A family of bobcats -- two adults and three cubs -- has taken up residence in a foreclosed home in Lake Elsinore. Karen Brown lives across the street. "They're...
9:45 PM |
0 comments
Questions persist about the credibility of the self-advertised reformer Sarah Palin. Recent history reveals she has spent most of her youthful political career as a bottom feeder to the Washington lobbyist trough. It is all reminiscent of her mentor-in-chief, John...
9:00 PM |
3 comments
Washington Post: John McCain and Barack Obama announced today that they will visit Ground Zero in New York on Thursday to mark the seventh anniversary of the 9-11 attacks that brought down the Twin Towers. In a joint statement, the...
6:55 PM |
0 comments
Barack Obama responds to John McCain's acceptance speech (video).
3:33 PM |
0 comments
One of the many issues on which John McCain is hiding his plans from the American people in is regards to Social Security. It's an important issue to a lot of people.... a lot of Americans are counting on Social Security being there for them when they retire.
12:00 PM |
3 comments
What the...?
11:58 AM |
3 comments
This must be the week for crazy baseball injuries. From AP- CHICAGO -- American League home run leader Carlos Quentin has a broken right wrist stemming from his own temper,...
10:21 AM |
0 comments
Noel Cruz is a portrait artist who took up doll painting to help his wife complete a collection. But the guy is super talented. I mean these make that...
8:33 PM |
0 comments
Let me note two things before getting to the topic- 1- This is my first time to write on this controversial subject. On August 13th I had heart valve surgery...
7:17 PM |
0 comments
Seems that the McCain campaign folks never bothered to license the music they were illegally exploiting for free featuring in the videos. Updated and Bumped: They did it again - the second time in two weeks. Apparently copyright laws are among the laws easily ignored by the McCain camp. Third Update: They did it again and now they're being sued.
6:38 PM |
15 comments
Comments (12)
- Hmmm ... could it be the ... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Hunter | September 16, 2004 12:57 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
- Hmmm ... could it be the Bushies are slowly leaking this stuff deliberately to keep Kerry's stumping efforts in a TV cave...
- One things sure ... Anyone who looks to use them will vet the ink off the paper they'll be so careful now....
1. Posted by Hunter | September 16, 2004 12:57 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 16, 2004 00:57
2. Posted by Bill K | September 16, 2004 1:02 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Kevin, you don't think it is asinine that Bush and crew have constantly stated they have released all the records, but now they are going to release more now?
2. Posted by Bill K | September 16, 2004 1:02 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 16, 2004 01:02
3. Posted by Phil Smith | September 16, 2004 1:09 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Stifle yourselves.
MR. McCLELLAN: Well, actually, we talked about this earlier today -- some questions came up this morning. And if you'll recall back in February, the President directed the Department of Defense to do a comprehensive search, gather all the records, so that we can make them available publicly. The President's personnel, payroll and medical records were released in their entirety -- I notice you had a comment the other day, I just want to make sure that's clear and that's what I referred to back then. Since that time, there were some further media inquiries. The Department of Defense went back and did -- apparently they didn't do as comprehensive a search as we had requested, and they found some additional documents that weren't in any of those files. And so they have continued to scour through additional files that aren't part of the President's personnel, payroll, and medical files to see if there are any records relating to the President. And my understanding is that that work has continued. I don't know the latest update on it at this point.
Q Have you or others in the White House seen documents that have not yet been released?
MR. McCLELLAN: I have not. I'll try to check. We've been traveling, but I don't know of any other specific documents that have been found at this point. But I know that they're -- I know they're continuing to look at that, so that's a very real possibility.
3. Posted by Phil Smith | September 16, 2004 1:09 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 16, 2004 01:09
4. Posted by Dan | September 16, 2004 1:45 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
One never knows, but please recall that the same day the Kerry camp / dems started the charge that Bush wasn't on active AF duty, a document pointing out that he was, in fact, on active duty appeared. I heard no questions about the doc appearing and the charge faded away. Maybe I'm wrong, but I'm starting to think Rove et al worked realhard to see whatever they could see coming and planned for it. Word is Bush doesn't just want to win, he wants to win big - so far, Kerry hasn't been able to mount anything worthy of being on the same field with these guys. As an aside, I saw a revealing little snippet on ABC's note tonight. Notice ABC sees 2 tracks to THIS story, neither of them have to do with Bush. Very telling, I think.
President Bush and the National Guard: the politics of the documents:
No one knows where the twin tracks of this story (documents real or not and, if not, who made 'em up?) are going.
4. Posted by Dan | September 16, 2004 1:45 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 16, 2004 01:45
5. Posted by Christopher Cross | September 16, 2004 1:47 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
The greatest political rope-a-dope ever? This combined with the SBVT's claim that they have more forthcoming documentation to back up THEIR charges...I can't handle the suspense.
5. Posted by Christopher Cross | September 16, 2004 1:47 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 16, 2004 01:47
6. Posted by Hunter | September 16, 2004 1:52 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
- So now Rather wants to investigate himself?...
- at the risk of being a little indelicate I seem to remember something back in my youthful college days about going around in circles until you got your head stuck up your ass....
6. Posted by Hunter | September 16, 2004 1:52 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 16, 2004 01:52
7. Posted by Dan | September 16, 2004 2:41 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Dear Hunter,
Thank you. Somehow your post inspired me. I can now report that Rather has indeed found new memos.
7. Posted by Dan | September 16, 2004 2:41 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 16, 2004 02:41
8. Posted by Jeff | September 16, 2004 6:26 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
It is interesting to note that as one who served in the US military 1979-1987, that drug screening tests and testing were not available until the early 1980s. The US Navy did not begin random drug testing of its personnel until 1981.
8. Posted by Jeff | September 16, 2004 6:26 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 16, 2004 06:26
9. Posted by Bucky Katt | September 16, 2004 8:10 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Not to mention that drug screening is *not* part of the annual flight physical process. The blood samples and urine samples taken for flight physicals do not follow the strict chain of custody and signature receipt process used as a part of drug testing. The Flight Surgeon will ask questions about what prescription medications you're on and ask about any Over-The-Counter (OTC) med useage (btw- OTC useage is a big no-no in a flight status. Any meds have to be approved by a flight surgeon). But that's about the extent of it.
The only time drug testing becomes part of a flight physical is during post-accident investigations, where samples will be drawn not only for detection of illegal drugs, but unauthorized OTC medications. This is to determine if unauthorized drug useage was a contributing factor in the accident.
The other part that seems to be neglected about the "missing flight physical" and is ignored- why would anyone require a flight physical for a person who (a) can't fly the type aircraft available and (b) is leaving in a few months to head off to Harvard? Full flight physicals are damn expensive. Why would you waste money on administering a flight physical to someone you know is leaving?
-From a former Naval Flight Officer whose gone through 21 flight physicals.
9. Posted by Bucky Katt | September 16, 2004 8:10 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 16, 2004 08:10
10. Posted by Jumbo | September 16, 2004 11:12 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I vote rope-a-dope. If this were damgaing, thye would have put it out long before now, not teased it. Rove has made not a single substantive error in this campaign; would he screw up something like this? Genius.
10. Posted by Jumbo | September 16, 2004 11:12 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 16, 2004 11:12
11. Posted by jen | September 16, 2004 11:18 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
As a federal employee, let me assure you that it's quite a task to round up documents from 5 years ago, much less 30+. We only hold documents for maybe 7 years anymore. When we purged the older stuff it gets shredded. Now, DoD has a different archiving standard, I'm sure, but I'm surprised they have any of those old documents.
11. Posted by jen | September 16, 2004 11:18 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 16, 2004 11:18
12. Posted by Mikey | September 16, 2004 2:07 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Jen's right. I have worked for government at various levels for many years and losing documents is real easy. One misfiling, transpose a file number, and you won't find it until you accidentally stumble across it enroute to finding something else. You are really up the creek if the documents are in "remote storage". Chances of finding those again is the chance brothers: slim and fat.
12. Posted by Mikey | September 16, 2004 2:07 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 16, 2004 14:07