A family of bobcats -- two adults and three cubs -- has taken up residence in a foreclosed home in Lake Elsinore. Karen Brown lives across the street. "They're...
9:45 PM |
0 comments
Questions persist about the credibility of the self-advertised reformer Sarah Palin. Recent history reveals she has spent most of her youthful political career as a bottom feeder to the Washington lobbyist trough. It is all reminiscent of her mentor-in-chief, John...
9:00 PM |
3 comments
Washington Post: John McCain and Barack Obama announced today that they will visit Ground Zero in New York on Thursday to mark the seventh anniversary of the 9-11 attacks that brought down the Twin Towers. In a joint statement, the...
6:55 PM |
0 comments
Barack Obama responds to John McCain's acceptance speech (video).
3:33 PM |
0 comments
One of the many issues on which John McCain is hiding his plans from the American people in is regards to Social Security. It's an important issue to a lot of people.... a lot of Americans are counting on Social Security being there for them when they retire.
12:00 PM |
3 comments
What the...?
11:58 AM |
3 comments
This must be the week for crazy baseball injuries. From AP- CHICAGO -- American League home run leader Carlos Quentin has a broken right wrist stemming from his own temper,...
10:21 AM |
0 comments
Noel Cruz is a portrait artist who took up doll painting to help his wife complete a collection. But the guy is super talented. I mean these make that...
8:33 PM |
0 comments
Let me note two things before getting to the topic- 1- This is my first time to write on this controversial subject. On August 13th I had heart valve surgery...
7:17 PM |
0 comments
Seems that the McCain campaign folks never bothered to license the music they were illegally exploiting for free featuring in the videos. Updated and Bumped: They did it again - the second time in two weeks. Apparently copyright laws are among the laws easily ignored by the McCain camp. Third Update: They did it again and now they're being sued.
6:38 PM |
15 comments
Comments (5)
I don't think I can even mu... (Below threshold)1. Posted by SCSIwuzzy | September 29, 2005 4:36 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I don't think I can even muster an Muhahaha. But at least we know the 22 names to completely ignore in the future nominations.
1. Posted by SCSIwuzzy | September 29, 2005 4:36 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 29, 2005 16:36
2. Posted by rick13 | September 29, 2005 4:43 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
They just swore him in at the White House. Where's the damn kid! That was the part I was most looking forward to!
2. Posted by rick13 | September 29, 2005 4:43 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 29, 2005 16:43
3. Posted by SCSIwuzzy | September 29, 2005 7:47 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
According to the Kossacks, I thought the kid was in the closet
3. Posted by SCSIwuzzy | September 29, 2005 7:47 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 29, 2005 19:47
4. Posted by -S- | September 30, 2005 3:25 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Yes, they've moved the goalposts, changed the rules of engagement, to their detriment. Because, by opposing Roberts and for such ludicrous, even imagined paranoias (let's see...Feinstein objects to him not talking to her, in her perceptions, "as a son, a brother, a father..." and then there was Schumer's mindnumbing venture into film titles, and the perpetual grandstanding without any sense otherwise by Biden, and...), they've opposed intelligence, a man of character, a person of great education and mature intellect, a generally all around super qualified person for Chief Justice.
If they oppose Roberts, that means they're to the Left of all that. Not a good sign but it's a bad sign about them, not about candidates and confirmations. Certainly not about Roberts -- I am vastly impressed that he maintained a mature and kind composure throughout the "questioning" and other theatricals because if he can do THAT, he can run a Supreme Court any day, and very well.
I could briefly comprehend the temperamental objections to Robert Bork, based upon his overt directness (shouldn't disqualify anyone but I can understand how Democrats would find it objectionable that someone wasn't bowing to them otherwise and Bork didn't), but he was and remains a highly qualified justice who would have brought clarity and wisdom to the Supreme Court. Instead, he was denigrated to the point of character assassination, probably most of all, because Democrats couldn't take the truth (and still can't, from how some have responded to Roberts).
Anyway, thank God for Chief Justice Roberts, thank God our country has this guy, from what I've heard him say, he's as qualified as we are ever going to find, in these days of vast differences. I'd give about anything to hear Roberts discuss future cases with Ginsburg, though I know that'll never happen (me hearing, not them discussing).
4. Posted by -S- | September 30, 2005 3:25 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 30, 2005 03:25
5. Posted by Jo | September 30, 2005 5:51 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I don't think a lot of Democrats have any vision for what the future might hold if the next President is a Democrat and the Republicans maintain control of the Senate. After the Dems vile partisan display against Roberts, I don't see another liberal judge being confirmed in this country any time in the near future. Payback is going to be a bitch.
Maybe for the next appointment the Democrats will think of the consequences.
5. Posted by Jo | September 30, 2005 5:51 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 30, 2005 05:51