Ten Die in Nascar Team's Plane CrashMARTINSVILLE, Va. (AP) -- A plane owned by the Hendrick Motorsports organization crashed Sunday on its way to a NASCAR race, killing all 10 people aboard, including the son, brother and two nieces of the owner of one of auto racing's most successful teams.
The Beech 200 took off from Concord, N.C., and crashed in the Bull Mountain area about seven miles west of Martinsville's Blue Ridge Regional Airport about 12:30 p.m., said Arlene Murray, spokeswoman for the Federal Aviation Administration.
A spokesman for a funeral home where the bodies were being taken said the dead included the four relatives of Rick Hendrick, owner of Hendrick Motorsports.
The weather in the area was overcast at the time of the crash, according to Jan Jackson of the National Weather Service in Blacksburg.
NTSB spokesman Keith Holloway said investigators were on their way to the crash site, which was in rough terrain, but could not begin their examination until Monday.
Hendrick owns the teams of Jeff Gordon, Jimmie Johnson, Terry Labonte and Brian Vickers, who competed in Sunday's Subway 500 in the Nextel Cup Series at Martinsville Speedway.
NASCAR learned of the plane's disappearance during the race but withheld the information from the Hendrick drivers until afterward, NASCAR spokesman Jim Hunter said. All the Hendrick drivers were summoned to the NASCAR hauler immediately after the race and Johnson, who won the race, was excused from Victory Lane.
NASCAR has spoken with Rick Hendrick, NASCAR spokesman Jim Hunter said, adding that neither NASCAR nor the Hendrick organization would have further comment Sunday night.
Tragic.



Comments (15)
Flying may be safer than dr... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Remy Logan | October 24, 2004 9:57 PM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Flying may be safer than driving, but it sure is a hell of a lot more tragic when something goes wrong.
1. Posted by Remy Logan | October 24, 2004 9:57 PM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on October 24, 2004 21:57
2. Posted by Matt | October 24, 2004 9:57 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Crap. My father was one of the designers of that plane. Our condolences to the families.
2. Posted by Matt | October 24, 2004 9:57 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 24, 2004 21:57
3. Posted by Kevin | October 24, 2004 10:26 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I'm sure Radio Blogger will be all over this like white on rice...
http://radioblogger.com
http://kmclive.com
3. Posted by Kevin | October 24, 2004 10:26 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 24, 2004 22:26
4. Posted by TEM | October 24, 2004 10:45 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Oh God! :'(
May they be with God now!
Go Hendrick Motorsprots!
4. Posted by TEM | October 24, 2004 10:45 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 24, 2004 22:45
5. Posted by Bush'04 | October 24, 2004 11:34 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
REV. JORDAN AT CINCINNATI AME: "We are asking you to support him. I'm not worried about a 501 (c) (3) doctrine. We are asking you to support him."
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/NotedNow/story?id=156246
Internal Revenue Code section 501(c)(3) organizations (including churches) are "absolutely prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office." (IRS Pub.1828)
As it did in 1992, 1996 and 2000, the IRS issued an election year advisory this past April reminding 501(c)(3) organizations of this prohibition. In its recent advisory letter, the IRS referenced a case, Branch Ministries vs. Rossotti. 211 F.3d 137 (D.C. Cir. 2000). In this case an appeals court upheld the revocation of a church's tax-exempt status because the church engaged in political activities. Just prior to the 1992 presidential election, the church published newspaper ads titled "Christians Beware" and asserted that then-Governor Clinton's positions on abortion, homosexuality, and the distribution of condoms to teenagers in schools violated Christian teaching. The court found that the church's political activity violated the Internal Revenue Code's prohibition on intervening in political campaigns.
5. Posted by Bush'04 | October 24, 2004 11:34 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 24, 2004 23:34
6. Posted by firstbrokenangel | October 25, 2004 12:08 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I was watching the race when it was mentioned at the end. Jimmie Johnson won and was not allowed to celebrate and none of the drivers were able to be interviewed out of respect for Rick Hendricks. Tragic is right; my heart goes out to the family. He lost so many in one downfall.
~c
6. Posted by firstbrokenangel | October 25, 2004 12:08 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 25, 2004 00:08
7. Posted by firstbrokenangel | October 25, 2004 12:11 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Bush04 - what the hell has anything you said got to do with Rick Hendricks loss of family and friends today in an airplane crash from NC to VA?
go spam elsewhere and under the right subject.
~C
7. Posted by firstbrokenangel | October 25, 2004 12:11 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 25, 2004 00:11
8. Posted by toddzilla | October 25, 2004 1:27 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Yeah, I saw the non-celebration in Victory Lane, too. I don't think it's because Jimmy wasn't "allowed" to celebrate, but that under the circumstances it would've been inappropriate. Especially since none of the Hendrick drivers, or anyone else, for that matter, knew about it until the race was complete. Between now and next week's race in Atlanta, there's going to be 10 funerals. I can't imagine. One of the things that's drawn me into being a NASCAR addict over the last few years is how the sport is a community. In the NFL, for instance, you have 30 teams going at each other two at a time, and they all switch up the next week. NASCAR teams compete against each other week in and week out. It's a sports family. It's worst for Rick Hendrick and his immediate family, of course, but this affects everyone attached to the sport, even, to a much lesser degree, down to the fan level.
And Bush'04, you're a jerk for posting your message in this thread. Go buy some respect, 'cause you'll find none here.
8. Posted by toddzilla | October 25, 2004 1:27 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 25, 2004 01:27
9. Posted by Ron Rapp | October 25, 2004 2:33 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"Flying may be safer than driving, but it sure is a hell of a lot more tragic when something goes wrong."
That's not necessarily true. Things go wrong more often that you might realize. Most aviation accidents occur on the ground at an airport and do not involve injuries. Aircraft are designed such that they can operate with engine failures, landing gear problems, flight control snafus, inoperative instruments, airframe damange, and much more.
Most aircraft accidents are due to pilot error rather than mechanical failure (by a ratio of about 86 to 13, according to the Air Safety Foundation). Of course, that's little consolation to those who lose friends or family in an accident.
The cause of this one will, as always, remain uncertain until the NTSB issues its report. The King Air has a good safety record. In fact, I believe Raytheon claims it's the best of any cabin class turboprop twin on the market.
Flying is like driving, walking, racing, and every other thing in life in the sense that it has risks.
My condolences to the Hendricks team.
9. Posted by Ron Rapp | October 25, 2004 2:33 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 25, 2004 02:33
10. Posted by Tim | October 25, 2004 11:27 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I was looking at the flight manifest last night and it just made my heart drop. There isn't much you can say to someone who has lost so much except "we love you and our prayers are with you..."
10. Posted by Tim | October 25, 2004 11:27 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 25, 2004 11:27
11. Posted by Jack | October 25, 2004 12:27 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Just so sad, very tragic.
11. Posted by Jack | October 25, 2004 12:27 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 25, 2004 12:27
12. Posted by TBALL | October 27, 2004 5:28 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
MY CONDOLENCES TO THE HENDRICK'S FRIENDS AND FAMILY.
Ok... there were more than 20 planes that diverted their landings to another airport because of fog that day. Why didn't Hendrick's plane do the same ?
This is a clear cut case of pilot error folks.
The plane missed the first approach, then collided with the side of the mountain.
It sheared the tops of the trees for 100 ft.
AND according to a couple of witness's that heard it before it crashed... the plane was at not much more than idle when it hit.
Pilot error. Plain and simple. Tragic.
12. Posted by TBALL | October 27, 2004 5:28 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 27, 2004 05:28
13. Posted by brian | October 27, 2004 4:18 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
T Ball you haven't a clue about flying, but are very opinionated. Twenty other flights may have diverted, but weather does change constantly. As for missing one approach, many airlines, corporate and general aircraft, miss for one reason or another every day. Approximately what torque setting do you think? Yes just what I thought, again you're speculating.
Lets get back to the facts; many people have lost loved ones. God bless them all in this time of need.
13. Posted by brian | October 27, 2004 4:18 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 27, 2004 16:18
14. Posted by TBALL | October 28, 2004 6:25 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Yes Brian... You're absolutely right. I AM opinionated. But, common sense tells me I'm also right on this. How many other planes flew into that airport that day ? How many other planes diverted to a much "safer" airport ?
Weather conditions do change... that's a fact.
But, it was overcast and VERY foggy that morning causing most other planes to divert. The Hendrick's plane didn't... and it cost 10 people their lives.
Commom sense.
Again... May Godbless the friends and family members of all that perished on this tragic flight.
14. Posted by TBALL | October 28, 2004 6:25 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 28, 2004 06:25
15. Posted by LJ | August 1, 2007 11:03 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
there was an airplane on the approach in front of the Hendrick's plane that landed without incident. why do you think we have not heard any of there statements concerning the events of that day? Everything would lead to the incompetence of the Hendrick's pilots
15. Posted by LJ | August 1, 2007 11:03 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 1, 2007 23:03