Can't see the left one, but the right one looks like it's made out of fiberglass...something from Amercian Chopper maybe.

What will we tell the children?

(Seriously, I needed to know this why? I honestly didn't understand the kerfuffle over the Janet Jackson incident either. Could we please make up our minds what we are supposed to think about public displays of boobies? Thanks.)

No American Chopper is more angular... Something that round is more Foose's style... I'm thinking "Rides."

Yep, looks like a cereal bowl was placed under her boobies. Are there any women who respect what God gave them???? Or are they so obsessed with their looks they just gotta fit this Madison Ave mold???? Disgusting, like Pam Anderson.

Yes, Ed, there are women who respect what God gave them, unless you frown on tattoos as well as fake boobs.

At great risk of a sexual harassment lawsuit resulting in unemployment and divorce I showed the pictures to a female coworker. She assures me that there is no way she did not realize she had popped out.

"If she was aware enough to actually walk - she new."

She forgot her underwear.

It's more like a CBS memo boob: Fake But Accurate.

Stephen---go back and ask your coworker if, um, surgery could "desensitize" one to such things.

I have come to the conclusion that these women who surgically enhance their Ta Ta's lose most feeling in them. Every shot I see with the slippage of a fake chi chi out of clothing and the owner of the fake boobage has no clue.
To deduce, no feeling left in the nippleage area or where the water soluted plastic vestible resides.
I stand by my thesis.

Ah my fashion neophytes, this is no malfunction but on purpose I would submit, because ye old tightly fitting blazer sans shirt or even bra is standard presentation on the fashion runway these days, that is why Fashion Television, the all model all runway channel has a segment called Uncut and Uncensored, for all those butt hanging and boob flashing fashions that WHO? except Paris Hilton wears out in public that even FT cannot show during prime time.

And yes, did girlfriend have those fake boobs during the Apprentice or after? I'd fire that surgeon, LOL

(Seriously, I needed to know this why? I honestly didn't understand the kerfuffle over the Janet Jackson incident either. Could we please make up our minds what we are supposed to think about public displays of boobies? Thanks.)

Because you need a life?

Seriously, why does it matter so much to you, S9, what Kevin posts here? And why is it so important that everybody come to an agreement of what to think about the public display of human mammalia?

Got control issues, maybe?

That thing is scary looking.... I'll take my well-worn (from nursing) real ones any day over that.

That surgeon should have his license revoked.

Hey, I wish I nominated her for new Secretary General of the UN (posted in another thread). She'd fit right in with the other fake boobs.

'I'll take my well-worn (from nursing) real ones any day over that'

You can have 'em!

It's a store-bought boob.

McGehee writes: And why is it so important that everybody come to an agreement of what to think about the public display of human mammalia?

It's difficult keeping up with the changing standards of decency here in America, and when you're a small player in the media business— where one fsckup can put your entire net worth into the hands of a criminal defense lawyer— it would be nice to know whether we think public displays of boobies are indecent or not.

Maybe part of the problem is that it matters whose boobies are on display, and who is making money charging admission to see them.

Sometimes a side effect of the store-bought kind is that you no longer have sensation in the skin. While I canNOT imagine how she couldn't have known, I will grant that it's a possibility that she really didn't know because she couldn't feel them.

D U Stray,

I bet you are as much of a phony as those boobs are.

At least mine, which still have SOME perk to them, can FEEL when they are blowing in the wind ! She should sue the surgeon for his crappy work.

She STOLE my garlic baker ~

Implants.

Implants 101: if you can see the edge of an implant on women without much to any body fat, it's an implant.

Is there really any credibility in the notion that a woman in her position doesn't KNOW that her breast is hanging out? Isn't it rather apparent? She looks pretty proud, after all. Anyone else wonder if she did it on purpose, like (I think) Jackson did?

I agree with Stephen Macklin's coworker.

wavemaker: I'd put money on the fact, if I was a betting person, which I'm not, but, anyway, I'd bet money if I was a betting person that the lady is actually FLAUNTING THOSE FAKE BREASTS.

She's could just not have been aware of what was exposed and what she was exposing, even if she had limited feeling on part of her chest after her implants (it happens but it's usually affecting the nipple area since sometimes a person has plastic surgery on the nipple when a breast is recreated or raised...they raise the nipple apart from the breat implant and area, in separate procedures if not separate surgeries sometimes, but usually at one time, multiple procedures and that can make the newly positioned and/or recreated nipple and nipple area limited in sensation and sometimes render it without feeling)...

The woman appears to my view (situation and behavior in that situation) to be flaunting her fake breasts. Or, flaunting her breasts with the pretense that "no one will know they're fake" or whatever her motivation, still an intentional exposure. As in, she's intentionally exposing herself.

Even if they are fake, God Bless her, I think they are fine, as is she. As for some kind of "wardrobe malfunction" who cares! This wasn't televised.
While it is sweet and romantic to yurn for the well gnawed tata, I would gladly suckle hers.

Definitely bolt-ons, not that there's anything wrong with that.

Gnaw and Suckle? Sounds like a good name for a law firm.

-S-, I admire your insight, thanks for the lesson --- but let me ask you something (which you may or may not be qualified to answer) --- why would a woman care to have fake breasts if she has no feeling in them --- isn't that sort of like buying a kick-ass sports car and leaving it in your driveway?

I worked briefly in a plastic surgeon's office. I do remember the informational pamphlets warning that possible side effects of implants were (a) loss of sensation and (b) loss of ability to breast-feed.

So, in exchange for having breasts that - like Ms.Campins' - look as fake as the day is long, you can also lose out on the only to reasons to really HAVE breasts. Sounds like a winning plan to me!

Looks like a flying saucer landed on her chest.

Wow. I can't imagine risking losing the incredible sensation of someone kissing your breasts so you could be a little bigger.

Those are actually nice implants, she is just too skinny. I agree with S.
She's was not a celeb when she got them, she had a good surgeon.
Looks good, probably tastes like .....well.

Why do they look a different color than her chest? They just look like they hurt to me - like the skin is too tight. Ouch.

Well, I know that kind of thing ALWAYS happens to me when I forget to wear a bra AND a shirt under my jacket.

I'm with Kathy on the giving up the good for the better look, which it isn't. So it's a lose/lose.

Thank you, Kathy and Sparkle. I would have been seriously disillusioned otherwise. :-)

wavemaker and others here:

I'll be blunt (you raised the issues, so I'm just trying to explain to the best of my non-physician capacity, as in, I'm not a professional but I did stay in a Holiday Inn a few nights ago...)...

A lot of people value their cosmetic appearance over what's underneath that appearance. Meaning, they find the plastic, outer appearance of showing "firm, youthful breasts" far and above and more important than opting to maintain a normal breast and to later breast feed a child/their children (let someone else do it or else use a bottle).

So, many people with those standards (not mine) opt to whittle away the appearance despite the drawbacks. Look at the faces with their ears on their necks because they had a pull-back and not a scalp lift...look at these women who display obvious breast implants and then go show them off (probably related to perceived status at being able to pay for them or get someone else to pay for them which to some is the point of having fake anything/something and that is to indicate an altered status or to at least suggest increased status to some others who reason as they do -- it's some sort of competition among the same type, in my experience, to see who can buy what and very much like that sports car analogy to my view).

When you reposition the nipple part of a breast (which is done when most breast reductions and/or breast redo's are done...they first remove the nipple and surround skin, keep it fresh on ice, then they surgically cut into and remove some of the original breast skin and fat and underlying muscle on the chest, then they discard what they don't want to reintroduce, then they reattach by foreshortening the underlying body fats/muscles into a more cosmetically desirable shape [higher, less of everything in most cases like this where no implants to enlarge the area are the issue], then they reattach the nipple in a higher positiion on the newly redone breast areas and when they do that, there's the issue that most of the nerves affiliated with the nipples have been severed and many don't reconnect afterward, thus the desensitivity, even lack of complete sensitivity to the nipples afterward).

Sometimes with implants, they have to do the same things but in reverse, while the things with the nipple areas remain the same as I just described because: a woman with small-to-smaller than she'd like breasts has nipples where they are originally, she gets a larger substance placed inside her chest, under her skin but above her muscles and chest wall, and then the original nipples and their placement by nature no longer accommodate the 'newer' expaned breast shapes on her chest, so the nipples have to be surgically repositioned, and the nerve damage results.

For people who undergo these procedures simply for the cosmetic effects (breast implants are almost always for different reasons than breast reductions and breast reconstructions), particularly with implants, their motive isn't to preserve some biological integrity of their breasts as functional aspects to their reproductive person, but to make a different appearance other than what's already there for one reason or another. So, to my read, the fact that they'd lose sensitivity and even function (for breast feeding) to their breasts afterward, as long as they got their cosmetic solution, seems to be their value system at work.

Which is also why it seems quite so foolish to so many others. I agree that breasts are beautiful -- I like mine and very much -- but these surgeries are not minor things like teeth bleaching and using an Total Gym where your body is concerned and the costs involved are huge. I have a hard time imagining someone so pushed by whatever that they'd go spend so much money and efforts and all involved just to expand their breasts. Personally, I can't understand it beyond understanding it obliquely like this.

And, the reason most cannot later breast feed after these breast implant procuders is due to the engineering changes to the breasts themselves. They have milk ducts...they connect one area to another and during these breast implant and reduction procedures, those milk ducts are disturbed, disconnected, along with most of the nerves.

Thus, none of the "plumbing" and "wiring" inside is actually any longer connected to anything else. It's just a lump of saline pushed under the skin in many implant procedures even when the nipples aren't repositioned (most times the nipples are), so I also do not understand the male fascination with the appearance by implants. I mean, go hug and caress a plastic doll or a water filled balloon....it's about the same thing without the human flesh covering.