SHOCK REPORT: Ohio TV Station Actually Calls Black Violence ‘Hate Crimes’

In nearly every big city in America gangs of black youths have been roaming through the city searching out white people to beat and sometimes kill. A major book chronicling these “hate crimes” was published a few years ago but other than that the media has ignored the truth for fear of being called “racists.” But one TV news station has told the truth, these crimes fit the mold of a “hate crime” like no other.

I interviewed the author of the book White Girl Bleed A Lot for Breitbart in November of last year, but the crimes Colin Flaherty described in his book didn’t stop in 2013. Now a Cincinnati, Ohio TV news outfit has done what no other TV news has done, pointed out that these crimes are based in black racism.

The anchor there is Rob Braun of Channel 12 News, WKRC in Cincy. Rob is a member of a major media family in Cincinnati. His dad, Bob Braun, was famous in the region for hosting a morning show for decades in the 60s, 70s, and 80s. Bob’s nephew, Bucks Braun was a major radio personality in Dayton, Ohio. I mention all this to note that Rob is not an inconsequential figure in Cincinnati.

Regardless, the truth is groups of black teens in nearly every major city in the nation have done these things and continue to perpetrate these crimes and police agencies are afraid to call them “hate crimes” or in any way ascribe these crimes to racism despite that they clearly are race-based.

Wanted: A Father for Fathers Day
Wizblab Open Thread Starter: Obama's Best Effort to Erase U.S. Borders Succeeding
  • Walter_Cronanty

    Raaacist!!!

  • Commander_Chico

    If I lived in one of the shitholes where this kind of thing happens I would consider going out strapped at all times.

    • Brett Buck

      This sort of thing happens wherever liberals have been in control for significant periods of time, and were unrestrained in their efforts for “progress”.

      I take it that this means you will be voting the straight conservative slate next time around.

      • jim_m

        Chico will say that the problem of crime in the inner cities is the fault of Bush and/or Cheney because he read it on a hat.

        • Commander_Chico
          • Retired military

            Just for you Chico

          • jim_m

            Still waiting for you to provide the link that backs up your claim that Sen Leahy says that Cheney plotted the anthrax attack on his office.

            Waiting…

          • Commander_Chico

            I didn’t say that. I said Leahy said he thought there was a conspiracy. Leahy did not name Cheney. I do. Just a hunch, true, but falls into all of the other pre-war bullshit, like the Niger uranium forgeries.

          • jim_m

            Oh, I’m sorry, your claim about Leahy was made in th context of your accusing Cheney, so naturally I assumed that you were using Leahy as proof that your accusation was correct. Now we see that you admit that there is no proof and that Leahy’s concern about a conspiracy is totally unrelated to your fantasy.

            What an epic lie and walk back.

            Next we will here from our resident military imposture that the moon landing was faked.

          • Commander_Chico

            My drill sergeant said “assume” means making an “ass of u and me”

          • http://wizbangblog.com/author/rodney-graves/ Rodney G. Graves

            Your mythical DI was certainly correct about you.

          • Jwb10001

            And yet you assume Cheney sent the anthrax letters, and Bush is a war criminal. If not for assumptions on your part you’d have basically nothing to say at all.

          • Commander_Chico

            It’s a hunch on Cheney based on circumstantial evidence and motive.

            Bush being a war criminal is an established fact. Two crimes prosecuted at Nuerenberg: Waging aggressive war and torture.

          • http://wizbangblog.com/author/rodney-graves/ Rodney G. Graves

            Whereas we have solid reason not to believe a single word proceeding from your keyboard, hand, or mouth.

          • jim_m

            You would define shouting angrily at someone “torture” if you were ideologically opposed to them. Bush had backing of the UN Security Counsel to enforce their directives, so this would not fall under the aggressive war definition.

            So once again we see that you are full of crap. All of your positions are based in ideology and fantasy and not in facts or reality.

          • Commander_Chico

            http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/foreign-policy/item/18441-un-could-prosecute-bush-for-war-crimes-says-ex-u-s-terror-czar

            Former U.S. terror czar Richard Clarke (shown), who resigned in 2003, dropped two bombshell statements about the Bush administration he served during a recent TV interview. First, he said, former President George W. Bush and then-Vice President Dick Cheney probably perpetrated what amounts to “war crimes” surrounding the unconstitutional attack on Iraq. While plenty of Americans on all sides of the political spectrum might be inclined to agree, Clarke went even further. He suggested the duo could be prosecuted by the dictator-dominated United Nations at the global body’s self-styled “International Criminal Court” (ICC) in The Hague.

            Clarke was fairly blunt when asked whether he thought war-crimes charges should be brought against Bush, Cheney, and then-Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. “I think things that they authorized probably fall within the area of war crimes,” the former U.S. terrorism czar for Bill Clinton and George W. Bush said in an interview with Amy Goodman of the “progressive” Democracy Now TV program. “Whether that would be productive or not, I think, is a discussion we could all have.” It was not immediately clear why, if he believes they authorized war crimes, there should be a “discussion” about whether justice is “productive.”

          • jim_m

            Citing an ultra far left article is not what I would consider as a credible truth source. I also find it more than a little ironic to hear self styled progressives declaring about the necessity for justice when OJ Simpson had to be found not guilty for actually killing 2 people, “Because Justice!” and the Duke Lacrosse players had to be convicted of a crime they did not commit “Because Justice!”

            Your sense of justice is too highly contaminated with your ideological sense of taking any means to an end to be taken seriously.

          • Commander_Chico

            If the John Birch Society is “ultra left” to you, I guess you’re pretty far right. That explains you harping on “the left” all of the time – to you everyone is the left.

          • jim_m

            Nutbag is nutbag and knows no right or left. If you are citing the John Birch Society then my point still stands. Citing the irrational to prove a point is not proving a point, it is only showing lack of judgement.

          • http://wizbangblog.com/author/rodney-graves/ Rodney G. Graves

            Who here has made such a claim and precisely where and when?

            If the John Birch Society is “ultra left” to you, I guess you’re pretty far right.

          • jim_m

            Remind me again why it is that anyone should take seriously anything said by a lunatic that claims that Bush was complicit in 9/11 and that Cheney was responsible for the anthrax attacks?

          • Scalia

            Which is what you’re doing with Cheney.

    • http://wizbangblog.com/author/rodney-graves/ Rodney G. Graves

      You are a one person shithole besmirching anyplace you happen to be.

    • Idahoser

      you mean you don’t already?!? Dude, think about it for a while.

  • jim_m

    For the left, racism is something that only whites can do. This is taught in our schools why would a government agency go against what is effectively official policy?

  • GarandFan

    Eric Holder was unavailable for comment.

  • The_Weege_99

    How soon until the howls of “racism” from the usual suspects. It is a certainty that if Cincinnati police act on the fact that there is a higher probability of black youth criminality, they will be prosecuted by Holder’s Dept of InJustice for “profiling.” Because, as we all know, profiling criminals is bad if the criminal element being profiled happens to be of a certain race.

  • superdestroyer

    I hope Dr. Wright has tenure. That is the only way that his career survives.

  • Idahoser

    there is no such thing as a “hate crime”. Or interchangeably, EVERY crime is a hate crime. The point is you should be ashamed for considering yourself capable or worthy of punishing thought.

  • ohio granny

    What difference does it make if the murderer did it because they hate the victim or because they have no respect for human life? Dead is still dead. And why is it that hate crimes seem to only go one way? White on black, not black on white. Everyone knows there is a lot more black on white crime than there is white on black.

    • http://wizbangblog.com/author/rodney-graves/ Rodney G. Graves

      The short and obvious answer is that motive should matter not at all.

    • jim_m

      Because if a white man kills a black man there are extra charges for hate crimes. But if a black man kills a white man it’s OK.

  • Terence Sommer

    Thank God a news outlet is trying to let the truth out. Read about South Africa people too.

Optimization WordPress Plugins & Solutions by W3 EDGE