You really ought to be ashamed of yourself for writing this. I can understand and support Brucehenry‘s point that this isn’t a “tool of the left”, but a man was maliciously placed in a situation where he (possibly his wife, too) could have lost their lives, and all you can say is “oh, ho-hum, hardly of national importance, nothing to see here, why are you bothered, move along”?

      • Commander_Chico

        It’s a local news story, a little blogger jihad.

        Sure, it’s bad to do this, but is it a good discussion topic? No, unless you consider a thread of comments denouncing it a good discussion.

        Boooorrrring.

        • jim_m

          “Shut up!” Chico explains

          A leftist murdering (or at least attempting tomurder) someone for political reasons is no big deal.

          • Guest

            No, he said it’s boring.

            Actually — before I’ accused of being a blood sucking murderous liar, he said it’s “Boooorrrring”…

            Why are you such an over-the-top drama queen? Do you not get enough attention at home? Do your wife and children hate you so you come here and take it out on the “leftists”…?

            You repeatedly come across as a blowhard idiot. That comment is a perfect example, you queen.

          • Hank_M

            “You repeatedly come across as a blowhard idiot”

            This is too rich, coming from you.

          • Guest

            No, he said it’s boring.

            Actually — before I’m accused of being a blood sucking murderous liar, he said it’s “Boooorrrring”…

            Why are you such an over-the-top drama queen? Do you not get enough attention at home? Do your wife and children hate you so you come here and take it out on the “leftists”…?

            You repeatedly come across as a blowhard idiot. That comment is a perfect example, you queen.

        • http://www.rustedsky.net JLawson

          If you’re bored, start your own blog and write about what you find interesting. Blogspot’s still open, and you can have one set up quickly for free.

          I’ll even come visit, and keep visiting if you’re interesting.

          But I wouldn’t be rude enough to tell you (or any blog owner or poster) that what you’ve decided to blog about is boring. That’s just tacky.

          • Commander_Chico

            Commenting is always editorial comment, either on the substance or the coverage.

            How is commenting here about weak content any different from complaining about what the NYT covers or doesn’t?

          • http://www.rustedsky.net JLawson

            When it comes to weak content, I just don’t comment.

            And I don’t gripe much about what the NYT covers or doesn’t – it’s their lookout, and if they can’t tell from their revenues what works and what doesn’t (since money speaks far more clearly than random complaints on the internet) why should I expect them to take any complaint I might make seriously?

            (Though I AM considering writing to Popular Science – they’ve gone whole-hog on the AGW ‘green’ agenda that Scientific American’s pretty much abandoned… but that’s an issue, not a ‘weak content’ thing.)

            Bottom line, I think, is that you can vote with your feet or your wallet if you don’t like the content. And either way’s more effective than going “WEAK! CONTENT!” in a comment… ’cause you’re still giving the ol’ sitemeter upticks, you know?

        • herddog505

          This from the guy who waxed oh-so-self-righteously-indignant about Zimmerman. Yep, a Latino shoots a black kids in a podunk town in Florida and “we gotta get ANSWERS!”

          This, on the other hand, an apparent pattern of attempted murder by SWAT, rates a “meh”.

          I have to say that I’m inclined to agree with those who say that you support this sort of thing because your side is enjoying the (dubious) benefit.

          • jim_m

            Except of course that Zimmerman is not a Latino anymore because the left has determined that he must be white. Just like Lizzy Warren is a Cherokee because the left has proclaimed it so. Actual heritage has nothing to do with it.

            Facts have nothing to do with the truth for the left.

    • http://www.rustedsky.net JLawson

      Okay, then let’s look at it another way.

      Would you find it objectionable if, say, Kos over at DailyKos were to have the same treatment? A politically motivated blogger spoofing Kos’s phone number and calling in a report that he shot his partner? He’s just a blogger – what’s the big deal?

      I sure as hell would find it objectionable – because it’s just plain wrong. The answer to speech you disagree with isn’t “STFU or I’ll get you murdered by police” – it’s a cogent and rational argument… or even an incoherent one, because we have the right to speak our minds freely without government interference.

      (Hell, even the NAMBLA folks have that, I support their right to free speech – and I sure as hell don’t agree with their crap. They’ve got the right to speak, I’ve got the right to ignore them or speak against them as I choose. It works out.)

      When folks you support (even tacitly) attempt to silence one side or the other through means like this, you’re setting things up for real trouble down the line. The tactics you condone today (or tacitly approve of) are thus validated as usable by those who you don’t agree with.

      And this is one political tactic that I think needs to get stopped, and stopped fast. It doesn’t do ANY good for any side.

      But hey, if you don’t care about it then you don’t care. Just don’t whine when it occurs to some group you DO care about.

      Big issues come from small issues that are left to rot – like a small scratch can cause major infections. Taking care of the small stuff before it becomes big problems is in the interest of everyone.

    • Guest

      I will grant that this Kimberlin affair is mainly of little interest. It’s basically a pissing contest between two groups of bloggers with too much animosity and too much time on their hands. Except for some arcana that’s mostly of interest to First Amendment geeks, it’s a sideshow, not worthy of any attention.

      That is, it’s a sideshow until somebody starts pulling the SWAT squads. I suppose the SWATer considers this some sort of grand prank, but it isn’t. A grand prank would be to pull HerdDog’s underwear up over his head as he’s about to give the keynote address at the Attractive Conservative Women Who Are Fans of HerdDog meeting.

      This SWAT thing is entirely different. It’s sending a bunch of heavily armed uniformed men to your enemy’s home. And in an age where SWAT police sometimes shoot first and ask questions later, the whole thing is one nervous police officer away from being murder by proxy.

      This kind of thing needs to be shut down. And it needs to be shut down hard, and shut down fast. Period.

      And this, this is completely false:

      Whoever’s doing this will be caught eventually.

      No, the person won’t “be caught eventually.” Local police (or the appropriate federal authorities) will catch the individual(s) responsible only if somebody keeps up the pressure to catch them. Things in life don’t just happen. Somebody has to make them happen.

      • http://www.rustedsky.net JLawson

        “A grand prank would be to pull HerdDog’s underwear up over his head as he’s about to give the keynote address at the Attractive Conservative Women Who Are Fans of HerdDog meeting.”

        You’re making the assumption that he (and they) would be wearing underwear at such a meeting…
        ;-)

        • Guest

          Let’s not go there.

          • http://www.rustedsky.net JLawson

            Anyhow, I agree with your main point – that this is a nasty tactic that needs to be stomped out.

          • Guest

            Indeed. Although JLaw, if I ever find your regular address, I might hire this guy to come do his thing outside your living-room window.

          • http://www.rustedsky.net JLawson

            LOL.

          • Guest

            Make mine a triple.

      • herddog505

        I like the way you think!

        S.E. Cupp, Dana Loesch, and Katie Pavlich. That’s all I ask.

        ;-)

    • jim_m

      Hey Chico, if it’s no big deal why not just post your home phone number so someone can SWAT you and then you can demonstrate for us all what a nonevent it is?

      • Commander_Chico

        sure, 867-5309.

        • jim_m

          Coward. Area code too…

        • Jwb10001

          Chico is Jenny how cute

          • jim_m

            Missed the Jenny reference.

            But did you know that:

            1) 8675309 is a prime.
            2) 8675309 is a twin prime (8675311 is also prime).
            3) 8675309 is the hypotenuse of a (primitive) Pythagorean triple: 8675309^2 = 2460260^2+8319141^2.

    • 914

      Small minds cover small issues”

      Nice of you to finally admit it!!

  • Brucehenry

    If Kimberlin is guilty — the police don’t seem to have enough evidence that he is to charge him — that still doesn’t make SWATting a “tool of the left.” It makes SWATting a tool of Kimberlin.

    Show me another incident of a “leftist” who isn’t Kimberlin or one of his associates who has SWATted someone in an attempt to “silence the opposition.” Just one.

    • herddog505

      I’ll give you this one. As you write, it seems to be Kimberlin or a (ahem) supporter.

      On the other hand, I must say that lefties don’t seem to have a real problem with it. Based on the comments of your compadre Commander_Chico, the prospect that a man (and possibly his wife) could be shot by overzealous SWAT officers sicced on them by a lefty hoodlum seems to rate nothing more than a, “Meh.”

    • cirby

      Considering that Kimberlin himself is a paid tool of the left (collecting tens of thousands of dollars per year from several major left-wing organizations just to be an annoying jerk), you just agreed that the story is correct.

      Then, of course, there are the numerous Kimberlin supporters – and leftists – who pop up in comments like Chico’s, saying “who cares?” – because the victims were merely right-wingers.

      Don’t worry, though, it’s going to be a big, big deal. That is, the day after some minor-league left-wing blogger has the same thing happen to them.

      • herddog505

        Good point.

    • UOG

      I realize it’s not responding to your question Bruce but, borrowing your argument, please explain to me how the political “right” was blamed (and still is by many) for the shooting of Rep. Giffords and 18 other people even after Loughner was identified as an anarchist with a history of behavioral problems and drug use?

      • Brucehenry

        So because many on the left were dishonest and/or foolish about Loughner, Warner is given a pass (or actively encouraged by certain sycophants here) for being disingenuous or foolish on HIS pet subject?

    • jim_m

      Bruce: Show me one instance of SWATting perpetrated by the right.

      And Chico proves my point of the left being unwilling to stand up against violence done in the name of his ideology. He too much wants the benefits received by the oppression of conservatives and their ideas. He welcomes the violence done against them because it shuts them up (or so he hopes). He is too cowardly to commit these acts but he is also too cowardly to stand against them.

      It’s a tool of the left until someone else does it. I at least give you credit for not saying “who cares” but your response is little better. It still amounts to excusing acts of violence in your behalf.

      • Brucehenry

        Jeffrey Dahmer was a dishwasher. He also picked up young men in gay bars, took them home, then raped, killed and ate them.

        Does that make rape, murder, and cannibalism a “tool of dishwashers?” Because as far as I know, no other dishwasher has raped, then murdered and ate, any young men since.

        By the way, I’ve never heard you denounce Dahmer. Why do you tacitly support rape, murder, and cannibalism, Jim?

        • jim_m

          I’ve never heard you say that you stopped beating your wife either.

          The difference is that Kimberlin et al are using SWATting as a tool in pursuit of their political agenda. Dahmer did not use dish washing as a tool in pursuit of his serial killing. False equivalence my friend.

          But i will wait to hear that you have stopped beating your wife.

          • Brucehenry

            There’s where you’re being dishonest, Jim, and so is Warner: where you say Kimberlin “et al.” There IS no “et al.”

            And OK, forget dishwashing. Dahmer frequented gay bars. Does that make rape, murder, and cannibalism a “tool of denizens of gay bars?” He DID use his frequenting of these bars as a tool of his psychosexual agenda.

            But I haven’t seen any other incidence of gay barflies raping, murdering, and eating anyone since Dahmer, have you?

          • jim_m

            Does that make rape, murder, and cannibalism a “tool of denizens of gay bars?”

            No because gays repudiated Dahmer. The left does not repudiate Kimberlin.

            And there is an et al with Kimberlin because he is joined in this activity by at least one associate.

            And I take it from your silence on the subject that you are still beating your wife. ;-)

        • jim_m

          And if you really want to go there: John Wayne Gacy was an active Democrat. SO you support the official party of homosexual rape and serial killing do you?

    • Guest

      Put on a tin-foil hat. That way you can see through walls and divine the distant truth, just like these white wing jammy-wearing bloggers and their legions of sycophants.

      Rush LImbaugh does an excellent job of demonstrating this principle.

      • 914

        Stumped one! -

        “That way you can see through walls and diving the distant truth, just like these white wing jammy-wearing bloggers and their legions of sycophants.”

        He’s off his lude’s again!!

        • http://wizbangblog.com/author/rodney-graves/ Rodney G. Graves

          More like off his lithium.

          • jim_m

            Haldol is more like it.

  • Hank_M

    Kimberlin and his cronies may have gone too far with this particular SWATing.
    No sooner does Worthing get the peace order from Kimberlin modified and then this occurs.

    Worthing, to his credit, will not be intimidated into silence, and neither will Paterico, Erikson and others.

    It’s going to be great to see Kimberlin and his cronies brought down.
    Couldn’t happen to a more deserving bunch of screwballs.

  • warnertoddhuston

    You’ll all notice that while all our half-wit lefty tolls come on here to say this topic is “booooring” and unimportant, they come to EVERY ONE of these Kimberlin stories and post a dozen comments to tell us so. This very fact makes them liars. If it was so unimportant and “booooring” to them they would not come to each and every Kimberlin story thread to repeatedly engage in the comments section. They’d just skip it and move on. No, what is really the case here is they are trying to obfuscate to give cover to their dangerous, anti-American, and downright psychotic pals on the left to keep doing what they do.

    • jim_m

      They are apologists for violence perpetrated in the name of their ideology. Too cowardly to commit violet acts themselves they instead choose to support those radical enough to do so. By attempting to minimize the issue they provide cover and encouragement for those who engage in this activity. They are accomplices in the act.

      • warnertoddhuston

        And willing accomplices, at that.

        • Guest

          lol… poking you get such a nice reaction.

      • Guest

        nobody is apologizing for anything – we’re just laughing at the OUTRAGE of the right over something so criminal that the police are ignoring it.

    • UOG

      It would be easy for our liberal friends to just come in, admit that it embarrasses the shit of them that this is being perpetrated by some lunatics on the left and condemn the practice. But… have I missed something here?

      Blog-war, Chico? Honestly, I didn’t think you were capable of saying something that dissociated.

      Brucehenry, I honestly doubt Brett is making those phone calls himself. I’d look to “friends” and their “friends.” It doesn’t need to go beyond that to be characterized as coming from the “left” since there have been no similar incidents from the “right” during the time frame.

      • Brucehenry

        Asserting facts not in evidence.

        Hey, if Worthing can prove, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that Kimberlin is responsible, why won’t the police accept his proof and arrest the guy? And don’t call the police lazy — it pisses Garandfan off. And it should.

        • jim_m

          The threshold is beyond a reasonable doubt. Stop trying to protect you fellow travelers and favorite terrorists

          • Brucehenry

            OK, a reasonable doubt, then.

        • UOG

          I wasn’t aware I was asserting facts here. My “It would be easy…” statement was an opinion. The statement to Chico was an assessment (right-on Chico, that’s a level of dissociation I expect only from myself).

          My comment to you included the only fact I asserted. And if you know of anyone from the right who has been spoofing a phone number and then calling in a “report” to 911 so as to provoke a SWAT team response at the home of someone on the left please provide me with the details. I will be more than happy to modify my statement. Or is it your position that after four such events, in four different regions, intersecting only with writers who have blogged about the same person that there is no connection between the four occurrences?

          It’s not for Worthing to prove anything, that’s law enforcement’s job. Since telephones are being used in the commission of these crimes (yes, crimes, not practical jokes) the FBI needs to be involved along with State and local police. DoJ too, but I don’t believe that will happen.

          • Brucehenry

            They have blogged about the same ONE person, I assume….Kimberlin? I’m not claiming there’s no connection with Kimberlin — I’m saying there IS.

            What I’m taking exception to is Warner’s assertion, on this and several other threads, that this SWATting thing is a “tool of the left.” It ain’t, as far as I can tell — it’s only a tool of Kimberlin’s, but not so obviously that the cops can prove it.

            I’ll take Worthing’s word for it that Kimberlin is to blame. But even if he is he isn’t a trendsetter — at least not so’s you’d notice. Because NO ONE ELSE is doing it, see?

            The fact that it’s not being done by anyone BUT Kimberlin doesn’t stop Warner from saying it is, though. Why do you reckon that is? Is it the same personality trait that led him to claim that Dan Savage was “Obama’s Bullying Czar?”

          • UOG

            I agree, these events all seem to revolve around Brett & Co. The list of suggested names that make up that Co., as well as Kimberlin himself can all be described leftists. So I understand what Warner wrote. I also understand the distinction you make. I think it is a very valid distinction that certainly needs to be made in at least some circumstances (law enforcement or legal proceedings, for instance).

            I have no desire to debate word definitions with you Bruce.

          • SCSIwuzzy

            When will the various left aligned groups that give money to Kimberlin and his “charity” money pull support or distance themselves until his name is cleared?

          • jim_m

            What? You wouldn’t want the left to hold themselves to the same standard they demand of the right? That would imply that they actually believed the crap they spew.

          • UOG

            Yeah, what Jim said… basically never.

            Edit….
            I’m sorry SCSI, you deserve more of an answer than that. Age has brought a whole new perspective of things to me. For instance: I don’t just go out and do risky things any more. First I look at what the consequences will be for me if everything goes sideways. Then I decide if I’m willing to invest the time required to heal from those consequences. At that point I know if I’m going to try the risky thing or not.

            So, in the case above, I’m just too old to wait for the Leopard to change his spots. UOG

    • 914

      How could anyone push the down vote tab here??? Oh?, That’s right. Even halfwits and illegals can vote in the land of the free and home of the non leftist brave!

    • Brucehenry

      You keep saying “pals” With an “s”.

      Plural.

      One more example, please, of a “leftist” using SWATting in an attempt to silence his critics. That would make it plural. That would go a LITTLE bit of the way into making this a “tool of the left.”

      But if you can’t produce EVEN ONE MORE example of a lefty (who’s not Kimberlin or his buddy Brynaert) using SWATting as a political tool, kindly admit you are ummm……, exaggerating a little.

      • jim_m

        I don’t think that we have to produce another person who has done it when we have already produced two people here (Grumpy and chico) who support it.

        • Brucehenry

          Another imaginary Gotcha for Jim.

          Enjoy, buddy.

          • jim_m

            That’s not a gotcha. I just think that when you have people defending the actions it is just as good as if they were committing the acts as well. Like Herddog I give you credit for at least distinguishing that you feel that it is not emblematic of the left.

            I will grant that it probably does not represent the whole of the left, but really represents a segment of the left that is growing and currently holds a great deal of sway within the dem party.

          • Brucehenry

            Yes, the SWATter-supporting wing of the Democratic Party. Absolutely. You’re a hoot.

          • jim_m

            Kimberlin has received $100,000′s from high powered dem donors, none of whom have said a single word about the issue or disavowed his actions. Yeah, they are supportive by their silence.

          • Guest

            So are the police – they are supporting Kimberlin too “with their silence”….

            So, in summation, only jammy-wearing bloggers and their sycophant boorish friends are upset about this.

            That’s about it. Yawn… Todd throws up another loser.

            Ooooh, those jammy-wearing bloggers can get the rubes riled up though. Just loook at how… many … conservatives are commenting on this post.

            Is it up to 10 yet?

            It’s an outrage.. just ask the police – lol.

          • Brucehenry

            Has he really? Since this incident came to light?

          • jim_m

            I don’t know about current donations, but the left is remarkably silent about their past support and some have been asked about it and they have refused comment.

            If it were a right wing activist who was outed as a domestic terrorist
            much less as the psychopathic stalkers that Kimberlin and his friend Rauhauser have been shown to be, the left would be screaming for some kind of distancing if not outright denunciations.

            Just more hypocrisy from the left. Really, it is just standard
            operating procedure: Hold your opponents to a standard you, yourself have no intention of ever living up to .

          • Brucehenry

            More “News That Would Have Happened” from Jim M.

  • 914

    FAQWeekend Caption Contest
    “Aaron Worthing Wins Blow for Free Speech, Then Gets SWATed:”

    I hope Eric and Barry didn’t confiscate his silverware too!!

    The Cartels agree with this message and will turn out heavily in democrat districts this fall..lolol

  • LiberalNightmare

    Don’t worry too much about the liberal reaction folks. As soon as a liberal blogger gets swatted, we can count on swatting suddenly becoming obamas main talking point.

    Till then, make sure to keep your hands visible when answering the door.

  • LiberalNightmare

    Don’t worry too much about the liberal reaction folks. As soon as a liberal blogger gets swatted, we can count on swatting suddenly becoming obamas main talking point.

    Till then, make sure to keep your hands visible when answering the door.

  • LiberalNightmare

    Don’t worry too much about the liberal reaction folks. As soon as a liberal blogger gets swatted, we can count on swatting suddenly becoming obamas main talking point.

    Till then, make sure to keep your hands visible when answering the door.

  • Pingback: Grinding Exceedingly Slow | Daily Pundit