Move over Paris, and Demi, and Severina; Nicole is bringing the kiddie porn! From NEWS.com.au:
Nicole Kidman is in for a rocky week if the US supermarket tabloid The National Enquirer is to be believed.Borderline disgusting? Maybe I'm cynical, but it sure seems like a convient way to generate interest in a crappy movie...Controversial ... Nicole's latest role might be locked away.
Her latest movie, Birth - made after the soon-to-open Stepford Wives - see the Australian Oscar winner Kidman play a young widow who falls in love with a 10-year-old boy she believes is the reincarnation of her dead husband.
But executives from New Line Cinema, the production company, are reportedly considering pulling the $US50 million ($72 million) flick because of scenes showing Kidman bathing naked with the young lad.
Sources told the Enquirer that the film had undergone a string of creative battles and rewrites.
Now executives have told the film's executive producers that the two scenes - showing Kidman and the boy stripping off and kissing in the bath - are "borderline disgusting" to watch.




Comments (7)
Talk about double standards... (Below threshold)1. Posted by JFH | June 14, 2004 10:59 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Talk about double standards (and I'm just as guilty as anyone else). Imagine if it was a man kissing a 10 year-old girl in a bath... It wouldn't even be a a slight dilemma of whether to release or not.
1. Posted by JFH | June 14, 2004 10:59 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 14, 2004 22:59
2. Posted by Kevin | June 15, 2004 12:52 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
It would be jail time...
2. Posted by Kevin | June 15, 2004 12:52 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 15, 2004 00:52
3. Posted by Pat | June 15, 2004 2:24 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Of course it is somewhat hard to judge on the "disgustingness" of the nude pics without the evidence to see first. If it is just a mature woman bathing naked with a kid---- well, where is the problem? At least in many countries outside the US people are naked together at the beach or in swimmingpools, jakuzzis or saunas all the time without any major erotical conotation. However, if there is more than just some simple, caring and loving touching, than there would be a problem, because sexual contact with minors are just not o.k., not matter if they are boys or girls.
Of course it is probably most teenage boys wetdream to get rubbed down by a mature woman like Kidman, that doesn't make it right and I do have a friend who was molested by his aunt at the age of thirteen and it took him a long time to get over it..........
3. Posted by Pat | June 15, 2004 2:24 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 15, 2004 02:24
4. Posted by Marc | June 15, 2004 6:00 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
And what is Michael Jackson charged with? And here is Kidman doing similar things, in a $72 million movie, before a crowd of witnesses called a film crew.
She gets charged in my court of law, along with the financiers, the Director, and any that were present on the set.
4. Posted by Marc | June 15, 2004 6:00 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 15, 2004 06:00
5. Posted by pylorns | June 15, 2004 12:49 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
its prob. a bit of both.. but she needs every bit of publicity after the flop of stepford wives. That movie was trash.
5. Posted by pylorns | June 15, 2004 12:49 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 15, 2004 12:49
6. Posted by Jay | September 6, 2004 2:21 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
what were the parents of the boy thinking? Money can't buy your child mental piece of mind.
6. Posted by Jay | September 6, 2004 2:21 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 6, 2004 02:21
7. Posted by the dead | September 9, 2004 1:27 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
nicole kidman is a pedophile,
her hands find their way to the ten year old boy.
sick
she needs help in jail.
7. Posted by the dead | September 9, 2004 1:27 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 9, 2004 13:27