South Oregon Proves Gov’t Subsides Are Bad for You


The Beautiful Rogue River in South Oregon

A very long article at the conservative Washington Free Beacon describes how economic recession and a changing timber industry has turned parts of southern Oregon into a “lawless” area with toothless authorities, few police, and empty government treasuries. But what the article really proves is that government subsides created this problem in the first place proving that government largess is a bad thing in the long run.

The piece, “The Lawless South,” by CJ Ciaramella, describes the hard times that parts of southern Oregon have fallen upon. The hard times have come from several directions all converging to smack the area with high unemployment, plunging home prices, and failing industry.

The area Ciaramella is around Josephine County, way south of Portland and near the Oregon/California border. This area is in such bad economic times that the various governments, city and county, have had to make massive cuts. The cuts Ciaramella focuses on are the cuts in policing, hence his “lawless” title.

The main industry in this area, we discover in the article, is the timber industry. And that industry has disappeared in the last decade. The very last timber mill in the area closed last year, so the one important source of jobs is now completely eliminated.

But, we also find out that the timber industry has been practically the only industry in the area since forever and that the city and country governments had in the past been fully funded by federal subsides to the timber industry. And now that the timber industry is over, the federal subsidies are also finished.

With no federal subsidies these local governments suddenly have no money for government services like police forces and the area is having a jump in crime and no police to investigate and help solve crimes.

Worse for the governments, with no job base left in the area, the voters have consistently voted down new taxes to help pay for those police agencies (and other government services that lost their federal subsidies).

One fired police officer even formed a group of citizens to act as a Community Watch group that can respond in non life threatening situations.

“Who else is going to protect you when your government can’t?” former officer Ken Selig told Fox News during a recent report on his efforts.

Well, he said it himself. It becomes the citizens’ duty to police themselves. Get a gun, folks, get a gun.

In any case, the article talks of no jobs, it talks of “idle hands” that cause trouble, it talks of the end of federal subsidies causing all this trouble. And after reading it one comes to several inescapable conclusions.

Firstly, and most importantly, this whole situation is the fault of government subsidies. Without all the cushy government subsidies these communities would never have formed. People moved there because of the false economy created by tax dollars being thrown around.

It is clear that if there were never any federal subsidies, few people would have moved to these areas and these towns would not exist–at least not to the extent to which they grew.

Secondly, one is struck with a question. If it is so bad, if there aren’t any jobs, why aren’t these people moving to where there are jobs?

This question also gets answered in Ciaramella’s piece. Most of these people are on welfare and so they don’t want to leave the area and lose their government subsidies!

The government strikes with subsidies to destroy again!

Josephine County is truly one of America’s most beautiful, forested landscapes. We should be telling residents there to leave the area to the wildlife and move away. And we should also note that this entire tale of woe was created when the US government flooded the area with federal subsidies in the first place.

CJ Ciaramella has given us a great example of how destructive government subsidies actually are.

Shortlink:

Posted by on February 25, 2014.
Filed under Big government, Business, corruption, Culture, Culture Of Corruption, Democrats, Economics, Entitlement Culture, Liberals.
Warner Todd Huston is a Chicago-based freelance writer, has been writing opinion editorials and social criticism since early 2001 and is featured on many websites such as Andrew Breitbart's BigGovernment.com and BigJournalism.com, RightWingNews.com, CanadaFreePress.com, RightPundits.com, StoptheACLU.com, Human Events Magazine, among many, many others. Additionally, he has been a frequent guest on talk-radio programs to discuss his opinion editorials and current events.He has also written for several history magazines and appears in the new book "Americans on Politics, Policy and Pop Culture" which can be purchased on amazon.com. He is also the owner and operator of PubliusForum.com. Feel free to contact him with any comments or questions, EMAIL Warner Todd Huston: igcolonel .at. hotmail.com"The only end of writing is to enable the reader better to enjoy life, or better to endure it." --Samuel Johnson

You can leave a response or trackback to this entry
  • Paul Hooson

    One of my friends in the lumber industry and I have talked about many of the problems plaguing the timber and lumber industry for years. He found it a real shame that he often had to buy his lumber from British Columbia because of some many problems in Oregon’s timber industry, some because of local or state government, some because of the federal government.

  • GarandFan

    Parts of Southern Oregon and Northern California say they are victims of an unresponsive and out-of-touch state government. There is talk of seceding and of forming their own state of “Jefferson”. Both Oregon and California are liberal states run by a Democratic majority. So if “the government” is unresponsive, why do folks keep re-electing the same representatives again and again.

    • jim_m

      So if “the government” is unresponsive, why do folks keep re-electing the same representatives again and again.

      – Because they don’t want to admit they were wrong
      – Because they believe the ideology behind the policy so devoutly that they are certain that the idea is right despite the continuing failure
      – Because the choice is between one candidate who promises you a return to the days of free money flowing out of the government and the other says that you need to be responsible for yourself. People would rather sit on their asses and do nothing so they vote for the first one.

  • LiberalNightmare

    My dog is perfectly capable of finding his own food.
    However, he has been trained since birth to get his food from me.
    When I say sit, he sits.

    That’s how subsidies work.

  • stan25

    Ask a spotted owl lover if he/she has a job or is sponging off the welfare state. Bet the answer will be the latter.