Wash. Post-Owned Website: Will Romney Reach Out to Racists?

A website owned by the Washington Post, one that caters to African Americans, has a question about the upcoming debates. In yet another outrageous use of the race card, The Root wants to know if GOP nominee Mitt Romney will “reach out to racists” in the debates.

Keli Goff ‘s Root piece is exactly as insulting, racist, and ignorant as that title leads you to believe it is, too.

In Goff’s blinkered opinion, only racists question the inappropriate, 20-year-long relationship between racist Reverend Jeremiah Wright and Barack Obama. Goff’s feverish imagination conjures that racism as Romney’s next move to gain the advantage in this close election contest.

First of all, aside from her own racist premise that all whites are racists enough that re-introducing Rev. Wright into this election will automatically win Romney votes, one has to wonder why this fool would think that this tactic would work in 2012 when it didn’t four years ago?

It didn’t work the first time for the big reason that the Old Media establishment refused to allow the charge to have any legitimacy. The media’s treatment would be worse a second time around should Romney be foolish enough to try and use it as an issue. The media would not only phoo phoo the charge, it would destroy Romney as dredging up old news.

The truth is that it just wouldn’t work.

But. let’s get back to the biggest flaw in her argument, that even questioning Obama’s connection to Wright is racism.

The fact is, it is Wright who is the racist. He hate whites, he hates the USA, and he’s said so repeatedly. Further, Obama sat in Wright’s audience and happily listened to his racist rants for years without being overly concerned if Wright’s hatred and racism was at all a big deal. Even worse, he considered Wright part of his family and involved his wife and children with that scumbag.

Wright is a racist and Obama didn’t have a problem with it at all.

But this issue doesn’t mean anything in the greater scheme of the election. Goff herself was amazed that millions of whites voted for Obama the first time. Millions will do so again. Obviously whites’ “racism” didn’t stop them from voting for Obama in 2008. How does this halfwit imagine that we’d be a nation of enlightened voters in 2008 but suddenly devolve into sheet-wearing KKK members only a few years later, all based on raising an issue that didn’t work the first time?

Well, there is only one way Goff could imagine that her premise has any logic at all. Goff is a racist that thinks all whites are less human than she and her racist ideas have blinded her to logic and good sense.

(H/T Mental Recession)

Obama's Offensive Anti-Woman Campaign Ad (Now Disappeared Down Memory Hole)
  • Carl

    You’re suggesting that only racists care about Obama and Wright?

    You’re right.

    • Jwb10001

      Are you suggesting the good reverend is a reasonable and tolerant, proud American of good will? Then I will trump your race card with the” you’re an idiot” card….

    • LiberalNightmare

      Actually, I think it is being suggested that Wright was interested in ‘keeping it real’ until he had enough money to get the hell out.

      I suppose you can turn that into racism, if you squint your eyes and click your heels 3 times.

    • retired.military

      No only that racists will vote for Obama and give credence to Wright.

  • GarandFan

    You want to hear something that’s “funny”? Wright moved into a gated WHITE community when he retired!
    Guess “the hood” wasn’t good enough for the Revered Wright….and his MILLION DOLLAR retirement.

  • Carl

    Sure, he’ll reach out to racists. He can’t win the election without keeping the racists engaged and out to the polls.

    • Sky__Captain

      Of course, the Grumpy racist troll is talking about 0bama…

      • Guilt can be a motivator.

        “You’re racist if you don’t vote for Obama!”

        “But I’m not a racist.”

        “Are you voting for Obama?”

        “Considering what he’s done to the economy and our international standing, no.”


        “Why do you call me that?”

        “Because he’s BLACK, and you’re not voting for him!”

        “But his being black doesn’t have anything to do with it!”

        “Are you voting for him?”


        “Racist! Racist! EEEEEVIL RACIST!!!”

        (Walks away to shouts of “Racist!”, muttering… “After that, you couldn’t pay me enough to vote for Obama…”)

        Guilt works. Not as expected at times, however…

    • Jwb10001

      You know where you can shove your race card right?

  • 914

    Romney can reach out to Carl like voters all he wants. They however, are too ignorant and stupid to see beyond color.

  • 914

    Interesting to note that Barry thought of Wright as family. Wright officiated his marriage and then Barry drop’s him like a used condom when the dollar sign’s flash before his greedy eye’s..

    I guess Barry’s loyalty is as genuine as his transparency.

  • Commander_Chico_Cognoscente

    Jeremiah Wright again. Don’t you have any new tunes? Who’s next, Ashley Todd?

    • Racism again? Don’t they have any new tunes? What’s next, accusing everyone who doesn’t vote for Obama of having paid-up memberships in the KKK?

  • Owen007

    Of course Romney won’t reach out to racists. He’s banking on a Republican base turnout and those precious independents. Why waste time reaching out to the party of Robert Byrd?

  • Hank_M

    This is another attempt to make Romney run a McCain campaign.

    Obama and his supporters would rather Romney roll over and let Obama lie, attack, and beat him into submission with gutter level ads, blatant dishonesty, and of course the race card.

    Besides, anyone that can write: “We’ve already seen him begin flirting with the racially inflammatory line by making a joke about his birth certificate….” is a fool
    and not to be taken seriously.

    • Carl

      He’s losing – of course he’ll attempt to rally his racist base.

      What do you think the Daily Caller video is about? It’s about showing racist Americans how black Obama is…

      • Jwb10001

        You know where you can shove your race card, right?

  • Pingback: If All You See… » Pirate's Cove()

  • When black or Hispanic people pursue their racial interests it’s called “civil rights.”

    When Jews pursue their interests it’s called “lobbying.”

    When White people pursue their interests it’s called “White Supremacy.”

    Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.

  • 1) Immigrants from the “developing world” are flooded into the West.
    2) These immigrants and any national minorities are then forced integrated with the White populations, communities, and institutions. This is made law by removing freedom of association, creating affirmative action and requiring racial quotas. Whites who wish to move from these dangerous, integrated communities are forced to live in expensive suburban or exurban areas (which will be forced integrated over time anyway) which makes having large families difficult. Anyone who objects to this is denied economic opportunities, status, and in some cases freedom itself.
    3) An information campaign is implemented which demonizes Western culture and history. The old myths that helped form the identities of the West are replaced with new mythologies that make Whites into enemies of humanity and non-whites (like MLK) as morally superior heroes. People who oppose mass immigration and forced integration are portrayed as mentally ill, evil, and lacking positive human qualities. Miscegenation is encouraged and glorified. The people of the West are constantly reminded of the inevitable brown future and that anything short of celebrating this makes you a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
    This system leads to the end of the White-European people.
    Article 2 of the UN convention on Genocide:
    In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
    (a) Killing members of the group;(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

  • Who let the fracking bircher in?