Bill K. at Rooftop Report has been tracking down the story behind the truly tasteless ad (shown below) for VW since yesterday, This morning The New York Post picked up the story, wondering whether it was an actual VW ad or a viral hoax. The Post didn't really provide an answer to the question of whether VW was behind the tasteless ad.
This afternoon I found the answer....
LONDON (Revolution) - Volkswagen and DDB London are distancing themselves from a hoax viral commercial for the VW Polo, which features a suicide bomber. The ad plays on the established tagline for Volkswagen's Polo model, "small but tough". It shows a man in fatigues setting off in his Polo. He arrives outside a restaurant and pulls out a trigger. However, when he detonates the bomb, a flash is seen inside the car but the car itself does not explode. The strapline appears at the end. The campaign is the work of a duo known for their spoof advertising, called Lee and Dan. The pair run a website, LeeandDan.com, but the ad does not appear on the site at the time of writing. They have worked on a string of legitimate ads including Ford SportKa, BP and Casio G-Shock, among others. Dan, from Lee and Dan, said: "The ad got out accidentally and has spread like wildfire. It wasn't meant for public consumption. "We think the spot reflects what people see in the news everyday, and in this instance the car is the hero that protects innocent people from someone with very bad intentions. We're sorry if the ad has caused any offence." Volkswagen stressed that the spot, which has been doing the viral email rounds this week, was made without any involvement from the company whatsoever.Good news for VW.
Comments (83)
I talked to VW, do you know... (Below threshold)1. Posted by bill K | January 19, 2005 4:04 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I talked to VW, do you know how I can contact the POst?
1. Posted by bill K | January 19, 2005 4:04 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 19, 2005 16:04
2. Posted by Mark J | January 19, 2005 4:14 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I can't decide if it is tasteless, funny, clever, stupid, incindiary, hateful, or some combination of the above. It makes my jaw drop, but I don't know why!
2. Posted by Mark J | January 19, 2005 4:14 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 19, 2005 16:14
3. Posted by Justin B | January 19, 2005 4:15 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Perhaps they could have new Ryder Truck commercials with McVeigh next. WTF? That is just plain crazy.
3. Posted by Justin B | January 19, 2005 4:15 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 19, 2005 16:15
4. Posted by Jared | January 19, 2005 4:23 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I've never laughed so hard at something so inappropriate in my life. This certainly isn't a commercial that a reputable company needs to be making (if indeed they made it), but from a purely satrical point it's hilarious. Just imagine the whole thing with South Park style animation and I think you'll understand my point.
4. Posted by Jared | January 19, 2005 4:23 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 19, 2005 16:23
5. Posted by Jared | January 19, 2005 4:26 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
And of course I meant "satirical," not "satrical."
5. Posted by Jared | January 19, 2005 4:26 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 19, 2005 16:26
6. Posted by Just Me | January 19, 2005 4:31 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Tasteless, but clever, and definitely not something a reputable company would consider doing.
6. Posted by Just Me | January 19, 2005 4:31 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 19, 2005 16:31
7. Posted by -S- | January 19, 2005 4:41 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
WEll....to a degree, what Jared wrote. The idea/spoof concept is laughable but the taste level is bottomless. I need a shower.
7. Posted by -S- | January 19, 2005 4:41 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 19, 2005 16:41
8. Posted by giuliano | January 19, 2005 4:42 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Tasteless but oddly satisfying...like reading about jihadis blowing themselves up in their bomb factories. (I feel bad for their nieghbors, tho.)
8. Posted by giuliano | January 19, 2005 4:42 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 19, 2005 16:42
9. Posted by magnetism87 | January 19, 2005 4:47 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
OT: Dirty Bomb threat in Boston. Drudge has the headline...
9. Posted by magnetism87 | January 19, 2005 4:47 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 19, 2005 16:47
10. Posted by mikeymike | January 19, 2005 5:51 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I thought it was great, I feel pretty stupid bacause I don't see how it insults anyone but the terrorist.
10. Posted by mikeymike | January 19, 2005 5:51 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 19, 2005 17:51
11. Posted by julie | January 19, 2005 6:48 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I guess one could argue it's not nice to make fun of terrorism no matter what, but I wouldn't. How can you say The Producers is okay and this isn't?
11. Posted by julie | January 19, 2005 6:48 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 19, 2005 18:48
12. Posted by barbobot | January 19, 2005 7:20 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Well that was funny. If thats considered innapropriate I wish there were more inapropriate commercials.
12. Posted by barbobot | January 19, 2005 7:20 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 19, 2005 19:20
13. Posted by Gary and the Samoyeds | January 19, 2005 8:11 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I thought it was funny and I don't see anything really wrong with it. You are allowed to think of yourself as superior to Me. You are not allowed to force Me to value your opinion.
Now, the SportKa jobber (with the cat beheading) was tasteless and not funny. That would instantly turn Me away from any company using that advertisor.
13. Posted by Gary and the Samoyeds | January 19, 2005 8:11 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 19, 2005 20:11
14. Posted by John | January 19, 2005 8:17 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Sorry but people need to take the sticks out of their butts if they can't admit that was funny without having to reassure everyone how 'tasteless' they found it.
The terrorist battlefield is the mind of the public. They can never truely effect change through direct action.
Showing terrorist as buffoons is the first step to demistifying them and taking away their psycological power over us. Once that happens, they will lose all their influence.
14. Posted by John | January 19, 2005 8:17 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 19, 2005 20:17
15. Posted by 89 | January 19, 2005 9:14 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I was going to say the same thing as the other people here: More of this, please.
First we laugh at them.
Then we kill them.
Then we win.
Of course, we can't really make commercials like that because it would be inapropriate for children. But as part of a humor show, it works.
15. Posted by 89 | January 19, 2005 9:14 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 19, 2005 21:14
16. Posted by PTG | January 19, 2005 9:24 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Reminds me of the National Lampoon's fine spoof VW ad from the 70's: "If Ted Kennedy drove a Volkswagen, he'd be President today." with photo of floating VW.
16. Posted by PTG | January 19, 2005 9:24 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 19, 2005 21:24
17. Posted by tre | January 19, 2005 9:32 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
It's not good, either way... creative or otherwise. I predict a negative effect.
17. Posted by tre | January 19, 2005 9:32 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 19, 2005 21:32
18. Posted by Jeff B. | January 19, 2005 9:34 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I'm sorry....I'm pretty quick to take offense, especially things are tasteless in reference to Israel...
...but I'm not gonna lie: that ad brought a big goofy grin to my face. I look at it the way mikeymike did - the only person embarrassed here is the terrorist. I like the idea of making fun the 'splodeydopes, too.
So sure, it's tasteless in an undeniable way, but I still give it a thumbs-up.
18. Posted by Jeff B. | January 19, 2005 9:34 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 19, 2005 21:34
19. Posted by mcg | January 19, 2005 9:52 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
So I told my wife, "I want to show you something, but I want to warn you it's pretty tasteless."
And I played it.
And she said, "What's the tasteless part? That he probably ruined the appetites of the people eating lunch because they saw his guts splatter?"
Ahh. I married well.
19. Posted by mcg | January 19, 2005 9:52 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 19, 2005 21:52
20. Posted by fansipans | January 19, 2005 9:56 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Dude, funniest add ever! Perfect! The triumph of western technology over mid-eastern barbarism! Snap!
20. Posted by fansipans | January 19, 2005 9:56 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 19, 2005 21:56
21. Posted by Mike | January 19, 2005 10:33 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Maybe we're both way too tired, but the wife and I had a very long belly laugh when we saw the ad. I only wish that VW had the guts to have done it for real.
Truth is, in our culture we deal with maniacs and lunatics by turning them into buffoons. Hence, Dr. Strangelove's Coke-bottle glasses and arm that keeps stiffening up into a Nazi salute, or Jake and Elwood Blues chasing neo-Nazi Henry Gibson off a bridge in a Ford Pinto.
All in all, I'd give it a solid 8 / 10.
21. Posted by Mike | January 19, 2005 10:33 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 19, 2005 22:33
22. Posted by willow | January 19, 2005 10:38 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Truth is, in our culture we deal with maniacs and lunatics by turning them into buffoons.
Mike, I couldn't agree more. That muffled explosion that made the small car rock - ever so slightly - while the passersby looked on and a 'terrorist' was obliterated was so satisfying. I'll admit it, I bellylaughed too.
22. Posted by willow | January 19, 2005 10:38 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 19, 2005 22:38
23. Posted by willow | January 19, 2005 10:39 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Sorry - the blockquote thing didn't work in my post above. The first sentence was Mike's.
23. Posted by willow | January 19, 2005 10:39 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 19, 2005 22:39
24. Posted by julie | January 19, 2005 10:52 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Maybe, the people who do find it tasteless and are offended by it, should explain why.
24. Posted by julie | January 19, 2005 10:52 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 19, 2005 22:52
25. Posted by King of Fools | January 19, 2005 11:06 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I liked it. I would never air it if I were Volkswagen because some topics cannot be touched, but no one of consequence dies in the spot and it is a funny way to demonstrate the qualities of your product. (Ok - albeit exagerated.)
25. Posted by King of Fools | January 19, 2005 11:06 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 19, 2005 23:06
26. Posted by Big Bang Hunter | January 19, 2005 11:17 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
- Comes with extended bullet hole repair and 1 detonation warrenty.....
26. Posted by Big Bang Hunter | January 19, 2005 11:17 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 19, 2005 23:17
27. Posted by Big Bang Hunter | January 19, 2005 11:18 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
- make that 100,000 miles or ten detonations, which ever comes first... your millage may vary....
27. Posted by Big Bang Hunter | January 19, 2005 11:18 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 19, 2005 23:18
28. Posted by julie | January 19, 2005 11:23 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
no one of consequence dies
Yep. In fact just the opposite happens: A couple of men (who appear to be of the mideastern persuasion), several young women, a mother, and an innocent baby -- their lives were saved.
When did we have to start apologizing for wanting the bad guys to die? I know, I know. For a long time now. Bleh.
28. Posted by julie | January 19, 2005 11:23 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 19, 2005 23:23
29. Posted by Jinx McHue | January 19, 2005 11:30 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Oh, yeah. "It got out accidentally." Mmm-hmm. Tell me another one. Lee and Dan just got oodles of free publicity.
29. Posted by Jinx McHue | January 19, 2005 11:30 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 19, 2005 23:30
30. Posted by julie | January 19, 2005 11:37 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Unfortunately, they are just as likely to get death threats.
30. Posted by julie | January 19, 2005 11:37 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 19, 2005 23:37
31. Posted by leelu | January 20, 2005 12:23 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I loved it.
It's funny, at the expense of, well, terrorists.
Go Lee & Dan!!
31. Posted by leelu | January 20, 2005 12:23 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 20, 2005 00:23
32. Posted by iggi | January 20, 2005 12:53 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
i loved the commercial...somehow i find the way this video was distributed and by who it mas made The best way this commercial could have gotten out.
32. Posted by iggi | January 20, 2005 12:53 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 20, 2005 00:53
33. Posted by Cybrludite | January 20, 2005 4:02 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Let's try that again... Funniest thing I've seen in a while. (I'll be the first to admit, though, that I'll laugh at the strangest things) As far as I'm concerned, if it offends the fatwa-f****hers then I'm all for it!
33. Posted by Cybrludite | January 20, 2005 4:02 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 20, 2005 04:02
34. Posted by Kathy K | January 20, 2005 6:13 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I'm with the ones who think it's funny. PTG and I must be of an age, I also immediately thought of the National Lampoon ad (they got in a lot of trouble for that one but it was funny too).
34. Posted by Kathy K | January 20, 2005 6:13 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 20, 2005 06:13
35. Posted by Rob Hackney | January 20, 2005 1:34 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Nothing wrong with this ad, were it a real ad. The only people getting pissed off would be the terrorists, and only the loony left PC liberals give a shit about them.
35. Posted by Rob Hackney | January 20, 2005 1:34 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 20, 2005 13:34