« In defense of profiling | Main | It's A Major Award! »

I Am So Freaking Jealous

I've got my own psycho little pet troll, but La Shawn Barber has me beat by a mile.

Damn, I'm Jealous!

Now I know how Rodney Dangerfeld felt.


TrackBack

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference I Am So Freaking Jealous:

» The Unabrewer linked with My attempt to make Paul feel better.

» La Shawn Barber's Corner linked with I've Reached Ann Coulter-Hate Status!

Comments (35)

Freak! Freak! Don't you g... (Below threshold)
-S-:

Freak! Freak! Don't you get it, Paul? We conservatives are FREAKS!

------------------------------------

My first and worst troll, so far, wasn't pleasant but it ended up being one of those learning experiences I'd read about. Before MovableType and I.P. banning, leaving my site a bit more vulnerable to the troll than I'd have preferred. I've nearly concluded by now that the troll was Kevin Drum...

i do not hate la shawn barb... (Below threshold)

i do not hate la shawn barber.

i just think she is dishonest
with her readers (and herself,
albeit on a semi-consious level). . .

in any event, i think "the best
antiseptic is sunshine," so i've
decided to let it shine right on
in. . . we may disagree about
my views; or hers; but that is
perfectly cool by me. cool?

increase the

p e a c e

-- tae, out.

Tae is delusional. Cool?</... (Below threshold)
Patrick:

Tae is delusional. Cool?

Increase your oxygen intake. Wear looser clothing.

-- Patrick, out.

"Out, out, damn spot!"... (Below threshold)
-S-:

"Out, out, damn spot!"

Tae sure seems defensive ab... (Below threshold)

Tae sure seems defensive about La Shawn's reaction to her blog. I guess the idea of being laughed at by the target never occurred to him/her/it.

see how you all are! --... (Below threshold)

see how you all are! --

i come here to bow low, and
tug at my forelocks, before
the almighty wizbang -- whose
blog is actually excellent,
btw -- and his very own "amen"
chorus chants way, way silly at me. . .

he he!

carry on, boyz. . .

knock yourselves out.

pax tecum

-- tae, out.

W00t, tae, from one of the ... (Below threshold)
-S-:

W00t, tae, from one of the gUrlz.

The clues are mounting up.<... (Below threshold)
Steven L:

The clues are mounting up.

Obviously "tae" is . . . e.e. cummings!!!!

dun dun DUNNNNN.

. . . on crack.... (Below threshold)
Steven L:

. . . on crack.

y a w n. . .g'nigh... (Below threshold)

y a w n. . .

g'night one and all. . .

erh, well-met, s.

but why might i
be a "damn spot"?

do tell.

pax tecum. . .

-- tae, out.

Suzy, you're crazy.<p... (Below threshold)

Suzy, you're crazy.

"w00t" to you back, y0u l337 h4xd02!

w32d =-)


("Woot to you back, you elite haxor, werd =-) ")

By the way, Tae, its a Macbeth reference.

um. . . henry -- </p... (Below threshold)

um. . . henry --

you must really be a fly brutha.

uh-huh.

feel entirely free to keep suzy.

'tis a taming of the shrew thang, henry, just f.y.i. . .

p e a c e

-- tae, diggety, no doubt.

Henry: May the force be wi... (Below threshold)
-S-:

Henry: May the force be with you.

~:-D

s. --in what way a... (Below threshold)

s. --

in what way am i
a "damn spot"?

care to answer? or, should
i simply infer the "usual" answer?

in any event, seems you and henry
are proof of my "for every garbage
can, there exists a. . . lid"
theory.

's all good to go, baby. . .

increase the

p e a c e

-- tae, out.

tae, are not you the person... (Below threshold)
-S-:

tae, are not you the person who has created a website to ridicule another human being?

Seems to me you are a bit confused both in motive and intellectual definition as to what the word, "peace" actually means. Or perhaps you function on another set of definitions than do others.

I have no idea what "the 'usual' answer" is to you nor does most of anyone else. But, as to what you've done where LaShawn is concerned, it appears to me to be baseless and without merit. You focus abnormally on another human being without regard to how your actions impact another, which, to put it bluntly here, is pscyhotic. It's certainly libelous and I hope that LaShawn complains, at least, to your I.S.P.

There are consequences to actions. You've taken actions that bear consequences. I don't see you making efforts to actually engender peace and so read your use of the word as often as you use it as being ingenuine. Which means, again, that you are either functioning with an alternative set of defintions in language of that word or are using it quite contrarily, indicating not at all a peaceful tactic or motivation.

That's about all I can write about this, other than I enjoy Barber's blog and consider her to be of great character and quite charming and talented as a writer. If you find her, to the contrary, upsetting or thereabouts, then just move on. But, why go to such lengths with her as your focus? It appears abnormal to everyone else, and you as yet don't appear to be able to perceive that.

thanks for your input, here... (Below threshold)

thanks for your input, here, s.

but let me offer a little thread-detangler
to you here -- gratis -- hers is an
opinion blog. one cannot be libel another
by simply disagreeing with that other's

o p i n i o n s. . .

[citations available on request.]

i note that you still did not tell me
what you meant in calling me a "damn spot. . ."

would you care to answer, THIS,
the third time i've asked?

i am all ears -- and eyes. he he!

now, as to peace, it is my opinion. . .

that debunking hate leads to understanding,
and understanding leads to. . . yes, peace.

[and yes, i do think she hates, lustily -- more
than she is even consciously aware, she does.]

you disagree. and that is plainly cool.

here's an idea -- chill -- and let me handle
my wonderful life in the way i like. . . i'll
gladly let you do the same. . . persona, or no.

pax tecum

-- tae, out.

I find nothing near, not ev... (Below threshold)
-S-:

I find nothing near, not even closely approaching, hate or hateful about La Shawn Barber nor anything she writes and opines.

You describe yourself as defining what you're doing -- authoring a website for the express reason of ridiculing another person, and a public person at that ("public" in the sense that Barber is recently a higher profile blogger than some) -- as being acceptable because you consider it entirely your "opinion" in nature, while I disagree with you as to the effect of what you're doing.

As in, one individual bothers you to such a degree, again I write, why not 'walk away'? Why the intense focus on one other human being among countless millions on our planet, why the appearance, by yourself, of obsession? It appears that your obsession with Barber is intent on destructive action about Barber, which identifies you as a not well intended person where she is concerned.

So other humans are correct to question you and your motives AND your actions.

Because, the norm here is that when encountering an offensive person, someone that upsets you to any degree that you have things to write about them to ease your own tension about them, is to disregard that or he/she which is bothersome, that troubles or offends. The norm is to disconnect from that source of bother, not to aggress upon it as you have.

Because of that, no, I do not find your use of the word, "peace" as being sincere. And, using that expression ongoing and insistently as you do, suggests a certain need by you in reference to yourself.

Rhetorically, some examples: you use challenging words with others, giving directives here, there, and yet, why? Why insist and aggress upon others?

Barber has as much right to opine in the world as does anyone else. I question your motives for trying to bring harm to her, not that your website does in actuality, just that it seems apparent that your intentions to and about her -- and others -- is harmful.

y a w n. . .all th... (Below threshold)

y a w n. . .

all the same things you
wrote before; this time using
many more words to convey less

m e a n i n g.

y a w n. . .

and, still, not a peep
about why you called me
a "damn spot. . ."

how tedious.

and yet, how true to form:

duck and dodge, s.
duck and dodge.

btw, thanks for the undergraduate,
introductory-level, survey-course
psychological-profiling of me,
just the same. . . as time passes,
i am reasonably sure you'll let
me know how this all worked for you. . .

pax tecum

-- tae, out.

Stop lying. No, one called ... (Below threshold)
julie:

Stop lying. No, one called you a "damn spot." If you really need someone to interpet the meaning in context (and I doubt you really do), she told you to "get lost." Now, don't bug me by asking why. You've already gotten much more attention then you are worth.

hi julie --... (Below threshold)

hi julie --

i'll ignore that rather
pungent opening from
you, and offer you some
good-natured, genuine, yet
i think, constructive, advice:

have you ever considered the

d e c a f f e i n a t e d

brands? you should! -- they
are a very tasty alternative
to that "twitchy" feeling you
obviously experience in the
mornings -- it's your starbuck's
komoto dragon blend. . .

just a thought. he he!

increase the

p e a c e

-- tae, out.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"paging. . . s. -- paging ms. s. -- to
a blue paging telephone. . . oh, ms. s.?"

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Oh, please don't ignore it.... (Below threshold)
julie:

Oh, please don't ignore it. Show us where someone called you a "damn spot"? You are the one who went on and on and on about it. Now's your chance. Oh, wait . . . you can't show us because it's a LIE!

silly julie -- html ... (Below threshold)

silly julie -- html is
for kiddies -- 2:57 pm: i appear
here for the first time.

4:46 pm: s. intones thus.

julie, please have the courtesy
to let s. answer, for herself,
this time. . . mmmkay?

"i think someone's NOT
drinking her sanka. . ."

pax tecum,

-- tae, out.

No. You falsely accuse S. o... (Below threshold)
julie:

No. You falsely accuse S. of calling you a "damn spot." Then you demand S. explain what S. didn't do. Are you always this illogical? Now, show us where anyone called you a "damn spot."

Speaking of spots, did you ... (Below threshold)
-S-:

Speaking of spots, did you know that Data named his cat, "Spot"?

Did you know that people, when impacted on the head, often "see 'spots'"?

julie, you are spot on. Thanks.


~;-D

a h e m.act v, sce... (Below threshold)
tae_diggs:

a h e m.

act v, scene i

macbeth, by william shakespeare:

lady macbeth: "...out, damned spot!
out, i say! one -- two -- why then 'tis time
to do't... hell is murky... what need we fear
who knows it, when none can call our power
to account? yet who would have thought
the old man to have had so much
blood in him?..."

[editor's notes: these lines were uttered by lady macbeth in act v, scene i, lines 30–34, as she sleepwalked. the lady was the driving force behind a plot to kill another character; moreover, earlier in the play, when macbeth believed his hands were permanently bloodstained, lady macbeth advised him, “a little water clears us of this deed...” (act ii, scene ii, line 65).

however, in act v, as she sonambulated, lady macbeth saw the same blood-stains indelibly marked her own hands. thus she was, suddenly, completely unraveled by her guilt, and then descended into madness. note well that these lines -- almost the only ones not uttered in iambic pentameter by a major character in the play (save, of course, the witches) -- were shakespeare's (bacon's?) reflection of lady macbeth's vanished sanity/lucidity.

she pressed on, though: “what need we fear who knows it when none can call our power to account?” asserting that as long as her husband’s power was secure, the murders they committed would do her no harm. but her guilt-ridden descent into madness proved these assertions completely empty. “hell is murky,” she finally said, and thus implied that she already intimately knew its darkness. and so, lady macbbeth, by her own diabolical actions, created her own hell, where she was to be endlessly tormented by guilt-driven insanity.]

just for the record, that is what i
infer is the "usual meaning" of
writing those words to/about
someone. it is now clear s.
does/did not know this. . .

i note that henry reinforced s.'s
macbeth reference, and s. wrote
nothing to indicate she did not
intend this meaning.

w h e w. . .

[or, maybe, just maybe, it
was meant as a black thang. . .]

but really, julie -- leave the caffeine
for the grown-ups -- it doe not be-
come you. in any event, here's to

p e a c e,

through gnosis

-- tae, out.

Oh, look, tae is playing th... (Below threshold)
julie:

Oh, look, tae is playing the race card! Can you be any more dishonest? Oh, wait, of course you can and I am sure you will. So, show us where you were called a "damn spot." Oh, you can't! Because it's a lie!

s i g h. . .grow u... (Below threshold)

s i g h. . .

grow up, julie.


either way, i'll still
"call 'em as i see 'em" -- whether
you grow up. . . or not.

but do grow up.

life's more interesting
when one grows up. . .

see, then one day, you might
be able to handle real black
coffee -- no sugar, no cream. . .

yeah, that's right, caffeinated coffee.

increase the

p e a c e

-- tae, out.

s i g h. . .grow ... (Below threshold)
julie:

s i g h. . .
grow up, julie.

Translation of taespeak: "Stop calling me on my bullshit, julie!"

either way, i'll still
"call 'em as i see 'em" -- whether
you grow up. . . or not.

Then seek help because you are either seeing things or you are truth challanged. So, show us again where you were called a “damn spot,” liar.

but do grow up.
life's more interesting
when one grows up. . .

Transalation of taespeak: "Life's more interesting when you lie, feign persecution, and create hate websites."

see, then one day, you might
be able to handle real black
coffee -- no sugar, no cream. . .
yeah, that's right, caffeinated coffee.

Sorry. Coffee like you is way too bitter for anyone to swallow. Time to pour you down the drain!

ah, julie -- i shoul... (Below threshold)

ah, julie -- i shouldn't dignify
your painfully silly one with any reasoned
response, so i'll just dash one off
of the top of my head. . . forgive me
if you won't be able to follow it. . .

julie, here's a fascinating
feature of "callin' 'em the way i
see 'em. . ."
or, more precisely,
what i know to be true.

i do not require that you believe
in these truths, in order for them to re-
main true. the truth is funny that way:
it remains what it is, despite your dis-
belief. but, keep sippin' your kool-aid,
baby, just the same. 's all good. . .

see julie -- when you grow up, you'll
figure out that there are some things
that are true, valid, and concrete for
you, whether others believe them so, or
not. . . so, until then, i will simply say:

"you're right, julie; you are of course,
always, and forever. . . right. no one
but you, and you alone, can be right."

[i am sure you feel much better, now. vindicated,
in fact -- in your mind, you feel as though you've
acheived the one-dimensional "win" you wanted.]

living in one-dimensional a world has the
benefit of being easy to parse. reality, on the
other hand, sails the far event-horizon -- complex,
multi-dimensional -- p-braned, and super-stringed.

but as i say -- good luck with your one-
dimensional life. . . i hope it turns out well
for you, when it comes time to explain, say,
quantum mechanics, or human interactions.

i bid you, sincerely,

pax tecum

ah, julie -- i shouldn't... (Below threshold)
julie:

ah, julie -- i shouldn't dignify
your painfully silly one with any reasoned
response, so i'll just dash one off
of the top of my head. . . forgive me
if you won't be able to follow it.
. .

Hmmm. Another lie, because you go on to subject us to your longest, and dumbest b.s. yet.

julie, here's a fascinating
feature of "callin' 'em the way i
see 'em. . ."

Translation of taespeak: tell a whopper and label it "callin' 'em the way i
see 'em. . ." Haaaaaa!

or, more precisely,
what i know to be true.

What's true is that you pretend to be a victim of your own made up lies.

i do not require that you believe
in these truths, in order for them to re-
main true.

Sure you do, why else would you keep posting this crap when you are already on record for lying. You're really acting pathetic now.

the truth is funny that way:

You mean your: Funny truths. Not quite legit truths. Lies labeled as truths. Yeah, we got it.

it remains what it is,

Yeah, a lie.

despite your dis-belief. but, keep sippin' your kool-aid,baby, just the same. 's all good. . .

What's the matter? No one will drink your bitter, stale, cold, coffee?

[snip, let's cut to the chase]

"you're right, julie; you are of course,
always, and forever. . . right. no one
but you, and you alone, can be right."

Thanks. Now show us where you were called a “damn spot,” liar.

[i am sure you feel much better, now. vindicated,
in fact -- in your mind, you feel as though you've
acheived the one-dimensional "win" you wanted.]

No vindication necessary. It was already in writing what a liar you are.

living in one-dimensional a world has the
benefit of being easy to parse. reality, on the
other hand, sails the far event-horizon -- complex,
multi-dimensional -- p-braned, and super-stringed
.

Oh, brother! Can you be any more narcisstic? Really, it's pathhological, man. Seek professional help.

but as i say -- good luck with your one-
dimensional life. . . i hope it turns out well
for you, when it comes time to explain, say,
quantum mechanics, or human interactions.

It has already turned out well for me, but thanks anyway. Do get help for that narcissim thing.

i bid you, sincerely,
pax tecum

Ewww, another lie. And I dare predict, not your last one, either.

ah -- "thy powers of<br ... (Below threshold)

ah -- "thy powers of
reason so cut me to
the quick. . . i have
no further reply, save
to exit where i entered,
tugging at my forelocks,
bowing before thy reflected

g l o r y . . ."

he he! right.

so, i guess you agree, then,
my blog is about bringing at
least a modicum of balance
to the public perception of
that ironic persona called
la shawn barber. . .

that is, of course, what this
thread is about, after all -- not
your whining about my bustin'
you out for behaving like a

t h i r d g r a d e r.

p e a c e

-- black coffee,
no sugar, no cream.

ah -- "thy powers of rea... (Below threshold)
julie:

ah -- "thy powers of reason so cut me to the quick. . .

Silly, as if you had the ability to reason.

i have no further reply, . . .

How many times have you said that before?

so, i guess you agree, then, my blog is about bringing at least a modicum of balance to the public perception of that ironic persona called la shawn barber. . .

No one agrees with you at all. No one reads your blog. You got a bit of attention that apparently you are psychologically desperate for. There is nothing balanced in telling lies and falsely portraying yourself as a victim.

that is, of course, what this thread is about, after all -- not your whining about my bustin'
you out for behaving like a t h i r d g r a d e r.

No, it's all about you being a troll. That's all you are. And I love your insults: grow up, third grader, etc. How old are you?

p e a c e -- black coffee, no sugar, no cream.

No, still bitter, black, no sugar, no cream. Don't you get tired being dumped down the sink? No, I guess not.

Posted by: tae_dumb at January 4, 2005 08:27 AM

ooh -- so sassy!fr... (Below threshold)

ooh -- so sassy!

frothy, in fact,
which is actually
a pretty scary
thought -- julie -- all
worked into a lather.

ick.

Lather? No. I've met gnats ... (Below threshold)
julie:

Lather? No. I've met gnats 100x more annoying then you -- and smarter, too. In fact, pointing out what a hypocrite you are, is merely mindless entertainment. Plus, you make is so-o-o easy.

um. . ."then"</... (Below threshold)

um. . .

"then" me?

did you mean smarter

T H A N. . .

me? ooh -- smart one, that.

's all good, though, 'cuz i believe
in "mind over matter. . ."
that is -- i don't mind, 'cuz you
don't matter. . .

i've bigger fish to fry, julie,
soo. . . be well -- and stay smart.

http://lashawnbarberexposed.blogspot.com/2005/01/doctrine-of-judicial-review-third.html




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

tips@wizbangblog.com

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy