Gay SiriusXM Talker Tells Conservative Gay Caller to Commit Suicide

Remember how liberals are the only ones tolerant of others? Well, keep that in mind as you listen to talk show host Michelangelo Signorile tell a gay caller who voted for Mitt Romney that he should take “arsenic” and commit suicide because he dared to vote for a Republican.

Via our friends at Gay Patriot, we get yet another example of the “more tolerant” set, who cannot stand to see someone think differently than they do, “tolerantly” wishing death on anyone that disagrees with them.

Signorile hosts a gay-themed radio show on SiriusXM and during his October 31 show slipped into full blown Obama flack mode as a caller tells him he is both gay and a Romney voter.

Transcript of relevant segments

(At about 2:15)
Michelangelo Signorile: Mitt Romney Does not think gay people should adopt, he does not think gay people should marry, he does not think gay people should be protected against discrimination. Now, you went and voted for him and it would have been much easier to go to the store and buy some arsenic and make a potion and take it. You know what I mean?

Caller Wes: No, I have no clue.

Signorile: That would have been much easier than, you know, waiting for the slow painful death that Mitt Romney will bring.

I, I honestly, I can’t talk to you if you don’t have correct facts, Wes. And you are the epitome of a low information voter. You should not be allowed to vote.

Caller Wes: Oh, really!?

Signorile: Well, you vote based on distortions and I don’t even know what you’re talking about with regard to Clinton and Obama. Obama who did Don’t Ask Don’t Tell.

(At about 3:35)
Signorile: Like I said, Wes. Go to the drug store, there are plenty of things you can get, it’ll put you to sleep really, really easily. Ok? Cuz that would be a better way than the convoluted, twisted way you’re doing it, right? you’re stabbing yourself, uh, right in the back.

So, not only did Signorile lie that Mitt Romney wants gays to have a “slow death” (or any death at all, for that matter), the talker himself wished death on anyone that disagrees with his gay agenda.

Speaking of “tolerance,” Michelangelo Signorile is a big admirer of Obama’s “bullying czar,” Dan Savage, the same guy who has been repeatedly heard bullying Christian kids during his school presentations on “bullying.”

Such tolerance, eh?

Don't Forget To Buy A New Charger
Democrat in LA Dist. Attny Race Gets Porn Star Endorsement
  • Obama is the first President brave enough to support the GLBT community’s access to basic civil rights. The church and conservative hands paint a Blackface on him for defending this human-rights issue. Religious doctrine and the bigotry which goes along with it have NO place in politics. Read about how Obama and simple logic are being bamboozled at

    • Do you have anything to say about one of your guys telling a man to kill himself for daring to stray from the plantation?

      • herddog505

        I wouldn’t hold my breath. Typical tolerant lefty: it’s OK to bully, attack and generally be a prick in the name of tolerance.


    • How about addressing the topic of Warner’s post. Michelangelo Signorile encouraged someone to commit suicide because Signorile didn’t approve of the way that the other person voted. What you wrote is not a defense of Signorile.

    • GarandFan

      “Human rights issue”? Really? And as for your Obamassiah, wasn’t that long ago he was opposed to “gay marriage”. Until the polling showed that he wasn’t guaranteed a walk-in to a second term. And thanks for staying on-topic!

      • The_Queen_of_France

        Heh. Don’t you mean Dear Leader was opposed to “gay marriage” till Biden outed him?

    • 914

      “Read about how Obama and simple logic are being bamboozled ”

      Stick your spam where the sun don’t shine!

    • retired.military

      Oh give me a break.

      Brave LOL Obama’s idea of brave is using a 5 wood on a 160 yard hole.

  • rcdcr

    As usual, Warner Todd Huston exposes himself as a total asshole.

    • Your use of ad hominem against Warner does nothing more than show that you can’t defend what Michelangelo Signorile did.

    • GarandFan

      Wow! Right on topic and on point. Who’s the “asshole”?

    • Jwb10001

      Wow you’re about as good at making your point and winning over converts to your point of view as this Signorile idiot.

  • JWH

    A number of times, I’ve seen gay conservatives aver that conservatives are less judgmental about their sexuality than liberals are about their politics.

    Me … I figure there’s more to an individual than his sexuality or his politics.

    • HERETIC!!!!!

      Or not. (Shrug.) I agree with your assessment – there’s a lot more. But any more, that seems all that’s important.

      • JWH

        Which is one reason I deliberately went to a Chick-Fil-A a few months back. Just because I refuse to let my politics dictate food choices.

        I haven’t been back, but that’s because waffle fries are bad for my cholesterol.

  • Brucehenry

    I notice that Warner wraps his dishonest assertion that Dan Savage is “Obama’s ‘bullying czar'” in quotation marks now.

    What a weasel.

    • Jwb10001

      Topic avoidance, check, nit picking check, what’s next Bruce bitching about spelling or grammar? Liberal tolerance is lovely to behold should your avoidance of subject be considered support thereof, yes I think it should. Behold the hater!

      • 914

        Bruce seems to be drifting further and further left as his hero’s days in office draw to a close. Hey Bruce! The sun will still rise tomorrow Nov 8

        • Brucehenry

          And you should absolutely show up to vote on Nov 7, 914.

          • 914

            For sure.

      • Brucehenry

        If I WAS gonna bitch about grammar I’d have a target rich environment in your comment, dude.

        • 914

          Spoken like a true crap weasel. (y)

    • jim_m

      Let’s not expect Bruce to stand up for freedom of conscience. He is, after all, a leftist.

      • Brucehenry

        Yes, I should stand up for freedom of conscience by posting a blog comment about a satellite radio show host, with an audience of 73, saying stupid shit to a dude who calls him up begging to be insulted — AGAIN.

        Nothing more important.

        Actually, I think it’s more important to point out that Warner is lying — AGAIN. And you guys are giving him a pass — AGAIN.

        • jim_m

          So you are denying that the radio host said these things? I’ve heard it elsewhere before Warner made his post. If you are referring to the “Bullying czar” thing, grow up and get over it. You’ve made your point. I think it telling that you are more concerned about Warner’s screw up than the naked hate the left has for people who dissent from their fascism.

          • Brucehenry

            Umm, no, I’m not denying he said these things. I just heard them! I’m saying that commenting on Wizbang can hardly be considered “standing up for freedom of conscience.” It’s a circle jerk, not an act of civic virtue.

            Whatever comment this pissant radio show host made, to a guy who called him up and ASKED to be insulted as he apparently has been in the past, who gives a shit? What ratings does this moron get? What makes him important?

            I’ll let the “bullying czar” thing drop. I suspect Warner threw it in there just to bait me anyway. But before I do I’ll just say it’s not a “screw-up” if you do it AFTER it’s already been exposed as prevarication. It’s a slap in the face — and not to me, but to you guys, his defenders. This guy has no respect for you. He thinks you’re stupid.

          • jim_m

            Yeah,I’m sure that Warner crafts his posts with the singular purpose of baiting you.

            Fact of the matter is that while Wizbang is not the center of the universe, people do read it and bringing to light the disgusting and hypocritical tactics of the left is important even in a small way. The more people talk, the more this BS will be heard and the less it will be tolerated.

            Your argument is to ignore the fascist BS from the left because you benefit from it.

          • Brucehenry

            This BS isn’t coming from “the left” any more than Donald Trump’s and Joe Arpaio’s birther nonsense is coming from “The Republican Party.”

            It’s coming from one idiot with a radio show on satellite. What’s his audience? I’ll wager this guy, who I never heard of before Warner made me aware he exists, will never be touted as a potential Democratic party nominee, as Trump was. He’s not considered a Democratic hero, as Arpaio is, is he?

            As to Wizbang, it’s a fine site and I enjoy it. But commenting here is not something I would describe as “standing up” for anything. It’s a hobby, a pastime, not a civic duty, in my opinion. Yours may differ.

            This dude who called in to this radio show had called before and been treated rudely, apparently. It’s kinda like a guy who appears on the Jerry Springer show and complains that he is made to look undignified — TWICE. Or like me complaining that other Wizbang commenters call me names. If I find it so objectionable, I’m free not to comment.

  • The_Queen_of_France

    It’s exactly this kind of crap that keeps the gay agenda from getting support from average Americans.

  • The_Queen_of_France

    Seems to me Michael Savage lost his cable tv show some years back because he went on a rant and told a caller to “get AIDS and die”. Has this ass been fired yet?

    • Brucehenry

      I don’t know, but Warner mentioned DAN Savage, not Michael Savage. I wasn’t aware that either one of them had a cable TV show.

      • The_Queen_of_France

        Michael had a show (CNN? MSNBC? not sure) several years back and it wasn’t on long until he made the statement I referenced. Why did you feel the need to point out that Warner mentioned Dan Savage? I wasn’t confused; I can read. I brought up Michael because the two situations are nearly identical but for which end of the extreme the protagonists represent. BTW, I know who Dan Savage is, too: a slug, a pervert, and hypocrite.

        • Brucehenry

          Didn’t mean to offend, Your Majesty. I pointed it out because the conversation had turned to Warner’s misidentification — AGAIN — of DAN Savage as “Obama’s Bullying Czar.”

          He first did it months ago and I’ve been giving him shit about it ever since. Just when I had pretty much forgotten about it, he tried to pull it again. When I did, Jim jumped in, and so I thought maybe you had mixed the two names up.

          No disrespect intended to your reading comprehension. If you HAD made such a mistake, it would have been understandable.

          The smaller your audience, the crazier you can get without being fired. Rush Limbaugh, powerful as he is, could never get away with saying some of the stuff local talk-show wingnuts say. Similarly, Bill Maher lost his job on ABC for saying something you can hear every day on satellite radio.

          • The_Queen_of_France

            No offense taken, Bruce.

            Too bad Maher won’t lose his current job for his most recent “joke.”

            you’re thinking about voting for Mitt Romney, I would like to make this
            one plea: black people know who you are and they will come after you.”