Hey, GOP, what part of “non-renewable” do you not understand?

Non-renewable
“The top House lawmaker overseeing energy said he wants to lift the four-decade-old ban on exporting crude oil.” – The Hill.com . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

If Americans want the USA to have and to maintain energy independence, then they should be alarmed about the effort by some members of Congress (several of them Republicans) to lift the current ban on the export of crude oil originating in the USA.

Crude oil is a non-renewable energy resource, which means that it is getting scarcer and scarcer. Eventually, the world’s supply of crude oil will begin to run out. If one wants the USA to be the last place on Earth to run out of crude oil, then one ought to support keeping the current ban on the export of crude oil originating in the USA.

Granted, people in the oil industry will claim that there is plenty of crude oil for the near future, but such a claim misses the point. If one wants America as we know it to exist in the distant future, then one ought to prepare for what will be inevitable in the distant future.

Navy Chaplain Disciplined for Being True to His Faith - Sen.. Lindsay Graham Steps Up ...
Hillary vs. CNN, ABC & Washington Post?