At war for the nation one city at a time: San Jose

On Monday we highlighted the steps San Bernardino, CA is taking to get out from under the iron thumb of union contracts that have forced the city into bankruptcy. Today we’re going to look at San Jose.

Public employee pensions have put San Jose on the ropes. Their Democratic mayor and city council took the bull by the horns last year and put a measure on the ballot to rein in pension costs. In the heavily Democratic city of San Jose it passed in a landslide. Needless to say the unions weren’t happy, they sued the city and the suit is still winding its way through the courts in California.

They’re even less happy today.

The mayor, Chuck Reed, is most likely on a couple of hit lists. He’s put together a ballot initiative for next year’s California ballot that would dramatically alter the playing field for unions in their Golden State.

Reed last month took steps toward putting a statewide pension proposal on the November 2014 ballot. The measure would, among other things, change California’s constitution so that state and local government employers could legally lower employees’ pension terms prospectively. A week ago he offered to talk things over with the unions and with Democratic and Republican leaders in the Legislature.

Meaningful dialogue can only occur in an environment of trust and sincerity,” the coalition’s letter says. “Your choice, to first introduce this draconian and flawed measure and then invite dialogue, shows a lack of both.”

The “meaningful dialog” sentence from the union’s letter has to be one of the most hypocritical statement I’ve read in a long time. Public employee unions work diligently to destroy trust and are the most insincere group of thugs on earth. Islamists included.

If passed by voters, Reed’s ballot measure would invalidate a body of case law that suggests pensions once promised are a “vested right” that can’t be diminished without equal alternative compensation.

California is certainly a pot of gold for unions. You can also bet that California’s unions – who own the Democratic Party, lock, stock, and barrel – will unleash an unprecedented campaign to defeat Reed’s proposition.

Today, the really important fact is that a Democratic mayor has passed one ballot measure reigning in unions in a heavily Democratic city and now he’s being taken seriously as he moves to amend the California state constitution.

Curmudgeon Subscribe 150h

Is it time for a belated hat tip to John Roberts?
Even Bill Clinton Says Obama Lied About 'Keeping Our Insurance if We Like it'
  • Tanuki Man

    “Rein” in costs. Not “reign.”

    • jim_m

      Now your just reigning on there parade. To bad allot of people have such poor grammar. 😉

      • alanstorm

        Shouldn’t that be “pour grammer”?

        • Let he who has never fracked up the grammar and spelling of a comment cast the first stone…

          • 914

            Where’s Bruce Henry for grammar patrol when you need him? Oh, that’s right. We never needed him.

          • 914 Wins Wizbang for the Day!

        • jim_m

          I was tempted but decided to stick with just the homophones.

      • Tanuki Man

        I do tend to be a grammar nazi. And I’m all right with that.

        • Michael Becker

          I have no issues with grammar nazis. Hell, I’m one. Thanks for the correction, and I fixed it.

          • jim_m

            I have no problem with pointing out grammar. I just wanted to have some fun with it.

          • Tanuki Man

            Damned decent of you, sir. Round of drinks for the house!

          • Michael Becker

            That would be 30 year old Glenfiddich. Thank you.

  • Hank_M

    So the unions filed suit. Suppose I can’t blame them. They haven’t finished bleeding San Jose dry.

    I was curious about the salaries San Jose paid and found this:

    It’s for 2012 and I have to admit, the salaries and pensions are mind boggling.

    It’s a great place to be a senior librarian.

  • Lawrence Westlake

    This isn’t really surprising. Mayors are CEO’s and they actually have to care about such items as budgets, deficits, debt and debt service, revenue and spending. And quite unlike folks on Capitol Hill mayors can’t simply print money out of thin air and levy taxes nationwide. Obviously the unions will go ballistic about this. That goes without saying. But it’ll be handled largely behind closed doors. It won’t breathlessly be reported. The headlines will be quite neutral. “Mayor and Unions Meet Over Details of Local Pensions.” That sort of thing. Ultimately as far as LIV’s, drones and useful idiots are concerned, it’ll all somehow be the GOP’s fault. And Bush’s.

    • 914

      Oh like Detroit? Right