Is There No Democrat Who Will Carry Out Their Duty?

I recently suggested that Equality Under The Law had met its end.  Here is further proof of that murder, and evidence of the parties responsible for the crime.

The FBI Investigation of EmailGate Was a Sham

NSA Analyst: We now have incontrovertible proof the [Federal] Bureau [of Investigation] never had any intention of prosecuting Hillary Clinton

By , the Observer

From the moment the EmailGate scandal went public more than a year ago, it was obvious that the Federal Bureau of Investigation never had much enthusiasm for prosecuting Hillary Clinton or her friends. Under President Obama, the FBI grew so politicized that it became impossible for the Bureau to do its job – at least where high-ranking Democrats are concerned.

As I observed in early July, when Director James Comey announced that the FBI would not be seeking prosecution of anyone on Team Clinton over EmailGate, the Bureau had turned its back on its own traditions of floating above partisan politics in the pursuit of justice. “Malfeasance by the FBI, its bending to political winds, is a matter that should concern all Americans, regardless of their politics,” I stated, noting that it’s never a healthy turn of events in a democracy when your secret police force gets tarnished by politics.

I will quibble with Mr. Schindler in that the FBI, for all its faults, is not (yet) a “secret police.”  I think that absent some meaningful oversight and real and severe consequences arising from this gross malfeasance on the part of the FBI that they may indeed be headed down that slippery slope, but I hasn’t (yet) reached that point.  What the FBI has done is undue all of the good faith it had built in the post Hoover era.

Just how much Comey and his Bureau punted on EmailGate has become painfully obvious since then. Redacted FBI documents from that investigation, dumped on the Friday afternoon before the long Labor Day weekend, revealed that Hillary Clinton either willfully lied to the Bureau, repeatedly, about her email habits as secretary of state, or she is far too dumb to be our commander-in-chief.

Worse, the FBI completely ignored the appearance of highly classified signals intelligence in Hillary’s email, including information lifted verbatim from above-Top Secret NSA reports back in 2011. This crime, representing the worst compromise of classified information in EmailGate – that the public knows of, at least – was somehow deemed so uninteresting that nobody at the FBI bothered to ask anybody on Team Clinton about it.

This stunning omission appears highly curious to anybody versed in counterintelligence matters, not least since during Obama’s presidency, the FBI has prosecuted Americans for compromising information far less classified than what Clinton and her staff exposed on Hillary “unclassified” email server of bathroom infamy.

The seriousness of the security breach committed by Madam Former Secretary is certainly not “news” to regular readers of Wizbang, though our progtard trolls will no doubt go to their graves insisting that since there was no prosecution there was no crime…  What Hillary Clinton and her aids did, per the FBI Director’s own statement, was indeed criminal conduct and a series of felony offenses under Federal Law.

Now it turns out the FBI granted immunity to much bigger fish in the Clinton political tank. Three more people got a pass from the Bureau in exchange for their cooperation: Hillary lawyer Heather Samuelson, State Department IT boss John Bental, and – by far the most consequential – Cheryl Mills, who has been a Clinton flunky-cum-factotum for decades.

Mills served as the State Department’s Chief of Staff and Counselor throughout Hillary’s tenure as our nation’s top diplomat. Granting her immunity in EmailGate, given her deep involvement in that scandal – including the destruction of tens of thousands of emails so they could not be handed over to the FBI – now seems curious, to say the least, particularly because Mills sat in on Hillary’s chat with the Bureau regarding EmailGate.

This was in fact so highly irregular that Jason Chaffetz, chair of the House Oversight Committee, pronounced himself “absolutely stunned” by the FBI’s granting of immunity to Cheryl Mills – which he learned of only on Friday. “No wonder they couldn’t prosecute a case,” Rep. Chaffetz observed of Comey’s Bureau: “They were handing out immunity deals like candy.”

Not to mention that Mills has a longstanding and well-deserved reputation in Washington for helping the Clintons dodge investigation after investigation. When Bill and Hillary need a fixer to help them bury the bodies – as they say inside the Beltway – trusty Cheryl Mills has been on call for the last quarter-century.

The Clinton Criminal Enterprise strikes yet again.  Between Hillary’s conspiracy to avoid the Federal Records Act, violations of the National Security Act, Obstruction of Justice and Pay to Play bribery via the Clinton Foundation, there lies a RICO Case of the Century.  But the criminality neither begins nor ends in the Clinton Crime Cartel.  They have been enabled in this, and actively defended by Barrack Hussein Obama.

Obama’s Colossal Email Lie Final Test for Tarnished MSM

BY ROGER L SIMON, Diary of a Mad Voter, PJ Media

hillary_obama_youve_got_mail_banner_9-24-16-1-sized-770x415xc

That Barack Obama communicated in 2012under a redacted pseudonym—with Hillary Clinton on the then secretary of State’s permeable home-brew email server and then claimed he did not know of that server’s existence until it was reported in the press in 2014 is far more than the usual politician’s prevarication.

Since the fish rots from the top—and in this case it stinks to high heaven—the surfacing of this particular presidential lie calls to question the entire FBI inquiry into the Clinton server, an investigation whose credibility was paper thin in the first place and has now completely vanished.

It’s time to ask that age-old question: “What did the president know and when did he know it?”

That we do know (as of this Friday’s dump) that one of Clinton’s own IT workers referred to her then just-announced 60-day email retention policy (who does that?) as “Hillary’s coverup operation” almost (but not completely) tells the story in those three quoted words. Even though they say it’s not the crime, but the coverup, in this case, it’s both.

The seriousness of this crime/coverup—involving the national security of our country—makes Watergate seem like a minor kerfuffle at a sewing circle. If the mainstream media does not investigate this thoroughly, they are unquestionably the court eunuchs many of us have accused them of being. Worse, they are the enablers of the decline of Western civilization.  Without a free and honest press — some of it anyway — not to mention adherence to the rule of law, such a civilization cannot survive.  And the decline can come remarkably swiftly.  We have plenty of  examples of that from twentieth century Europe.

Does this sound over-heated?  You could say so, but how do you avoid the conclusion, given the MSM’s passivity, or is it collaboration, that they do not care a whit about the rule of law as long as their side wins?

There can be no doubt that this pattern of behavior rises to the level of High Crimes.  Prosecution is not optional.

Scott "Dilbert" Adams Reverses His Presidential Endorsement
Is It Time For A Hallelujah?
  • EricSteel

    I think Trump should tie the sentiment that blacks aren’t treated fairly by the justice system with how the government protects a rich, connected white woman.

    • If done well that would be some very effective political ju-jitsu.

      • EricSteel

        Trump should say that Hillary is treated like she is above the law while blacks are treated like they are below the law and neither is fair to any American.

        • The second is demonstrably untrue.

          • EricSteel

            Come on Rodney, what does truth have to do with politics?

          • jim_m

            This should have been about the law. The dems made it about politics.

          • EricSteel

            It should be about the law, but it isn’t any more because those who enforce the law are now corrupted. The next step is political, either the people vote to enforce the law or to reinforce the corruption.

            Blacks in this country for right or wrong feel that they are poorly treated by the justice system. Ironically, they are supporting a person who is acting above the law. I think Trump should point that out.

          • jim_m

            Most blacks also want the legal system to be political. They want innocent police imprisoned in Baltimore. They want any non-black who shoots a black in self defense imprisoned. In short, they want “social justice” not real justice. Just as several years ago they claimed that the Duke Lacrosse team should be punished if not for the crime that never happened, for the accrued crimes of whites against blacks.

            Giving Hillary a pass is only a demonstration from the dems that they are more than willing to accommodate this radical thinking.

          • EricSteel

            I think the real message should be that giving Hillary a pass is a demonstration from the dems that they believe in two kinds of laws.

          • jim_m

            I think you misunderstand the left. They do not believe in an objective truth. With all things being relative they see nothing inconsistent with how they apply the law. Nor do they see the blatant favoritism toward their friends to be something that is out of line with equal application of the law. There is only one law. They simply believe that the interpretation of the law should be subjective.

            I believe it was Justice Kagan who said that people should not be able to go into a court and predict the outcome based on the evidence. Such a way of interpreting the law as objective and fact based is alien to them. They are a danger to democracy.

          • No. More of a danger to Republican forms of government. Democracy (mob rule) is their goal.

          • EricSteel

            Jim most blacks may be Democrats but most Democrats are not black and haven’t been the victims of subjective interpretations of the law.

            AGAIN, my point is that I believe that Trump has an opportunity to make the case to African-Americans that Hillary Clinton embodies the white priviledge and legal double standard that they hate.

            I believe that someday in the future there will be a tipping point when blacks in this country come to the realization that the Democrats take them for granted. While blacks give Democrats a rock solid vote, they get shit in return from the Democrats.

            Just a couple days ago former governor Douglas Wilder made the case that Democrats are taking the black vote for granted.

          • jim_m

            Tell them that. Blacks have been taught to believe that they are being oppressed, that somehow they are unfairly being put into prison for murder and other crimes and that white people are not. The implicit assumption is that the rate of crime in white communities is the same as in black, but white are simply not arrested or prosecuted.

            Blacks are taken for granted, that is why the left must whip up this bogus idea that they are oppressed. Yep, pretty damned oppressed they are. The President is black, the AG is black, Black athletes dominate football and basketball earning millions of dollars, black workers dominate the bureaucracy.

            My God, it’s exactly like slavery an the Jim Crow South. Or so they claim that it is today. If they are allowed to see the reality of things they would dump the dems in a flash. Hence why it is imperative to keep them in dem controlled failing public schools. Keep them ignorant so it is easier to lie to them.

          • jim_m

            As a funny aside, 53 years ago George Wallace (a dem) declared “segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever”. Today the left is still screaming for segregation. Nothing has changed. In fact, they still claim that segregation is for the benefit of blacks. The difference is that they finally have the blacks believing their BS.

          • WHO’S THE BUSTER

            The rate of drug use is the same in suburban White communities as in Black neighborhoods, with one minor difference; Whites generally snort powdered cocaine and are “sentenced” to rehab, while Blacks do time. Blacks do time for marijuana far more than Whites. Marijuana? is that even a crime anymore?

            While it is common knowledge, I will post a link because I have found that not doing so is somehow, dishonest. Who knew?

            http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2011-01-31/news/ct-met-drug-report-20110131_1_low-level-drug-drug-crimes-drug-laws
            You can Google it any way you like and find a hundred other articles.

            The drug war, what a foolish mess. Luckily we are moving away from privatized prisons as the profit motive relegated it to warehousing. I would imagine even the most staunch law and order advocate realizes that prisoners are eventually released back into society.

            As an aside, did any show illustrate the sheer inanity of the drug war better than The Wire? While it was set in Baltimore, I live in Detroit and saw the exact same scenario and I am sure it is common to many regions (Justified is the rural version of the story). I think of this because a friend sent me a book that tried to make a case for the greatest television shows in history. They listed the Simpsons, The Sopranos, The Wire, Cheers and Breaking Bad; in that order. I simply never watched the Simpsons for more than a few minutes, but will admit it is clever, but my list is different.

            Let’s see, The Wire, The Sopranos, Deadwood, Mad Men and the Rockford Files (hey, I’m old, but I have watched the reruns way too many times to not consider it among the favorites). Yes, I am woefully off topic; hey it happens, but I don’t think anyone sustained any injuries.

          • There is no truth in dhimmocratic politics, it seems. Conservatives are not so alientated from The Truth.

    • Constitution First

      After being fooled once we can never trust what the FBI says again.
      Do it again, you’re the fool.

  • jim_m

    Of course it was a sham. Everyone knew that from the beginning. Conservatives knew that because, as I have repeatedly stated, we all understand that the left sees the law as a tool to punish their opponents and not something to hold their allies to.

    Secondly, the left believes that unless someone is convicted and sent to prison, nothing unethical much less illegal has happened. This allows leftists such as Bruce (who has admitted to my previous statement) to make full throated claims that this is a fake scandal and that there is nothing wrong ever going on (as Bruce has repeatedly claimed about this despite the obvious record of Hillary’s lying and the obvious imprisonment of people who have done less than she with regard to classified information).

    • I stated your second point in the body of my piece, I merely did not name the progtard trolls to which I referred…

      …since they cannot respond here to such accusations truths.

  • jim_m

    The duty of a democrat is to party above all else. None has expressed any duty to the country, virtually all express little but hatred for the US and claim that it is the source of all evil in the world today.

    That being the case finding a way to not indict Clinton IS the duty of every dem in public office. They have done their duty well.

  • Scalia

    No Democrat thus far.

    • Walter_Cronanty

      Do you see one in the murky future?

      • Scalia

        I don’t see any Democratic politician coming forward, but apparently there are a lot of Democrats who think she should have been charged. The speculation is that they’re Sanders’ supporters, but if Bruce is any indication, that’s probably false.

  • Honesty

    Justice is Dead