The fact that Barack Obama was elected President is a pretty clear indicator that Politics is not scientific. That is, with all due respect to the President, his resume was...
1:31 PM |
2 comments
8:05 AM |
0 comments
Karl Malden, the bulbous-nosed character actor who won a Best Supporting Oscar for his role as Mitch, the guiless suitor of Blanche DuBois in the 1951 classic A Street...
8:02 AM |
2 comments
Visitors to the Sears Tower's new glass balconies all seem to agree: The first step is the hardest. The balconies are suspended 1,353 feet in the air and jut...
7:50 AM |
0 comments
Angelina Jolie's was named highest-paid actress on Forbes' annual Celebrity 100 list. Coming in second behind Angie is Jennifer Aniston. Which would have the rag mags in a tizzy...
7:42 AM |
1 comments
It's still unclear what David Carradine was doing when he died, but a doctor knows what technically killed him. Having already ruled out suicide by hanging, the private pathologist...
7:37 AM |
1 comments
Dimension Films has acquired the remake rights to "An American Werewolf in London", John Landis' 1981 horror-comedy. Landis spoke to bloodydisgusting.com and said "Yes, Dimension is now in negotiation...
7:30 AM |
1 comments
article here!! Jackson was not the biological father of any of his three children, it was claimed yesterday - a revelation that may herald new complications in his family's...
10:06 PM |
4 comments
SELLER: Alan Jackson LOCATION: Moran Road, Franklin, TN PRICE: $38,000,000 SIZE: 19,000 square feet (approx.), 6 bedrooms, 7 full and 2 half bathrooms DESCRIPTION: Magnificent offering w/o compare. Bordered by...
7:57 AM |
1 comments
7:42 AM |
0 comments
Comments (7)
It's a liberal wish-fulfill... (Below threshold)1. Posted by TallDave | February 9, 2005 10:43 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
It's a liberal wish-fulfillment show, kind of like a show where a terrorist named Ogama fin Raden blows up a building and gets shot in the head would be for a conservative.
Just different values I guess.
1. Posted by TallDave | February 9, 2005 10:43 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 9, 2005 22:43
2. Posted by m a r t i n @ b l o g b a t | February 10, 2005 1:17 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I have to ditto what TallDave just said. That said, what do you folks think about the --new-- Cosby show? Here is my two-cents worth: He is being (or has been) "O'Reilly'ed".
Not that I'm a fan of the latter Bill or his proclivities, but I think its fairly certain among most that said proclivities were known and that the bait therefore was rather easily set by those who wanted to take him down.
2. Posted by m a r t i n @ b l o g b a t | February 10, 2005 1:17 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 10, 2005 01:17
3. Posted by Tom | February 10, 2005 9:40 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
So now, we're going to analyze all television programming for "bias" or what might be perceived as such? It's a freaking television show, and if you don't like it, don't watch. I think if everyone thought that the freaking fictional (or "ripped from the headlines and altered to fit a one hour story") television programs out right now were biased one way or another, they should go out, start their own network, and shoot the liberals on the show instead.
I didn't see anyone complaining when the Dana Delaney character tried to kill a "liberal" talk show host whose program resembled Howard Stern's earlier this season - after he was "blamed" for having the Delaney character's son rape a television star - is that wrong, too? Guess shooting that character was just a "liberal wish fulfillment," too.
3. Posted by Tom | February 10, 2005 9:40 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 10, 2005 09:40
4. Posted by tim | February 10, 2005 12:44 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I saw that, it made me quite angry because it didn't even advance the storyline by having the Bill O'Reilly character in there. Had they based the character on my life it would not have changed the show one iota. It was basically an excuse to take as many shots as possible at O'Reilly.
4. Posted by tim | February 10, 2005 12:44 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 10, 2005 12:44
5. Posted by tim | February 10, 2005 3:41 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Plenty of people have criticised O'Reilly, they just didn't do it in a format in which they can launch emotional screeds with no chance to address them. Additionaly there was more than one characterization of the positions he has taken that was a strawman at best. Had these "criticisms" been laid out in a commentary or other written work they would have been ignored as a joke.
5. Posted by tim | February 10, 2005 3:41 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 10, 2005 15:41
6. Posted by Raina | February 10, 2005 5:56 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
This is hardly the first time Law & Order has been biased against conservative values...
http://www.aclearvoice.org/archives/2005/02/bias_on_law_ord_1.php
Their writers show all the understanding of conservative policies of your typical 19 year old college liberal.
6. Posted by Raina | February 10, 2005 5:56 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 10, 2005 17:56
7. Posted by TallDave | February 11, 2005 4:31 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Tom,
LOL You don't have to look very hard at TV and Hollywood to find liberal bias. Just ask Kelsey Grammer. It's easier to "come out of the closet" as gay than Republican.
7. Posted by TallDave | February 11, 2005 4:31 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 11, 2005 16:31