Target v. ObamaCare on transparency

Target was the target of a very sophisticated cyber attack before Christmas. They got credit and debit card information from Target’s customer base during the busiest shopping days of the year.

Target immediately informed their customers that their information might have been stolen and put out a series of informational emails and announcements about the cyber attack. The information release and working with their customers is an ongoing effort as they released a new announcement today that apparently the attack got more customers information than was first indicated.

In addition to being immediately upfront about the cyber attack, Target has offered all of their customers free credit monitoring for a year to insure that they can help their customers – known as “guests” to Target Team Members – mitigate any possible damage to their credit.

We’re sure this mess isn’t over, and we’re also sure that Target will stay on top of the situation, keep their customers informed, and work hard to help any customers who’ve been damaged by this breech.

Here’s the latest report.

Let’s take a moment and compare the response of Target to the response of the Obama administration with respect to possible data breaches in the ObamaCare system.

Keep in mind that Target has a very mature and secure network. It’s been around for years, they have a very professional IT group who’ve built the system, and they’ve never had any major data breaches.

The ObamaCare system, on the other hand, was designed in a patchwork by unconnected groups of people, the overall management of the system architecture and code was a complete fustercluck and is ongoing in that regard. The entire system isn’t even complete, though it was launched on October 1 of last year. Security has been, from day one, an afterthought.

It could take a year to secure the risk of “high exposures” of personal information on the federal Obamacare online exchange, a cybersecurity expert told CNBC on Monday.

“When you develop a website, you develop it with security in mind. And it doesn’t appear to have happened this time,” said David Kennedy, a so-called “white hat” hacker who tests online security by breaching websites. He testified on Capitol Hill about the flaws of last week.

“It’s really hard to go back and fix the security around it because security wasn’t built into it,” said Kennedy, chief executive of TrustedSec. “We’re talking multiple months to over a year to at least address some of the critical-to-high exposures on the website itself.”

Insurance customers who are using the Federal Exchange – and we don’t think the state exchanges are any better, they were written by mostly the same people – are entering their social security numbers, their birthdays, basically all of their personal information, along with payment information. According to multiple computer security people, the information is wide open and ripe for picking.

It just so happens that federal law exempts the government from the requirement to inform consumers if there has been a security breach and their personal information might have been stolen. The Obama administration, in the same spirit of transparency that has rule Washington since inauguration day 2009, is refusing to meet the same standard that federal law requires companies like Target to meet.

The good news here is that it looks like even Congressional Democrats – who are in a dither about the upcoming election – are turning their backs on The Imperial President in droves.

The House has passed its first Obamacare-themed measure of the year, approving 291-122 a bill requiring the administration to quickly notify Americans if their personal information has been compromised on the new health insurance exchanges.

Sixty-seven Democrats joined Republicans to pass the bill, which was offered by Rep. Joe Pitts (R-Pa.).

Republicans aimed the vote squarely at what they consider one of their best Obamacare targets now that most of the Affordable Care Act is in effect and is working: the flow of Americans’ personal information between the federal data hub and the insurance marketplaces.

The administration insists that the law is not necessary because there haven’t been any security breaches to the ObamaCare system. Well, there haven’t been any that the administration has admitted to.

This is another case of the Obama administration putting itself above the law that we common folk have to follow. Kind of like Tim “Turbo Tax” Geithner not bothering to file his income taxes just before he was nominated to be Secretary of the Treasury.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Curmudgeon - Check Out 600w 200h

Global Warming is a beautiful thing!
Eric Holder declares same sex marriage legal in Utah
  • jim_m

    Ah! But when business has a security breach it is because they are evil and preying upon unaware consumers who must be protected. When government does the very same thing it is an innocent mistake and there is nothing to worry about because no one would ever use the government to hurt anyone else.

    There has never been any example in our history of the government ever doing anything to hurt anyone.

    • Michael Becker

      You’re right Jim. I don’t know how I could have missed the obvious.

  • GarandFan

    “The administration insists that the law is not necessary because there
    haven’t been any security breaches to the ObamaCare system.”

    The same administration that says Fast and Furious was run by “rogue agents”. The same administration that says the IRS Scandal was caused by “rogue agents”. The same administration that says Benghazi was a “spontaneous demonstration”. The same administration that says the President was unaware of NSA snooping on various heads of other governments.

    • Retired military

      You forgot “If you like your healthcare you can keep it”

      • jim_m

        Too bad they never offered us “If you like your democracy, you can keep it.”

  • Walter_Cronanty

    If a security breach does occur, don’t worry. Rest assured that: 1 Obama won’t know anything about it until he sees it on the news; 2 He’ll be just as outraged as you; and, 3 He’ll issue a stern warning about the consequences and vow to bring the nefarious curs to justice.

  • Walter_Cronanty

    Well, we finally got some Obamacare numbers from the most transparent president ever, and we see why he’s been less than forthcoming – 24% of enrollees are between the ages of 18 and 34 – the target, for the end of March, is just below 40%. Those onesie wearers better get off the couch and register, or this will crash sooner than expected.
    The most damning number, however, is the percentage of enrollees who are eligible for subsidies – 79%. Thus, we have 21% subsidizing 79%.
    EDIT: Forgot the linky, again:
    Remember when Obama said Obamacare would not add $.10 to the deficit?

    • jim_m


      As Walter points out, obamacare is hitting its max subsidy level and falling well below the minimum of healthy young enrollees needed to make the system work.

      And if Chico thinks that this is some big payday for the insurance companies, he should be aware that the bailout only covers 80% of their losses. So this is a loser all the way around for everyone except for the totalitarian left that wants total control over healthcare.