« Survivor Found 1 Month After Tsunami | Main | Quote Of The Day »

I Wouldn't Trust Him With Your Money

From David Scott Goofball:

With all the news about the Tsunami, many people have not heard of the devastating flood that recently hit Costa Rica's Carribean Coast.

...send ANY donations to ISOU. Send them directly... I have asked for ... a note in English, where you can easilly donate. I will update with a link on Monday.

If you don't know what I talking about read this post of mine. Then read what Shit for Brains did to it.

The core responsibility of blogging is to try to fair and honest at all times. Partisanship and bias are fine but within the bounds of intellectual honesty. Anyone can cut a quotation out of context like Maureen Dowd.

Shit for Brains (SFB) glibly posts it with the subject "without comment." Of course he does, that is a tantamount admission he is wrong. Anything he said would give away he was cutting the quote.

Notice he posted it under the heading "Hatred." Oddly -but typical for a liberal- I'm the one who -in his distorted world- is displaying hatred but the people chopping peoples' heads off get a pass. If SFB were so worried about "hatred" maybe he could mention the murderers? Huh? Huh?

Any fair reading of my full post would show that it should be filed under something like "sad dismay."

But it is typical of moonbat liberals -- terrorists cut off peoples' heads and they blame Republicans.

And they wonder why they lose election.

2 Updates below the fold...

If he had any class he'd admit he overplayed his hand and apologize... but he won't. The only "hatred" on display in that post is his own.

Update Funny, after prattling off at the mouth about the hatred of Christians and calling me a Nazi, he still has not managed to even condemn the beheadings. Typical liberal.

And SFB, I have a correction for you. You said "I am a partisan political player" You might be a lot of things... but a "player" you are not.

Update 2 For my liberal readers --wait, lemme rephrase that-- for my moonbat readers...

I of course was not implying he was trying to steal money. David is a complete moonbat and a horses ass but he was genuinely asking for money for a good cause. And he was asking you to send the money to the Red Cross. (Please follow the top link)

For you moonbats who could not figure it out, he took one of my quotes out of context so I did the same to one of his posts to illustrate how easy and dishonest it was, as well as how you would make a quote say anything if you have no ethics.

For my readers with an IQ above 65 who figured that out, sorry for wasting your time with this explaination.


TrackBack

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference I Wouldn't Trust Him With Your Money:

» The Progressive Blog Alliance HQ linked with The Other Flood

» The Progressive Blog Alliance HQ linked with The Other Flood

» The Politburo Diktat linked with Carnival of The Coward

» Fistful of Fortnights linked with Boulevard Of Broken Dreams.

Comments (39)

You know, I dont have a pro... (Below threshold)

You know, I dont have a problem with you being upset about my post, read it however you like, I could care less about your hurt feelings. But please show enough class not to play with the lives of the flood victims. You can accussed me of taking your quote out of context all you like. What you have done is changed mine. And in the process, perhaps denied some people who desperately need help, help. This is the first thing Wizbang has mentioned about the disaster, which is interesting since Costa Rica was one of the people who supported your President in going to war with Iraq. You want to fight me, bring it on, but dont fuck with the poor victims of this flood in an attempt to make political points. That is LOW even for you.

David, just wanted to point... (Below threshold)
Just Me:

David, just wanted to point out that your comparison to Christians is off.

Mainstream Christians do not embrace the behaviors you described. I don't attend church with a single Christian who would defend the burning of crosses in white sheets.

You should probably rethink your metaphor, it isn't working too well.

Here's a hint clueless... <... (Below threshold)
Paul:

Here's a hint clueless...

Trying to use the victims of the flood to divert attention from your pathetic behavior is far worse than anything I've done or could have done.

Your standing on the backs of dead people to change the subject shows what a lowlife you are.

Funny Stuff Amish, but it w... (Below threshold)
Paul:

Funny Stuff Amish, but it was not 1983.

The Mac (like the one over his shoulder) came out in 1984. Windows (like the disk he is holding) came out a few years later. I'd guess 1986-7. I'm sure google knows.

Excuse me, what dead people... (Below threshold)

Excuse me, what dead people am I standing on, and it was you who bought up my Post to help the Costa Rican Flood victims. You know what Paul. I am not even going to bother arguing with you. I will post a response on my Blog, I am sure you will delete the trackback, as you are a coward. You will note, I have not deleted either of yours, and wont. I believe you demonstrate your ignorance and closed mindedness much better than I ever can.

Well the Costa Rican thing ... (Below threshold)
Rob Hackney:

Well the Costa Rican thing may well be true and not just some kind of Nigerian scam, but since that place is a Liberal Paradise, why should they get any money when the Tsunami victims don't live in a Carribean playground???

The only hatred comes from Liberals who seek to divide us and fracture our great nation.

Crawl back under your rock Liberal.

Paul, I don't have any prob... (Below threshold)
-S-:

Paul, I don't have any problem understanding not only what you wrote and have written (well, maybe unless it's about yer MAC affair, but we all have our spessialiteees, so no worries), here or elsewhere, particularly right here and now.

What I do have a problem with are a few people who seem to construct their online identities from remmants sewn together from other sources, like some Frankenshteen (typing abnormalities intended) thing, and then wait around for someone to notice as to add more stitches to their monster.

This process works to a degree of notice but after a while, most people notice that they are just doing someone else's material, however resewn. Never worry, is what I mean, most people notice the heart of the matter and can and do disregard spinning tops.

Wow Paul, not only do you b... (Below threshold)
tas:

Wow Paul, not only do you bash David's plea to help Costa Rican flood victims, but you also tell the flat out lie (and you know it was a lie) and David is trying to use this cause to steal people's money. Aren't you the person who wrongful accused the left half of the blogosphere for not even paying attention to the sunami crisis? Now you're slandering David for trying to help victims of another natural disaster?

I smell a hypocrite.

Typo correction: and Dav... (Below threshold)
tas:

Typo correction: and David is trying...

Cross out the "and", add a "that".

Tas, please try to engage y... (Below threshold)
Paul:

Tas, please try to engage your brain before you comment.

David took my quote out of context... To ILLUSTRATE how easy it was and how dishonest it was, I did the same to one of his posts... Did you miss that?

I smell dummy.

tas, au contraire, I believ... (Below threshold)
-S-:

tas, au contraire, I believe that Paul is pointing out that someone else is misstatating, misrepresenting him (Paul). Trying to say the degrading fish only stinks when it's upside down after the fact that the degraded fish smell has permeated the realm only adds to the problem.

My take on this: the degraded fish smells however it's repositioned. And, trying to describe the degraded fish smell as rosey afterward when the discrepancy is pointed out just suggests that the rosey smell is fishy.

Meaning, Paul was misquoted, taken out of context, had a Dowdification attempted on his content from earlier.

Paul: For people who don't ... (Below threshold)
julie:

Paul: For people who don't read what you write and show such disdain for Wizbang, why the hell are they always here posting?

-S-: PUT THE CANDLE BACK!

The money issue is moot - y... (Below threshold)
leelu:

The money issue is moot - you can send donations to the Red Cross (Cruz Roja) directly.

The information is on their site:

http://www.cruzroja.or.cr/

I realize this might irritate a liberal, but if I were to send my donation to numbnuts, how would I substantiate a tax deduction?

julie: ?As in, st... (Below threshold)
-S-:

julie: ?

As in, start a fire? Flame? Spew sooty soot all over my freshly painted walls? What?

I'm in a bleak mood. I had a hard day. It's allowed. At least I understand and support Paul in this, as almost always unless, of course, he starts going on about his MAC and various size issues.

~;-D

"Perhaps you should take... (Below threshold)

"Perhaps you should take your head out of Mien Kampf for a while and actually read a little history, perhaps then you will understand that the ideas of Islam are no more represented by this group of murderers and terrorist, than My Christianity is represented by your ideological soul mates who turn the cross into a symbol of hate and intolerance, or twist it into a Swastika"

MMMMMMMMMM...This is too easy.

I tried to leave a comment on this moonbat's post but either typekey is down or he's not allowing any. No matter, the link whore probably runs back here every 15 minutes to see if anyone has responded to his gibberish.

Just for the "historical" record...the swastika has been around for more than 5,000 years. In fact, Hitler chose the swastika not to connect the nazis to Christianity but rather because of its PAGAN significance...before Christianity ever made it to Europe it was being used by germanic tribes.

As for the ideas of Islam being taken out of context by the facist beheaders, I beg to differ. In fact, the major problem with Islam is that it's never undergone anything approaching a reformation. Because of that, it adherents still follow precepts set down almost 1500 years ago, including strictures on dealing with infidels.

The idea that Islam is a tolerant religion is a myth spread by the multiculturalists and moslems themselves. They proudly point out that when Islamic armies took over kingdoms and countries, they allowed the practice of other religions.

This is true...as long as you didn't mind paying exhorbitant taxes, obey an entirely different set of laws and endure the slights and insults of your neighbors who were encouraged by Islamic law to shun you.

Jeez...what a tolerant bunch.

So when Mr. link whore (that moonbat links to 50 other sites a day with sometimes not even a little blurb talking about the original post) wants to talk about Nazis, methinks he doth protest too much. Perhaps, as Paul suggests, he post one of his incoherent rants against the beheaders of humans in the name of Allah.

No, that just would't do. We don't want to take sides here.

Paul: For people who don... (Below threshold)
Paul:

Paul: For people who don't read what you write and show such disdain for Wizbang, why the hell are they always here posting?

Julie:

In David's case it is a way to linkwhole from Wizbang who probably has more visits per hour than he has in a week. (just a guess, too lazy to look)

He has a habit was trying to trackback larger blogs when he has little or nothing to add to the conversation. .

You can tell that by the way he goes postal if I delete a trackback. Funny thing is, (especially lately) people have been pinging Wizbang and not even linking us. Kevin and I are pretty laid back about things like that and (so far) we don't delete them. (as we rightfully should)

What SFB has not figured out -and ironically he still won't even after he reads this- is that when he posts a neutral comment I don't delete his trackback. (I don't think I've ever seen a positive one)

But here's the kicker- When he posts a negative comment BUT has a legitimate difference of opinion or says something (anything) intelligent about the topic (even if he strongly disagrees) I don't delete the trackback.

When he acts like a jackass however, I hit the big red button. (And I have a very low "jackass threshold" in this case.)

He of course whines that I delete anyone who disagrees with me... go look at my posts to see the stupidity of that line... Then he often says I'm "afraid" of him... (Why I'm supposed to be "afraid" of a nobody 1000 miles away, I'm not real sure.)

The kicker is, if he were not a jackass, I'd leave the trackback and he'd get the link he so desperately caves.

BillK and I often violently disagree but I've never deleted a trackback. (except maybe that zoo post Bill ;-)

Bill, at some level, has a brain and he and I can spar. David is just a hopeless petulant child.

Hope that answered the question.

P

I see I'm not the only one ... (Below threshold)
Paul:

I see I'm not the only one who noticed his link whoring.

Just for the record, I am w... (Below threshold)

Just for the record, I am well aware of the Nazi Symbol in both Eastern Culture and Native American culture.
Secondly, you know superchicken, you would be a lot more credible without the gross exaggeration. If I chose to do an around the blogsphere post, I rarely include more than KEVIN does in his 10 SPOT???? But I do appreciate the fact that you TRY to read ISOU daily. I suppose Kevin is a link whore too hmmm? You guys are very funny.
And as for condemning terrorist, you must have missed every one of the post I have made about beheading previous to this. In fact, I think the terrorist who have done the beheadings are nothing more than sadist and serial killers, who should be exterminated.
I do not think Islam as a whole qualifies as a cult, and describing it as such goes no where towards encouraging moderate Muslims to speak out against it.
I believe the efforts of the US in support of the Tsunami victims will do more to aid in the fight against terror than anything else we have done.
Now keep calling me names and acting childish, when you are in an echo chamber, I know it feels good to have your feelings validated. I however suffer no illusions about winning anyone over.
I posted Paul's original quote without comment because I thought it and the islamofacist represent the worst of relations between our peoples. I did not comment, because I wanted people to truly make up their own mind. There is a big difference between quoting a quote in it's entirety and cutting one up to make it say something it did not.

David, the fact you don't s... (Below threshold)
Paul:

David, the fact you don't see the difference between Kevin's 10 Spot and your "early morning, late-morning, afternoon, late-afternoon, reading" says more bad about you than I ever have.

Trust me... Everyone else sees the difference.

Back on Martin Luther King ... (Below threshold)
Rob:

Back on Martin Luther King day David and I had a little dust-up over my asserting an opinion about what MLK's stance on affirmative action might have been. Dave got pretty hot under the collar and called me "David Duke" and my guest blogger "the most blatantly racist person in the blogosphere," then went on to post some other lovely sentiments.

Really, this has become a bit of a trend. A few months before the MLK thing David got mad at me for linking to his posts to often. He said I was attacking him or something like that because I disagreed with him all the time. I certainly wasn't trying to attack him...but he posts a lot of things I disagree with. When I see something I disagree with on a blog I read, I tend to link and post my thoughts. The fact that I linked David a lot should have been sort of a compliment as to how much I was reading his blog.

So basically, I've come to the opinion that David is a basically ok guy who can't always handle debate or disagreements. He likes to strut his stuff over at his blog saying all these really critical things about conservatives or Republicans, but when he gets called on some of the things he says he gets really upset and resorts to name calling and simplistic talking points.

I understand your anger, Paul. His posts are inflammatory and typically give a twisted view of the issue, but I'd just ignore him. As high-status as Wizbang is getting people like David are going to be saying some pretty nasty things about you. There will probably come a time when you're just going to have to let what a lot of it roll of you're back.

Easy to say, not as easy to do. I know. But shining the spotlight on it just gives them what they want.

You're right Rob... I've be... (Below threshold)
Paul:

You're right Rob... I've been ignoring him for about 6 months... it was the Downification that pissed me off.

10 Bucks says he Dowdifies me next week to get the attention.

And Rob, those links were h... (Below threshold)
Paul:

And Rob, those links were hysterical... he really is quite a nut case.

I understand where you're c... (Below threshold)
Rob:

I understand where you're coming from Paul. He's really ticked me off a time or two as well. Sometimes he says some really nice things about something I've posted, but other times its like he goes off the deep end. And then when you try to debate some of his points he gets angry that you won't "concede" that he's at least part-way right, or something like that.

I think most people who read my blog would say that I don't have any problems with debating issues, even heated debates, but David seems incapable of it.

Anway, the best thing to do is just let it go.

Okay, Rob, take your nose o... (Below threshold)

Okay, Rob, take your nose out of Paul's ass. Your comments are dissengenous and somewhat hypocritical. One thing you fail to mention is that I have NEVER deleted a single trackback or comment from Say Anything, nor have I deleted Paul's tonight. Now who is more unreasonable someone who wants to debate in an echo chamber and will delete any TB's or comments that make them look bad. Yes, your comments about Dr. King, a personal hero tweaked me. Yes, Seth Yantis is a bigot, whether he knows it or not, but having lived in Black Skin for 45 years, I know it when I see it.

I dont expect you to agree with everything I say. In fact, quite the contrary, I dont expect you to agree with anything I say. My frustration came out of trying to have a rational discussion that was not happening. And I have since our falling out, given you props on a couple of occassions. So why you bring it here, I dont know, but consider it tacky.

Nevertheless, it is interesting how this got off of the subject of libeling me, and became a discussion of your opinion of my psyche and charector. Very interesting indeed. Fact is, I do my discussion in the open, like a man. I dont delete comments, and I dont delete trackbacks. I have never deleted yours, even on those occassions where I felt you were deliberately baiting me. Now while you are falling all over yourself congradulating Paul for standing up to David, why dont you reflect on that, as while at it, ask him why he tries to hide from his readers, "The Rest of the Story," that is, if you have the balls to ask.

Okay, Rob, take your no... (Below threshold)
Rob:

Okay, Rob, take your nose out of Paul's ass.

Lets not be grotesque, David. I have no need to "suck up" to Paul. I read Wizbang often and link it occassionally. I think Paul has, on occasion, read my blog and may have even linked before, but I certainly don't feel any need to kiss his ass. I'm just calling them as I see them here.

Your comments are dissengenous and somewhat hypocritical. One thing you fail to mention is that I have NEVER deleted a single trackback or comment from Say Anything, nor have I deleted Paul's tonight.

Is anyone accusing you of deleting comments or trackbacks? Given what I know of Wizbang's comment section I'd say its a far cry from an "echo chamber." There are plenty of heated debates taking place in this forum every day. You're the one being disengenous.

Now who is more unreasonable someone who wants to debate in an echo chamber and will delete any TB's or comments that make them look bad.

As far as I know yours are the only trackbacks Paul deletes. Has he done this to other people or are you basing your accusations just on that? Because given the nature of debate that usually takes place here I don't think you have any basis for your assertions.

Yes, your comments about Dr. King, a personal hero tweaked me. Yes, Seth Yantis is a bigot, whether he knows it or not, but having lived in Black Skin for 45 years, I know it when I see it.

And I was a bigot too, David Duke no less, when you were angry with me. When you throw that accusation around, David, it loses its meaning.

I dont expect you to agree with everything I say. In fact, quite the contrary, I dont expect you to agree with anything I say. My frustration came out of trying to have a rational discussion that was not happening. And I have since our falling out, given you props on a couple of occassions. So why you bring it here, I dont know, but consider it tacky.

David, you've never tried to enter into a rational discussion on my site. You usually come in and make a few bombastic statements or silly assertions and then get angry when people don't concede that you have a point. You have, on occasion, made some positive comments but you've never been interested in a debate. I'd go so far as to say that you're not capable of it. At least not in any instances I'm aware of.

And I don't think its tacky for me to come here and say these things. As someone who's been in a similar situation with you I think its quite appropriate.

Nevertheless, it is interesting how this got off of the subject of libeling me

Libeling you? Have I said anything that is untrue? Or a matter of my opinion?

Fact is, I do my discussion in the open, like a man. I dont delete comments, and I dont delete trackbacks. I have never deleted yours, even on those occassions where I felt you were deliberately baiting me. Now while you are falling all over yourself congradulating Paul for standing up to David, why dont you reflect on that, as while at it, ask him why he tries to hide from his readers, "The Rest of the Story," that is, if you have the balls to ask.

Paul, Kevin and J. Tea accept criticism daily from people all over the blogosphere. The fact that Paul finds your particular criticisms tiresome is no indication that he's hiding anything.

And I've never tried to bait you. I've linked to your posts disagreeing with you, but isn't that how the blogosphere is supposed to work? If you don't want people to disagree with what you write why don't you turn off trackbacks and comments? Or just write this stuff down in a notebook or something?

-S-: You must be tir... (Below threshold)
julie:

-S-:
You must be tired. Rent Young Dr. Frankensteen. Then you will remember to PUT THE CANDLE BACK. ;p

No, julie, not tired, just ... (Below threshold)
-S-:

No, julie, not tired, just was in a serious mood...I returned here for purposes of writing, "oh, haahaha, julie" but now I read your later comments.

Still it was funny, just took me a bit to get your reference, since I'd written two comments prior to yours, didn't understand the candle part referring to what, later did.

Funny. Among my favorite films, by the way.

But, no need to rent...what... (Below threshold)
-S-:

But, no need to rent...what with the DVD and often viewed, I add. ~:-D

"I am well aware of the ... (Below threshold)

"I am well aware of the Nazi Symbol in both Eastern Culture and Native American culture"

If you're "well aware" of the cross NOT being the inspiration for the swastika, why the hell did you say it was.? You said straight out that Paul's ideological soulmates " turn the cross into a symbol of hate and intolerance, or twist it into a Swastika" It proves you not only know nothing of National Socialism as an ideology, you reveal yourself a lying, weaselly whelp as well.

As for link whoring, Paul may do a 10 spot once or twice a week. You do a "Morning Roundup" just about everyday, do you not? This roundup consists of a link with what I will charitably refer to as a blurb on the post. There's no rhyme nor reason to it, no theme whatsoever. You link to some of the top 50 blogs to generate traffic.

If that isn't the definition of a link whore, I don't know what is.

BTW...why do you feel it necessary to challenge me physically by calling me "chicken?" Is this to make up for an inadequacy you have in penis size? It's been my experience that people who physically challenge others when they know there's no possible way for any physical confrontation to take place are either cowardly wretches or teenage boys...which are you?

I think we should declare i... (Below threshold)
Justin B:

I think we should declare it "David Scott Anderson is an asshole" day and invite everyone to post their worst experiences with him.

The only problem with that idea is he would get the attention he keeps whoring for.

What are you all talking ab... (Below threshold)
me:

What are you all talking about? I mean I enjoy this blog and all. But I have no idea what the catfight is about.

that whole 10 spot thing ar... (Below threshold)

that whole 10 spot thing argument as link whoring only works if he sends trackback pings to the sites he links. Otherwise he's link whoring for THEM.

I don't get it.

<a href="http://www.grupo-u... (Below threshold)
Paul:

Shit for Brains is downright funny.

--------------
Subject: I don't know why I do it....

Angel is always warning me about it.
I get into these arguments with people who just pound and pound the tin walls of their little echo chambers, and I get sucked in, showing absolutely NO discipline. Well tonight it ends. There are things I will blog here, things that are important to me. But I will not get into any more pissing contest with people. It just insn't [sic] worth it. I cant [sic] believe I let myself get pulled into an argument tonight...
--------------

David the victim.

He just gets "sucked into" arguments... DUH! He started the damn thing! As he always does!

Here's a hint, Shit for Brains, quit attacking people and you won't "get sucked into" arguments that you don't have the brain power to win.

But he wouldn't be a liberal if he couldn't screw people over then whine that he was the victim. I'd be mortally embarrassed if I were as stupid as him.

Careful with those "sic's,"... (Below threshold)
Rob:

Careful with those "sic's," David gets ticked off when you point out his spelling errors too.

Really, you've got to laugh at how he frames it all. He trackbacks a post and then gets mad when the person he trackbacks responds.

You want to know if he is a... (Below threshold)
Jessie:

You want to know if he is a Link Whore?

First, he is in that goofy liberal alliance where they just trade links to bump themselves up the ecosystem. That adds 167 links to his site. All you have to do to join the "alliance" is leave a comment on a post, so it is just scamming the ecosystem.

He is presently rank #160 in the ecosystem with 432 links. Subtract the 167 links and he really only has 265 real links.

That should rank him #377. WITHOUT his thrice daily self serving linkfests he produces. They are probably worth about 50 links minimum.

But that's not the best part. He's a liar too!!!

He claims 18,000 visitors a day. Quite a lot of traffic for someone who has so few links... 18,000 per day would put him almost tied with Wizbang and would give him DOUBLE the traffic of Scrappleface, The Command Post, Matt Yglesias, Jeff Jarvis, Michelle Malkin and many other big name bloggers. They all come in about 9000 per day and he claims 18,000 yet he has only 265 real links.

Boys, you are dealing with a mad man.

(Ever wonder why there is no sitemeter logo on his site? Now you know.)

Rob, I'll be more careful n... (Below threshold)
Paul:

Rob, I'll be more careful next time.

Jessie, that's funny as hell.

1. I'm not a liberal. I'm ... (Below threshold)
me:

1. I'm not a liberal. I'm one of those who thinks dubya is too much of a spender.

2. I enjoy this blog. In general.

3. I still don't see what the hell this whole thing is about. Could someone dispassionately explain it, from the beginnning? I'm the type that if a conservative is wrong, want to know it too. I really hate people who won't cede a point when wrong, but argue on with sophistry (not saying this is happeneing...just that at this point, it's a catfight. So I just want to sort it out.)

4. Spelling errors and that crap is weak. Who cares if he missed an apostrophe? Go to the Flame Warrior site and look up "Grammarian".

Me, this is an inside argum... (Below threshold)

Me, this is an inside argument. Don't worry about it and move along.

Just don't bother reading it =-)

Like Civil Rights Hero Rodn... (Below threshold)

Like Civil Rights Hero Rodney King once said, "Cain't we all jes get along?"




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy