« Darwin strikes again | Main | I'd rather be a chickenhawk than a chickensh*t »

Supreme Court Session Closes - Hollywood Wins Big, Reporters Lose, Ten Commandments Split

Here's some of the notable decisions announced on the last day of the Supreme Court session.

June 27 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. Supreme Court bolstered the entertainment industry's anti-piracy campaign, saying Grokster Ltd. and other Internet file-sharing networks may bear responsibility when users illegally download music and films.

The unanimous ruling today revives efforts by Time Warner Inc., Walt Disney Co. and other media companies to make those file-sharing systems block unauthorized downloads. It reverses a lower court ruling that threw out most of the industry's copyright suit against Grokster and StreamCast Networks Inc.

The court said substantial evidence" supported the industry's case.

This may be good news for individuals targeted by industry lawsuits, but it's a preemptive death sentence for anyone developing software that allows peer to peer (P2P) file sharing.

In the Valerie Plame investigation, two journalists refusal to disclose their anonymous source will likely land them in jail.

NEW YORK (Editor&Publisher) -- The U.S. Supreme Court will not hear the appeal of journalists Matthew Cooper and Judith Miller, who have been held in contempt for refusing to disclose who leaked the identity of a CIA agent to them.

The court's decision not to take the case, which could have led to a major precedent for the rights of reporters to keep sources confidential, means that Miller and Cooper, who were ordered to jail for their actions, will likely have to surrender sometime soon.

The case is now expected to return to the district court level, where judge Hogan, who offered the initial contempt ruling, would have to hold a hearing before any jailing would occur, Attorney Floyd Abrams, who represents Miller, told Editor&Publisher last week.

The ACLU's drive to eliminate religion from public spaces was dealt a blow and scored a win all in the same day.

June 27 (Bloomberg)-- Government officials can post the Ten Commandments on public property in some contexts, the U.S. Supreme Court said in a pair of high-stakes church-state rulings.

The court, voting 5-4, today approved a Ten Commandments monument on the Texas State Capitol grounds, rejecting arguments that the state was unconstitutionally favoring religion. In a second case, the court ruled 5-4 that two Kentucky counties were too focused on promoting religion when they posted framed copies of the commandments in courthouses.

The decisions will help guide government officials who want to display religious symbols. The rulings will affect the legal status of thousands of statues, murals, monuments and other displays that already are in place around the country.

That clears things up... not. Displays of the Ten Commandments now appear to be legal so long as those placing them aren't endorsing their content...

There was no word from the bench on possible retirements from either Chief Justice William Rehnquist or Justice Sandra Day O'Connor.

Links to the decisions are available at SCOTUSblog, as well as to additional coverage. More from Jeff Quinton.

Update: I've thought more on the phrase "preemptive death sentence" for developers here.


TrackBack

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Supreme Court Session Closes - Hollywood Wins Big, Reporters Lose, Ten Commandments Split:

» Macmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense linked with Ten Commandments - Supreme Court - One For; One A

» The American Princess linked with Cop-Out: SCOTUS and the Ten Commandments

» The MUSC Tiger linked with Supreme Court: Ten Commandments Yes and No

» The Unalienable Right linked with God Bless This Honorable Court

» Secure Liberty linked with Supreme Court Ten Commandments

» Danny Carlton (aka Jack Lewis) linked with Responses to the Supreme Court's Schizophrenic decisions

Comments (5)

Just to be clear, the Groks... (Below threshold)
mcg:

Just to be clear, the Grokster case is not about making P2P software illegal: it is about holding companies responsible who market their software to accomplish illegal tasks. Grokster has been trying to be too clever by half here, claiming that their software has plenty of noninfringing uses, while out of the other side of their mouth letting us all know that "if you want, you can download all sorts of copyrighted material for free, too."

You can't sue a gun manufacturer (successfully) for a crime committed with their gun, but if they start advertising that their gun is well-suited for such crimes, then that's a different matter.

A company who is careful not to promote illegal uses of their P2P software ought to be OK, according to this ruling.

Here's the key quote (empha... (Below threshold)
mcg:

Here's the key quote (emphasis mine):

We hold that one who distributes a device with the object of promoting its use to infringe copyright, as shown by the clear expression or other affirmative steps taken to foster infringement, is liable for the resulting acts of infringement by third parties,

Sounds OK to me.

For the record, the Ten Com... (Below threshold)

For the record, the Ten Commandments cannot be called as such. They may be referred to as:

Ten strongly worded suggestions;
Ten ways to avoid bad outcomes;
Ten strongly encouraged actionable statements; or
Ten nonreligiously originated phrases one should follow.

Your punishment for failing to abide by this will be participating in the sandblasting of Moses and the Ten Cs from the Supreme Court building in Washington D.C. If you are unable to attend, suitable replacement sandblasting ceremonies will be held in government buildings and courts near you.

That is all.

I think the court has adopt... (Below threshold)

I think the court has adopted for Establishment Clause infringements a certain notorious test once proposed for obscenity: We know it when we see it.

And let us not forget that ... (Below threshold)
Squawkbox:

And let us not forget that private property ownership is a thing of the past.

http://lonestartimes.com/index.php?p=1071




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy