90 year old business owner exercises his 2nd Amendment rights

A young punk robber learned about the 2nd Amendment this week.

George Hicks owns a Laundromat in Dayton, OH. He’s been in the neighborhood for decades and is respected and loved by his neighbors who are his customers. That all could have come to an end this week if only George had installed a silent alarm button in his office to alert the police to a problem.

George was minding his own business, sitting in his office at the back of the Laundromat when a kid walked in and demanded all his money. Logic might tell you that a 90 year old man would be easy pickings for a twenty-something kid who was bent on robbing somebody. After all, robbers typically pick the easiest mark they can find. They’re not particularly interested in working hard or in taking unnecessary risks.

This particular robber got a lesson in the Constitution from George instead of “all of his money”.

It all went down very quickly.

If George had a police call button on his desk, the cops would probably have arrived about ten minutes after the robber left with George’s money. If George didn’t have an alarm button and had to call 911, the cops would probably have taken at least a half hour because the perp would have been long gone – with George’s money – and they’d just be taking an incident report to file and forget.

George happens to be a self-sufficient old guy who’s also a realist. He understands the physics of police response time vs. muzzle velocity.

Surveillance video shows a man walking into George Hicks’ office in Dayton, Ohio. He demanded money from the register, but the 90-year-old refused.

Hicks says he reached for his pocket and told the suspect he wasn’t getting anything. That quickly scared the man away.

“I got up and had my gun in my hand,” Hicks laughed. “He ran out the door and, phew! He flew.”

The suspect took off without taking any money.

Hicks armed response obviously saved him some cash. It very likely saved his life. If he didn’t have enough cash on him to satisfy the robber the kid could very well have decided to take his anger out on George and that’s a confrontation that can easily turn deadly when one combatant is 20 and one is 90.

There’s a history lesson here as well as the lesson in the Constitution. The history lesson – and the Constitutional lesson – are lessons that people like Mike Bloomberg and Barack Obama never learned even though one of them, supposedly, is a Constitutional law professor.

The Constitutional lesson here is that the founders understood the real world and understood that we have the individual right to protect our lives and property from robbers, be they twenty-something punks or an overreaching government. They understood that the right to own and bear arms was central to the right to protect ourselves.

The history lesson here is one that comes to us from the 1800s. As pioneers moved west into a hostile land some unknown American coined the phrase “God man but Samuel Colt made them equal”.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Curmudgeon - Check Out 600w 200h

 

Detroit Police Chief: the city is safer when good people can carry a gun
Duck Dynasty becomes Gun Dynasty?
  • jim_m

    He’s lucky because it took him forever and a day to draw his weapon. He should get a proper holster for that thing so he can draw it faster.

    But it is a good moment to note the recent Quinipiac study which shows that more guns = less crime:

    The purpose of the present study is to determine the effects of state-level assault weapons bans and concealed weapons laws on state-level murder rates. Using data for the period 1980 to 2009 and controlling for state and year fixed effects, the results of the present study suggest that states with restrictions on the carrying of concealed weapons had higher gun-related murder rates than other states. It was also found that assault weapons bans did not significantly affect murder rates at the state level. These results suggest that restrictive concealed weapons laws may cause an increase in gun-related murders at the state level. The results of this study are consistent with some prior research in this area, most notably Lott and Mustard (1997).

    Or at least fewer murders. Expect the left to dismiss this because it runs counter to their ideology which they know is infallible.

    • http://www.traveLightgame.com/ ljcarolyne

      Hey he took care of it, didn’t he. Why doesn’t everyone quit criticizing the man and cheer him on. Always a comment that doesn’t matter now that it’s over, the man won, thank God. I could care less what the left does or doesn’t. If they only knew how sick of them we all are, To He!@ with all of them and are dismissed for good.

  • GarandFan

    “Expect the left to dismiss this because it runs counter to their ideology which they know is infallible.”

    As someone once said, ‘Liberals know a lot. But a lot of what they know simply isn’t true.’

  • LiberalNightmare

    It pains me to see a young re-distributionist foiled in the faithful execution of his duties

  • williamdiamon

    The proper response, when someone is shooting at you is to shoot back. You will need a gun for this. It is also the only way to protect an innocent, If you care as much about people as you think you do. If you do not have a gun, call police. Why? Because they have a gun. / Reread paragraph until it sinks in.

Optimization WordPress Plugins & Solutions by W3 EDGE