
Jim Cramer, host of CNBC’s Mad Money raised a few eyebrows with his picks in The Washington Post Outlook section crystal ball contest.

Cramer says of his prediction that Obama will win the electoral college 440-98, “The presidential race is nowhere as close as the polls suggest.” Via Jim Tankersley comes a graphic of the EV breakdown that would be required for Cramer’s prediction.
Of course this is the same Jim Cramer who pumped-up the bona fides of former MLB player Lenny Dykstra as a stock picking savant, claimed that Facebook was undervalued at IPO, and was telling people to buy Bear Sterns right up until the day they went under.
Here’s how he explains his pick…
No one is going to recall the guy who picks Obama by 10 electorals if it turns out to be 150 margin.Believe me.
— Jim Cramer (@jimcramer) November 4, 2012
I want whatever Cramer is smoking…
Shortlink:
Pingback: Pundit accountability: The official 2012 election prediction thread
Pingback: Other Notable Predictions « The Political Equation
Pingback: Common Folk Collective » Election Prediction
Pingback: Obama, à plus de 9 chances sur 10 « maison blanche
Pingback: Predictions of political pundits | regression to the mean
Pingback: Some people are very confused | WUPR
Pingback: The National Memo » Pundit Scorecard: The Good, The Bad… And Dick Morris
Pingback: Of Polls, Political Pundits, Predictors and I | elcidharth
Pingback: Worst Predictions: Election Edition | Open Source Thinktank
Pingback: Presidential Poling, Pundits, and Predictions (The Results)