Black ‘Professor’ Who Attacked Teen Anti-Abortion Protester Blames ‘Slavery’

So-called professor Mireille Miller-Young of the University of California at Santa Barbara says she has a legitimate reason for physically attacking a 16-year-old anti-abortion protester in march of this year. She was pregnant, so anti-abortion protests are a “trigger” that makes the disease of pregnancy cause her to go wild. On top of that, “Slavery” made the black “Queer Studies” professor do it, you see?

In March this crazed “professor” attacked the teen and her 21-year-old sister when they took advantage of the school’s “free speech zone” where the pair set up a display to protest abortion.

The “professor” swooped in, physically assaulted the kids and stole their display running away with it to her office where she locked the display away.

Professor Mireille Miller-Young proudly walking off with stolen property just before she assaulted the owner of that property.

“Professor” Miller-Young, who teaches feminist studies and specializes in “queer theory” and also teaches courses in pornography, was later charged with criminal assault.

Apparently this so-called professor of classes unworthy of college study also claims that since she was pregnant at the time of the incident, it seems she was unbalanced–because apparently pregnancy is a disease, don’t you know?

Miller-Young told police that she had a right to attack the anti-abortion protesters because, since she was three-months pregnant, the anti-abortion display “triggered” her.

But the “professor” was forced by the court to pen an apology letter and now she says she had no such right to attack the girls.

Regardless, her actions are being excused by her fellow “professors” one of whom is claiming that “slavery” is the ultimate cause of her rage.

One of this prof’s fellow fake professors–one Eileen Boris of the so-called “Feminist Studies” department–sent a letter of support to the court explaining why Miller-Young looked like she was enjoying her criminal behavior on the video taken last March.

“If she appears smiling on camera,” Boris claimed, “she is ‘wearing the mask,’ that is, she is hiding her actual state through a strategy of self-presentation that is a cultural legacy of slavery.”

That’s right, despite that slavery has been gone for three generations, despite that she’s never experienced it nor had the threat of it in her life, despite that she’s been allowed to become rich teaching a faux class, despite that she is pretty much given carte blanche to act like a thug at work… why it is “slavery” that is oppressing her.

The saddest thing is that these deluded idiots actually believe this crap.

The fact is, Miller-Young should be sentenced to the harshest penalty the law can give for this act of craven thuggery. She abused her position of authority and has now essentially told every distempered leftist that all you have to do is write an insincere “apology” letter and that will paper over any criminal act you perpetrate as long as that criminal act was perpetrated in the name of political correctness.

This is what we are paying our “professors” to teach.

One last point to this, a coda, if you will. This “professor” engaged in actual censorship. Now usually in these situations the side trying to oppress–whether it be a music label, newspaper, the media in general, or a single distempered protestor acting like a thug–are not really engaging in true censorship.

You see, only government can actually perpetrate censorship.

But since this professor is a paid member of the government in her role as a purported teacher paid by state money and carrying the color of authority, her act was actual, government sponsored censorship.

She should be fired for that alone.


The final legal word on this incident:

Miller-Young was sentenced to 108 hours of community service, 10 hours of anger management, and three years probation for her assault on a group of pro-life students in early March. She was also ordered to pay a small fine and restitution of almost $500.

We Should Not Call Them The 'Ruling Class,' But the 'Immunes'
Leftist Columnist Glenn Greenwald Somehow Blames Israel for Ferguson Riots
  • Retired military

    IMO from the one video I saw it appeared the protesters were following the woman. I have an issue with that. At the same time as long as they didn’t touch her than she had no business touching them. If there were bothering her or invading her space that is what campus security is for. Plus you have an adult and a child (Someone UNDER 18). The adult needs to act like an adult.

    • They were only following the “professor” because she stole their display and they were trying to get it back.

      • Retired military

        Okay I didn’t see that part. Was just barely paying attention. She was in the wrong anyway for touching them.

        • Agreed.

          • Blaming slavery is in the wrong too. We are all sick of that racist excuse don’t want to hear it from the Usurper either or his race card players.

      • jim_m

        Professor of queer theory, black film and pornography.

  • jim_m

    She made the Daily Caller’s list of worst professors.

    Sadly, she is not the worst (there is a lot of competition)

  • LiberalNightmare

    Can we get her kicked off campus for saying “trigger”?

    • Walter_Cronanty

      No, but you could be for typing “trigger.”

  • GarandFan

    “The saddest thing is that these deluded idiots actually believe this crap.”

    But…but..but they are of the elite intelligentsia today. Just ask them!

  • Jwb10001

    Are liberals the only people that are effected by triggers? Don’t anti abortion supporters have trigger rights too? I mean does a physcial assult count as a trigger? This is so stupid that I suspect sharing a classroom with this idiot could cost you several thousand brain cells.

    • jim_m

      It’s not that liberals are the only people who are effected by triggers. It’s that liberals are the only people who have rights. If you are a conservative you have no rights.

      Obviously this leftist goon believes that the people speaking their minds in the “free speech zone” on campus (there is a frightening idea, it used to be that the entire university was considered a place for open exchange of ideas, but no longer now that it is dominated by the ultra far left), if these people are conservatives, they do not have any rights and that she can steal from them, assault them and silence them using any means she chooses.

  • JWH

    And this, ladies and gentlemen, is why defense counsel should always review letters of support before they’re submitted to court. It would have been sufficient to say, “She’s a good person, her students love her, this incident was uncharacteristic of her.” If the accounts of those letters are even a little true, then the professors have spent a little too much time in the ivory tower.

    • That’s pretty much a given…