We're positive that it wasn't mere coincidence that Rep. Katherine Harris' (R-FL) perky breasts were prominently featured in a 6 minute segment earlier this week on Hannity and Colmes. If you watch the video (available at Crooks and Liars) it's impossible not to notice how prominently her boobs are featured in her profile shot. While a Fox News PA, or the camera person, was probably responsible for making sure the H&C gabfest got Harris's best side, her swaying and chest jutting (whether intentional or not) certainly indicate she knows how to "work it."
The former Florida Secretary of State's assets are hardly a secret. Last year Drudge featured the picture below...
Love her or hate her, Harris is giving new meaning to the term polarizing figure...
Permalink | E-mail This | Technorati Links | Sphere: Related Content | Digg this! | FARK It!
Filed under:
Katherine Harris, Politics
Tags: harris, katherine
Comments (66)
Argh...surefire giveaway th... (Below threshold)1. Posted by -S- | August 11, 2005 10:00 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Argh...surefire giveaway that Harris is posing on that horse: her toes are down, something anyone with any familiarity, much less skill, in equestrianism would ever do.
I watched that FOX appearance and wondered about that posing, given that every time Harris started to turn from the initial struck pose (with breasts featured) she seemed to be responding to some directive and would jerk back into stance. I think she should try to dampen the sexual connotations a tad since it's offputting to many adult females. At least, as to public embraces and kissing and such, which Harris does with a certain suggestiveness that is odd, out of place.
Which is also a lot of why she was wearing so much makeup and for so long...I notice that she's now gotten the message and toned down the eye makeup, which is good if she wants to pursue her role in politics, but she's applying a sorta "Hi, I'm Katherine, Fly Me" quality to her candidacy that I do hope she stops or at least, puts the breakers on.
If only for the reason that it is easily ridiculed.
1. Posted by -S- | August 11, 2005 10:00 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2005 10:00
2. Posted by -S- | August 11, 2005 10:02 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
And next time she gets on a horse, she first adjusts her saddle and stirrups to fit.
2. Posted by -S- | August 11, 2005 10:02 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2005 10:02
3. Posted by JD | August 11, 2005 11:09 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I am moving to Florida just so I can vote for her !
3. Posted by JD | August 11, 2005 11:09 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2005 11:09
4. Posted by Dean | August 11, 2005 11:13 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I guess the adage of "if you've got it, flaunt it" does not note true for politics.
Probably the only place.
4. Posted by Dean | August 11, 2005 11:13 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2005 11:13
5. Posted by wavemaker | August 11, 2005 11:15 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
-S- is correct -- the stirrups are four inches too long -- and she is stickin em out there in the clip.
Gawd, I find her so smarmy and wooden -- so "on message" and insincere. A real professional politican.
5. Posted by wavemaker | August 11, 2005 11:15 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2005 11:15
6. Posted by wavemaker | August 11, 2005 11:17 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
...and whoever came up with that schlock line about "one woman announcing for the US Senate and another woman landing the shuttle" ought to be gut shot. Ugh!
6. Posted by wavemaker | August 11, 2005 11:17 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2005 11:17
7. Posted by JAB | August 11, 2005 11:22 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
SHE'S BEAUTIFUL. SHE'S AN INTELLIGENT CONSERVATIVE WOMAN. I WISH I COULD BE SO LUCKY TO HAVE A WOMAN LIKE THAT AS MY WIFE OR SIGNIFICANT OTHER. SHE SHOULDN'T BE ASHAMED OF THE FACT SHE'S ENDOWED. I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH IT IF SHE'S SHOWING OFF. I WOULD IF I COULD. SHE'S A GOOD CONSERVATIVE, AND SHE LOOKS GOOD DOING IT. WE SHOULD ENCOURAGE BEATIFUL GOOD CONSERVATIVE WOMEN. THERE ARE MANY. MANY ARE CONSEVATIVE BLOGGERS. LEAVE HER ALONE.
7. Posted by JAB | August 11, 2005 11:22 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2005 11:22
8. Posted by Jinx McHue | August 11, 2005 11:27 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
WARNING: The following comment is completely unnecessary, entirely sexist and probably mostly adolescent.
"I'd hit it."
Thank you.
8. Posted by Jinx McHue | August 11, 2005 11:27 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2005 11:27
9. Posted by ICallMasICM | August 11, 2005 11:32 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Guys in general like T & A.
9. Posted by ICallMasICM | August 11, 2005 11:32 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2005 11:32
10. Posted by Peter F. | August 11, 2005 11:32 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
LMAO@Jinx.
Ditto.
And settle down, JAB.
10. Posted by Peter F. | August 11, 2005 11:32 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2005 11:32
11. Posted by Kurt | August 11, 2005 11:40 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Who's doing her PR?? I saw that interview and thought exactly the same thing - what an odd way to stand for an interview. She came across as extremely fake - looking and sounding more like a beauty pageant contestant than a serious political candidate. It's a shame...
11. Posted by Kurt | August 11, 2005 11:40 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2005 11:40
12. Posted by WunderKraut | August 11, 2005 11:41 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
ICallMasICM,
Gee do you think? That is probably the understatement of the year.
12. Posted by WunderKraut | August 11, 2005 11:41 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2005 11:41
13. Posted by joe | August 11, 2005 12:04 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Born April '57, making her 48.
Not bad.
13. Posted by joe | August 11, 2005 12:04 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2005 12:04
14. Posted by John Burgess | August 11, 2005 12:38 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
She is my Congresswoman and yes, I'd hit it.
But I'm not going to vote for her in her Senate bid. She's way too easily swayed by populist sentiment, voting in favor of restrictions on speech--particularly films--among other things.
Cute, but vapid.
14. Posted by John Burgess | August 11, 2005 12:38 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2005 12:38
15. Posted by SR | August 11, 2005 12:44 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Just like her photos. It isn't the image that has beeen doctored. Katherine is a flirt and a phony. Did everyone see the "Canoodle" segment from CNN where she comes on to male Rep Congressman during debate on homeland security. Does anyone remember the lies about terrorists in Indiana? Forget about her abuse of power in 2000, she has been an embarrassment since 2002. Her morals are even too low for the likes of Karl Rove, and that's about as low as you can get.
A friend once accidentally bumped into Katherine's chest. They aren't real.
15. Posted by SR | August 11, 2005 12:44 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2005 12:44
16. Posted by Chris W. | August 11, 2005 12:52 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I'd hit it. Not sure I'd vote for it.
16. Posted by Chris W. | August 11, 2005 12:52 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2005 12:52
17. Posted by sanka | August 11, 2005 12:58 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
If you can touch them they are real.
17. Posted by sanka | August 11, 2005 12:58 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2005 12:58
18. Posted by Clash City Rocker | August 11, 2005 1:00 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I'd vote for them =-)
18. Posted by Clash City Rocker | August 11, 2005 1:00 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2005 13:00
19. Posted by Clash City Rocker | August 11, 2005 1:02 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I tought this was a thread about a tight tee shirt contest, sorry. Didn't realize she was a serious candidate
19. Posted by Clash City Rocker | August 11, 2005 1:02 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2005 13:02
20. Posted by FloridaOyster | August 11, 2005 1:03 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Thank you, John - vapid is the word I've been looking for for days. I can finally rest.
20. Posted by FloridaOyster | August 11, 2005 1:03 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2005 13:03
21. Posted by Gabriel | August 11, 2005 1:17 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Given how hideous most female members of Congress tend to be, I see nothing wrong with "busting a move". Harris at least doesn't look like a female version of Skeletor:
21. Posted by Gabriel | August 11, 2005 1:17 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2005 13:17
22. Posted by Paul | August 11, 2005 1:26 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Katherine gives new meaning to the term... Front Runner.
22. Posted by Paul | August 11, 2005 1:26 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2005 13:26
23. Posted by ICallMasICM | August 11, 2005 1:27 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
'Forget about her abuse of power in 2000'
Actually she was about the only one doing her job. Her job was to certify the vote absent of seriuos evidence of fraud or malfunction which is what she did.
Your 'abuse of power in 2000' assertion is about as believable as 'A friend once accidentally bumped into Katherine's chest'.
23. Posted by ICallMasICM | August 11, 2005 1:27 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2005 13:27
24. Posted by AnonymousDrivel | August 11, 2005 1:34 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
RE: SR's post (August 11, 2005 12:44 PM)
...Did everyone see the "Canoodle" segment from CNN where she comes on to male Rep Congressman during debate on homeland security...
No, but not surprising. Fewer and fewer are watching CNN every day. By the time K. Harris gets reelected as Senator, CNN will be hitting up underprivileged kids and seniors for milk money and TV dinners.
...Her morals are even too low for the likes of Karl Rove, and that's about as low as you can get...
Ahh, had to get Rove in there. So satisfying to see such consistency. Having such a predictable lot makes winning elections that much simpler.
24. Posted by AnonymousDrivel | August 11, 2005 1:34 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2005 13:34
25. Posted by cancon | August 11, 2005 2:23 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
ah Kevin I saw that interview and didn't notice those boobs once, I think this is more a reflection as to where your brain is and/or the fact I am female, if you have a wife or girlfriend, she needs to give you a slap on the head.......
25. Posted by cancon | August 11, 2005 2:23 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2005 14:23
26. Posted by Roger | August 11, 2005 3:01 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
If you don't like the woman, fine, but don't make fun of how she looks. I don't see any of you making fun of Ted Kennedy's tomato-red face when he's ranting, or of his hypocrisy and lies. For a group that claims to be the embodiment of tolerance, I see them hurling a lot of intolerance at anyone they don't like. She did her job in 2000, according to the law, and all I see on the left is a bunch of crybabies who don't like the fact that Gore lost and try to take it out on anyone who had anything to do with it. That was more than four years ago: get over it!
26. Posted by Roger | August 11, 2005 3:01 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2005 15:01
27. Posted by wavemaker | August 11, 2005 4:28 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Oh FAGAWDSAKE Roger, will you relax and have a sense of humor!
Ted Kennedy fat/drunk jokes are passe anyway --- she's one of ours, we're entitled to poke her for fun (aren't we guys!!).
27. Posted by wavemaker | August 11, 2005 4:28 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2005 16:28
28. Posted by John Burgess | August 11, 2005 5:34 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Florida Oyster: de nada. She hot, but she's not
going to win a senate seat.
28. Posted by John Burgess | August 11, 2005 5:34 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2005 17:34
29. Posted by Rightwingsparkle | August 11, 2005 7:18 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
She does look good. I noticed that stance on Fox too. I also thought it looked a bit like a beauty pageant pose. She has a certain airy way about her. Not sure that is bad. I don't know her take on the issues, but then I don't have the opportunity to vote for her either.
29. Posted by Rightwingsparkle | August 11, 2005 7:18 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2005 19:18
30. Posted by Michael | August 11, 2005 7:28 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Geez, can we lighten up? So she did a publicity shot on a horse, and her stirrups are not adjusted and her toes are not pointed correctly. And she is exploiting her appearance. What a slut!
At least we're not voting on whther to be represented by a PORN STAR.
30. Posted by Michael | August 11, 2005 7:28 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2005 19:28
31. Posted by Michael | August 11, 2005 7:30 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Well, I didn't do the link right. Go here if you're curious:
www.rotten.com/library/bio/entertainers/actors/cicciolina
31. Posted by Michael | August 11, 2005 7:30 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2005 19:30
32. Posted by HM | August 11, 2005 8:02 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I trust she will stay abreast of things in the Senate . She certainly seems to be a handful. Here's hoping she'll wrack up the win in Florida.
32. Posted by HM | August 11, 2005 8:02 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2005 20:02
33. Posted by -S- | August 11, 2005 8:11 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Michael...the thing about the non-fitted stirrups and her seat in that saddle is that she's obviously faking. That thing about reality...when you get on a horse, I mean, faking it is a sure giveaway that you are, um, a faker. Faking it, as in, "yeah, my friend wants your number."
That sorta stupid faking. It tends to offput females, mostly, who evaluate other women differently (ahem) than men.
But, I like Harris and I'm a female, just not in the way that most on this thread "like" Harris. Ha.
I was earlier trying to give her a few pointers -- no pun intended -- because if us conservatives can ridicule her so, just wait for the liberal screed. And it'll be about: (1.) her appearance; (2.) her posing; (3.) "she's so false"; (4.) that makeup; (5.) "she's so false..."
Just trying to head them off at the pass, so to speak. Harris ought to not have allowed that photo to be taken of her on that horse so ill-fitted because other people who would never do that notice. It matters.
On the other hand, I'd rather see a posing, obviously staged, Harris on the horse than Hillary Clinton ANY day.
33. Posted by -S- | August 11, 2005 8:11 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 11, 2005 20:11
34. Posted by SR | August 12, 2005 3:46 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
The problem with Harris is not the eyeshadow, the plastic surgery or the posturing. Those are just blue eyeshadow herrings. The problem is that she is a liar and a fake politically and a public embarrassment. She has a history of sleazy campaigning - including guesting at the illegal Delay Texas fundraisers - lying about imagined terrorist cells in Indiana, stalling and delaying and finally blocking the 2000 Fl vote recount, lying about her Congressional opponent, flirting inappropriately on camera.
Why doesn't Rove want her running for the Senate? Could it be because she is incomepetent?
34. Posted by SR | August 12, 2005 3:46 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 12, 2005 03:46
35. Posted by Toby928 | August 12, 2005 9:35 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"The problem is that she is a liar and a fake politically and a public embarrassment."
In other words, she's a politician! Astonishing!
Tob
35. Posted by Toby928 | August 12, 2005 9:35 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 12, 2005 09:35
36. Posted by ivan.sikorsky | August 12, 2005 1:31 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
***Sexist comment but on topic (apparently).***
I'd hit it (twice!) ...
... but I sure would not vote for her or ever "take her to meet the 'rents".
Hmmm... I wonder if she's got any daughters. ;-)
36. Posted by ivan.sikorsky | August 12, 2005 1:31 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 12, 2005 13:31
37. Posted by Chuck | August 12, 2005 6:51 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
When a good-lookin, healthy babe poses on a Harley, does that mean she is a biker?
37. Posted by Chuck | August 12, 2005 6:51 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 12, 2005 18:51
38. Posted by Rob | August 12, 2005 11:26 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I'm a proud lib Democrat residing in Florida. I'd never vote for that corrupt, phony bimbo for all the money in the world but Lordy would I dig a weekend of bipartisan work with her. Love that beauty paegent runner up gone bad thang she's got going. Plus it's obvious from listening to her that she can get her hands on some serious dope.
Whizbang, indeed!!!
38. Posted by Rob | August 12, 2005 11:26 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 12, 2005 23:26
39. Posted by BR | August 13, 2005 3:46 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Goodness, what a bunch of sour grapes. I thought it was only jealous fat lesbians who would attack a pretty woman on her looks. It's a pity any conservatives would stoop as low as the usual suspects on the left by attacking Harris in this way. Michelle Malkin said it best.
39. Posted by BR | August 13, 2005 3:46 AM |