« Demonstrations In Baghdad | Main | 2003 Weblog Awards - Procedures »

Man Versus Freeway

Xrlq took a spill on the 405 yesterday and had to spend the night in the hospital.

Today he wants you to know exactly why he is alive today. Without his helmet, it would have been a very dark day in the blogosphere.

There people who complain about mandatory seatbelt and helmet laws as government nannying. If the threat of a traffic ticket is what it takes to get you to make the choice to wear a seatbelt or helmet how is that so different that the threat of a ticket to keep you from speeding. You have to choose to speed or buckle up or put on your helmet every time you take to the road. Please make that choice.

For those of you who don't know Xrlq, he is one of the real good guys of the blogosphere. He's been helping people move off of BlogSpot as long as anyone and I'm proud to have him helping folks who are moving to free 1and1 accounts.

Get better soon bud.

  • Currently 0/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rating: 0/5 (0 votes cast)


Close

Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):


AddThis Feed Button

TrackBack

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Man Versus Freeway:

» Technically Speaking linked with LOTD - Q

» OUTSIDE THE BELTWAY linked with DAMNUM ABSQUE MOSTLY UNINJURED

» JohnHays.net linked with XRLQ is going to be alright, I think and hope

Comments (3)

Thanks.... (Below threshold)
Xrlq:

Thanks.

If the threat of a traff... (Below threshold)

If the threat of a traffic ticket is what it takes to get you to make the choice to wear a seatbelt or helmet how is that so different that the threat of a ticket to keep you from speeding.

Because if you speed, or drive drunk or whatever, you put others directly at risk.

As far as seatbelts and helmets, it's indirectly at best -- higher risk of a loss for those who care about you, and potentially higher medical bills/lawsuits.

I don't get bent out of shape about government "nannying" to this degree, but I do think there's a meaningful difference.

"at best" should be "at mos... (Below threshold)

"at best" should be "at most" or "at worst" ... I'm not wishing bad on anyone ... I'm just splitting hairs. :)


Post a comment




Advertisements







rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

tips@wizbangblog.com

Categories

Archives

Credits

Publisher: Kevin Aylward

Section Editor: Jay Tea

Comment Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Jim Addison, Charlie Quidnunc, Jayson Javitz, Cassy Fiano

All original content copyright © 2003-2007 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type 3.35

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login

Site Meter


Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice